Property talk:P763

Active discussions

Documentation

PEI Register of Historic Places ID
identifier of a historic place in Prince Edward Island, Canada
DescriptionThe (unique) identifier of a property protected under the Heritage Places Protection Act (Q13559774) of Prince Edward Island (Q1979), Canada (Q16)
RepresentsPEI Register of Historic Places (Q30374403)
Applicable "stated in" valuePEI Register of Historic Places (Q30374403)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domain
According to this template: place - cultural property (Q2065736)
According to statements in the property:
geographical feature (Q618123), artificial physical object (Q8205328) or group of physical objects (Q61961344)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values[1-9]\d{0,3} (numeric string, 1 to 4 digits)
ExampleProvince House (Q2113954)3241
Sourcehttp://www.gov.pe.ca/hpo/app.php
Formatter URLhttp://www.gov.pe.ca/hpo/app.php?nav=details&p=$1
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P763 (Q69861372)
Related to country  Canada (Q16) (See 114 others) (Prince Edward Island (Q1979))
See alsoCanadian Register of Historic Places ID (P477)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total913
Main statement88697% of uses
Qualifier10.1% of uses
Reference262.8% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
  List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P763#Item P1435, hourly updated report, search, SPARQL (new)
 
Item “country (P17): Canada (Q16): Items with this property should also have “country (P17): Canada (Q16)”. (Help)
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P763#Item P17, hourly updated report, search, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
 
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P763#Unique value, hourly updated report, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value), SPARQL (new)
 
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P763#Single value, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
 
Format “[1-9]\d{0,3}: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P763#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
 
Item “image (P18): Items with this property should also have “image (P18)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P763#Item P18, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
 
Item “coordinate location (P625): Items with this property should also have “coordinate location (P625)”. (Help)
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P763#Item P625, hourly updated report, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
 
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P763#scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
 
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P763#allowed entity types, SPARQL (new)



Constraint on locationEdit

I don't know if the way to programm the constraint on located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) is the right think, Charlottetown (Q2127) is a subclass of Prince Edward Island (Q1979), so I don't think it's the presence of Prince Edward Island (Q1979). Maybe a «Type» constraint would be best, but I don't known If it is posible the program it for.? --Fralambert (talk) 18:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

There are different ways P131 is used (one or several values). If it bothers you, feel free to revert my edit. --  Docu  at 18:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
I asked if it is possible to program, such a think in Template talk:Constraint:Value type, but I am not totally sure it is the best way to demand it. --Fralambert (talk) 19:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Return to "P763" page.