Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2018/08/14

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

It was consulted with three experienced persons, several dictionaries and text corpora and this word actually does not exist and is result of error of one single printed dictionary. Emptied and unlinked. KaMan (talk) 07:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

  Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 07:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Alana De Roma (Q55441082): actress and singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No identifiers or references, not used on other items, no sitelinks, I could not find a singer with this name on the web Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 12:49, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Probably the one mentioned in the description of The Little Mermaid : Part Of Your World - One Line Multilanguage w/ *Subtitles* (Youtube) is meant. This alone still not enough to be kept I'd say. --Marsupium (talk) 11:15, 12 July 2018 (UTC), 11:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the hint. I found a Alana de Roma who performed this song, has an imdb-id (nm0211212) and appeared in Amy (Q4749060) in the main role. I suspect this one is meant. I changed the label from "Alana Romana" to "Alana de Roma", added these informations and think that she is notable, now. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
  Not done --Pasleim (talk) 11:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Q55083688: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There are two churches dedicated to San Biagio in Albiano: old Saint Blaise church (Q27987698) and new Saint Blaise church (Q27987699). Q55083688 is surely a duplicate, but it is unclear of which one, so I would just delete it. --Jaqen (talk) 21:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC) --Jaqen (talk) 21:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

@AlessioMela: Mahir256 (talk) 22:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
This is as Jaqen said. Sure a merge with one of the first two but is difficult to choose which one. --AlessioMela (talk) 09:41, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment if the identifier in P973 is invalid, I'd use Q35779580 for P31 and remove the other statements. If you delete or merge it, one would just end up applying it to the wrong church.
    --- Jura 12:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
  Deleted by Pasleim (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Q56084795: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test page Esteban16 (talk) 10:54, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

  Deleted by Pasleim (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Q56072942: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't meet the notability criteria. Esteban16 (talk) 10:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

  Deleted by Pasleim (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Q56070732: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Esteban16 (talk) 10:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

  Deleted by Pasleim (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Android emulator (Q52229854): class of software which allows Android apps to be run on other platforms. A software program that runs android OS on your PC using virtualization technology and allows to install mobile apps/games on your Windows PC and Mac computers.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No item used -Zest (talk) 13:09, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

@Zyksnowy: Thoughts on this and the other deletion requests from @-Zest:? Mahir256 (talk) 14:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Perhaps @-Zest: can explain in Mandarin the issues with @Zyksnowy:'s items, either on Zyksnowy's talk page or here? Or perhaps someone else (@Shizhao:, maybe) can do the same? Mahir256 (talk) 19:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Android Application Runner is the type of software for BlueStacks安卓模擬器是藍疊的軟件類型。--Zyksnowy (talk) 22:50, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
@Zyksnowy: 明白,不过你创建的这些项目没有任何链入或外链,其他编者查证不到,也不知道应该怎样使用这些项目啊。请看Wikidata:Notability/zhDeryck Chan (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
能直接用中文真好..安卓模拟器 跟video game console emulator (Q1196126)游戏机模拟器类似的 “安卓模拟器 和 BlueStacks”“游戏机模拟器 和 VisualBoy”这样类比
前段时间腾讯和网易也都开发了他们的安卓模拟器“腾讯手游助手”和“网易MuMu模拟器”[1]只是我觉得他们可能抄袭蓝叠的--Zyksnowy (talk) 14:03, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:00, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
  1. 网易MuMu模拟器_网易MuMu模拟器官方下载【安卓模拟器】-华军软件园
  • @Zyksnowy: 你这个“安卓模拟器”所指的是一个特定的产品还是模拟器的种类? (Translation: Is this "Android Application Emulator" a specific product or a type of products?) Deryck Chan (talk) 11:55, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
當然是一個種類呀..。。^ω^。。在港台我不太清楚。。在大陸幾個大的廠商的宣傳中的意思是這樣哦--Zyksnowy (talk) 12:11, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
(Translation: Of course it's a type. Not sure about Hong Kong and Taiwan. Most Mainland manufacturers' publicity use it this way.) Deryck Chan (talk) 10:25, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

  Not done --Pasleim (talk) 11:31, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Otis Sudeikis (Q55327492): American actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

4 year old "actor, director, producer, screenwriter and activist". Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 07:57, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:00, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
  Keep per Jura1 above, we should keep such film-related items separately, there should never have any deletion possibility for them. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:52, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Is this reason too laugh to be useful? --117.136.55.109 02:29, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Yes, that's why such keep reasons are having no sense. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Okay. I think this item has been blown out of proportion but the child of two people each with Wikipedia articles (Jason Sudeikis (Q14539), Olivia Wilde (Q200355)), whose full name and date of birth is known, definitely deserves a Wikidata item per WD:N "fulfils a structural purpose". I have removed all the claims that isn't obviously sourceable (occupation, country of citizenship, place of birth) but otherwise   Keep. Deryck Chan (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

  Not done --Pasleim (talk) 11:31, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Tanel Joost (Q50700279): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I can't see the notability Infovarius (talk) 12:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

@Infovarius: I can't see why it wouldn't be notable. See WD:N, clearly, a person is an « identifiable conceptual or material entity » and there is a « serious and publicly available reference » ; plus « It fulfills some structural need ». What and where is the problem of notability? Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 13:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Is Kes on kes? Eesti 2000 (Q47088720) a good authority? I know that many "Who is who" books are just payable opt-in lists (you pay - you are included). Additionally, User:EV100 leksikonid, who imported from there, admits that "A lot of "items" what I created are just father or mother somebody and nothing more". Are all "fathers and mothers" of our items notable just by this fact? --Infovarius (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
@Infovarius: WD:N doesn't requires « good authority » just « serious and publicly available reference », this book is obviously a « publicly available reference » and I don't know for the « serious » part but without more informations, I assume good faith. « just father or mother somebody and nothing more », isn't it exactly what the « some structural need » notable criteria is here for? Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 08:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

  Not done --Pasleim (talk) 11:39, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Q23931078: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't meet WD:N. Please see Wikidata_talk:WikiProject Taxonomy#Is capuronii (Q23931078) a taxonomic_patronym? --Succu (talk) 22:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

  WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Succu (talk) 21:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete I think creating items for patronyms is over the top and creates ambiguity within the database. Take this search based on your patronym, only one of these is named as per your refs. The rest are named for oother people, in other references. If you want to record a name is a patronym then do so in the binomen and record it as an additional information point. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 22:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
    • @Faendalimas: Please could you relate your "over the top" assessment to our notability criteria? As for your "oother [sic] people" point; no claim is made that this is the only eponym called "Capuronii"; you're quite welcome to contribute to creating the others. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
      • @Pigsonthewing: I never mentioned WD:N that was you and Succu. however, if that is needed. I feel that this item cannot be restricted as is under point 2. It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. in that no singular instance of a species name can be clearly identified without reference to its genus, ie binomen. As I pointed out this patronym could refer to a dozen or more species. Further to this under point 3. It fulfills some structural need I do not see any value for this without it being restricted by its binomen, hence my suggestion to instead of creating a unique instance for this word, it would be better to add this information to its binomen. Considering the structure of this database the ambiguity of dozens of identical words (yes they would have different q numbers) that differ only in their reference, could be better stored hierarchically. So I still favor to delete this item and move the information contained into the binomen. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 22:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
        • @Faendalimas: And nor did I claim that you mentioned WD:N; I did, quite clearly. Since that is the policy by which we decide what to include or not in Wikidata, I asked you to relate your "over the top" assessment to it, since such an opinion is not the policy... ditto. I note your view on a "reference to its genus", but I do not see that criterion anywhere in WD:N; and nor are we discussing a "singular instance of a species name". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
          • You are most definitely using a singular instance of a species name. Names in biology first and foremost follow the principals of nomenclature, by adding the reference that states who it is named after you have attached the name to its concept. In nomenclature it is therefore a singular item. It does not matter how many species a person has named after them species names are always singular by definition. As for the genus being required to specify the species name, again that's how nomenclature defines names, as a binomen. Hence presenting it as a mononomial is incorrect under the code. Stating that it does not say a genus is required in WD:N is irrelevant, and a strawman. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 23:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is not a formal entity, just a random word. It is not an eponym. The references that have been provided have no bearing on the concept (such as it is); they refer to other concepts. There is no structural need (Andy Mabbett only feels a need since he misunderstands the basic nature of Wikidata items on taxa). - Brya (talk) 04:46, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

attenboroughi (Q51343038) has the same issue. --Succu (talk) 08:46, 4 April 2018 (UTC) PS: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (Q4657775)

  Delete has URAA problem, thus matching copyvio reason. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:44, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  Deleted by Pasleim (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Q41697445: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No differents from WhatsApp item — Dimon4ezzz 05:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

  Keep I see no reason why we can't have items for the various different versions of a software like WhatsApp. ChristianKl14:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
  Delete No need to do such separation for an App that not more than 1K users to maintain. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:03, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
  Keep, seperate concepts. 78.55.177.69 11:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  Delete. Duplicate of WhatsApp (Q1049511), which already states that it is a mobile app (Q620615) and contains the same Google Play Store app ID (P3418). Keeping it would imply that we need different items for each platform version of the same software (here, WhatsApp (Q1049511) mentions 6 platforms). -Geraki (talk) 13:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
  Delete don't see a need for item for every version.-- Hakan·IST 06:21, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
  Deleted by Pasleim (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Driss Abouabdillah (Q47486645): Moroccan mathematician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable, see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abouabdillah's theorem --Tudor987 (talk) 09:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
@Tudor987: not notable for Wikipedia but what about Wikidata? There is 32 results on Google Scholar for this name - which seems to be about this person - it seems acceptable for Wikidata. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 18:50, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
I don't think he is notable for Wikidata. I only get 10 actual results on google scholar btw. But his theorem, which was deleted on enwiki, was not deleted on arwiki. As such, you have not given a valid reason to delete to support this request. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 00:05, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

  Not done --Pasleim (talk) 11:43, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Färdsleskogens naturreservat (Q49097533): nature reserve in Västra Götaland, Sweden: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Inaccurate --Ascilto (talk) 10:09, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Because I was afraid that inaccurate data from the deleted page would be moved to the correct object. /Ascilto (talk) 20:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ascilto: You may also remove statements before merging, as I did so some months ago, why not? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  Done Redirect created by Ascilto, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Risvedens vildmark (Q49097537): nature reserve in Västra Götaland, Sweden: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Inaccurate --Ascilto (talk) 10:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

  Done Redirect created by Ascilto, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Q23994446: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty entry ChongDae (talk) 18:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

  Deleted by Pasleim (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Q55993532: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item without any wiki links Chabota (talk) 19:48, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

  Deleted by Pasleim (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)