Property talk:P953

Active discussions


full work available at URL
URL of a web page containing the full text for this item
Descriptionlink to legal online providers of the full text of any creative work, including e.g. books, scripts for plays and speeches, etc.
Data typeURL
According to this template: creative work (intended for songs, albums, and artists)
According to statements in the property:
work (Q386724), guideline (Q1630279), technical standard (Q317623), version, edition, or translation (Q3331189) and legal rule (Q216200)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed valuesValid, working external links (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExampleL'Odyssée, 'Poésie homérique' (Q21715294) →
Open Access in Context: Connecting Authors, Publications and Workflows Using ORCID Identifiers (Q27050016) →
SourceData is generated by en:User:LyricsBot by crawling lyrics websites, filtering out user-contributed content, and matching against properties such as title and performer/musical artist. (note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use property source website for the property (P1896))
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P953 (Q23909097)
See alsoofficial website (P856), newspaper archive URL (P7213)
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Main statement313,59699.5% of uses
Qualifier1,3060.4% of uses
Reference3900.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
  Pattern ^https?://www\.un/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=([1-9]\d{0,7})$ will be automatically replaced to \1 and moved to UN document symbol (P3069) property.
Testing: TODO list

This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

See alsoEdit

Clarify access rights?Edit

I just fixed a link at Q24091322#P953 and noticed that full work available at URL (P953) is used there to point to a page where the full text of the piece (1 page) is available for free at a rather low resolution, whereas the default resolution is behind a paywall. On his talk page, User:James Hare (NIOSH) explains that he thinks P953 can point to full texts hidden behind access barriers (which may come in different flavours, e.g. paywalls or requirements to register for free to get access). I do not think this was the intention when the property was created, but I could not find any concrete stipulations on that matter, so I would like to invite clarifications. --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 23:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I am fine with links behind paywalls, because that is still more useful to our users than not linking at all. That said, we should probably qualify such links somehow. --Srittau (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
I understand that it was probably not the intention. I used full work available at URL (P953) as a last resort for situations where the DOI did not resolve for some strange reason and I wanted some way to get to the document from the item. Alternative approaches are more than welcome. James Hare (NIOSH) (talk) 13:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Non-free only?Edit

The description in the documentation above says that this property should only be used for non-free works. Why is this? Could this be expanded? --Yair rand (talk) 17:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

I do not understand it either. --Marsupium (talk) 13:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
I couldn't understand it from the property proposal discussion either. So I delete it now … --Marsupium (talk) 17:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps because if they are free they could be included in Wikisource? Which also begs the question, should works in Wikisource always have this property in addition to the sitelink? I guess that will make queries more consistent (or at least easier to construct). If so, it would be a nice bot task to add this property to all items with Wikisource sitelinks. Ainali (talk) 07:49, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Not limited to text?Edit

Some animation films were published online on youtube.

Same about English speaking films. d1g (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

mandatory qualifier constraint property archive URLEdit

Can we delete the "mandatory qualifier constraint property archive URL" it is very confusing as to what it wants and every instance of using the "full work at" gets the message which appears as if an error, even though it is just a suggestion. Is it suggesting to me I should be using a link from the Wayback Machine? --RAN (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

It's suggesting that you should add archive URL (P1065) as a qualifier whenever you are using the property. I know that we have a lot of pages missing the property, that's why i marked it as a suggestion constraint rather than a mandatory constraint. --Trade (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Return to "P953" page.