Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2020/09/26
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
AV idols / pornographic actresses
| Batch 1 |
|---|
|
| Batch 2 |
|---|
|
| Batch 3 |
|---|
|
| Batch 4 |
|---|
|
Deleted on jawiki. Not notable. 本日晴天 (talk) 12:33, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
{{Keep}}Most of them have worked comercially in the industry. No reason to delete them--Trade (talk) 11:09, 13 July 2020 (UTC)- Every item should be reviewed separately, too strong to say that all 58 performers aren't notable for WD. The Japanese adult industry is very developed. --Wolverène (talk) 11:29, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Please restore @Ymblanter:--Trade (talk) 22:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
@Trade, Wolverène: These need external links in order to be identifiable and verifiable. Can any of you add something useful to the items? I am otherwise going to delete them, at least those where no identification is provided. —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Only Q11594826 and Q11661165 have YouPorn performer ID (P5267), but that property is Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320). And there is no back link in main namespace.--本日晴天 (talk) 15:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Done; highly sensitive BLP issue, completely unsourced, not in use anywhere, nobody cares. As announced three weeks ago, I have deleted these items. —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Q28688869: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted on jawiki. Non-notable person. 本日晴天 (talk) 09:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99486414: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Wait for local deletion Rockpeterson (talk) 09:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Article on en wiki deleted Rockpeterson (talk) 07:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Q91334410: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. Minorax (talk) 06:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)- Deleted by Bencemac (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99592840: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 23:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- this was just deleted under an hour ago. Quakewoody (talk) 23:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99485257: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Cross wiki spam , linked article deleted मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 06:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99613027: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Some soccer boy killed in 2017. It is impossible even to check if there was such a boy. --Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 15:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Capsicum annuum (Q12837648): species of the plant genus Capsicum: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Something that does not exist. E4024 (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Q12837648 is the orphan of a merge at Wikipedia. I merged the items here also to preserve the edit history. The item wasn't empty as it had a couple of labels that were included in the merge.[1] From Hill To Shore (talk) 09:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:From Hill To Shore, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99613027: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Junk/vandalism entry created by an anonymous user --Gpatgn (talk) 21:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99616617: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted twice in time spam of 2 days मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 04:20, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99640564: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Previously deleted, LTA spam मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 08:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99639111: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable, promotional मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 09:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99639024: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
LTA spam मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 09:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99638715: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability? मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99577846: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
LTA spam , previously was on deletion मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 09:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by Bencemac (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q9326073: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Page on plwiki deleted, term is not established Pyfisch (talk) 09:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Fountain (Q76939332): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This item was imported from OSM that is ODBL licensed, and therefore should not be imported into Wikidata. Author was asked about this at https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ralfhauser&diff=1087535354&oldid=681173857 and ignored it
Per https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2020-June/008903.html author of Wikidata item is not author of OSM data but copying it.
Triggered by https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2020-June/thread.html#8899
https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ralfhauser&diff=1087535354&oldid=681173857 has link to query finding 1771 other imported items, but I think that creating one probing deletion request is better than opening 1771 redundant ones.
Note https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilegal/Database_Rights "Whenever possible, the best course is to use only content that is made available by the author under an open license. In particular, for EU databases, the license should include a license or express waiver of the sui generis database right. In the absence of a license, copying all or a substantial part of a protected database should be avoided."
Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note that I was unable to find
- is Wikidata respecting or ignoring meta:Wikilegal/Database_Rights
- is Wikidata officially forbidding or allowing import of copyrighted databases
- is Wikidata data supposed to be free of copyright and copyright-like restriction in USA legal situation
- is Wikidata data supposed to be free of copyright and copyright-like restriction in EU legal situation
- Where Wikidata is on spectrum of OpenStreetMap/Wikimedia Commons "we respect copyright, even stupid parts - we are not an experiment in copyright breaching", through Internet Archive with "we ignore copyright where it is stupid according to our opinion" to "Pirate Bay warez site". Is "it is a copyrighted data" or "this collection of data is protected by database rights" a valid removal decision?
- Compare Wikidata:Copyright and c:Commons:Copyright See phabricator:T193728
- Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- I opened Wikidata:Project chat#Copyright question Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- I think there are a bunch of grey areas. In the case of data that's clearly licensed as share-alike by an entity outside of Wikimedia like OSM I consider copyright a good reason to remove the data. 09:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)ChristianKl ❪✉❫
- "Remove" does not mean "delete". It may be an idea to remove only the coordinate location (P625). The rest does not seems to have any intellectual creativity.--GZWDer (talk) 12:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- I think there are a bunch of grey areas. In the case of data that's clearly licensed as share-alike by an entity outside of Wikimedia like OSM I consider copyright a good reason to remove the data. 09:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)ChristianKl ❪✉❫
- I opened Wikidata:Project chat#Copyright question Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- I do not quite see the point. Manual copying of coordinates of a single object from OSM (or from Google Maps, for that purpose) is not in any way copyright or database right infringement. Are we talking here about automatic import of data for multiple objects? If yes, this needs to be reverted (no need to delete the item, though this one is arguably not notable).--Ymblanter (talk) 16:23, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Single copy of a coordinate is not a problem, but "systematic extraction" is. Automatic import seems almost certainly to be "systematic extraction". Possibly also multiple Wikidata users copying manually coordinates may count as systematic extraction Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
As wikidata is an organized effort to build a database, I do not believe that someone can claim they are "manually copying single objects", because it is the sum of all these manual single copy actions by all the wikidata users together that makes it a systematic approach and illegal by the European database directive. In this case it is not a single fountain we are speaking about but very likely all these fountains which seem to be a kind of "test balloon" for an import which in the end was not completed: https://query.wikidata.org/#%23defaultView%3AMap%0Aselect%20%3Fitem%20%3Fcoordinates%20where%20%7B%0A%20%20%3Fitem%20p%3AP625%2Fprov%3AwasDerivedFrom%2Fpr%3AP248%20wd%3AQ1224853%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20wdt%3AP625%20%3Fcoordinates.%0A%7D These are 1771 fountains in Hamburg, Zürich and Rome, from OpenStreetMap and without attribution to OSM nor stating this data is ODbL licensed. --2001:B07:6463:EF28:8041:3CE2:34DB:8E0B 09:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
The OP asserts that "This item was imported from OSM" - where is the evidence for this assertion? Where is the evidence that whoever added the data (and which data - there are three statements?) to OSM did original research, and was not copying it from elsewhere? Or that whoever imported it from OSM is not also the person who added it there? Where is the evidence that ODBL is the only licence applicable to the data in question? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: The creator of the item Fountain (Q76939332) added explictly stated in (P248)Open Database License (Q1224853) to the coordinate location (P625). This is an incorrect reference, not to OpenStreetMap, but merely to a license used by OSM. Though in conjunction with the fact, that the coordinates in WD are the coordinates in OSM rounded to six decimal places, it seems to be the cases, that the coordinates are indeed from OSM and the creator indeed knew about the license. From that though, we can only speculate, whether he only knew of the existence of the fountains from OSM. The OSM user ralfhauser did never edit fountains (or anything else) in Hamburg and has the same username as User:Ralfhauser – the creator of said items. If it's only about the coordinates, we have worse things like bots copying them... --CamelCaseNick (talk) 00:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted; first of all a disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.
The main attack vector here seems to be the claim that OSM's database rights resulting from the EU Database Directive have been violated. For this comment, I assume that OSM does in fact enjoy protection by the EU database directive, although I am personally not 100% sure that this is even the case. Nevertheless, given the small amount of items/claims involved here (order of 1000), I do not see a violation of this right. Usually an extract is considered "substantial" when it is at or above 10% of the entire database, but this is more a soft limit and needs to be treated carefully. It is clear that this is not the only extract from OSM and there may have been other insubstantial amounts of data copied here by other users; the complete extent of this is unknown however.
That said, I mention here that meta:Wikilegal/Database Rights applies to Wikidata as well, thus imports from databases which are protected by the EU Database Directive and do not waive these rights should usually not be done in a systematic effort, as there is the risk that one crosses the somewhat soft limit to a "substantial" import (@Ralfhauser: FYI). —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Mickey Mouse flag (Q97500972): flag depicting Mickey Mouse: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not a notable entity; the Flags of the World link lists various flags used by Disney, but the one with Mickey Mouse doesn't appear to be particularly special Trivialist (talk) 17:34, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Comment I understood the flag to be notable based on the second and third criteria at Wikidata:Notability, albeit not nearly notable enough for a sister project like Wikipedia. Specifically, the flag is shown in the cited Bing Streetside imagery – though I'll admit it's a slippery slope to consider anything visible in Streetside to be "published" – and it had been linked from The Walt Disney Company (Q7414) until Special:Diff/1234758125. For context, I created Mickey Mouse flag (Q97500972) and Walt Disney World flag (Q97500876) in order to link [2][3][4] to it, as part of a broader effort to link OSM flags to Wikidata flag items. (The goal is for this federated SPARQL query to be as comprehensive as possible.) If this item is deleted, I'll go ahead delete the QID from OSM and rely on the more ambiguous flag:nametags instead. However, I don't think the criteria for inclusion in Wikidata should be that a flag gets its own page at Flags of the World; FOTW is missing or has consolidated pages for plenty of municipal and commercial flags that I think we should strive to include. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 03:18, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted; apparently not made up, externally referenced, and externally in use —MisterSynergy (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Bulk deletion request from User:Viapicante
| Extended content |
|---|
|
read more Eihel (talk) 01:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
Here are some creations from User:Viapicante and these are just the latest modifications. Yes DeltaBot, each of the Items is linked to something else and that's the problem. But
- the film trailers,
- the ironworkers,
- the actor-barber,
- the soldier Unknown-Of-The-Battalion,
- the short films That-The-Actors-Refuse-To-Put-On-Their-CV or
- the complete Serafin-Butler family, etc.
all unknown (and therefore not respecting WD:N… in a roundabout way), we can do without. Each time there is a multitude of unnecessary pages, but one more interesting than another or a sitelinked Item causes all those unnecessary pages to be kept. Soon we are going to end up with a very famous film director who owned a puppy whose litter came to his neighbor John Doe, etc. Above, pages to delete that are pending due to internal links and it's been going on for a long time. Nothing has happened for months… I mean globally (already locked on enWP). It reminds me of User:LoganTheWatermelon (in his way of not understanding). @Pharos, Jura1, Praxidicae, Billinghurst, Rschen7754: Best regards. —Eihel (talk) 01:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Q64705430: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 01:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q98546748: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable Rockpeterson (talk) 05:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted per backlinks —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Bernhard Scheublein (Q94887867): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Murks Bahnmoeller (talk) 16:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted; item looks okay and has a sitelink —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Category:Enchanted Kingdom (Q28462085): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Rdundant item to Q5375375. Both are exactly the same thing, Enchanted Kingdom theme park of the Philippines. I already moved the commonswiki sitelink there but for some unknown reason Pi bot reverted my move. The commonswiki sitelink however should be at the main item which is Q5375375. JWilz12345 (talk) 17:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted; has 2 sitelinks which cannot be moved to the other item —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Tone Wille (Q99465295): Norwegian businessperson: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable with no sitelinks Alexhuff13 (talk) 20:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Probably same issue as below. CEO Norwegian Postal service (Q1815701), need more info. Used on no:wiki. Kaffedrikkendepinscher (User talk:Kaffedrikkendepinscher) 20:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- I completed (her still partial) resume and linked to her from other employers (Q4784650 & Q1331615). Please let me know if more is needed Kaffedrikkendepinscher (User talk:Kaffedrikkendepinscher) 00:05, 20 September 2020 (CEST)
Keep per WD:N --RAN (talk) 02:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Andreas Enger (Q99464758): Norwegian businessman and engineer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notable? Alexhuff13 (talk) 20:30, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Chairman of the Norwegian postal service (Q1815701), and CEO of a noticeable (in Norway) shipping company. Hoëg Autoliner. Used on no:wiki. I am not super familiar with Wikidata, so I might have needed to add more info.Kaffedrikkendepinscher (User talk:Kaffedrikkendepinscher) 19 September 2020 20:38
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- I sourced his other occupation and linked to him from the other company (Q15966759). Please let me know if more is needed.Kaffedrikkendepinscher (User talk:Kaffedrikkendepinscher) 20 September 2020 00:02 CEST
- Keep per WD:N --RAN (talk) 02:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Red Vox (Q93710964): American rock band formed in Staten Island, New York, in 2015: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not meet notability requirements. All linked Wikipedia articles were deleted; it is a promotion. --IWI (talk) 17:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted; there are quite some backlinks, some of them have sitelinks —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99567376: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Wait for local deletion मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 15:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted here; will appear on the page_deleted list once the sitelink is gone —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q96309668: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fails notabulity. wait for local deletion. Quakewoody (talk) 19:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted here; will appear on the page_deleted list once the sitelink is gone —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99543885: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fails WD:N. Hasley 19:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- has an article (that wasn't linked at the time of nomination). This isn't spam. But I doubt it is notable. So, if someone were to nominate it for deletion (not speedy), it would probably fail. Quakewoody (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted per sitelink —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Bulk deletion request 2601:989:4300:BEA0:0:0:0:0/64
| Extended content |
|---|
|
spam items. see this report. Quakewoody (talk) 03:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- and any others I may have missed. Quakewoody (talk) 03:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Done by someone else. —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q98962179: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable, social media promoting, Spam Baby come (talk) 04:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q94034635: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
SEO spam Quakewoody (talk) 04:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- I know we probably can't tell here on WD, Jamil Abiad and Jowy Cenat both use the same PR team. We can also look for (not currently existing on WD) Matt Tommy and Syed Falak. Quakewoody (talk) 13:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q32474243: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty Yuriy Kvach (talk) 07:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Linked no more. --Wolverène (talk) 07:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Category:Małkinia Górna (Q32129234): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Probably it is a duplicate of item Q993913. Please verify content and history of both items. --Kracho (talk) 15:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Bornbach (Q99618533): creek in Hamburg-Langenhorn: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Duplicate --Nexo20 (talk) 16:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:MisterSynergy, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q55523122: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability Haansn08 (talk) 17:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99570574: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. – Aranya (talk) 18:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99558360: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. – Aranya (talk) 19:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99617362: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Anan Islam spam Trade (talk) 11:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q21155987: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty. CptViraj (talk) 09:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q21176087: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty. CptViraj (talk) 09:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
social policy (Q828395): measures by governments or institutions which aim to improve or reform society: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Same as Q828395 UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 20:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- yes, they are the same - because you listed it twice. Quakewoody (talk) 20:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done per above. Mahir256 (talk) 21:02, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Q99617829: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable, previously deleted. Hasley 22:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Items created by 188.127.173.212 probably should be nuked. —Hasley 22:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)