Wikidata

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Fuzheado 2

< Wikidata:Requests for permissions | Administrator
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
More than 75% support if counting yes/no, closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fuzheado

edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 8 October 2020 18:33 (UTC)

Re-applying for the admin bit since I was just short in the last 6 month window of activity and removed. I was previously supported 28-0 in 2018 and plan to continue cleanup of items and addressing vandalism. I'm an admin on English Wikipedia and do lots of Wikidata training for cultural institutions and Wikimedia affiliates. Thanks! -- Fuzheado (talk) 18:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

edit
  1.  Support Sure, if you could check on the deletion requests once in a while that would probably keep you active enough :) ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Lol, noted! :) -- Fuzheado (talk) 10:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Gamaliel (talk) 19:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support more sysop activity… —Eihel (talk) 22:44, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support. Hasley 22:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support Pamputt (talk) 05:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support -- Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support - Premeditated (talk) 11:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. At this stage, I cannot support a candidate that has lost adminship just a moment before the new RfA. — regards, Revi 12:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello -revi Hello May I ask you a question: Any contributor who has lost a technical right cannot immediately request the return of this right by a new application? —Eihel (talk) 01:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Oppose Their answer below does not convince me they will really return to activity, given that our requirements aren't at all that stringent and it is everyone's responsibility to know them.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Neutral with Arthur's suggestion and Jasper's skepticism. Mahir256 (talk) 16:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Epìdosis 17:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support An easy choice for me to re-affirm Fuzheado as admin. It's okay to have inactivity removal rules, but clearly Fuzheado's case of editing a lot without using admin buttons in the last few months is one that the rule is designed to let the community reaffirm, not remove for cause! Admins often perform admin duties by reviewing cases and deciding not to use admin buttons. Deryck Chan (talk) 17:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support great explanation by Deryck Chan, user is an active editor even if not active as much as an admin in the last few months --DannyS712 (talk) 19:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support not concerned with inactivity, if they still want to help out then that is good enough for me. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 21:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Neutral; you've shown little commitment to this role in the past two years —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Neutral, per MisterSynergy. The fact that you have been fairly active all this time but you barely used your admin tools is worrying. Tools are to be used. Esteban16 (talk) 01:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support ミラP 02:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Mike Peel (talk) 09:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support ChristianSW (talk) 16:35, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support Of course, why not? I am confident that they'll use their admin buttons wisely. A little inactivity is nothing to worry about; I'm sure that they'll do better this time; we're used to the COVID pandemic and there's really nothing to worry about. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 17:27, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support - PKM (talk) 20:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support --Denny (talk) 23:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support NMaia (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Neutral per Esteban16. --Minorax (talk) 05:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support -- Yaakoub45 (talk) 07:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 09:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support Acceptable to me. --Wolverène (talk) 11:19, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Oppose Isn't convinced that there is actual need of tools. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 16:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 01:50, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31.  Weak oppose. I am not sure that Fuzheado qualifies as an "active user". According to others above, he has just lost his permissions, he should show a bit more activity before gettin the tools again. Cheers! Nadzik (talk) 17:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Administrator/Fuzheado_2&oldid=1957355703"