Wikidata

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/RfA/2018

< Wikidata:Requests for permissions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful --Lymantria (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Putnik edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 21 March 2018 15:40 (UTC)

I am an administrator on Russian Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. I have been participating in the Wikidata since very beginning and now I have 120K edits (plus 667K under the PBot account). I am creating tools for more intensive use of Wikidata in other Wikimedia projects, but this has the opposite side: because Wikidata is not well protected against vandalism, and information from one element can be used in thousands of others, it is vulnerable to vandals. Recent events in Russian Wikipedia have shown that there is vandalism, which is not observed by users from other projects, but they are very harmful to ruwiki. Because of the language barrier, it is difficult for users to find somebody who can help. Therefore, my main purpose of obtaining a flag is to fight against vandalism. Also I plan to improve the Russian localization of MediaWiki messages.

Votes edit

  1.  Support. A participant with a constructive contribution. He did a lot for the Wikidata! It is high time! OlegCinema (talk) 16:10, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support--NewDataB (talk) 17:08, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support - Based on his answer on my question he indeed needs the admin bit to fight vandals. Mbch331 (talk) 17:31, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support Putnik has very good and long-term experience as sysop in Russian Wikipedia. He is one of the most expert users on wikidata in Russian Wikipedia and he has a big contribution to integrate Wikidata and ruwiki.--Draa kul (talk) 18:24, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support wikidata usage in ru-wiki is pretty high, so does visibility of wd-vandalism (see [1]). It would definitely helps if someone who speaks Russian and active at ru-wiki will be able to (semi)-protect some items --Ghuron (talk) 18:38, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Rschen7754 18:43, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support, thanks for volunteering! − Pintoch (talk) 18:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support Truested and experienced user. Pamputt (talk) 19:44, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --Alaa :)..! 19:47, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 19:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Oppose doesn't respond to bug reports about tools he develops.
    --- Jura 20:06, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm very sorry that I did not answer. If possible, give a link to the bug report. In fact, I answer questions and reports dozens of times a month. But since there are a lot of them, and they all appear in different projects, then sometimes I miss or forget something. —putnik 12:36, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Showed sensible behaviour in Ruwiki, won't be unnecessary here. Ignatus (talk) 20:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support given experience and above comments I agree, thanks for volunteering! ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Serhio Magpie (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support ShinePhantom (talk) 04:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support --Pasleim (talk) 04:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support - yona b (talk) 07:53, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support.-- Hakan·IST 11:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support. Almost single-handedly supports the entire Wikidata integration in Russian Wikipedia and has written tools that have provided Wikidata with more than 300,000 edits in the project. More than sure that his tenure as a sysop would be even more productive both to Wikidata and to Russian communities that use it. stjn[ru] 11:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support Sure. Mahir256 (talk) 16:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support. - Kareyac (talk) 17:04, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support. --Ksc~ruwiki (talk) 20:37, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support. --VladXe (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support no concerns --Kostas20142 (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support --Eurodyne (talk) 21:24, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support --Epìdosis 15:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support Taivo (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 17:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful. --Lymantria (talk) 17:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jarekt edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 10 January 2018 16:48 (UTC)

I am an admin on Commons since 2007, mostly active with maintaining high volume protected templates, but I was doing great many other maintenance tasks over the years. I am also occasionally active OTRS volunteer. Couple years ago, when Commons was added to Wikidata universe, I began working on copying content of many Commons pages to Wikidata and writing Lua codes to access Wikidata from Commons. I worked so far on coping following data from Commons to Wikidata: authority control identifiers, taxonomic data, location coordinates and currently I am working on copying data from Commons creator templates. I have over 100k edits on Wikidata, plus about 30k using User:JarektBot account, many of them done manually or in very small sets. In addition to importing data I am quite active in watching over Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations of several properties and working on fixing related issues. I am applying for position of administrator in order to help with maintenance tasks on Wikidata, including vandalism related tasks, as I see vandalism as a big issue on Wikidata, with many bad edits not discovered for months. --Jarekt (talk) 16:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support more admins and vandalism fighting is needed, thanks! ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support per #1 —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support without any hesitation, thanks for your work! − Pintoch (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Neutral it isn't really needed for what you plan to do.
    --- Jura 18:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support He is a trusted person and we need good-faith admin. Pamputt (talk) 18:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Pasleim (talk) 19:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Epìdosis 19:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support of course, trusted user. Multichill (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support in no particular order: hardworking, trustworthy, and significant cross-wiki experience. Green Giant (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Okay. --Rschen7754 02:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --NatigKrolik (contributions • talk) 04:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support, no doubt. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk)
  13.  Support .-- Hakan·IST 06:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support seems alright. --Eurodyne (talk) 06:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support seems like a competent candidate. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 21:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support Trusted user globally, understands how Wikidata works, so no reason not to. Kostas20142 (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Matěj Suchánek (talk) 09:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Neutral Good luck to the candidate, I've just never seen the user before. --Wolverène (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support Sure! Taivo (talk) 12:16, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support - need more admins, and good Commons contributors :) --Hsarrazin (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23. +1 --Nemo 20:36, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support - Mbch331 (talk) 20:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support impressive work towards better usage of Wikidata data on Commons Powerek38 (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support Sound pair of hands. Jheald (talk) 21:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support -PKM (talk) 00:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support Mahir256 (talk) 00:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support User understand Wikidata well and is active while I'm not aware of any issues with his past behavior. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support --Alaa :)..! 01:05, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

I have not done any patrolling yet. but I run into a lot of undiscovered vandalism by just looking at new constraint violations. I will look into getting acquainted with the new tool you mentioned. --Jarekt (talk) 17:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful --Lymantria (talk) 08:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mahir256 edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 18 January 2018 08:28 (UTC)

Over the last three years I have become accustomed to the rules and norms, written or unwritten, that govern Wikidata. I have indeed performed many high-volume QS edits on this account, but they have encompassed areas of lesser interest on average (natural numbers, dates/times, foreign relations...). Yet I wish to take a larger role in maintaining Wikidata than what rollback, as wonderful a right as it has been for the last six months, allows at present. I have begun participating more in property proposals, merging mass-created items, and working to eliminate duplicate labeling across languages. While I do not form this request because no speakers of South Asian languages are admins at present, bad edits in those languages that arise due to the confusion of those speakers can and have gone unchecked in some items that I have passed by, and being able to take up page protection and, if need be, blocks in clearly malicious instances of these edits would definitely help. --Mahir256 (talk) 08:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Mahir256 is a well established user and I don't remember any problematic behavior from him. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 09:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support competent user. Contributions look OK, and has used the rollback right properly here. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 09:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support, more candidates please. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support thanks for your work! ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support thanks for your help. --- Jura 08:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    There might be canvasing issues.
    --- Jura 05:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    You also have a lot of canvasing comments, aren't you? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support suitable candidate --Alaa :)..! 10:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support. Candidate presents a strong case for himself to fill the gap of an admin who is a native user of a South Asian language. Deryck Chan (talk) 11:30, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support. Experienced user. Rzuwig► 20:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Okay by me. --Eurodyne (talk) 01:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Rschen7754 06:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support The so-called "canvasing" from Jura1 doesn't confirmable. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support I don't find any reason not to trust the user. The canvassing seems highly unlikely. --Kostas20142 (talk) 16:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Epìdosis 20:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support and thanks − Pintoch (talk) 14:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support, native speakers of Indian languages among the sysops will be helpful. --Wolverène (talk) 19:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support Mbch331 (talk) 21:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support I see no reason to oppose. Sufficient experience. Taketa (talk) 12:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 14:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support --Aftabuzzaman (talk) 21:42, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support Last minute but still. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • You mention South Asian languages; your edits have been mostly in Bangla and English, which are also your native languages according to your babel box. Are you at all comfortable with other languages of the area? Hindi for instance? Can you read Arabic at all (or Persian, Urdu, etc)? ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@ArthurPSmith: There is a lot of lexical overlap among at least Indo-Aryan languages, including Bengali and Hindi, and I can decipher the Devanagari script comfortably, so in many instances I can "understand" Hindi text (and with some transliteration effort certain other Indo-Aryan languages). For liturgical reasons I can also decipher Perso-Arabic scripts comfortably, but there is less overlap in vocabulary between Bengali and either of Arabic or Persian, so my ability to "understand" Arabic or Persian is less. (I nevertheless cannot speak Hindi, Arabic, or Persian if I tried, and thus I would mark those as -0 among my Babel boxes.)
In any case, I have always tried to exercise caution whenever I operate on languages I do not speak, checking for exact correspondences with other languages before, for example, adding sitelinks or performing merges, and will continue to exercise caution in these instances. Mahir256 (talk) 23:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

I am withdrawing, since it appears that an important part of the community would like to see more before supporting me. Thank you for your support or your constructive comments. I will continue editing as usual unless someone wants to give me any sort of advice regarding anything. --Kostas20142 (talk) 12:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kostas20142 edit

Vote

Hello fellow Wikidata contributors! During my stay in Wikidata so far, I have been active mostly in 2 venues: First of all in new pages patrolling for small (under 1,5KB) items that require either deletion or improvement, as well as for inappropriate pages in other namespaces. The second is patrolling recent changes using customized filters to detect vandalism or spam. The reason I am requesting adminship is to be able to delete these pages (that unambiguously require deletion) on my own instead of sending them RfD like I am doing now and take the appropriate actions when encountering vandalism, as well as to help handling similar request on RFD and AN. Regarding languages, my native language is Greek but I also speak English and French (less fluently though). Regarding relevant experience, I am a sysop on Greek Wikiquote. Disclosure: I have 2 alternative accounts globally, Kostas20142 (alt) and Kostantinos20142, both of which I plan to create here especially if granted the permissions. Thank you for your time --Kostas20142 (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support Mbch331 (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2018 (UTC) I see Kostas20142 a lot on RfD and his request are valid requests.[reply]
  2.  Support  Oppose per MisterSynergy below; I'd wait quite some time before making another request. Thank you, Nick, for the notice about his rights-gathering; I do think that Kostas is nevertheless a trustworthy person whose requests we've generally honored at WD:RFD and WD:AN. Mahir256 (talk) 18:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support David (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support.-- Hakan·IST 20:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support, thanks for volunteering! − Pintoch (talk) 20:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Oppose I think this is a bit too soon, but would be happy to support after the user has more experience. --Rschen7754 22:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support little experience but good will, it is enough for me. Pamputt (talk) 06:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Oppose 1,555 edits on Wikidata seems to me not enough experience to be an admin. I would encourage the user to gather more experience with Wikidata and then reapply. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 16:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Oppose This user has always been interested in acquiring user rights and permissions first and foremost, any help they can provide will be secondary to their hat collecting quest. Their interest in hat collecting was a significant issue at their first RfA on English Wikipedia (see w:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kostas20142 for evidence) and it's only a few weeks since they were requesting OTRS access here. I would expect significantly more experience and serious evidence of their dedication to this project, because my suspicion is that this is just a stepping stone to another RfA on English Wikipedia. Nick (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Oppose. The candidate's main experience with Wikidata is to do with patrolling items and nominating items for deletion. I understand the purpose of having admin rights so he can delete things directly without bothering another admin, but RfD isn't overwhelmed with backlogs just yet and the candidate's level of experience on Wikidata isn't sufficient for making deletion decisions without another editor's participation yet. Deryck Chan (talk) 19:03, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Oppose, too soon. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Oppose, as not experienced enough. I would have also opposed the October 2017 RfA on en.WP but that was snow closed. Take some time and do some serious work, and I'm sure your fellow editors will be much more inclined to support you. Schwede66 (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • Special:CentralAuth/Kostas20142 says you have temporary sysop rights at elwikiquote, and a total of only 112 edits in that project. When and why does that role expire, and how much sysop experience do you really have?
    Something else: you started contributing at Wikidata significantly less than two months ago, and you collected ~1.5k edits with your account. While I appreciate your efforts for this project at WD:RfD and I do indeed see you as a promising candidate, I am not sure whether it is already about time to run for adminship… —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @MisterSynergy: my adminship expires on 06:24, 2 September 2018. Basically, for such small wikis it is granted only on temporarily and can be renewed (like I have already done once. according to xtools I have 35 deletions and 2 revdels. I don't claim that this is significant, and my sincere apologies if it was perceived that way, but merely that I have carried out sysop tasks in past. --Kostas20142 (talk) 19:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • As I noticed you hardly created any new items, have you tried to expand or correct a group of items in one or the other fields?
    --- Jura 10:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jura1: Indeed, I have created 5 items, all of which fall under the "structurally needed" category (3 film directors and 2 books as references). However I have expanded a few already existing items, especially recent creations by automated tools that had only an instance of (P31) or not even that. --Kostas20142 (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm beginning to doubt after Nick's statement. I don't see an issue in the number of edits, but the hat collecting does look like a valid point. What's your response to the hat collecting claim? Mbch331 (talk) 18:28, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nick:, @Mbch331:, I will be really honest with this: I have done mistakes. And I have requested permissions that appears I shouldn't have. For the sake of transparency I will also disclose that I had requested Global renamer some months ago. However, stating that helping Wikimedia projects is secondary to me, is an unsupported accusation. I might have given this impression, however that's not the case. First of all, why to stay here, especially after my unsuccessful RfA and the OTRS request you mentioned? If I merely wanted hats, I could simply go elsewhere and make a fresh start seeking hats there. Instead, I have stayed here contributing globally. You mentioned the English Wikipedia RfA. Some people thought that I could be trusted back there, some others thought either that it was too early, or that I was hat collecting. My intentions were pure, and the reason why I stopped participating in admin-related areas is that I found some comments a bit discouraging and felt unsure about my next step to fix the things and prove that these accusations were indeed wrong. Not following the advice I had been offered not to run was indeed a mistake. Maybe I was over-confident, maybe I thought it was a minority view. Either ways, I learned from this mistake and sought advice on whether it would be appropriate to run here. This was done privately, and I would prefer not to disclose the user unless this user is ok with this. (I had not mentioned the en.wiki RfA because I found it irrelevant) Regarding the OTRS, well, I really thought that I could be helpful to the team however I withdrew after 2 comments (one of which was Nick's) that expressed opposition. And this was done because I found continuing as candidate although I was not trusted, counterproductive. And to be honest, I don't think that this team would be suitable for a hat collector; although public few people know you are in and the activity is monitored so.... And especially in Wikidata I have done other things than admin related tasks as well; I first came here to edit manually linking items to el.wikiquote pages and later started contributing to items. Regarding Nick's closing comment, no, I do not plan to run again. Of course I have done mistakes, made bad choices and could have been better in many areas. However my intentions were, are, and will be pure. Hope I have covered all your points. I am at your disposal should you need to ask anything else. --Kostas20142 (talk) 21:38, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your explanation. For me you've answered the question. Mbch331 (talk) 22:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful --Lymantria (talk) 09:53, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okkn edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 25 March 2018 08:06 (UTC)

I have been an editor since August 2016, and have created (proposed) 16 properties, mostly contributing items and relations in the field of medicine and in the topic of Japan. I often check Special:RecentChanges and reCh to find and to fix wrong edits, and gradually come to understand the rules and customs of Wikidata.

I am a native speaker of Japanese so I can promptly cope with the vandalisms related to Japanese language and with the misuses of properties in items about Japan. Currently, administrators who use Japanese are very few, although Japanese Wikipedia is one of the largest projects.

Also I specialize in medicine and have a sound knowledge of healthcare. Vandalism on the healthcare data is a hanging matter, but it is difficult for those who don't know well about that field. Therefore, I would like to receive a permission for blocking vandals, protecting items, and deleting harmful items, in order to act as the occasion demands. --Okkn (talk) 08:06, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support David (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support --Epìdosis 15:53, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support Of course. It would be good if we have more Japanese admins. がんばってください！Jianhui67 talk★contribs 17:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support.-- Hakan·IST 18:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Kostas20142 (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Sure. Mahir256 (talk) 20:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:06, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support - Mbch331 (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support --Alaa :)..! 18:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support, valid rationale. Good luck! ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --Afaz (talk) 05:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support --Rschen7754 00:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Eurodyne (talk) 05:14, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support and thanks for volunteering! − Pintoch (talk) 08:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 08:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support Rzuwig► 15:32, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as unsuccessful as he can add Japanese labels now Mahir256 (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harshrathod50 edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 13 May 2018 10:20 (UTC)

I edit regularly, had been here for the decent amount of time and very well understand the working of WikiData. Therefore I find myself in a good place to hold adminship. Besides Hindi I also want to add other language labels to the items but even after adding {{#babel}} template to my user page, I'm not able to add Japanese labels to the items. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 10:20, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Oppose Only 76 edits here (as of this comment), and no stated need for administrator access.--Jasper Deng (talk) 10:47, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Oppose, too soon. not now. -- Titodutta (talk)11:24, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose --Alaa :)..! 12:15, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Oppose Should be snowclosed as soon as possible. Mahir256 (talk) 16:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Oppose Too rarely contributions, let's see more contribs before another request. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Oppose. --Rzuwig► 18:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Oppose please gain some local experience before applying for admin rights here. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Abstain Welcome to Wikidata, and thank you for your contributions so far. Please withdraw this request; with ~90 contributions, it is impossible to get the flag. For the time being. Continue contributing for a few months and if still believe that you would be fit for adminship, re-apply then. I am sure that the community will be willing to support you should you demonstrate a dedication and an appropriate temperament. For the time being please carefully read Wikidata:Administrators --Kostas20142 (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as unsuccessful; there is some concern elsewhere that this is a sock of a known sockmaster. Mahir256 (talk) 06:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adminor edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 18 May 2018 14:13 (UTC)

I think it would be easier for our Crats and for me if I can assign myself the Flooder-flag. I have been sysop before, see the last RfP. I resigned myself for inactivity in June 2014. I cannot see that I will be active as sysop in the normal manner in the future. We do not delete items in the way we used to do. And I do counter-vandalism when I accidently come across it, I do not actively chase vandals. I start this RfP for my own convenience, nothing else.-- Adminor (talk | contribs) 14:20, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Oppose copy and paste from this RfA, and less than 200 edits! --Alaa :)..! 10:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Oppose. Rzuwig► 19:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose per Alaa. Mahir256 (talk) 23:48, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Oppose Too premature. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:42, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Oppose and snow-close. --Titodutta (talk) 12:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful --Lymantria (talk) 06:54, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addshore edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 22 May 2018 15:59 (UTC)

I allowed my admin flag to lapse last year. I held the flag between 2013 and 2017. I would like to be considered for the flag again in preparation for the upcoming new Lexeme entity type and an expected increase in deletion requests etc. --·addshore· talk to me! 16:05, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support
    --- Jura 16:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 16:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support absolutely, thanks for all your work on wikidata! ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:38, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support definitely --Kostas20142 (talk) 18:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Strong support Mahir256 (talk) 18:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Alaa :)..! 18:42, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support. Sure, welcome back! Deryck Chan (talk) 15:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:54, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support, definitely! -- Hoo man (talk) 16:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support --Epìdosis 07:04, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support-Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Sure. Rzuwig► 20:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support − Pintoch (talk) 09:02, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support.-- Hakan·IST 14:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Eurodyne (talk) 18:49, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support, without question. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:54, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support, undoubtedly. Ivanhercaz (Talk) 00:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support. --abián 09:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support --Denny (talk) 14:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 15:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support Yes please. Mkdw (talk) 16:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful --Lymantria (talk) 08:50, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pintoch edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 26 May 2018 08:48 (UTC)

I am working on tools around Wikidata and it would be useful for me to have admin rights for the following tasks:

  • For the upcoming editing features of OpenRefine, I would like to create MediaWiki tags to flag the edits coming from OpenRefine (one tag per version of the software). (Note that these tags would not be OAuth tags, which anybody can apply for, because OpenRefine does not use OAuth).
  • For the EditGroups tool, it would be useful to let admins delete items created by batches (after discussion at RFD). It would be useful to be an admin myself to develop and maintain this feature.

− Pintoch (talk) 08:48, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support
    --- Jura 08:56, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 09:03, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support --Epìdosis 13:31, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --Okkn (talk) 13:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support.-- Hakan·IST 14:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Alaa :)..! 18:58, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support. Ivanhercaz (Talk) 00:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support Mahir256 (talk) 03:16, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support - yona b (talk) 09:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support no question from me! ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:08, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 14:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --Jklamo (talk) 08:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Maxlath (talk) 08:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Toniher (talk) 09:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 15:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support - PKM (talk) 19:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Any help is welcome! Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 21:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lakokat edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 28 July 2018 13:20 (UTC)

I am sorry for letting my sysop flag slipped away earlier this year due to real life reasons. I am ready to continue my work at RfDs and help with the requests from Chinese wikimedians, if I could be considered as trusted again. Lakokat 13:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 13:24, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Mbch331 (talk) 13:40, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support.-- Hakan·IST 14:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support Sure. Mahir256 (talk) 17:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:15, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support. --Epìdosis 06:52, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:32, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support − Pintoch (talk) 14:51, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support Pamputt (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support. Welcome back. Deryck Chan (talk) 15:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Okkn (talk) 18:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --Ruthven (talk) 18:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support. --Rzuwig► 20:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support. Bencemac (talk) 13:13, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support KaMan (talk) 14:16, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Brror (talk) 06:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Green Mostaza (talk) 19:10, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support --Alaa :)..! 19:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

 Not done, no consensus (0/7/0 | 0%). --Vogone (talk) 15:57, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cookingmonster123 edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 3 August 2018 15:49 (UTC)

I promise to continue to contribute to the wiki and only use my privileges when i need to and use them responsibly. --Cookingmonster123 (talk) 15:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Oppose - 444 Edits on Wikidata (at current time) and 540 in total for all SUL projects. Way too little to trust user with admin rights. Mbch331 (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Oppose --Succu (talk) 16:16, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose per Mbch331. Too early --Alaa :)..! 19:04, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Oppose More experience is required. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:27, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Oppose Disruption like this doesn't make me think it's an appropriate candidate. Moreover, I don't believe they know more about any of privileges. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:46, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Oppose See above. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. LOLno. Your abuse on #wikidata@freenode shows you are not capable of trust. — regards, Revi 10:19, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful, apologies for the delay, all of us were travelling--Ymblanter (talk) 05:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bovlb edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 8 August 2018 22:03 (UTC)

I am an active Wikidata user, and often come across cases where page protection, deletion, or user blocking would be appropriate; I would like to be able to assist directly, without having to bother others every time. Having said that, I confess that I lean "inclusionist" and would rather research and improve a bare item than delete it out of hand. I also try hard to head off blocks by working with users to help them to make a positive contribution. Although I am now more active on Wikidata, I have been an administrator on the English Wikipedia since 2005. Professionally, I use Wikidata as an information source, and am strongly motivated to see it grow as an accurate and useful resource. --Bovlb (talk) 22:03, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support; the candidate is apparently not yet overly involved in meta stuff at Wikidata, but what I see is okay and he is clearly familiar with the admin role. I am confident that Wikidata adminship for Bovlb would work out as well. —MisterSynergy (talk) 00:18, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Tend to  Support; inclusionist and mediating are both okay things to be. Mahir256 (talk) 02:26, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support. Already en.wp admin, nothing bad on the record. Deryck Chan (talk) 10:48, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --Okkn (talk) 20:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --NatigKrolik (contributions • talk) 00:27, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support but hope if there's more cross-wiki involvement --Alaa :)..! 08:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support - Seems to have a use for the permissions, thanks for helping out. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 20:56, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Oppose maybe later: has created hardly any items
    --- Jura 17:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Jura1: Would you like to request de-sysopping @Jasper Deng: on precisely this basis? I'm not sure that we should levy an item creation requirement as a requirement for adminship. Mahir256 (talk) 14:52, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think one should have some experience with contributing to this project. This includes several aspects. Creating new items is a fairly basic one. We do have plenty of admins that I couldn't really tell from memory what they do or ever did. The result is that a few, like you, end up doing most of admin work. I don't really know what the one you mention does or did. Bovlb does write excellent queries btw.
      --- Jura 15:00, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • What an odd metric. Why should creating items be more important than other parts of the project? I'm not sure that I've ever created an item, but that certainly doesn't impact my ability to use the sysop tools. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 15:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support I have worked with the user professionally and can attest to his strong commitment to making Wikidata a better resource. Mpetrenk (talk) 18:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Ptolusque (.-- .. -.- ..) 08:44, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:36, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support I don't know the user but I lean to trust him. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:42, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Rschen7754 00:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bencemac edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 15 August 2018 16:12 (UTC)

Hello, I am Bencemac and I would like to apply for adminship. This is the first time when I do this, therefore I have only bureaucrat and AbuseFilter-editing experiences. Besides basic admin tasks such as page protection or deletion, I would like to continue fighting against vandalism in Hungarian, deal with Hungarian articles’ deleted items and help with problems which are in my native language. Recently, I spotted a huge number of orphaned items; their huwiki articles were deleted because of disputed notability, self-promoting or hoax. I am planning to continue check them and new items one by one in the future. Without deeper administrator experiences, I want to learn before I would have bigger (and silly) plans.

I read Wikidata:Administrators and I hope that I am not the only one who believes that I would be a good administrator. Thanks for reading my request!

Votes edit

  1.  Support Although I cannot recall having worked with Bencemac directly, my interactions with Bencemac have generally been positive. Mahir256 (talk) 16:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 18:08, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support no concerns here.-- Hakan·IST 18:29, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support Sysop speaking other languages than English are more than welcomed. Pamputt (talk) 19:23, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --Rschen7754 00:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Okkn (talk) 01:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support - some good experience, deletion requests look good. Thanks for volunteering. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 05:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support. Already holds bureaucrat on hu.wp, no obvious concerns. Deryck Chan (talk) 13:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support - Nice to meet you ! :P — TBhagat (talk) 11:01, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Rzuwig► 19:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Oppose got the impression that the user just recently deleted deprecated statements because they appeared in some inaccurate query used at some Wikipedia. Created hardly any items, experience with deletion requests seems rather limited (10?).
    --- Jura 03:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful --Lymantria (talk) 10:46, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abián edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 30 August 2018 10:36 (UTC)

There is no native Spanish-speaking administrator available in Wikidata in European time zones, but the Spanish Wikipedia is a well-known source of vandalism. Anyway, I offer to help by using the administrator tools in any area, so this motivation is just an excuse. Due to my fondness for inclusionism and the principles of the Linked Data, I honestly don't expect to delete many entities except in case of obvious vandalism, but I would love to contribute by all other ways with which the community believes I can be helpful. I can be contacted via IRC, where I keep a 24/7 connection; Twitter, where I <spam>pay attention to @wikidata_es</spam>; Telegram or email.

Short background: I am a sysop and bureaucrat of the Spanish Wikipedia since 2012, but I soon reduced my activity there to focus on contributing to Wikidata. During these years I have given some talks and workshops about Wikidata, encouraged several institutions to use the project and occasionally tried to help on the technical side. I am a member of Wikimedia Spain (Q14866877) since 2012 and served as a board member from 2015 to 2017. Aspects related to my edits can be more or less easily deduced from the contributions page or related tools. Thanks for your comments! --abián 10:36, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support, yes please! Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 10:43, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support, of course —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:43, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support ArthurPSmith (talk) 12:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support. Deryck Chan (talk) 15:43, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  A favor Mahir256 (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Okkn (talk) 17:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Epìdosis 20:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support - Nikki (talk) 20:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support. Geagea (talk) 23:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support --Rschen7754 00:27, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support.-- Hakan·IST 05:18, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support KaMan (talk) 06:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Thanks for your help. It's good to have more active contributors as administrators. --- Jura 06:25, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:01, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Alaa :)..! 14:36, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support. Rzuwig► 21:42, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:20, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 15:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support--Akbarali (talk) 16:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support Mbch331 (talk) 19:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support Ambadyanands (talk) 04:24, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support trusted user with a use for the tools. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 17:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support We need more sysops who speak other languages than English. Pamputt (talk) 05:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • I notice you also have edited in a number of other European languages (Portuguese, Italian, Catalan) but you only list them as level 1 in your Babel box - do you think you could provide administrative support for those also? ArthurPSmith (talk) 12:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • I can't speak or write in those Romance languages; however, because of their similarities with Spanish or French languages and my relationships with native speakers, I can read in them and usually determine if an action is vandalism or not without resorting to a translator. My edits in these languages are poor: they consist in adding or fixing proper names, converting the first letter of the label to lower case if needed, removing the full stop from the description, etc. However, yes, I would provide some administrative support for them. --abián 13:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful, 80% support (16 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral) if neutral votes are taken into account --Lymantria (talk) 10:17, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Koehl edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 19 September 2018 10:06 (UTC)

I have patrolled Wikidata 1,5 years and during an increasing rate in Patrolling after I joined WikiProject Counter-Vandalism I have noticed the need for more Admin actions such as user blocking, page protection, and deletion. I'm experienced with RTRC and Huggle from other projects and have since my almost 16 years been an admin on 3 other projects. In order to continue fighting against vandalism on Wikidata in my native language Swedish, as well as Norwegian, Danish, German and English, I will make a better fight with the admin tools. --Dan Koehl (talk) 10:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support Wow, you've been way more polite than I have been regarding reverting IP edits - great work! ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:09, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Oppose I don't think you are acquainted enough with this project. --Succu (talk) 21:31, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose--Turkmen talk 22:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support. The candidate is a prolific vandal-fighter and seems to have put much effort into cross-wiki collaboration. Gaining admin rights is a natural next step. Deryck Chan (talk) 10:57, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support KaMan (talk) 04:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Okkn (talk) 07:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Epìdosis 19:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support easy; we need more of you :) Innotata (talk) 00:40, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support User is very active on counter vandalism. Esteban16 (talk) 00:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support An excellent worker on Wikispecies; would be valuable here too - MPF (talk) 09:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support A very valuable contributor, administrator and bureaucrat at Wikispecies. No doubt.--Hector Bottai (talk) 10:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Very active against vandalism, and also good cross-wiki worker and trusted admin at Wikispecies. --Thiotrix (talk) 11:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Burmeister (talk) 13:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support No reason to oppose. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support I think the experience of other projects will be very useful for this project. Also, it seems that you are participating faithfully in counter vandalism. Thank you for helping. --Sotiale (talk) 13:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Neutral Ainali (talk) 17:59, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support An experienced Wikimedian who will benefit from having admin rights to combat vandalism. Simon Cobb (Sic19 ; talk page) 18:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Oppose Was not reelected as admin on svwp because of lack of cooperation and patronizing attitude.  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Esquilo (talk • contribs).
  19.  Support - Brya (talk) 16:58, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Not sure if he is completely familiar with Wikidata (see Succu), but this feels safe.[reply]
  20.  Support --Rschen7754 04:27, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

An interesting question, but regardless of my answer, and in the role of WS crat, I can just say that it shall not negatively influence any potential admin activities here. In 2015, I established Project Wikidata on Wikispecies on Wikispecies, with the mission to discuss the integration of Wikispecies with Wikidata, and serve as a collaboration platform with Wikidata:Wikispecies in order to increase communication. Dan Koehl (talk) 15:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as unsuccessful by unsufficient number of support votes. Lymantria (talk) 05:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joalpe edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 21 September 2018 21:10 (UTC)

Hi all. I am an active Wikidata user from Brazil. There is up to now no administrator from Brazil or Portugal. I sometimes come across cases on which administrative actions might be needed, particularly deletion. I am a sysop on two other projects --Wikiversity and Outreach-- and I believe I can contribute directly. As I am not very active on meta admin activities on Wikidata yet, I hope I can learn from others and serve as a liaison between Portuguese-speaking contributors and project administration. It might also be worth mentioning I am one of the organizers of a series of Wikidata Labs we've held in Brazil, on which features of Wikidata are shared among Wikimedians and training is offered. These labs have been systematically advertised on the Village Pump (in Portuguese) and on social media, newsletters etc. Thanks for considering this application! --Joalpe (talk) 21:10, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support You have made lots of contributions to Wikimedia projects, so I supoort your candidacy, but please add more information to items you have created, such as Benedito Mergulhão (Q54981541) and Luis Roberto Alves da Costa (Q54557474). --Okkn (talk) 06:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Can I suggest you take a look at Wikidata:WikiProject Counter-Vandalism? I have seen vandalism in Portuguese, so it would be good to have somebody patrolling specifically for that language. ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:59, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support As ArthurPSmith. --Epìdosis 19:40, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • @Okkn: thanks for your message and for pointing these two items I had not worked on properly. Sorry! They are both associated to a GLAM initiative with the Brazilian National Archives; we have had a task force to create hundreds of biographies of politicians on Wikidata. This GLAM initiative --as well as other Brazilian Wikimedians have been working on-- has been an opportunity to really work on integrating Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects. To give an example, we have worked on several Wikidata-fed infoboxes (I am quite proud of the one on documents), Listeria-generated lists (w:pt:Lista das constituições brasileiras) structuring as much as we could uploads on Commons (from the simple depicted-person template to exclusively feeding metadata on Wikidata)... I know this context is moving away from your specific point, so I hope you don't mind for bringing this up. Thanks again. --Joalpe (talk) 00:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful --Lymantria (talk) 16:38, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ayack edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 26 September 2018 10:14 (UTC)

I lost my admin status in 2016 after a wikislow period. I'm now actively contributing and I'd like to become admin again to handle deletion and protection requests. Thanks. --— Ayack (talk) 10:14, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support --YMS (talk) 10:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support --Epìdosis 11:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support no luck ;) --- Jura 12:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support .-- Hakan·IST 12:21, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support -- Dan Koehl (talk) 13:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support Mahir256 (talk) 15:26, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 15:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support − Pintoch (talk) 07:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support − Flixwito^(•‿•)^ 10:15, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support VIGNERON (talk) 10:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support KaMan (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Jean-Fred (talk) 10:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful --Lymantria (talk) 07:12, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fuzheado edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 13 October 2018 04:18 (UTC)

Heeding the call for more admins in Wikidata, I'm happy to pitch in on tasks such as protection, deletion, property creation and addressing vandalism. Being active in the Wikidata Telegram group, I see real-time requests for admin actions that could be acted upon quicker with more admins around. I'm currently a translation admin on Wikidata and a longtime admin on English Wikipedia. Thanks. -- Fuzheado (talk) 04:18, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support Mahir256 (talk) 05:40, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 06:59, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support Dan Koehl (talk) 08:02, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --Epìdosis 08:59, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support − Pintoch (talk) 10:12, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support, but please use Babel on your userpage; I [we] would like to know that which language(s) you understand. Thanks! :) Bencemac (talk) 11:21, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bencemac: Thanks for the reminder. Added! -- Fuzheado (talk) 12:11, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Rschen7754 11:35, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support Joalpe (talk) 12:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --Alaa :)..! 13:24, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Sure! ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:15, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --Okkn (talk) 10:28, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Gamaliel (talk) 14:24, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support Esteban16 (talk) 00:07, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support and very happy to see this! Andrew Gray (talk) 12:01, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support +1 --Papuass (talk) 13:48, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support Rosiestep (talk) 13:53, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:26, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support — Envlh (talk) 18:22, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support - PKM (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support (but please don't read this as an endorsement of Telegram). Zazpot (talk) 21:28, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support Mike Peel (talk) 06:42, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support Waldir (talk) 07:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support. Deryck Chan (talk) 08:47, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:17, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support and thanks for your talks on Wikidata Clifford Anderson (talk) 03:44, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:44, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support - thanks for volunteering. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 15:09, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closing as unsuccessful--Ymblanter (talk) 21:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dardanianwiki edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 16 December 2018 03:16 (UTC)

Kërkojë voten e juaj të marrë më shum kompetenca pasi besojë që kam bërë një provojë të mjaftushme në Wikipedia si krijimi i stampave, përkthime të artikujve,ngarkime, përditsime, dhe korrigjime. Prioriteti im është të ndihmojë me artikujt dhe lexuesi shqipfolës të gjejë sa më shum artikuj në gjuhën shqipe. Do të isha i lumtur nëse do më pranonit në listën e administratorve për gjuhen Shqipe, faleminderit. --Dardanianwiki (talk) 03:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Oppose thanks for offering to help out, but I think it's a bit too soon. You should get more experience on both Wikipedia and Wikidata. Can you please create a user page so we know what languages you understand? Multichill (talk) 21:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Oppose You can help Albanian users with work at Wikidata without being an administrator. --Wolverène (talk) 07:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose per above. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Oppose Only 51 edits on Wikidata. We generally only grant admin rights to people who are already regular users of Wikidata. Additionally, most policy discussion on Wikidata happens in English and it's an important that admins can follow the existing policy discussion. As a result I want to see requests for adminship in English. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:23, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful --Lymantria (talk) 20:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

باسم edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 15 October 2018 18:45 (UTC)

Hello, I'm applying for Sysop permission at Wikidata in order to help protect the Arabic content from trolls and vandalisims, since Arabic is my Mother Language and i have spent a long time now on Wikidata, making sure several Arabic pages are stable. I Still notice every now and then some duplicate pages that require eaither deleting or merging, and i wish to help with that. I have carefully read the Wikidata Administrators policy. I'm also a Checkuser and Sysop in Arabic Wikipedia (See CentralAuth)--باسم (talk) 18:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1. As I'm the only Arabic native sysop here, I  Support Bassem request. Bassem is highly-experienced user with more than 200K edits (more than 30K edits in Wikidata), and he show high level experience to deal with Wikidata, also he helped (and still) many users to be involved in Wikidata community or help them on problem(s) they faced in Wikidata either in arwiki or Wikipedia groups in social media. I'm trusting he'll be a great addition in Wikidata sysops team --Alaa :)..! 18:54, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support --Epìdosis 19:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support Bassem request. Trabelsiismail (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --أبو هشام السوعان (talk) 21:24, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Neutral only because I have never seen this user in any sort of discussions. I have no specific objection to this user's adminship so long as Alaa can continue to give his reassurances for the duration of this user's adminship should it occur. Mahir256 (talk) 02:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Changing to  Oppose per the reason common to both rationales I gave for opposing David's two prior RfAs. In the near future, however, I intend to nominate David on good faith for adminship as my views on his use of the privileges have changed for the better since January 2017. Mahir256 (talk) 19:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Oppose, seems just regular Wikidata editor, no vandalism reverting nor much participating in discussions. Stryn (talk) 09:08, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support, Bassem is a Trusted user with a long history in the administration of Arabic Wikipedia. I'm sure he will be a successful administrator at Wikidata. --Dr-Taher (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support per Alaa. Deryck Chan (talk) 09:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support per Alaa.--فيصل (talk) 03:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support per Alaa.Sp!ros (talk) 07:00, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support - not super involved in admin areas, but would have the occasional use for the bit. Any help is good help. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 15:10, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Bassem is one of the few great, old and highly-experienced wikimedians and he will perform a great work to wikidata. Ahmed Najji (talk) 20:17, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support --Mishary Al-Dhufeeri (talk) 20:35, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support More than 50% of Arabic Wikipedia articles are linked to Wikidata. Fast interaction is needed. --Helmoony (talk) 21:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • Thanks for your candidacy. In all the years, you made 20 edits outside item namespace, of which not a single one was a contribution in a community discussion. This makes it a little difficult to learn more about you. Do you plan to involve yourself in discussions in future? —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:01, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@MisterSynergy: yes hopefully i will get involved in some discussions especially anything related to difficulties we might face with wikidata concerning Arabic languageباسم (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the next few months I'll be creating a lot of Wikidata entries about Islamic monuments in the Middle East/North Africa (some of them difficult to find in the web) and will definitely need your help! Sp!ros (talk) 07:30, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Sp!ros: gladlyباسم (talk) 20:20, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/RfA/2018&oldid=860112926"