Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2020/05/19

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q20738855

urban area with a population of 150-199 (Q20738855): inofficial concept used in a Swedish census-report of 1960: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

While this item currently satisfies the structural notability criterion, it seems to be only used on a couple of items as a instance of (P31) value, which might not be appropriate. (The item has no sitelinks and is described as an "inofficial [sic] concept".) Unless the relevant census data is not detailed enough to add the exact values through population (P1082), it should be possible to replace all the uses of this item. Jc86035 (talk) 16:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Support - yona b (talk) 08:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

@Innocent bystander:, you created the item, can you comment on this request? - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 15:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

@Jc86035, יונה בנדלאק, Innocent bystander, Cycn: This is definitely not a proper instance of (P31) value, but I guess it would be useful as a qualifier for population (P1082): unknown value Help claims, right? Anyone willing to make those changes? —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted; the item has some structural use at the moment, and although I see P31 use as mentioned earlier as not ideal, nobody seems to be willing to fix it. Thus kept here. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q81110157

Q81110157: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails wikidata:notability — billinghurst sDrewth 11:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:11, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

There are plenty of items with the same problem [1]. Can anyone please explain what sort of database FamilySearch (Q3066228) is? —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:39, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

According to the Wikipedia article: "The Family Tree section allows user-generated content to be contributed to the genealogical database." Q81110157 is part of a series of items linking Daniel N. Butler (Q28140172) and Brian Patrick Butler (Q27656034), via other people including John Tipton (Q16859160), to Ralph Fitzherbert (Q7287487). As Q69996003 has been deleted (although without discussion, and is still in use) the link has been broken. Peter James (talk) 13:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Familysearch has primary documentation on individuals, three are listed for Blackstone Waterhouse, so he actually exists and can be described by reliable sources. --RAN (talk) 01:42, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted as this is just one of many similar cases. I disagree with the notion that FamilySearch is necessarily a reliable source, as it seems to contain at least partially user-generated content. Yet, this has to be discussed on a larger scale for FamilySearch or even genealogical databases containing user-generated content in general, not by challenging notability of individual cases with the problem. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q86535474

POV. --Succu (talk) 22:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

I started a discussion at Wikidata:Project chat to gain further comments.--GZWDer (talk) 22:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Not POV. BLP. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:53, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Tentative keep. @Succu: can you expand on your one-word deletion nomination? I see nothing POV about saying someone has chosen to keep something private, and that we are respecting that. - Jmabel (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
- By the way, I believe this could also be used for the unpublished location of an archeological site, e.g. Duwamish Number 1 Site (Q5317644). - Jmabel (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Comment 1. Would no value or some value be more appropriate as the main value for such cases? 2. Will a deprecated value of no value be enough to suppress re-addition? Will bots and/or other users recognise this signal? There is nothing in the core software currently, I think, that would block a new statement being added. (Though perhaps one could ping the dev team to request such a feature). 3. "Private" might be a better label than "not disclosed" -- it's not just that the value hasn't been disclosed (but might be discoverable from some source, somewhere), the intention is to flag that there is an active desire to keep it private. Jheald (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Jheald: When I create this item it is to be used as qualifier ([2]), as it's impossible to add it as the value of date of birth (P569). 2. Bots may reimport it from other sources, in this case it can easily be queried and manually check whether the data added is reliably sourced and meets WD:BLP (if it is, the "not disclosed" should be removed as it is now public knowledge). This requires human judgement.--GZWDer (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  - @GZWDer: A qualifier, yes. But a qualifier to a statement with no value or a qualifier to a statement with some value ? To me the second seems more accurate. Jheald (talk) 21:54, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Wikidata usage instructions (P2559) says „Statements should not be replaced unless they can be considered widespread public knowledge or are openly supplied by the individual themselves“ This is POV and probably a kind of potential censorship (Q543). --Succu (talk) 22:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
- Added a German translation. Do we support rumor (Q878352)? --Succu (talk) 22:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

The idea was worth a try, but it did not gain much support and has some issues which were raised here as well. I thus Deleted the item. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q2464546

Q2464546: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Conflation articles no longer exist --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

@Liuxinyu970226: can you please have a look at the backlinks to this item and resolve them to the new items as well? Thank you, MisterSynergy (talk) 18:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Needs @Walter Whitey: help as they removed ru:Саундтрек Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas from it. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q5595149

Q5595149: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Conflation articles no longer exist --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

@Liuxinyu970226: can you please have a look at the backlinks to this item and resolve them to the new items as well? Thank you, MisterSynergy (talk) 18:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Needs @Volodyanocec: help as they removed en:Soundtracks of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas and pl:Ścieżki dźwiękowe z Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas from this. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q65960697

Item was incorrect, added the "en" link "Alfa Romeo in Formula One" on "Alfa Romeo (Q622489)" --Saschaporsche (talk) 18:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Seems the situation is slightly different from what i first thought. Therefore: Can the item "Alfa Romeo in Formula One (Q65960697)" be merged with the item "Alfa Romeo (Q622489)" The last one has the most links/seems. BOTH items describe Alfa Romeo activities in Formula One! There is no reason to have 2 different wikidata items. Kind regards Saschaporsche (talk) 20:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted; the sitelinks in Q65960697 cover multiple topics and should not be merged into Q622489; see also the other related items linked from Q65960697; interwikilinks need to be defined locally, if they should appear in sitelinks of both items. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q88463641

Sina Derakhshande (Q88463641): Iranian singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Mh6ti Quakewoody (talk) 00:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

On hold pending deletion on the fawiki. Also: A commonscat is linked, so we might not want to delete this item even if the Farsi entry is deleted. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 14:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted per Commons sitelink. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q20817300

Q20817300: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It doesn't contain at least one valid site link. Willy1018 (talk) 16:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Looking at the links, there may be a structural need to keep this item, even without site links. @MatheoPLI:, you created the item, can you comment? - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 15:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Deleted; pure family relations, and no sources or identification provided —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q5505181

Q5505181: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It doesn't contain at least one valid site link. Willy1018 (talk) 16:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Keep the author has a article Quakewoody (talk) 18:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q3877442

No Compromises!!! (Q3877442): 1991 extended play by IN.SI.DIA: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It doesn't contain at least one valid site link. Willy1018 (talk) 16:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Keep the performer has a article Quakewoody (talk) 18:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted per structural need —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Mass deletion of non-notable television elements

These don't seem to meet any notability policy and their Wikipedia pages are all either redirected or deleted. All full of fancruft too. 118.148.103.35 21:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Are the characters canon? --Trade (talk) 21:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

@Trade: Yes but still, no links to Wikipedia or other sites. Also the characer items are no longer linked to the item on their show. Also included very non-notable episodes of a different show that were deleted from enwiki recently. 118.148.103.35 21:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Keep e.g. A Gift for Zooter (Q4657000) since it passes WD:N (point 2). It is an item of a episode of a television show, with external identifiers. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

The characters, on the other hand, have only fandom articles for their external identifiers (not a reliable source). So I would go with deleting them. 118.148.103.35 21:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

@Josve05a: Ideally, I would go with deleting A Gift for Zooter (Q4657000) anyway. It's just an ordinary, non-notable episode of Jungle Junction, which seems to be a typical, common but non-notable television program. There are a couple of more notable television series whose episodes may be more suitable for Wikidata. 118.148.103.35 21:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Ideally, we wan't them all. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Done; one deleted, the others seem more or less fine. No need to editwar content from the items, btw. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q52202316

Valeria Jones (Q52202316): Czech pornographic actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A Czech adult film actress with zero notability (see WD:N). I guess she is of zero notability even in theory since I couldn't find awards for her or reviews for films in which she played. Wolverène (talk) 14:27, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

I dunno that's an awful lot of movie she's been a part of. --Trade (talk) 14:45, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

±62 films in which she appeared may be enough for her to be mentioned somewhere, but I tried to find her name at xcritic.com, avn.com, xbiz.com and there were nothing. It may be hard to find sources for males from the adult industry, but when there's nothing in case of females, it's unusual and says in favor of lack of interest. --Wolverène (talk) 14:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

xvideos only has 4 scenes of her. also, in the internet age, 62 films is not necessarily a lot. Quakewoody (talk) 15:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Not saying it's a whole lot but it's still a decent amount.

Keep --Trade (talk) 22:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Of course the number of films is important but in this moment there are no valid sitelinks, no references, and seems no structural need. Could you help with adding any of these? --Wolverène (talk) 08:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

I've tried but unfortunately WD is bugging out and won't let me add new statements or references. --Trade (talk) 11:41, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted; seems to be properly identified against several external databases meanwhile —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q89092538

In the Prisons that Don’t Exist (Q89092538): Film on the detention of Uighurs: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nearly emty, no identifier. MovieFex (talk) 21:32, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

@John Cummings: as the item creator, can you please add some more data? It does indeed look a little too basic. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy: added some, there's no IMDB item, my guess is there will be more information but will be in Chinese, its won multiple awards. --John Cummings (talk) 21:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. It is already enough to put Not deleted here, but more info (also in Chinese) can of course still be added. —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q75501371

Micheál Richardson (Q75501371): Irish actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Privacy Iamthecheese44 (talk) 21:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

I assume these requests are based on en:Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of names which doesn't apply here (although you didn't remove these names from the article, where no source is cited). Notability and reliability of sources may be a reason to delete, as the only source cites Wikipedia. Peter James (talk) 09:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia itself is not a good source, but it cites usable sources ([3][4]), which deas mention names.--GZWDer (talk) 01:06, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Keep Structural need, non minor, public figure --RAN (talk) 01:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted here, because he is listed in ThePeerage. If this is a problem, the issue should be discussed on a larger scale, not for individual items. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q89571250

Q89571250: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. MovieFex (talk) 21:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Item is no longer empty. Bovlb (talk) 16:56, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Even filled out, I don't see notability. Quakewoody (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q75501373

Daniel Jack Neeson (Q75501373): (born 1996): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Privacy Iamthecheese44 (talk) 21:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

I assume these requests are based on en:Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of names which doesn't apply here (although you didn't remove these names from the article, where no source is cited). Notability and reliability of sources may be a reason to delete, as the only source cites Wikipedia. Peter James (talk) 09:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Keep He's the son Liam Nelson who's a very huge celebrity. --Trade (talk) 12:33, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Keep Structural need, non minor, public figure --RAN (talk) 01:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted here, because he is listed in ThePeerage. If this is a problem, the issue should be discussed on a larger scale, not for individual items. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q89567678

Q89567678: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. MovieFex (talk) 21:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Item is no longer empty. Bovlb (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Even filled out, I don't see notability. Quakewoody (talk) 17:19, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q89104378

Zigeuner (Q89104378): 2007 film directed by Stanislaw Mucha: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. MovieFex (talk) 21:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

It's not empty anymore Germartin1 (talk) 09:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q91665224

Q91665224: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this person notable? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

when deleting this item, Q92821333 should be deleted as well. -- Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 18:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

there's some obvious socking going on between here and other projects. Quakewoody (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

previously deleted at Q91231731 Quakewoody (talk) 15:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

KeepSpotify artist--Trade (talk) 15:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

you don't think that it takes more than a spotify link to be notable? Quakewoody (talk) 15:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Where do you wish to put the limit regarding musicians? Don't get me srong i'm not too happy about how little notability he have--Trade (talk) 19:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Spotify is no more reliable than Instagram. Anyone can create an account and upload whatever they wish. And specific to this artist, I would hope that it takes more than 50 monthly listeners to make someone notable. Quakewoody (talk) 02:24, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q93594665

Q93594665: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Xwiki LTA DMacks (talk) 05:08, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Bulk deletion requestMexican pop

Q92821333 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q91665224 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q94023114 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q94018983 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q93985782 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q93981456 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q93928094 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

not notable Quakewoody (talk) 20:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Done —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:57, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q93892115

Q93892115: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable Trade (talk) 00:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q91665224

Q91665224: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion, notability is missing. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q94695754

2020 COVID-19 pandemic in Transnistria (Q94695754): viral pandemic: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q89277288 Fiver, der Hellseher (talk) 12:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:MisterSynergy, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q94695255

Q94695255: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 12:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q94680626

Q94680626: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 12:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Delete this as blatant promotional spam. We've previously seen this here multiple times, and the subject has never been notable. Hiàn (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Do you know if the person have used more than one user account when creating this item? --Trade (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

@Hiàn:--Trade (talk) 22:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

@Trade: It's almost a given that the person behind all this spam has used multiple accounts; I think they're all lockable but I'll have to check my records again. Hiàn (talk) 22:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

I'm well aware but i don't wish to fill a CU request without having the name of the accounts in question. --Trade (talk) 22:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)