Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/02/27

Hi there. This was not created as spam, but as part of a project I'm no longer into (personaldata.io). Cassandreces (talk) 17:10, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q83968877

Shellfish Research Laboratory (Q83968877): A research facility that contributes studies, training, and new technology in the field of shellfish aquaculture.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable Gikü (talk) 18:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

a research lab of a notable university sounds notable to me BrokenSegue (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Not done per BrokenSegue --Emu (talk) 14:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q85819530

Q85819530: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable Gikü (talk) 18:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q86597675

Q86597675: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable; was kept after Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/07/28#Q86597675 but the deletion rationale that time did not mention notability. Gikü (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Delete BrokenSegue (talk) 22:15, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q111025991

Q111025991: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item about a living person with questionable notability, created by a new account. Abbe98 (talk) 10:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q111025399

Q111025399: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, with a file name as description. Abbe98 (talk) 11:09, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Roman numeral lexemes

Lexeme:L19340 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19341 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19342 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19343 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19344 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19345 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19346 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

These correspond to the items Ⅰ (Q3147025), Ⅴ (Q3553034), Ⅹ (Q3570499), Ⅼ (Q3206231), Ⅽ (Q2932176), Ⅾ (Q3011516) and Ⅿ (Q3273364). Roman numerals (Q38918) is not a language and items are more appropriate for language-independent concepts. Nikki (talk) 17:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

It's perfectly valid as content for lexeme namespace as this is information generally included in dictionary. In one way or the other, the information needs to be there. The language (code) to use is debatable: should we repeat them for every lexeme language or just include them once. We opted for the later, but eventually, some language might include them in further detail.

Are users interested in them or not? If not, they can currently easily deselect them. It's unclear how the above hinders the user from contributing.

It does happen that the content of lexeme overlaps with Wikidata's items (e.g. senses on lexemes are also available on items, but we still add them). This for historic and other reasons: items are structured differently. --- Jura 19:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done per Jura1, would need a wider discussion about this before deleting. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:02, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Arabic numeral lexemes

Lexeme:L19330 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19331 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19332 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19333 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19334 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19335 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19336 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19337 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19338 (delete | history | links | logs)
Lexeme:L19339 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

These correspond to the items 0 (Q628001), 1 (digit) (Q3450386), 2 (Q3430563), 3 (Q3431160), 4 (Q4602749), 5 (Q10976211), 6 (Q10975598), 7 (Q10967277), 8 (Q10991374) and 9 (Q11033689). Arabic numeral system (Q176471) is not a language and items are more appropriate for language-independent concepts. Nikki (talk) 17:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

It's perfectly valid as content for lexeme namespace as this is information generally included in dictionaries. In one way or the other, the information needs to be there. The language (code) to use is debatable: should we repeat them for every lexeme language or just include them once. Here the later is done, but eventually, some language might include them in further detail.

Are users interested in them or not? If not, they can currently easily deselect them. It's unclear how the above hinders the user from contributing.

It does happen that the content of lexeme overlaps with Wikidata's items (e.g. senses on lexemes are also available on items, but we still add them). This for historic and other reasons: items are structured differently. --- Jura 19:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done per Jura1, would need a wider discussion about this before deleting. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q83807364

SoundCloud account (Q83807364): user account on SoundCloud: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not used Dartyytrad (talk) 21:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

seems to be used? unsure if those uses are legit. BrokenSegue (talk) 04:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

I listed one for deletion: Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q83807994.

some should probably be changed to "soundcloud" + soundcloud id. --- Jura 11:45, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

How is SoundCloud account not notable? It's the same as Facebook account (Q88008554) under social media account (Q102345381). Eurohunter (talk) 21:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done due to uses. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

items on without statements sitelink to redirect/frwiki

These items are currently unused and only link to a redirect at frwiki. None has any statements. This is part of the cleanup at Wikidata:Bistro#éléments sans déclarations. --- Jura 10:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

In my opinion they should be merged to other items instead of deleted.--GZWDer (talk) 13:23, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

As you seem to have created many of them could you so when possible? --- Jura 13:27, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

I have checked first ten of the list and:

two should be merged with item of the target
two should be merged with other item
four are valid separate topic
one (Q2819347) is strictly a Wikipedia article covering multiple topics (Q21484471) but the only sitelink is redirect, so it can be deleted
one (Q16524991) I can not tell what the topic is

--GZWDer (talk) 14:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

So it's duplicates (partially with redirects to the wrong item), disambiguations and topics without any reference or statement allowing to assess its notability or validity.

It's unclear if users could actually gain anything from these, especially if the conclusion is "should be merged with other item". --- Jura 10:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Comment a few items have been changed since, I can update the list prior to actual deletion. --- Jura 11:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done there seems to be no progress on this since last year, and it sounds like there's cleanup (merging) that needs to be done first before the rest could potentially be deleted. I suggest that @GZWDer, Jura1: return items to RfD that could be deleted individually, and/or propose a bulk deletion request after cleanup. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q109987797

Q109987797: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted realier by me for not meeting notability criteria, restored by @Bovlb: judging the item does meet those criteria. In my opinion the identifiers to Facebook and Google news (yielding an empty page), together with some links to advertorials or tiny interviews - not independent - are not sufficient. In addition the subject has been an LTA target and items on the subject has been deleted several times before. --Lymantria (talk) 06:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Delete SilentSpike (talk) 11:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Delete no external ids, only social media link, malformed --- Jura 11:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Comment @Jura1 added more social media links check Aroojakhan (talk) 08:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

social media links are more or less irrelevant to assess notability. --- Jura 11:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

for notability a person must have independent articles which i already mention in the property and also some below. Aroojakhan (talk) 12:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Comment I restored this item because it had a colourable claim to passing the notability criteria and had the potential for further improvement. That is sufficient to immunize an item from summary deletion and hence is sufficient for an undeletion request in the absence of any RFD. I was unaware that there was any history of this person being targeted by an LTA, but this isn't actually a reason for deletion so is not relevant to this discussion. This person does not appear to have been the subject of any past RFD. Bovlb (talk) 16:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

It is hard to search for them, but on Sheikh Asif items Q104438514 and Q104858389 have been subject of an RFD. Lymantria (talk) 18:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Good find. (I searched the RFD archive and these did not come up.) Neither had significant sources. Q104438514 had four identifiers not on the current version; I added three of them, but not the now-suspended Twitter account. Bovlb (talk) 19:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

If it's being added and re-added by users despite explicit prohibitions, this is very well a reason for deletion. Otherwise, we could just make site policy optional. --- Jura 12:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

@Jura1 I agree the property has been deleted in January when there was no source avail for the person but now i have added references also so i hope you will change your comment. Aroojakhan (talk) 13:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Did you create the previous items? --- Jura 16:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

no i dont but on articles you can check the date i see about him daily because i am an india . Aroojakhan (talk) 18:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Keep Hi as you mention there are few articles and not independent here i am sharing some which are independent and from good media maybe you dont find them on google and you have mention it has been deleted 2 times i am not expert but if you check both deletions has been done in jan and these are new articles please check and do needful https://www.etvbharat.com/urdu/jammu-and-kashmir/state/srinagar/sheikh-asif-in-conversation-with-etv-bharat-who-provides-free-it-education-to-kashmiri-youth/na20210403200318323 https://www.anandabazar.com/india/meet-srinagar-based-sheikh-asif-a-school-drop-who-established-his-own-it-company-dgtl-photogallery/cid/1310082 https://www.indiatoday.in/newsmo/video/-srinagar-meet-sheikh-asif-a-school-dropout-who-is-now-worth-2-5-crore-1866154-2021-10-18 https://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/started-with-a-salary-of-rs-1500-his-company-is-now-worth-rs-25-crore-jks-sheikh-asif-shares-his-success-story-550622.html https://www.5dariyanews.com/news/328604-Sheikh-Asif-Srinagar-School-dropout-turned-Entrepreneur-owns-an-IT-Company-based-in-UK Aroojakhan (talk) 05:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

@Aroojakhan: Thanks for coming up with these links, but can I ask you to ensure they are on the item, either as references on specific claims with reference URL (P854) or as top-level claims using described at URL (P973)? Bovlb (talk) 23:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

@ Bovlb: Will you please add one so that i can check how i have to add them. Aroojakhan (talk) 06:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

@Bovlb: The account of Aroojakhan has been locked. Lymantria (talk) 21:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Comment Aroojakhan locked as (another) sock of Hiefata/Thamesinfotech per enwiki SPI. Pahunkat (talk) 10:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q110627467

Q110627467: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not shown to be notable Tol (talk | contribs) @ 00:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q108000211

Q108000211: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails Wikidata:Notability, cleanup xwiki occurring — billinghurst sDrewth 12:11, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Not done since it's in use from multiple other items and has a Commons category. @billinghurst: you should clean those up first before re-requesting deletion. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q58827331

list of Manhunt characters (Q58827331): Wikimedia list article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Author's request Trade (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

@Trade: if you still want this deleted, would you mind orphaning it first? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Not done @Trade: I'm puzzled by why you didn't reply to @MSGJ: about this? But while it's in use, it shouldn't be deleted. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q107510053

Q107510053: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. — Afeef (talk) 09:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q107644070

Q107644070: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. — Afeef (talk) 09:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q110502220

Nikita Vasilyevich Smirnov (Q110502220): Russian programmer who gained his popularity thanks to the Saltpeter and Radio REDBOX projects.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable Jamie7687 (talk) 22:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item has a sitelink in enwikiquote. We cannot delete the item until the related sitelink has been deleted. @Jamie7687: Please nominate the page for deletion. --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:33, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Not done due to the sitelinks. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q110251214

Luis Cristóbal Carrasco Gatica (Q110251214): Marine biologist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability criteria Gymnicus (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

It's created for structural reason, that is Infobox and metadata on Commons. There were more than a dozen files which needed order.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Keep Valid category link. --RAN (talk) 05:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Not done, in use on Commons. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q108517090

Q108517090: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable entrepreneur. --Billy Jaz (talk) 23:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Not done seems to be in use at Moz (Q7389749). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q107405844

Q107405844: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. — Afeef (talk) 16:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Keep Keep. --JOestby (talk) 16:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Number of subscribers seem pretty marginal to establish notability. BrokenSegue (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q109829165

Q109829165: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Obvious spam Gikü (talk) 00:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q110891285

Q110891285: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Cross-wiki attempt to promote entity. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q59100932

Q59100932: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability recognizable Gymnicus (talk) 16:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Another small note: Before anyone here wants to justify the relevance with the Creator template in Wikimedia Commons, this template was also proposed for deletion (Commons:Deletion requests/Creator:Esculapio) and was only kept because a Wikidata item was then created. So the Wikidata object is responsible for the Creator template still existing. --Gymnicus (talk) 16:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

I deleted the Creator template first, then the Wikidata item. Only used for three photos, it wasn't needed. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q68659012

Remulazz (Q68659012): lettera27 Foundation Wikimedian in Residence: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability recognizable Gymnicus (talk) 16:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

This one is needed for the automated table here to work: meta:Wikimedian_in_residence#History_and_case_studies. T.Shafee(evo&evo) (talk) 22:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

I see it differently and the page you linked does too. There is the following sentence in front of the table you mentioned: “Below is a table of current and previous Wikimedians in residence according to their Wikidata entries. Wikimedians without are not included.” – The second sentence is particularly important. The list does not claim to be complete. Instead, only those Wikimedians in Residence who have received a Wikidata item through their notability are displayed in the list. The data object proposed here for deletion does not meet the notability criteria. --Gymnicus (talk) 10:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

The table used to be manually maintained and frequently out of date and switching over the using wikidata has reduced workload by 95%, so I think it satisfies a structural need. Making a partial list would be pretty unhelpful, since then a separate manual table would still need to be maintained. The alternative would be to create an item 'Wikimedians in residence' and list each as 'has part'. T.Shafee(evo&evo) (talk) 04:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Not done seems to be notable. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q110911269, Q110911271, Q110911274

Q110911269: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q110911271: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q110911274: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Youtube videos that seems not to be notable since they are without any external identifiers that could be grounds for notability, no references and no incoming links. Ping Lectrician1 who created these items. --Ainali (talk) 22:38, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

I remain confused why these need to exist separate from the videos items themselves. BrokenSegue (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

To track viewership over time. I would like to use such data in Wikipedia articles where it is mentioned like Butter (song)#Music video and List of most-viewed YouTube videos. Lectrician1 (talk) 23:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Viewership over time is better tracked in Wikimedia Commons. Wikidata is a poor place for tabular data. Ainali (talk) 08:19, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

That's not an excuse not to have it. Wikidata being an unstructured database has significant benefits over tabular data when it comes to editing and querying. It's much easier to add data than it is a table that expects values and say querying for "the views of all YouTube videos that have less than 2000 likes by person x who has occupation y" is much easier with SPARQL. Also, just having all the data in one place is really nice. We can't have YouTube video items and their ontological properties easily link to tables if we store all the data on Commons. Lectrician1 (talk) 20:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Well, "To track viewership over time." does not create notability. There are plenty of things Wikidata could do if we cram in specific kinds of data into it. But this is not a discussion about usefulness, but about notability, and those two are decoupled, however great one of them is. Ainali (talk) 11:29, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

I still don't get why this data can't be on the videos' items. A separate item isn't needed. BrokenSegue (talk) 20:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

How else are you supposed to logically store multiple values of number of viewers/listeners (P5436) at different point in time (P585)? Lectrician1 (talk) 11:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

@Ainali: I agree with Lectrician1 on this: "We can't have YouTube video items and their ontological properties easily link to tables if we store all the data on Commons.". This is just one advantage that would bring creating items for YouTube videos. I've described some other advantages in this request for comment: Creating items for videos at online video platforms that are representation of notable items. I'd appreciate you could share your thoughts there too.

As for using Commons for storing tabular data: I think doing this might be helpful for some scenarios (e.g. a governmental institution provides multiple CSV dataset of the population in a given country) but I don't think doing this should be enforced on all users that want to contribute to Wikidata. Finally, note that there are properties that are also used for storing tabular data and that are widely used in Wikidata items. See population (P1082), number of cases (P1603) and number of recoveries (P8010). -- Rdrg109 (talk) 00:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

@BrokenSegue: Creating Wikidata items for YouTube videos could provide major advantages to the community. One of them being the one mentioned by @Lectrician1: storing multiple values of number of viewers/listeners (P5436) in an organized way. I've described this advantage and some other advantages in this request for comments: Creating items for videos at online video platforms that are representation of notable items. I'd appreciate you could take a look at it and share your thoughts there too. -- Rdrg109 (talk) 00:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

YouTube videos meet the notability requirement of "a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity". They are cited and have dedicated sections in numerous Wikipedia articles. Examples of prominent YouTube videos could be things like the famous "YouTube Rewinds" or even articles dedicated YouTube videos themselves. Lectrician1 (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

I have added a reference to Q110911269 Lectrician1 (talk) 23:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Extending this request to all these items below. This is a query for all YouTube video (Q63412991) without a single reference and no incoming links (as I am writing this, it has 22 results):

SELECT ?item ?label WHERE {
  ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q63412991.
  MINUS {?incoming ?prop ?item .}
  MINUS {?item ?propref [ prov:wasDerivedFrom [ ?ref ?reference ] ] }
  SERVICE wikibase:label {
    bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en" . 
    ?item rdfs:label ?label
  }
}

Try it!

However, it looks like some that do have references only have retrieved (P813) (like I don't want everybody to vote (Q98749513)) or a reference to youtube itself (like The Cellist of Sarajevo (Q94607867)) and then the major bulk of all items that are an instance of WD:Q63412991 is a batch import of 743 videos where the only reference only seem to support that the YouTube channel are making videos like the item rather than supporting they made that specific item. So while the statement is true, the reference does not support it and is kind of false. Left should be only a handful of items, that do have a proper source. Ainali (talk) 08:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Keep These videos are representations of notable items and having dedicated items for YouTube videos (in general, videos at online video platform) could bring major benefits to the community. For discussion on this, please refer to this Request for comment: Creating items for videos at online video platforms that are representation of notable items.

What need to be improved in the items, though, are the references in the statements. I've already added some references to some of them (mainly in number of viewers/listeners (P5436) by using retrieved (P813), archive date (P2960) and archive URL (P1065))). -- Rdrg109 (talk) 00:54, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Done @Lectrician1, Ainali, BrokenSegue, Rdrg109: I've deleted these items since there is no indication that they are notable, both in the items themselves and in this discussion, and the data doesn't seem to be used anywhere. You need to get more support at the RfC for it to pass - and if that happens then I'd be open to undeleting these items. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q110943378

Gabriela Chelariu (Q110943378): Romanian perfumer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability Sjö (talk) 09:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

She is a senior perfumer at the largest privately owned fragrance company and has designed many perfumes for several brands. In my opinion she “can be described using serious and publicly available references”. -- Meisam (talk) 09:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

It is a judgement call, but in my opinion LinkedIn and the sparse information on the employer's web site is not enough. Are there any more sources? Perhaps sources reviewing her perfumes and at least mentioning her name? Sjö (talk) 10:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

@Sjö: She has formulated perfumes for Abercrombie & Fitch, Allsaints, Avon, Harajuku Lovers, Jennifer Lopez, etc. so there are reviews, interviews, and news articles around. Here’s a few: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] -- Meisam (talk) 15:11, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Keep The link to the company's own website means we have a reliable source. --RAN (talk) 05:06, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Not done This is borderline, but RAN's point about the reliable source makes me inclined to keep this. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q54564212 and Q54564221

Q54564212: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q54564221: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The members of de:Some & Any (Q2299633) are de:Vanessa Meisinger (Q15852436) and de:Leonardo Ritzmann (not item yet) and not Q54564212 and Q54564221. Fomafix (talk) 09:16, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:30, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

I removed the links on Q2299633. Fomafix (talk) 10:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Done Neither seem to be notable. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q101535287

Crane Creations Theatre Company (Q101535287): professional theatre company based in Mississauga: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this notable? BrokenSegue (talk) 03:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

The connected people are also not notable. BrokenSegue (talk) 03:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Keep The theater is a member of the Professional Association of Canadian Theatres. The performers also have credits in the theater productions. --RAN (talk) 07:11, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Not done Seems notable per RAN, data is in use. Better to nominate the connected items for deletion first, then come back to this later if appropriate. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q111018950

Q111018950: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 07:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q111018674

Q111018674: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Rockpeterson (talk) 07:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q111018051

Q111018051: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional , not notable Rockpeterson (talk) 07:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q111018836

Q111018836: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Bettel (Q30701201)

Item refers to a hill in Berlin, Germany; but coordinates are in Thuringia, Germany. A hill with that name exist at neither of those. --Arjoopy (talk) 12:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

@Arjoopy The sitelink in cebwiki have to be deleted first. Fralambert (talk) 23:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Not done since it has a sitelink, if the cebwiki article is deleted then this could also be deleted. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q109664271

Q109664271: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, Advertising ComeBacks (talk) 13:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q108912847

Q108912847: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty Rockpeterson (talk) 19:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q111025925

Q111025925: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item about living person with questionable notability created by a new account. Abbe98 (talk) 10:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Q111025905

Q111025905: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item about real person with questionable notability, the item seems to be created by the person which it is about. Abbe98 (talk) 12:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)