Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/06/19

Of what? And in either case, if it is, merge rather than RfD. For more information, have a look at Help:Merge. Thanks! Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 00:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Nikki, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107291499

Q107291499: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N, the eswiki entry is RfDd. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 01:40, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107291516

Q107291516: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 01:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Nikki (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107291550

Q107291550: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 01:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Nikki (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107291657

Q107291657: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person, not used in any projects. Deleted many times before, yet another go at creating a presence here Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:03, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Taketa (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107271102

Q107271102: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Xezbeth (talk) 05:40, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Taketa (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q61928249

Q61928249: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not-notable item. Article in ruwiki was deleted for this
— Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 10:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Jianhui67 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107293372

Q107293372: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 10:43, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107067497

Category:Capela de San Mauriz (inside view) (Q107067497): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This was imported from a Commons category. The correct item is Q107067496 --Francians (talk) 12:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Merged – we don't delete duplicate content here, but merge it. See Help:Merge for detail.

Q99032797

Röne (Q99032797): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does this "family name" exist? there is nothing connected to it. Quakewoody (talk) 22:09, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

This is a German surname but it's extremely rare - only two persons bear it in western federated states of Germany (I can provide a source but it is not directly related to surnames in Germany).
In short, I'm not sure there are would be many notable persons with the surname Röne. --Wolverène (talk) 05:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

I guess the only one more-or-less known is this guy: [1][2], doesn't appear to be a notable one. --Wolverène (talk) 05:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Keep wikidata only cares that it exists, not that it is widespread. --RAN (talk) 07:55, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

It may not be notable if the number of those with the surname can be count by both hands' fingers and none of them are acceptable by the criteria. So seems no structural need. What's for reliable sources describing the subject, I couldn't find anything except this (it just shows that there are no Röne's in Luxembourg and only two surname bearers in borderline areas of Germany, undated but I guess as of 1980-90s). --Wolverène (talk) 19:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete Do we need surnames which are not used for any human in WD and have no references? --Haansn08 (talk) 10:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

You mean like Kucuk (Q37207308)? These items (like Kucuk) are fake names; delete'm all. --E4024 (talk) 18:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Kucuk (Q37207308) has attested in (P5323), which serves as a reference. Peter James (talk) 13:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Keep ideally https://lfa.uni.lu would be made into a ref. --- Jura 12:44, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep it exists. --Palaangelino (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Not deleted per above --DannyS712 (talk) 22:25, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q67173541

Q67173541: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Haansn08 (talk) 12:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q47486402

Q47486402: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Bardhi, he is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Keep Notableness in Wikidata isn't the same a notableness in Wikipedia. Matlin (talk) 18:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Delete I don't see how any of the points at WD:N are fulfiled. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references.

Google Knowledge Graph is this refer. Matlin (talk) 10:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Google Knowledge Graph ID (P2671) is marked as Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320). --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Delete no reference supports this please add some otherwise it fails notability.--Robflick (talk) 19:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC) Fails notability so Delete --WMEOIRHGU (talk) 18:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q105474992

Q105474992: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only sources seem to be self-published, says all albums were published on soundcloud (with two tracks nearly empty), I'm afraid seems not too notable --CamelCaseNick (talk) 03:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q96698189

Q96698189: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Based on Crossref data where author is "Crossref Test"; likely to be test item in the database and not an entry for a real journal. Peter James (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q105988349

Q105988349: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Delete useless "scientific articles"

These are mostly imported via PMCID by LargeDatasetBot. There are some false positives in there. The list of garbage can be found using filters like in this query that I have found to be effective. There are probably tens of thousands of items that fall in this category. They all have no back links and are typical journal stuff like these: CORRECTION (Q93629317) Medical News (Q93831600)--So9q (talk) 08:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

They could be useful, no reason to delete. There should probably be a link between Q93629317 and Q93629209, for example. Peter James (talk) 21:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Not done per Peter James, although I'm sure with a better refined and more well-defined list of items it could be better actioned. Mahir256 (talk) 20:16, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

Q106378500 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q106328403 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q102113866 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q106396450 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q106204664 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q105984952 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

This cluster of items was created by the same user, using multiple accounts, for promotional purposes only. Hoo man (talk) 09:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Q105984952

Keep I don't see any reason for deletion here. The film has not yet been released. But he should do it this year. In addition, the publication could also make it relevant for example for the German Wikipedia, for example if it is shown in the cinema. --Gymnicus (talk) 10:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Q102113866

Keep Because he plays in the film Q105984952, he should be relevant for a Wikipedia article, for example in the German-language Wikipedia. In addition, the third relevance criterion should meet him here in Wikipedia, because the statement Q105984952cast member (P161)Q102113866 should be given in the film object. Still, the data object should be cleaned up a bit, that's true. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

I agree that they might be formally notable (especially Q105984952), but all of the sources seem to be created by the same person (who also created the items), thus making them very questionable references. --Hoo man (talk) 12:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

All eventually

Done Mahir256 (talk) 20:14, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107028529

Q107028529: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability, promotional. -- Emu (talk) 16:51, 30 May 2021 (UTC) Keep please let me know about promotional parts he is notable for wikidata as he is mentioned in number of google news and also his website is the google news source and he has imdb and knowledge panel and he own registered business he is notable as he is featured and also he has verified social media Carldesselr (talk) 22:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Keep He is clearly notable for wikidata. look at guidelines of wikidata. Everything there is only fact with references there is not a promotional contant (talk) 22:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

- Keep To me clearly notable due to Wikidata:Notability, Valid Amazon author ID, Valid Google Knowledge Graph ID, Valid Google News publication ID, Valid Google News topics ID and Valid IMDb ID. I searched even Google he has featured in more than 15 Reliable Magazine. Like Forbes India, La weekly, International Business Times, Yahoo Finance,etc.--Robflick (talk) 22:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Delete spam. Also 3 "keep" vote from new acounts seem suspicious. --Fralambert (talk) 22:49, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

- - @Fralambert New users Have the same right as olders when they are writing about someone notable. All due respect If you have problem wth users do not take it ITEM itself. I just metioned facts about item. This is not suspetious just check yourself please you will see eveything i metioned is real. Valid Amazon author ID, Valid Google Knowledge Graph ID, Valid Google News publication ID, Valid Google News topics ID and Valid IMDb ID. I searched even Google he has featured in more than 15 Reliable Magazine. Like Forbes India, La weekly, International Business Times, Yahoo Finance,etc. Thanks a lot for your consideration in advance.--Robflick (talk) 08:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep Seams notable to me for Wikidata based on Wikidata:Notability. I checked his sources he has been featured in reliable sources. Enough Notability For Wikidata.--Jafarebadi (talk) 08:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep Seams notable, has a reliable ID.--WMEOIRHGU (talk) 13:20, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep He has valid identifiers and Verified social media. I searched a bit about this item, looks acceptable in general.--MERLINMAR (talk) 21:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
[3] - is this the Forbes India article mentioned above? This one seems like an anonymously contributed article when it says "No Forbes India journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article." I don't think advertorials count as serious sources describing the person which is required per WD:N#2.whym (talk) 12:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

@Whym This type of articles are called as Brand Content and totally acceptable as a reference in WIKIPEDIA let alone Wikidata. Because if this is not acceptable half of Wikipedia pages must be removed. I can List lots of people that have the same references on their Wikipedia page or here in Wikidata and approved. Also, this item has a lot of other coverage in the media enough notability. --Carldesselr (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

There is enough media coverage, so Keep--AlexCardone (talk) 20:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
This has been spiraling out into Q107128248 and Q107204058, which I think should be considered in this deletion request as a whole with Q107028529 above. whym (talk) 12:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

- All due respect, there are more than 20 reliable articles about him just check google news, what I mean by reliable is that all of his articles like laweekly.com and dozens of others have Wikipedia! If you check other people in Wikidata they do not even have one. I can list it here for you if you are a concerned citizen! So be realistic and do not let your emotions take over.--AlexCardone (talk) 20:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
  - @AlexCardone: With all due respect, there seems to be not a single piece of information that isn’t user-generated or paid for (“brand content”) on the internet. There is simply no independent coverage of this person. If I’m wrong, please provide a single link with serious, independent information. --Emu (talk) 21:04, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Firstly, Not all brand content is paid! This is a way that a newspaper writes about a person without taking future probable risks. Secondly, if you do not accept brand contents then you must remove 75 percent of Wikidata. 60 percent of today's so-called artists and actors are just brand content!!! Look at so many people who just have a Spotify id and have one WIKIDATA. As I said if you dig deeper you will find more than enough websites which are NOT even "brand content" that imply notability in wikidata. Here is one you asked for https://www.ibtimes.sg/reza-abbaszadeh-who-owns-operates-abbaszadeh-enterprises-about-make-his-next-big-move-social-56908 and one more for you: https://www.ibtimes.co.in/youngest-iranian-businessman-reza-abbaszadeh-823836 I am sure that you all know that having a wikidata is not so important but just I am just trying to sort this out. If you decide on deletion, then go ahead and delete it because it will not affect me or even this person. A lot of people make a wikidata to have a google knowledge panel but he already has a complete one which you can find it in the identifier section. Stage is all yours.--AlexCardone (talk) 23:07, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

The links you provided seem very much like advertising to me. --Emu (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep He has notobility. besides eveything, he is featued in Entrepreneur Magazine --WMEOIRHGU (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107060540

Q107060540: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional Rockpeterson (talk) 06:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q95979242

Q95979242: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 15:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q75308583

James Pelham (Q75308583): (born 1994): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The Wikidata page is about me. I did not agree to have this information publicly available. Please take it down. --93.86.95.225 09:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:40, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I don't see many statements in the data object that would make it relevant. That's why I would support the deletion.

Delete --Gymnicus (talk) 12:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

It has structural need.

Keep --Infovarius (talk) 22:46, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep part of a genealogy. --RAN (talk) 16:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

per Wikidata:Living_people, this item should be removed... living people have a right to their privacy --Hsarrazin (talk) 06:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Not done as the complaint of the user should be with the two sites with identifiers linked to him which continue to publish information about him. Once that information is removed from those sites, we can litigate this further. Mahir256 (talk) 20:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106771558

Q106771558: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears like self-promotion. Wolverène (talk) 06:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Delete, looks like blank self-promotion. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107225741

Q107225741: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 11:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106860648

Q106860648: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability, promotional Emu (talk) 11:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107242418

Q107242418: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N/spam/junk Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 12:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q86431843

Don't want my name here, i can prove its my information. I'm also delete my ORCID profile so just tell me how and i prove. i want to remove my data from here. thanks --46.116.3.250 14:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

It appears the ORCID has been deactivated, but the Google Scholar and ResearchGate remain. I have some hesitation in taking this request at face value because of the timing. This request comes just after the deletion of Q106870050, a self-authored item by a distinct person of the same name who not only tried to repurpose Q86431843 but also repeatedly requested the deletion of Q86431843 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). While I am sensitive to privacy concerns, this request does not claim or describe any. Bovlb (talk) 17:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I asked to delete the profiles from there as well. Here's proof that this is my profile: ‏https://ibb.co/7SLKfyV

I found instructions here for how to delete your own Google Scholar profile. It looks like a quick and easy process. Sorry to be so suspicious of you, but we have already had someone putting prolonged effort into deleting this item as part of their own SEO campaign, so we have to be careful. You should also be aware that, while we value the dignity of living people, you do not control your Wikidata item, and we do not need your permission to have a Wikidata item about you. Bovlb (talk) 18:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

I just want to delete my information please..

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Note that OP deleted three incoming links to this item. Reverted and warned. Bovlb (talk) 19:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

It's because I want to delete my name.

Keep My conclusion here is "keep".

Even if we take this report at face value, they easily pass notability criterion 3 as an author of 17 reified papers. There is no obvious privacy concern. If we did delete them, they would probably get recreated by one of the various academic paper importers.
There are strong reasons not to take this report at face value. We already know that the subject of Q106870050 has been trying to get this item deleted for a long time in order to improve their own ranking in Google search results. If the subject were truly trying to erase their online footprint, they would have deleted their Google Scholar and ResearchGate accounts by now. Having said that, the deactivation of the ORCID is significant; I don't know how easy it would be to have someone else's ORCID deactivated, even if you had the same name.

Bovlb (talk) 21:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

In general, I agree with the first argument, and I think it's sufficient to

Keep on its own. By way of

Comment: the Google Scholar screenshot looks like mine when I'm logged in, and in general deactivating an ORCiD requires being logged in, so I'm not so sure about the second. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 01:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

@Ari T. Benchaim: I agree that the screenshot appears to show their Google Scholar page as it would if they were logged in. I don't want to get deep into image forensics here, but I think this would be fairly easy to forge. (I note that the avatar image is stretched to a different aspect ratio, the TIFF/software field in the metadata says it was generated by Adobe Photoshop, and the subject of Q106870050 also has a Google Scholar page.) Bovlb (talk) 02:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

No, this is not Photoshop. This is a picture I have from my account. I don’t have access to the email anymore. So I asked them to delete the account, it will take a few days. But like I said I can prove it's my information. So can you help me?

Keep No more and no less info in their Wikidata entry than on their university department profile. If deleted one of the bots would recreate it from Google Scholar or ResearchGate, and we may end up with two entries that need to be merged. We also have the problem that when this Wikidata entry was hijacked by the Apple technician, Google conflated the two, and still displays the image of the technician for the biologist. I think that error will remain, and Wikidata is needed to clarify the confusion. --RAN (talk) 05:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Not deleted per above, appears to meet notability rules --DannyS712 (talk) 22:17, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107256639

Q107256639: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 23:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106869745

Q106869745: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated and not paid-for (branded content) information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 10:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Delete, no reason for notability. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 12:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107261766

Q107261766: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 12:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107261642

Q107261642: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N, self-promotion, spam. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 12:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q20737391

Wikipedian of the Year, 2015 (Q20737391): awarded 'in pectore': (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No relevance recognizable. --2003:DA:1719:3E3B:3869:F0B2:E257:ADC6 20:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep - this is a person whose identity has not been disclosed but who is definitely notable as the abstract notion of Wikipedian of the Year. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 20:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Not deleted we may not know who it was, but the item still meets the notability rules --DannyS712 (talk) 22:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q10306278

Q10306278: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable item (Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (Q10964165)). Francisco (talk) 00:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep Seem to have a notability, like this article[4] in French. --Fralambert (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Withdrawn, per Fralambert. --Francisco (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Not done --Fralambert (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107272756

Q107272756: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 15:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107272410

Q107272410: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N? A little unsure, as she may have links in her native language. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 15:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107273672

Q107273672: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Seems largely promotional in nature Mahir256 (talk) 16:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Delete. Wikipedia promoting himhelf. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106892613

Q106892613: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. Emu (talk) 21:20, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106902675

Q106902675: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any information that wasn’t (1) user-generated (2) paid-for or (3) vanity journalism / branded content. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 21:23, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106900996

Q106900996: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Emu (talk) 21:25, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:31, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106904631

Q106904631: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any information that wasn’t (1) user-generated (2) paid-for or (3) vanity journalism / branded content. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 21:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106906903

Q106906903: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any information that wasn’t (1) user-generated (2) paid-for or (3) vanity journalism / branded content. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 21:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106906591

Q106906591: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any information that wasn’t (1) user-generated (2) paid-for or (3) vanity journalism / branded content. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 21:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106905775

Q106905775: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any information that wasn’t (1) user-generated (2) paid-for or (3) vanity journalism / branded content. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 21:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106908317

Q106908317: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any information that wasn’t (1) user-generated (2) paid-for or (3) vanity journalism / branded content. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 21:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107279872

Q107279872: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N, sources are primarily 'branded content' and vanity journalism, even if they are in otherwise reputable papers. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 21:53, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107279944

Q107279944: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 21:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107280812

Q107280812: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 22:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q99405403

Q99405403: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This items doesn't meet notability criteria of Wikidata. Also this person misleading and cheating people by making fake profile on Google like Knowledge graph etc, created via Wikidata

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107283501

Q107283501: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 07:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Delete, I have not found any reliable third party sources on him. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 13:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107283374

Q107283374: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N? Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 13:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107287936

Q107287936: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 15:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107288104

Q107288104: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 15:22, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107287275

Q107287275: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated and not paid-for (branded content) information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107285960

Q107285960: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated and not paid-for (branded content) information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107285858

Q107285858: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated and not paid-for (branded content) information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107287332

Q107287332: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated and not paid-for (branded content) information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106938556

Q106938556: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated and not paid-for (branded content) information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 16:22, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107281027

Q107281027: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability. Sun8908 💬 16:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106938398

Q106938398: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated and not paid-for (branded content) information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 16:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106939487

Q106939487: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated and not paid-for (branded content) information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 16:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107194746

Q107194746: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 16:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Not sure, but I doubt. I remember him from Commons, not the first attempt. --E4024 (talk) 00:13, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Delete Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 16:02, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Delete Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 16:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107289418

Q107289418: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N, been deleted several times. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 19:25, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107290672

Q107290672: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N, self-promotion. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 20:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107288999

Q107288999: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 20:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q76842629

Q76842629: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only sitelink was speedy-deleted more than a year ago (w:es:Keith Carson); zero references; only incoming link is to differentiate from someone else with the same name --Quesotiotyo (talk) 22:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107232882

Q107232882: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability policy, just another person with a YouTube channel. ✗plicit 01:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Q3709387

Q3709387: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

As explained in these discussions on de-wiki. en-wiki, and it-wiki, the subject of this entry is a hoax. There are no remaining sitelinks. If you're curious, the original en-wiki article is available here. --Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)