Wikidata:Bot requests/Archive/2013/08
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Fix value item in property
Can someone, replace made from material (P186): oil painting (Q174705) with made from material (P186): oil paint (Q296955) (the first item is about the technique, the second about the material). Side note, it would be great if there was a bot that could be fed with a list "frequently needed fixes" that could be run once in a while - or continuously. --Zolo (talk) 07:28, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- My bot could do this he also checks GND and Gender and some other properties. I am also currently running a task to check every item for double entered values. I will add this check, too. I can also add other fixes, too. --Sk!d (talk) 11:05, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- My bot has made a run. I also proposed a bot approval for your idea of a list for "frequently needed fixes" at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Sk!dbot 3.
- This section was archived on a request by: done --Sk!d (talk) 10:42, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Some of the 95 strings listed there just need the "cb" removed. -- Docu at 21:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Manually corrected all non-functional ones, including all the cb-prefixed ones. LaddΩ chat;) 14:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: LaddΩ chat;) 14:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Can anybody add this template to all categories on commons which are linked from wikidata? It can prevent deleting these categories without adding new link to WD. JAn Dudík (talk) 08:50, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- We can wait for Commons sitelinks, IMHO. --Ricordisamoa 00:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: -- Docu at 04:37, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
This property can import is data from fr:Modèle:Wdpa. (1727 transclusions) --Fralambert (talk) 04:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
- Doing from {{Infobox Aire protégée}} with wd_import.py. --Ricordisamoa 01:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Done for all linked and non-conflicting pages; we have now 1684 occurrences of WDPA ID (P809) on items; some others still need to be checked manually. --Ricordisamoa 16:44, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Tanks --Fralambert (talk) 03:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- Done for all linked and non-conflicting pages; we have now 1684 occurrences of WDPA ID (P809) on items; some others still need to be checked manually. --Ricordisamoa 16:44, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: -- Docu at 04:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The property could be added based on "ID" in en:Template:Infobox World Heritage Site (template has currently 1098 transclusions, the property just 36 uses). -- Docu at 06:27, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: -- Docu at 07:03, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Taxon category merges
Could a bot potentially merge all of these (non-conflicting ones) and then nominate the empties for a bulk deletion? It would save a lot of user time doing this automatically rather than manually. Del♉sion23 (talk) 17:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- My merge.py script can do that (discussion), I'll run it ASAP. --Ricordisamoa 17:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- All done! (deleted the items by myself) Regards, --Ricordisamoa 23:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- Great work Ricordi! That was quite a backlog we had there. Thanks for fixing it! :D Though you're not going to like the news that there is another page at User:Byrial/Category+name merge/ceb-war-Animalia that also has a backlog :( apologies. If you create a list of emptied items i'd be fine with helping out with the deleting part. Del♉sion23 (talk) 23:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- I already knew that, and already merged many of those too. But that is not related to this request BTW, actually my script deletes the items by itself --Ricordisamoa 00:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Running on ceb-war-Animalia now. --Ricordisamoa 00:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Awesome :) Thanks. Del♉sion23 (talk) 00:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Completed --Ricordisamoa 16:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Great stuff :) Thanks! Del♉sion23 (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Completed --Ricordisamoa 16:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Awesome :) Thanks. Del♉sion23 (talk) 00:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Great work Ricordi! That was quite a backlog we had there. Thanks for fixing it! :D Though you're not going to like the news that there is another page at User:Byrial/Category+name merge/ceb-war-Animalia that also has a backlog :( apologies. If you create a list of emptied items i'd be fine with helping out with the deleting part. Del♉sion23 (talk) 23:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Ricordisamoa 18:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Move statements
Per Wikidata:Properties for deletion, P100 (P100) is due to be deleted. Can a bot move X: P100 (P100): Y
to Y: member of (P463): X
? --Zolo (talk) 10:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- I'm doing some tests now: diff --Ricordisamoa 20:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please remember to also move the connected qualifiers. --Yair rand (talk) 21:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- Running... examples: adding qualifier and removing migrated claims. --Ricordisamoa 23:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- orphanized and deleted. Regards, --Ricordisamoa 02:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- Running... examples: adding qualifier and removing migrated claims. --Ricordisamoa 23:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please remember to also move the connected qualifiers. --Yair rand (talk) 21:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Ricordisamoa 12:54, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The above property could be added to the 2581 items mentioned at Constraint_violations/P359. -- Docu at 06:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- How could you be sure that all items should have geographical feature (Q618123) for P107? We should import this only from other sources by bot instead of just adding it without checking. --Sk!d (talk) 02:06, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Should we? If you found an issue with Rijksmonument ID (P359), I think you might want to tell Multichill about it. I think he added them in the first place. -- Docu at 06:43, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- P107 (P107) is going to be deleted. GerardM (talk) 13:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --ValterVB (⧼Talkpagelinktext) 15:05, 11 October 2013 (UTC)⧽
The property could be added based on no:Template:Kulturminne (template has currently 2329 transclusions, the property just 13 uses). nn:Template:Kulturminne (527 transclusions) might give additional ones. -- Docu at 11:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- Being done: Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/DanmicholoBot. -- Docu at 22:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
:This section was archived on a request by: Danmichaelo (⧼Talkpagelinktext) 20:54, 22 October 2013 (UTC)⧽
move values from one property to another
The 77 incorrect values listed at Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P605#"Format" violations should be values not to Property:P605 but to Property:P782. Could a bot please move these 77 values from Property:P605 to Property:P782? --UV (talk) 19:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- :This section was archived on a request by: UV (⧼Talkpagelinktext) 14:04, 11 October 2013 (UTC)⧽
Cleanup
Could you remove instance of (P31) = monument historique inscrit (Q10387575) and/or classified historical monument (Q10387684) when P132 (P132) = commune of France (Q484170) please? I've made an incomplete request to Legobot which creates some errors... Thanks. Ayack (talk) 21:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
- Anyone? — Ayack (talk) 11:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done --Zuphilip (talk) 21:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Zuphilip! — Ayack (talk) 09:37, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done --Zuphilip (talk) 21:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: тнояsтеn ⇔ 10:13, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
import identifiers for chemicals and drugs
I have seen that there are already authority control properties for drugs and chemicals but are not used much. They can be added from drugbox infobox on each article by Bots. See en:w:Diclofenac for example where there are 10 identifiers but not added to wikidata q244408. I added 2 on it. There are thousands of chemicals and drugs. Big bulk editing opportunity for Bots. :) --Nizil Shah (talk) 19:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose without sources. Snipre (talk) 15:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Remove undifferentiated GND entries in Property:P227
VIAFBot imported hundreds of thousands of GND identifiers from w:de:Template:Normdaten on de.wikipedia. Only individualized GND entries should be stored in Wikidata, though, and since our German template is still used with a couple of thousand non-individualized entries (those that just feature a "name", not an individualized "person"), a couple of thousand entries on Wikidata are wrong, too. We are in the course of updating our de.wikipedia templates in all these cases, but it's necessary to manually inspect all of these cases, and we're not entirely done yet. Hence the Bot somewhat prematurely imported those numbers. So here's my request: I'd like a bot to remove all GND identifiers on Wikidata that are also featured in this huge list of undifferentiated GND identifiers (zipped text file, zipped file size 15 MB) from Wikidata Property:P227. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 08:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
I went through a couple of them. Quite a few seems to have en_wiki sitelinks.
If a bot could complete the labels as MediaWiki:Gadget-slurpInterwiki.js does, this would probably reduce the list. -- Docu at 12:18, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, that should be quite simple. I'll write up something as soon as I've completed (or at least in a trial state with) a script that I'm working on now. Hazard-SJ ✈ 02:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks.
- Seems to be a re-occurring thing. There are more that could use it. -- Docu at 21:57, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
ISBN 13 format
Most the 515 strings listed on Wikidata:Database_reports/Constraint_violations/P212#.22Format.22_violations just need four "-" inserted. -- Docu at 21:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
'/doc' in template items
I request that a bot (or bots) removes '/doc' from links. Example.Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please see Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/SamoaBot 37. Regards, --Ricordisamoa 00:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- I hope you don't forget about labels. Infovarius (talk) 12:47, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: GZWDer (⧼Talkpagelinktext) 15:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)⧽
Import of Swedish urban area code (P775)
Can somebody help with adding Swedish urban area code (P775) for Swedish urban areas. It can be found in sv:Mall:Ortsfakta Sverige in parameter: tätortskod
. All these should also have P107 (P107):geographical feature (Q618123) and P17:Sweden (Q34). There are a few exceptions here, but I can handle those! -- Lavallentalk(block) 11:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
The property could be added based on "code" in en:template:Infobox observatory (template has currently 441 transclusions, the property 27 uses).
ru:Template:Обсерватория "Код" (currently 346 uses) might give additional ones. -- Docu at 21:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
The property could be added based on de:Template:SIKART (template has currently 425 transclusions, the property just 2 uses). Additional ones might be found through the other language versions on Template:SIKART (Q14375462), e. g. fr:Template:SIKART. -- Docu at 08:47, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
The property could be added based on en:Template:Infobox settlement. Sample values from en:Lufkin, Texas:
|blank_name = [[Federal Information Processing Standard|FIPS code]]
|blank_info = 48-45072{{GR|2}}
There are several hundred on en_wiki. -- Docu at 08:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Unique combinations from Special:LinkSearch may give elements to add for the property ("unique": articles with only one URL and id appearing in just one such article). -- Docu at 10:22, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
The property could be added based on UNNumber in en:Template:chembox (template has approx. 453 such numbers, the property just 1 use). -- Docu at 11:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
The above property could be added to the 25251 items mentioned at Constraint_violations/P649.
Further 37870 items can use instance of (P31) = cultural property (Q2065736), see details -- Docu at 06:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- Same as beneath. How can we tell if this value is correct isn't there another source? --Sk!d (talk) 02:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Have look at the property and the kind of items that use it. -- Docu at 06:36, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Labels from article titles
Based on the stats at User talk:Byrial/Language statistics for items, some 1.2 million labels could be generated from WP article titles. -- Docu at 18:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- C'est une estimation basse. Un grand nombre semble être dû à un seul robot, voir Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/EmausBot 2 suite à ma demande. Ljubinka (discussion) 11:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- It also happens if you create items manually with the interface language different from the iw language and you don't click "import interwiki (&labels)" at the end.
- Wikidata:Bot_requests#Special:EntitiesWithoutLabel.2Fen.2Fitem above is more or less the same issue.
- It something that can easily be fixed by bot. -- Docu at 13:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Set country for Italian comuni and Norwegian municipalities
Things with P132 (P132) set to commune of Italy (Q747074) should also have country (P17) Italy (Q38) and things with P132 (P132) set to municipality of Norway (Q755707) should have country (P17) Norway (Q20). There are quite a few that don't. I tried setting them by hand, but there are too many for me. --Nikki (talk) 06:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- This property could be set false. It would be better to import the State from a Wikipedia or another source. --Sk!d (talk) 02:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Alredy done for commune of Italy (Q747074). For other country I have added a new RFP. --ValterVB (talk) 07:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Italy seems mostly done.
- Items for Norway seem to remain: http://toolserver.org/~magnus/ts2/php/wd_query.php?q=[%22P132%22%2C%22Q755707%22%2C%22!Q20%22]
- You might want to try the "duplicate statements to category" feature of Wikidata:Tools#Wikidata_useful. -- Docu at 07:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Import P31 & P176 from en:Template:Infobox_automobile
I think should be a nice idea import property Property:P31 (istance of) and Property:P176 (manufacturer) into wikidata from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_automobile
For example Item Q622959 (Opel Kadett) has this template:
Infobox automobile
|image=Opel kadett ls crop.jpg
|name=Opel Kadett
|manufacturer=Opel <-------------- P176
|production=1937–1940, 1962-1991
|predecessor=Opel 1.3 litre
|successor=Opel Astra
|class=Small family car
|body_style=
|platform=
In wikidata for Q622959 we could set:
- Property:P31 (istance of) equal to Q1420 (automobile)
- Property:P176 (manufacturer) equal to Q40966 (Opel)
thanks LucaBiondi (talk) 13:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
RfC
Can somebody make a bot that posts a template in each project chat language that a new RfC is started. In the future the bot could maybe do this automatic every time a RfC is started. Wikidata:Requests for comment/Migrating away from GND main type --Tobias1984 (talk) 15:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- To me, it sounds like a job for EdwardsBot. -- Lavallentalk(block) 17:58, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- +1 for EdwardsBot. --Ricordisamoa 19:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Automatic descriptions for items with same name
- Go here
- Take "schematic" topics (e.g. "Ministry of Finance")
- Find items without English description
- Check pattern of English Wikipedia page, e.g. "Ministry of Finance (Greece)"
- Set description, e.g. "Ministry of Finance of Greece" (or the like)
– The preceding unsigned comment was added by Magnus Manske (talk • contribs).
- This is covered by SamoaBot 11, though I haven't run a trial so far. --Ricordisamoa 16:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Links to disambiguations
There are a few items with several links for the same meaning on User:Byrial/Used-disambiguations. -- Docu at 12:43, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh my. Possibly a good reason to make a special item type for non-items? Littledogboy (talk) 17:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- How should this be fixed with a bot? --Sk!d (talk) 11:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- There were a series of properties (for sports teams I think) that all linked to disambiguation pages. Replacing one item with another is sufficient.
- Note that the report currently cuts off most of its content (first 1000 of 4800 entries). -- Docu at 04:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The property could be added based on "codi" in ca:Plantilla:Infotaula del municipi espanyol (template has currently 5273 transclusions, the property just 2 uses). -- Docu at 05:20, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- I have taken a look, the template is widely used, but the parameter doesn't appear that often.--Micru (talk) 13:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- I went through a few other languages, it seems that only "cod_ine" in de:Template:Infobox Gemeinde in Spanien includes it as well. -- Docu at 15:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Values can be imported into GNIS Antarctica ID (P804) (if type=antarid) and GNIS Feature ID (P590) (all others). The template has currently 21096 transclusions. -- Docu at 07:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- en:Template:usgs-gazetteer is also used for the Antarctica IDs and could be imported as well, though quite a lot of transclusions are unfortunately missing the "id=" parameter. IMHO we need be to careful with both templates when they are used in references, as those don't necessarily refer to the article subject itself. --Kam Solusar (talk) 11:14, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- The "name" field from Template:GNIS should probably imported as a qualifier as well. -- Docu at 04:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Geographical coordinates from the Catalan Wikipedia
Could anyone import the geographical info from Template:Coord (Q6294369) in the Catalan wikipedia? There are a lot of items that could have their coordinates. Thanks!--Micru (talk) 19:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
w:de:Vorlage:Infobox Sprache (1827 uses) and w:en:Template:Infobox language (7912 uses) have ISO-639-1/2/3 data in them. The enwiki usage is a bit noisy because there's not a one-to-one matching between enwiki pages and ISO-639-3 codes (not to mention that some codes include other codes!), so it will have to be verified that it is a 3-letter code; the dewiki usage seems not to need the additional check, but it probably wouldn't hurt. KleptomaniacViolet (talk) 02:54, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- I decided to have a go myself. I'm getting the prototype ready for a test run now. KleptomaniacViolet (talk) 15:14, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
ISBN
Cite ISBN 13 format:
- Most the 515 strings listed on Wikidata:Database_reports/Constraint_violations/P212#.22Format.22_violations just need four "-" inserted. -- Docu at 21:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Can this bot run be repeated (see also: ISBN-10 = P957)? --Miredcessy (talk) 19:07, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- At the same time it would be good to convert ISBN-10 into ISBN-13, see this conversation.--Micru (talk) 19:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- I did some testedits and started a request for permission --Pasleim (talk) 20:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done All remaining format violations are either false positives or invalid isbn-13. --Pasleim (talk) 09:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Pasleim (⧼Talkpagelinktext) 18:16, 8 December 2013 (UTC)⧽
Remove obsolete imported from Wikimedia project (P143)->Wikipedia-based sources
imported from Wikimedia project (P143) is important to show from which Wikipedia a claim has been imported from. This allows to find the source of errors (e.g., Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations). Importing basic claims from Wikipedia is in turn important as an empty item has no information to identify itself. However, we all agree that Wikipedia is no "real" source to be used in Wikipedia and elsewhere again. Thus, all sources imported from Wikimedia project (P143)->Wikipedia where the claim is referenced by any other third party source should be removed. Ideally, in soon future, no imported from Wikimedia project (P143)->Wikipedia remain. This work should be performed continuously and, thus, by a bot living at Labs. Manual example edit: [1]. — Felix Reimann (talk) 08:09, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support Emw (talk) 02:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- No. I think it is still useful to indicate where it came from. -- Docu at 11:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per Docu. --Ricordisamoa 00:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)- Support It makes no sense to keep because it is an artifact of automated tasks - which bot was more active, such language is in front. Because the same statement can (and almost always) exist in multiple Wikipedias, emphasizing of particular language is not correct. --Infovarius (talk) 18:29, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Most of these „references“ are sensless or misleading or have now a „real“ source. --Succu (talk) 21:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I am not going to vote on this but I am going to say again here what I have already said on the project chat: Wikipedians are going to measure us by how many statements are sourced to Wikipedia. There are stats for exactly this here: http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/stats.php The trust in our data is one of the biggest issues we face and "imported from Wikipedia" is one of the biggest obstacles in gaining more trust. --Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) (talk) 21:36, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Oppose.It should be clear where a fact is coming from, regardless of whether the source is reliable or is an "artifact" or otherwise (per en:WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT). The only way to indicate that is the use of the "source", and in fact that's the best place for that information to reside.OTOH, I would certainly agree that a bot that detects multiple sources for a claim, at least one of which is not imported from, then the imported from claim should be removed. --Izno (talk) 23:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. --Yair rand (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Switch to support, because Felix was good enough to inform me that I apparently can't read. --Izno (talk) 14:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment One possibility to make everybody happy is to retain the historical information (which is useful for error correction among other things) but clearly distinguish it from real sources. Pichpich (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Oppose If it is meant to remove the source AND the claim the result will be an almost blank Wikidata. Also Oppose if it is meant to remove only the source but leave the claim without source it is very difficult to find the source (if any) form that wikipedia. HenkvD (talk) 18:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- I misinterpreted the request. Agreed to remove P143 if an other valid source is present. HenkvD (talk) 19:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Emot If a bot removes P143, when they add a "real" source, I agree. But just remove them en masse, would harm the traceability of discovered errors. I think the bots have to show not only which project they take the information from, but also which page and version. A url-property can be used together with P143 for that purpose. -- Lavallen (talk) 19:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose --Kizar (talk) 12:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. --Yair rand (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Yair rand, Lavallen, Izno: this is exactly what I tried to propose: In case of multiple sources for one specific statement, where at least one of the sources is based on a source according to Help:Sources (i.e., with stated in (P248)), any additional imported from Wikimedia project (P143) (i.e., pointing to where to statement came initially) should be removed. See my example: The statement had two sources, one based on P143, one based on P248 and thus, P143 can be safely removed in this case. — Felix Reimann (talk) 09:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm dumb. Good call. I'll switch me-self. I'll ping HenkvD and Ricordisamoa as well, because they also may have misunderstood. --Izno (talk) 14:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- I agree, that is what I tried to say above, but it was maybe Lost in Translation (Q107270). -- Lavallen (talk) 17:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm dumb. Good call. I'll switch me-self. I'll ping HenkvD and Ricordisamoa as well, because they also may have misunderstood. --Izno (talk) 14:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Conditional support on a case-by-case basis, provided that the bot will be explicitly designed to replace imported from Wikimedia project (P143) with Wikipedia-independent sources of which it can reasonably ensure the verifiability. There should be specifical tasks dealing with certain property sets (e.g. SuccuBot could do that for IUCN conservation status (P141)). --Ricordisamoa 00:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support. @Yair rand, Kizar: your oppose seems to be based on a misunderstanding of this proposal. Could you either elaborate your on your opinion or strike your oppose ? --Zolo (talk) 09:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Weak oppose: Just like on Wikipedia, sometimes Wikidata references will end up being unreliable, or will end up being based on a URL that dies. There is no guarantee that a single non-imported from Wikimedia project (P143) citation is going to perpetually remain better than a imported from Wikimedia project (P143) citation. Having multiple sources, and knowing what Wikipedia articles had information originally (since Wikipedia is supposed to have sources), might help recover more sources later. --Closeapple (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support —Wylve (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm not entirely convinced: If I find a claim is wrong (for example the source is reliable but misquoted) I not only correct the error in Wikidata, I also need to correct it in Wikipedia. Otherwise the same wrong claim will be reimported a few days or weeks later. --Kolja21 (talk) 23:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. No consensus in favour of this request. I'm marking this section as resolved so it can be archived. If you want to re-request this, please reach consensus first (on another page) and come back here. Multichill (talk) 18:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC) |