This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Property:P95

Hi, I've proposed Property:P95 for deletion here as the system is not yet ready to handle TimeValues. Delsion23 (talk) 00:45, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Deleted property

Hello,

I've deleted Property:P95 ("day of birth") per request at Wikidata:Requests for deletions because, "per discussion, date of birth will be done using TimeValue not Items". We can't use TimeValue yet, but when we can we will create a new Property.

Sorry if this is a surprise.

James F. (talk) 00:47, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

I found that proposal after creating, so its not surprise :-). JAn Dudík (talk) 10:10, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Unblock

 
Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

JAn Dudík
block logipblocklistcrossblockluxo'sunblockremove gblock • contribs: +/-

Request reason:
User:178.255.168.22 and #442 - shared IP (NAT for whole city
Unblock reason:


This template should be archived normally.

Thanks. JAn Dudík (talk) 10:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Bot

Hi, I made a sub-user page that shows how we can make and edit an item. yoursReza1615 (talk) 20:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

User:JAnDbot

Hi JAn Dudík!

I have blocked your bot for unapproved editing. Please ask for a bot flag or for a community approved task first. Kind regards, Vogone talk 21:40, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: Wikidata talk:Database reports/Popular properties

Sorry, I didn't have this page on my watchlist. I've responded to your question there. Legoktm (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Sedláčková or Sedlácková

Hi Jan. Can you tell which is the correct spelling of the name of Q495055: de:Andrea Sedláčková or fr:Andrea Sedlácková? I guess the article should be moved in one of the wikis. --Wikijens (talk) 14:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Czech version of name is Sedláčková [1] (female version of Sedláček = little farmer) JAn Dudík (talk) 18:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Bot a nové články

Ahoj. Procházím včera založené články a už několikrát (tedy nejen dnes) se mi stalo, že tvůj bot založil pro článek novou položku výhradně s odkazem na cs:, i když má článek stejný název jako na jiných Wikipediích (dnes cs:Sarа Jovanović - Q6445018 a Q10547164, cs:MATE - Q194090 a Q10546751). Chtělo by to asi nějak pořešit, žádostí o smazání je zde opravdu dost, tak aby aspoň jeden jejich zdroj byl umlčen. :-) --Harold (talk) 18:45, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Skript, který používám, při procházení nových stránek přeskočí nejnovějších 100. Ale když jede podle abecedy, nový článek nedokáže nijak identifikovat. Můžu zvýšit limit ze 100 třeba na 200, ale víc s tím asi nepůjde udělat. Nebo máš nějaký jiný nápad? JAn Dudík (talk) 20:53, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Možnosti skriptů neznám a v téhle technické oblasti se ani nevyznám. Co se dá dělat, nicméně pokud jde zvýšit limit, tak by asi těch 200 bylo lepších. Na cs: bývá denně okolo 100 nových článků, většinou je procházím ten následující den někdy odpoledne nebo večer (ne všechny, jen ty "žluté"). --Harold (talk) 22:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Ahoj, vzhledem k tomu, že dodávám cs iw na WD později, tak jsem se teď opakovaně setkal s novou položkou jen pro cs stránku vytvořenou botem. Má to nějaký praktický význam? Pokud již existují cizojazyčné iw, pak zůstane položka pro cs stránku stejně neprovázaná a osamocená navěky, další iw budou přidávány do již existující jiné položky. Takže, opravy vložení na tuto správnou stránku se musí provést ručně. Nešla by nastavit kontrola, jestli už neexistuje příslušný článek na jiné wiki? Něco na způsob dřívějšího doplňování iw boty.--Kacir (talk) 23:21, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Jak by to měl kontrolovat, když nemá žádné interwiki vložené? podle setjného jména? Bohužel starý skript, který uměl hledat stejnojmenné stránky už nefunguje (respektive neumí zapsat změny).
Bot nyní při kontrole nových článků automaticky přeskočí nejnovějších 200 (hledám způsob, jak mít různý počet u článků (700) a kategorií (100)), které nemají položku na Wikidatech. Ale zároveň projíždím všechny články A-Ž (!-konec), kde jednoduše nejde poznat, zda je článek nový nebo n ěkolik let starý. Během krátké doby dojedu zbývající část (K-P) a pak už by hodně nové články měl přidávat spíše ojediněle. JAn Dudík (talk) 19:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Jasně, vývojáři asi pořešili nefunkčnost vkládání z prohlížeče IE. Dříve nešli ikony [přidat] otevřít, nyní se už rozbalí, načítání trvá dél. Snad už budu cs iw doplňovat přímo po založení.--Kacir (talk) 11:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

A new bot list

Hi there! Per a request I have been working on a new informative bot list (that has secretly been hidden under the current list at Wikidata:List_of_bots. I think I am finished and it would be great if every botop (including you) could add your bot to the new list. I have added Addbot already and tried to make the template simple! Goodluck and if you have any problems get in touch on my talk page! ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 20:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Q10982438

Hi, could you please explain how that item falls under one of the exclusion criteria? Legoktm (talk) 06:52, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I selected bad summary, but in RFC majority votes was for excluding files. There is not clear consensus, but this file is Non-free content. JAn Dudík (talk) 08:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
No the closer of the RfC said "There should not be items for local files that are already available on Commons. However, there is no consensus as to whether or not there should be items for files that cannot be uploaded to Commons; therefore such items will be allowed until and unless there is a future consensus that they should not be." There is no prohibition against linking to NFC on Wikidata, and the RfC couldn't find consensus either way, so the status quo is in place, which is that it's ok. Legoktm (talk) 08:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes, but its nonsense - When somebody wants use it in infobox, got only redlink to nonexistent image, except the only wiki, where this non-free image is. JAn Dudík (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
That has absolutely nothing to do with whether the item should exist. If you think we shouldn't allow them, open up a new discussion about it. But in the meantime you need to follow the existing consensus and restore the file. Legoktm (talk) 11:57, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Hlavní město šablony?

Nevkládejte prosím nepatřičná tvrzení k položkám šablon (jako zde). Vlastnosti Property:P131 a Property:P36 jsou určeny pro zeměpisné objekty, což šablona není. Zdravím, --Šlomo (talk) 18:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Fajn, ale jak tedy jinak vyřešit, že cs:šablona:infobox okres má vyplněné chyby? JAn Dudík (talk) 18:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Už je vyřešeno. Každopádně Wikidata se nemohou přizpůsobovat tomu, aby něco na té či oné Wikipedii dobře vypadalo, to musí udělat skripty či šablony, které data přebírají.--Šlomo (talk) 18:56, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Please see...

...this. --Ricordisamoa 11:38, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

I think it's OK. JAn Dudík (talk) 12:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Bot blockage

Hi, I'm sorry but I've blocked your Bot because it still adds Q4167410 as value for GND-Type instead of Q11651459, please see here: Property talk:P107#Q11651459. If you have fixed this little error, you could unblock the bot by yourself. :)
Best regards, --#Reaper (talk) 20:18, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

OK, the problem was that in tool wikidatauseful.js was link to Q4167410, So I added this one.. JAn Dudík (talk) 20:34, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes, np, the gadget has been also updated today. Skids bot performs the changes to the new item. --#Reaper (talk) 21:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

P107:Q4167410

Hey could you change your bot to add Q11651459 instead of Q4167410 for P:P107. Thank you. --Sk!d (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

See one section upper. JAn Dudík (talk) 11:07, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata:Properties_for_deletion#Property:P527

FYI. --  Docu  at 07:54, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Non article items

Hi JAn, I've seen that your bot add a lot of category items that have no translations. For this cases there is now a new value for Property:P107 (main type): Q13384863 (non article). I wrote a list with examples and difficult cases. Cheers --Kolja21 (talk) 21:51, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Could you stop this adding as long as the RFD is not closed? Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q13384863 --Sk!d (talk) 07:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, my fault. I left the note before the RFD, but I still think the info "non article" is helpful, especially for items without translation. (We can later change Q13384863 to "no value", if this feature gets popular, but we can't go the other way around.) --Kolja21 (talk) 14:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Gadget-slurpInterwiki.js

I saw that modification. You’re right, but i18nData['be-tarask'] = i18nData['be-x-old']; will fix the bug without removing this functionnality. — Ltrl G, 08:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I don't unedrstand to javascript, but before this change was script working and after not - so is better to disable new change than having useless script. JAn Dudík (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Merge.js

Hi JAn, just a reminder to be on the look-out for whatlinkshere when you use the merge script. When you merged Q1328748 into Q84072 it left a data item with a deleted property. Thanks :) Regards, — Moe Epsilon 20:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Edit protected request

Please change the interwiki and label by Kosovo in Galician (gl) in Q1231. --Vivaelcelta (talk) 12:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done Label changed, link not, because gl:Kosovo is only redirect. JAn Dudík (talk) 05:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
I have moved the article, because in gl wiki the rules have been changed. --Vivaelcelta (talk) 09:26, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Q6579962

You have deleted this entry. Can you restore Q6579962 ? It is not the same as Q1479790 see Talk:Q6579962. TED (talk) 01:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done JAn Dudík (talk) 05:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Merci ! TED (talk) 11:07, 13 June 2013 (UTC) 

Empty property by bot

Please see here, here and etc.

I see. The problem is, that in eo.wiki is in template parameter commons = space. I stopped bot and I'll report bug. JAn Dudík (talk) 18:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Přemýšlím...

Honzo, nevím, já chtěl původně jen napojovat interwiki. A mám obavu, že v důsledku bych do práce tady ještě víc zabředl... Je to zvláštní záliba, ne? Littledogboy (talk) 15:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Já jen, že hodně slučuješ při tom se ty práva dost hodí. Já tedy kandidoval s tím, že aby tu byl někdo, kdo rozumí česky a slovensky, což zatím nebylo téměř potřeba. A správcovská práva jsem kromě slučování použil jen párkrát, ale jsem za ně rád. Jelikož na třech projektech ze čtyř, kde jsem víc aktivní ta práva mám (celkem na 4), dost mi jinde při vážnější práci chybí :-) JAn Dudík (talk) 15:26, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

BetaBot asi umí s novým API. Littledogboy (talk) 17:00, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Slnko v sieti

Dobrý den, všiml jsem si, že jste propojil tuto stránku na cs wiki se stránkami o stejnomeném slovenském filmu. Avšak tento článek české wiki pojednává o filmové eně, která je tamní obdobou Českého lva, ale ostatní články pojednávajíí o slovenském filmu z 60. let, podle kterého tato cena dostala jméno. Propojení je tedy chybné. Věřím, že to nebylo úmyslné a oceňuji vaši aktivitu, ale prosím již tyto stránky nepropojujte. Chtěl jsem vás však pouze upozornit na důvod, proč jsem propojení zrušil. Děkuji. --Bedivere.cs (talk) 08:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Díky za upozornění, nenapadlo mne, že by článek mohl být o něčem jiném, prostě jsem na sk.wiki našel stejnojmenný článek a automaticky jsem předpokládal, že půjde o tutéž cenu. JAn Dudík (talk) 09:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
To se stává. Na vašem místě bych možná udělal stejnou chybu. --Bedivere.cs (talk) 10:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Potíže s NUTS 4-5 (LAU)

Mohu poprosit o názor na Property talk:P605? Jedná se také o editace, které provedl tvůj bot - a kterých by IMHO mohl provést ještě daleko víc, pokud dospějeme k nějakému závěru...--Shlomo (talk) 22:45, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Smazy

Buď zdráv. Tak jsem se tu trochu víc rozjel. Mohl bys prosím tě později projet moje příspěvky a smazat, co je prázdné? Nechce se mi to všechno kopírovat na RfD a zároveň nechci, abych to tam zahlcoval jednou revizí za druhou. Díky (za odpověď). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Bot adding wrong commons link?

I think that Czech vulva symbols does not belong to cunt (Q2600). --Stryn (talk) 09:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Who knows? for czech article it's OK. You can add better category or change the value to none, otherwise my bot will add it in every run. JAn Dudík (talk) 09:33, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
CS, NL, EO use the same symbol in the article. JAn Dudík (talk) 09:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Property creation discussion for P527

I notice you created has part(s) (P527) back in May, but I can't find the creation discussion in your contributions around then or searching the property archives. Could you provide a link to the creation discussion, if it exists? Thanks, Emw (talk) 02:14, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

There was no discussion before creation, only RfD after creation. JAn Dudík (talk) 05:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Severosámská Wikipedie

Pane Dudík, tohle jsem už viděl mnohokrát, ale až teď mě trklo, jaká je to blbost. Littledogboy (talk) 15:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

A co s tím můžu dělat víc, než zakázat přidávání zdroje a nahlásit chybu, drahý Malýpsíkluku? ;-) doufal jsem, že se problém brzy vyřeší a že potom zažádám o opravu, ale řešení zatím není. --JAn Dudík (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Jo ahá, to já netušil, že máš takhle svázaný ruce. Ty teda nejseš programátor, ale spíš takovej koncepční myslitel... řekněme. Littledogboy (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Holt někdo umí programovat a někdo navrhnout silnici. Koncepční myslitel, to se mi líbí :-) JAn Dudík (talk) 21:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Czech cultural heritage ID (P762)

The property Czech cultural heritage ID (P762) that you first proposed is available now. Please excuse for the delay. --  Docu  at 14:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, but I can create it by myself. I waited for one user which can upload these IDs by his bot. JAn Dudík (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


There seem to be issue about me creating properties like the above, please see Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:Docu_and_the_property_creator_permission. --  Docu  at 18:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

NUTS/LAU

I see. BTW, would you create LAU per Wikidata:Property_proposal/Place#LAU? This way we could move over the errors on NUTS (P605#"Format" violations). --  Docu  at 16:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I want to create NUTS5. Format of CZ-LAU is the same as was CZ-NUTS (3,4). JAn Dudík (talk) 21:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
NUTS5 doesn't have to be created. NUTS5 is (was...) still subset of NUTS and we should use NUTS code (P605) for it, with qualifier end time (P582), since the it doesn't exist any more. If the format doesn't accept correct values, it's a reason to repair the format, not to create a new property.--Shlomo (talk) 00:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
česky: Problém je v tom, že NUTS5 mají formát ve tvaru NUTS4 číslo, ale často se používá jen číslo.
english: Problem with NUTS5 is in format, which is NUTS4 number, but often only number is used.
example - only 535737 is used, but Vidov (Q299) have CZ0311 535737 JAn Dudík (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
česky: Především by se hodilo najít nějaký spolehlivý zdroj a ověřit, jaká byla "oficiální" podoba NUTS5, a tu potom zapisovat jako NUTS code (P605). Příklad z czso.cz neuvádí NUTS5, nýbrž kód podle číselníku CISOB, takže ho nelze brát jako rozhodující. Každopádně si myslím, že důležitější než vkládání již zrušených NUTS4 a NUTS5 je vložení aktuálních LAU1 a LAU2, kde snad můžeme brát za oficiální verzi nomenklaturu Eurostatu. A zdá se, že konsensus vyzněl tak, že nemají být vkládány do Property:P605, ale má být pro ně vytvořena nová vlastnost...--Shlomo (talk) 07:06, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
English: First of all lets find a reliable source and check the "official" version of NUTS5, then lets insert this version into NUTS code (P605). The example doesn't give NUTS5, but some CISOB code, which is not relevant for this discussion. I'd suggest, let's wait with the (obsolete) NUTS4 and NUTS5 data and let's concentrate on (actual) LAU1 and LAU2 codes - I hope we can take the Eurostat nomenclature as a serious source for this purpose. And it seems, that the consensus is not to use Property:P605 for them, but to create a new property...--Shlomo (talk) 07:06, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
In Eurostat table is LAU2 in format number too. Name was maybe changed from NUTS to LAU, but format and value is still the same. JAn Dudík (talk) 07:20, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Do you have some reliable source that states, that the format and values didn't change, or is it just a guess? AFAIK there are usually minor changes coming with every new version of NUTS/LAU due to administrative changes concerning the unit.--Shlomo (talk) 08:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
There were only small changes in values of LAU1 in two regions in 1998. [2] You can study. JAn Dudík (talk) 09:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I can't see anything about the format or the values of NUTS5 or LAU2 in the links you provided. Only NUTS4 and LAU1, which seem to be less problematic.
As I said - Values of NUTS4/LAU1 had only minor changes in 2008, format is still same. For LAU2 I know only when some municipality changes it's district, 6 digits of NUTS5 (LAU2) remain same. JAn Dudík (talk) 11:53, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Návrh mazání

Ahoj, jak se prosím navrhují stránky na smaz? Přesunul jsem iw: Q14469069 --> Q14290273, ale uniká mi, kam vkládat šablonu "Delete"? Díky.--Kacir (talk) 00:56, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Já to mám jako jednu z možností - ve skinu Vector (v monobook bohužel dost věcí nefunguje) vedle hěvzdičky pro sledování položky.
Jinak máš dvě možnosti - V nastavení si zapni udělátko RequestDeletion: a nebo, lepší, udělátko Merge, které umožní sloučit dvě položky do jedné a zároveň označí tu prázdnou ke smazání. JAn Dudík (talk) 07:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
OK, dík, zapnul jsem Merge.--Kacir (talk) 01:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Check if commons cat exists before adding p373

Please have a look at this history, your bot and KrBot have a edit war, because your bot adds a non-existing commons cat and KrBot removes this. Please check first, if the commons cat exists on commons before adding it to a item. Thanks. 84.182.115.155 08:34, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Do you know how to test existence with standard pywikipedia bot? I'm working on adding commonscat from cs:Kategorie:Údržba:Commonscat_není_na_Wikidatech - as you can see, A-L is almost solved, the remaining are new or non existing and I'll check them manually. I usually import only one letter, but sometimes I stop bot too late or is there other issue. JAn Dudík (talk) 08:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
No, I do not know the functions of pybot. You can check it, with the following api request: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&titles=Category:Adolf%20Medzihradský In this case the api/pages/page[0] has a 'missing' attribute, which indicates that the category not exist. You can have here also a 'invalid', if the given commonscat is a bad title. 84.182.115.155 11:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Aktualizace

Ahoj, mohl bys zaktualizovat tento překlad (podle tohoto hlášení)? Matěj Suchánek (talk) 06:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Mysterious work of you and your bot

In May your bot removed a label and a sitelink from Q12043366, so that it had no sitelinks anymore. Per WD:N it should be deleted, but your bot didn't requested deletion. The same day you created a new item with the same contents over your user account, but also you didn't requested deletion of the old item. It is mysterious why your bot removes sitelinks and labels and you create new items with same content. Waiting for explanations. --Pyfisch (talk) 19:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

It seems to be product of unsuccessfull merging with version 3.0 of Reza's script. And there was bot reporting empty unused items, so I believed, that this page will be reported and deleted. JAn Dudík (talk) 20:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

JAnDbot

Hello. User:JAnDbot creates Property:P373 for nitratine (Q2622967), and User:KrBot deletes the empty Commons category. It doesn't seem a good idea. Regards --Chris.urs-o (talk) 09:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, bot added it, because cs article was linking to this commonscat. I'm working on it and now all commonscat seems to be imported. If now KrBot delete non-existing link again, I'll find that articles in separate category on cs.wiki and can manually check it. But there were thousands articles before, so it was not possible to check every one. JAn Dudík (talk) 10:08, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Ok. Thank you very much for the prompt answer. I reported it to Wikidata:Project chat#JAnDbot, it seemed to me that the bot needs some assistance. Regards --Chris.urs-o (talk) 10:13, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Same problem as in section #Check if commons cat exists before adding p373 above. A bot should do the check before importing. When the bot framework does not have a function for that, someone (at least the bot owner) has to create a new one. 84.182.96.148 10:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
I am not programmer, only user.
Should I stop my work because of small percentage of errors? My bot imported about 15000 commonscat statements, non-existing was in about 200 of them. JAn Dudík (talk) 10:31, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Better, a bot should check cs.wikipedia for deleted Commons cats. ;) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 13:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Do you have such script? And in many cases category on commons is, but not created, only pictures in this category. And in another cases there is typo in link (missing parenthis etc.) JAn Dudík (talk) 19:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
No. I'm not a programmer as well. That universe is far from me, sorry. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 01:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Mixing Wikipedias up

Hi. I'm not sure how a bot can, but it looks like JAnDbot has mixed up Northern Sami (se) and Czech (cs) Wikipedias: This edit and the three before seem to be based on cs:Adler Trumpf (Czech is the only Wikipedia that has those Commons links, Northern Sami does not even have a single article that mentions "Adler Trumpf"). --YMS (talk) 17:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

I have reported problem to developers of bot and disabled this feature. But no response for two months. JAn Dudík (talk) 07:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Ah, okay, I see. Thanks for the information. --YMS (talk) 08:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Overwrite

Hi Jan,

You might want to exclude overwrites in cases like this. --  Docu  at 08:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

ÚSOP code (P677)

Hi Jan,

May I delete the empty values listed at Reports/Constraint_violations/P677#.22Format.22_violations or are they needed? (I think your bot added them). --  Docu  at 19:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

yse, you may delete them. JAn Dudík (talk) 06:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

[3]

Please do not add taxon name (P225) to categories. Categories do not have scientific names.  — Felix Reimann (talk) 10:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

The problem is, that taxon name (P225) is used in cs:template:Wikidruhy, which is used also in categories. I can simple change my script, but what will saysome people to removing this links from cs? ;-) JAn Dudík (talk) 13:18, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Their module requires tracking, see [4]. This is not implemented yet. As soon as this is implemented, their module can get taxon name (P225) per category's main topic (P301). However, this module did not work until your bot added the corresponding claims. Your edits create constraint violation reports there and those which try to clean up the mess in our taxonomy data do not want to clean up behind a bot. Thus, the cs module needs to wait until tracking is implemented. I ask you to fix your bot and whenever changing taxonomic data bot-based, please have a look at Wikidata:Taxonomy task force if your change complies to the models discussed there. Feedback is welcome.  — Felix Reimann (talk) 16:15, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

duplicate additions

hi, [5] Amir (talk) 12:24, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

hi, I'm using claimit.py and harvest_template.py from pywikibot-core. I wonder that the script alow duplicate statement. JAn Dudík (talk) 17:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
file a bug :) Amir (talk) 14:22, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Hlášení Commcat šablony

Ahoj, v článku Joe Lhota hlásí Commcat jiný odkaz na Wikidata. Předpokládám, že je to díky odlišnému názvu (Joseph J. Lhota) tady. Např. en wiki hlášení nemá. Lze to nějak zafixovat, vyřešit? Díky.--Kacir (talk) 14:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Nejsnazší je ESO. wikidatový odkaz je redirect na lokální, tak se vezme příslušná položka (Q526038) a v ní se nahradí odkaz za nový. JAn Dudík (talk) 14:09, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
V noci jsem vložil odkaz na Commonscat, vidím, že je potřeba upravit něco jiného. Dík.--Kacir (talk) 14:36, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Vlastnosti

Všiml jsem si oné diskuse a pokusil jsem se do toho taky ponořit. Nicméně jsem nyní naprosto mimo. Jsou ty vlastnosti v těch položkách správně?

Něco říká, že je to podtřídou slovního druhu, něco zas, že to slovní druh je (nebo obojí). Jako nesmysl mi přijde i to, že předložka je podtřídou záložky. Nepodíval by ses na to? Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Jo, to mi přide taky divné. Já při zakládání přidával jen tvrzení, že se skládá (je částí), zbytek dodali jiní a já to nezkoumal, protože tomu moc nerozumím. JAn Dudík (talk) 21:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Odd edit to isotope

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q1770822&diff=54780818&oldid=50225938 all the best ;) --Tobias1984 (talk) 13:32, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

This edit was correct :-) for cs:C 13. The problem with source is another issue. JAn Dudík (talk) 13:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I think that needs to be a different item then. The item is about a certain carbon isotope and not about a cave. --Tobias1984 (talk) 14:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
O, you already did that. Thanks for fixing it ;) --Tobias1984 (talk) 14:09, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Polyphaga

Please revert your merge of Q147877 and Q15211248 and restore the last. Because there are 2 different Polyphaga (suborder of Coleoptera and genus of Blattodea). Infovarius (talk) 22:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

  Done JAn Dudík (talk) 06:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

P21

Hi, please see [6]. — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 08:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, this is not problem of bot but problem of incorrect categories in cs. article (as souce says :-)). JAn Dudík (talk) 08:56, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Stop your revert

Hi. Please stop your revert on Category:Belgian municipalities with town privileges as you clearly don't know what you're doing. First, it's User:InkoBot that's the vandal by slapping the wrong "Wikipedia category" comment over everything else including manually-inserted comments and refusing to revert. Second, the Commons category clearly doesn't match the subject: 99% of its components are NOT municipalities with town privileges and there are currently no matching categories on Commons for those special towns; it's not because Wikipedias (acceptably) point to loose-matching Commons categories that it must be reasonable on Wikidata, it may well not be. Accept that instead of assuming vandalism. -- Bjung (talk) 16:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

@Bjung: There is typical problem with these categories - dome languages have Town/City (cs, sk, fr, nl...) but some have place (de, es, an, dsb, hsb). Commonscat is OK for the second group.
Commons and enwiki have problem with this sorting to towns/villages. So the solition could be - split this item to two.
And with your edit you also removed seven correct labels for this item - this is why I called it possible vandalism.
JAn Dudík (talk) 21:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
IMO we should just accept that data on Commons is organized differently than on Wikipedias; that's not really a "problem" if all data structures on a project are useful independently of other projects; however I understand that may be a problem for import bots that operate on a permanent basis and I hope bot masters will be careful enough that it doesn't become the Wikidata users problem. As for the "Wikipedia" labels, in this specific case they're definitely incorrect as there is actually a Wikivoyage link down there... -- Bjung (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Commons category (P373) is used in cswiki and skwiki by template:commonscat, so this is why I want to have this link here.
There are some bots which adds this labels, better thanm deleting would be rewrite Wikipedia -> Wikimedia.
Difference depends on state - for czech republic we have correct base categories Towns/Villages/Municipalities on commons. Deeper they are not ideal, but beter than in many other countries.
JAn Dudík (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Re: Přidej se k nám

(Littledogboy, User talk:Matěj Suchánek#Přidej se k nám)
Já nevím, co tam napsat, tak ať mě jeden z vás nominuje, pokud mě jako správce chcete. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

adminship

Can you explain did he accepted about nomination?--DangSunM (talk) 13:39, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

He accepted, one section top wrote: I don't know what to write there. Write my nomination please, if you want to have me as admin JAn Dudík (talk) 14:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for translate.--DangSunM (talk) 22:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Q6293548

Hi! Please see Talk:Q6293548. --Palnatoke (talk) 22:53, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

label in language no

Your bot adds labels with language code no (example). The bot DanmicholoBot removes labels with language code no (example). This is a real bot war. --Fomafix (talk) 18:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Can you fix this script? There were some changes about no/nb, so I thought that it's OK. JAn Dudík (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I can’t help with Python. You should fix the bot script. Most of the edits of the bot are re-adding labels with language code no. The language code no should not used because it is not accessible: uselang=no delivers wgUserLanguage nb. --Fomafix (talk) 10:33, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Dung beetles

Hello JAn Dudík;

I see your bot put in taxon names after I removed them. Two points:

  1. According to the reference given, this is based on the cswiki-entry, which however has a taxobox and uses the scientific name of Scarabaeus. The names inserted by your bot are there only found as links to Commons, and that does not necessarily mean much. Any Wikipedia page may have a link to any Commons page, without there being any causal link between the two except that there are relevant pictures on Commons.
  2. Dung beetles are not a taxon, and should not have a taxon name (see see here). The tentative agreement is that if an item has an "instance of" other than "instance of taxon" that no taxon name should be put in.

Cheers, - Brya (talk) 04:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

This value is added from tepmplate cs:Šablona:Wikispecies. If there is any error, plese, reomve this template from cs article. JAn Dudík (talk) 20:06, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Oh, it is a template linking to Wikispecies, not a template linking to Commons (they look almost exactly alike). I don't see why a bot would pay any attention to such templates; these templates may well be completely meaningless. After all, anybody can add such a template for any reason whatsoever. If something is to be imported from a Wikipedia page, it is found in a taxobox (and even these may easily be in error). But there is no call to import any taxon name into an item that has an "instance of" other than "instance of taxon"; in such cases no taxon name should be put in at all. - Brya (talk) 10:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
I import from this template, because this template is comparing value with wikidata and there is tracking ctaegory for items with local value only. JAn Dudík (talk) 19:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
You may thus be importing a lot of junk. - Brya (talk) 05:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Brya is right. There might be a lot of pages which refer to one specific species but in Wikidata we only have one item for it. And no, it is not the task of Wikidatians to fix the errors your bot makes. Please stop it and fix the errors you made already.  — Felix Reimann (talk) 06:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Usually this category is empty, because all ~800 were imported. OK, I can check sometimes this category manually, but I am not biologist and I am not able to check all recent imports. There are Constraint violations for this task. JAn Dudík (talk) 07:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Yes, but your implication that the item of each Wikipedia article which has a template link to Wikispecies must have a property P225 is wrong. For example, there might be an article "Lion" and an article "List of lions in movies", both feasibly linking to Wikispecies "Lion". While the item of the taxon article "lion" must have an scientific name here, the second article is a Wikimedia list or something else but a taxon and, thus, must not get P225. And you as a bot operator are responsible to not create constraint violations (especially if you do not fix them yourself or consult the corresponding task force).  — Felix Reimann (talk) 12:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
I was not author of including this property from wikidata. I only import it, because there is nobody other, who can import to Wikidata from cs.wiki.
I asked community, if there is anybody who unerstand taxonomy, to check these categories for import. Next step might be to create parameter in template for y local use, as we have for Commonscat.
As bot operator I can check what bot imports (when there are 10 articles to import, but not when there are 10 thousand), but I am not responsible if anybody wrote to article Fox link to species:Lutra, or in worse case, to article Adalia decempunctata (Q184641) species:Coccinella septempunctata or something like that. JAn Dudík (talk) 13:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
As I understand, the cs template checks if the taxon name given to the template as parameter is the same as the Wikidata property taxon name (P225). This is an absolutely valid approach. For each cs articles where the parameter is equal, you could for example remove the parameter from the template and use the Wikidata value. However: This template is typically used on a lot of different pages, as I explained above. Your implication is that if an article has the template also the Wikidata item should have the property. But this implication is wrong. There might be some cases where P225 is missing here but there might be a lot of cases where the item here is not instanceof taxon (but for example a Wikimedia list) and, thus, should not get P225. Please assure that you check at least P31 before importing P225 from such a template, which is not used in taxon articles only.
Regarding the cs template itself: Could you as a Czech speaker inform the template creator that P225 is set for all taxa, but it does not imply that there exists a Wikispecies article. I'm not sure if this is clear for them. Wikispecies is not yet linked, it will get a section like every other Wikisource/-pedia/-voyage/commons link. The hyperlink created by the authority gadget is not to be confused as Wikispecies integration but only for usability until Wikispecies is not yet supported.  — Felix Reimann (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
JAn Dudík, there is indeed a constraint violations list (which is how I fond this), but that list keeps growing and growing (all those bots creating errors!) and soon it will be too big to load for practical work. - Brya (talk) 04:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Automatické importovanie článkov bez položky

Zdravím Jan. Všimol som si, že tvoj robot importuje nové články na skwiki, ktoré zatiaľ nemajú položku. Problém je, že také články už môžu mať položku (aj s viacerými článkami) len nie sú prepojené, ale tvoj robot proste len vytvorí novú položku (napr. Q15089034). Myslím, že v takých prípadoch by stálo za to článku nevytvoriť položku, aspoň by bol na miestnej wiki v zozname článkov neprepojených s Wikiúdajmi a mohlo by sa to ručne opraviť. Keď už to prepojené bude, ťažšie sa taký článok nájde. Čo myslíš? --KuboF (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Já mám pro sk.wiki nastaveno, že 100 nejnovějších článků se neimportuje. V době, kdy jsem nastavoval tuto hodnotu, to odpovídalo cca týdnu od vzniku článku. Není problém nastavit vyšší číslo. jaké?
Jinak, propojené, ale bez interwiki najdeš tady. JAn Dudík (talk) 21:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Myslím, že v súčasnosti by cca 300 až 400 najnovších malo zmysel. Čo si neustriehneme za touto hranicou je už náš problém. S pozdravom! --KuboF (talk) 21:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
OK, pro články jsem nastavil 400, pro kategorie tak 200? JAn Dudík (talk) 19:37, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

[7]

The top level category should be Q1281, not Q2945159.--GZWDer (talk) 05:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

That'S question. I took top level category from cs.wiki and added it to the same item. So something was wrong. JAn Dudík (talk) 08:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

place with town rights and privileges (Q13539802)

Hi JAn Dudík, the linked articles were redirected see town privileges (Q28942). So without linked articles this item can be deleted?--Oursana (talk) 01:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Redirects can be here (in fact, it will be possible to add them normally one day ). This item is linked from more than 400 other items, so cannot be deleted. WD:N JAn Dudík (talk) 06:48, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Interwiki SK-DE

Hi JAn, you reverted my change of interwiki between two articles in de-WP and sk-WP: The correct corresponding page from de:Denkmalgeschützte Objekte in der Slowakei is sk:Zoznam kultúrnych pamiatok na Slovensku and not the corresponding page from now - Actuell it is definitively false. --regards [[User:Karl Gruber|K@rl]] (talk) 15:26, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

As you can see, I reverted you and after that I reverted myself. both Cultural Heritage Monuments of Slovakia (Q960335) and list of protected monuments in Slovakia (Q15631418) now looks correct (and last edit is mine). Or is problem anywhere else? JAn Dudík (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Okay, now it's correct thx --regards [[User:Karl Gruber|K@rl]] (talk) 12:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Raven

How do you derive this from cs:Havran (báseň)? -- Lavallen (talk) 11:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

And Q11866 and Q2166642. -- Lavallen (talk) 11:25, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Q2863322 was correct, but the claim already existed. -- Lavallen (talk) 11:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
All these pages are in category Category:Disambiguation pages (Q1982926) on cs.wikisource. There is "bug" in script claimit.py, which knows only Wikipedias, not other projects as source. JAn Dudík (talk) 11:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Ok, Wikisource can never be used as source for disambigs, as they can be linked to work-items according to WD:WS. -- Lavallen (talk) 12:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Links ot userpages

Hello. Today your bot is adding a lot of links to userpages (see here). Can you please fix it? Thank you, — TintoMeches, 20:20, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed it [8], so I deleted all bad links, but I don't wanted to stop the run of the bot. Today it might be OK, because script was modified. JAn Dudík (talk) 06:33, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

List of infoboxes

Hi Jan, I created a list of infoboxes used on the Czech Wikipedia, similar to the one we have on en.wiki, which can be used for identifying infoboxes which have many transclusions to decide which ones to use for imports. For now it's under my userspace, but if you find it useful you could move it to a project page, under an appropriate title, and link it to the English equivalent. Cheers,--Underlying lk (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Přesun stránky

Ahoj, chtělo by přesunout Klára Zakopalová na název Klára Koukalová, po změně jména hráčky. Nevím, kde se přesun navrhuje. Díky.--Kacir (talk) 20:46, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

@Kacir: Již to někdo vyřešil, ale ve Wikidatech se nic nepřesouvá, pouze se mění odkazy nebo štítky. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 11:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
@Matěj Suchánek:: Koukám, že kolega změnil štítky [9], zřejmě to stačí ke změně názvu dané položky/stránky.--Kacir (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Nebo zřejmě se zobrazuje její název dle nastaveného jazyka. Po mém vložení se mi začalo zobrazovat "Koukalová", spojil jsem si to s editací kolegy 8 minut po mně, ale ta souvislost tam asi není.--Kacir (talk) 15:36, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Dispatch Lag and Bots

Hello, Today Lydia and I noticed that DispatchStats have been increasing since the Wikiquote deployment. Currently the lag is at around 18 hours, which means all changes being made to Wikidata are taking more than 18 hours to be reflected on Wikimedia wikis.

Because of the high dispatch lag, we are asking if all bot operators could please stop their bots or have them tone down the number of edits for around 24 hours in order to allow Dispatch to catch up at a minimum. If possible, we would appreciate bot operators to stop bots until dispatch is down to a low level (which may be more than 24 hours), you can view the stats at Special:DispatchStats. Lydia has posted a similar message to this at Wikidata:Project Chat and the mailing list where we have asked all uses of Widar or other high editing programs to stop.

Since Dispatch is an important part of Wikidata and it is essential that changes are reflected on Wikimedia wikis as soon as, if Dispatch is still an issue tomorrow morning (around 11:00 UTC), we may choose to stop bots from editing Wikidata for a selected time of around 12 - 24 hours or until the bot has been stopped. If you have any queries, feel free to poke me or Lydia Pintscher, or post on project chat or reply to the email. Thanks, John F. Lewis (talk) 14:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Lydia discovered the issue behind high dispatch was changes were not being dispatched at all. Unless this issue is fixed and changes begin being dispatched, Lydia has asked that bots be stopped by 17:30 UTC (in two hours) to reduce the amount of disruption to Wikimedia wikis with data dispatching in future. Please contact her if you have any queries. John F. Lewis (talk) 15:24, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Q16604178 and talk:Q16604178

Hi! I have seen that you have deleted Q16604178 and talk:Q16604178. Are you aware that hermaphrodite (Q303479) is semantically ambiguous? . GangLeri לערי ריינהארט (talk) 13:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

If there are mixed two different things, you should move to new item the one, which have no or less statements and less links. In this case it should be (be, bg, eu, gl, hr, hu, it, kk...) as hermaphroditism. But you moved only three random hermaphrodites. JAn Dudík (talk) 18:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Ethnic groups in Brazil (Q3704711)

Hi, I saw you reverted my last action in Category:Ethnic groups in Brazil (Q3704711). I removed Commons category (P373) from that item because the link to the common category is already present in the section Wikimedia Commons page linked to this item (in the bottom of the page), so the use of P373 seems to me redundant. In my opinion, in this discussion there is a consensus to keep P373, but to use it to connect articles with commons categories. I was wrong to interpret the consensus of that procedure? Thanks. --Paperoastro (talk) 08:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, it is not redundant, this property is used by many templates on wikipedias and wikisources. Removing this property causes that template {{Commonscat}} links to nowhere (or to Commons:Category:{{PAGENAME}}) - see Category:Commons category without a link on Wikidata (Q11925744). This was one of arguments in linked PFD. JAn Dudík (talk) 08:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
I understood. Thanks for the explanation. --Paperoastro (talk) 08:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Fotbalisti

Projeď dnešní příspěvky bota, já teď nemám čas. Nelíbí se mi některá data narození a "No portrait cs.svg". Nešla by ta data narození vyladit? Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Hm, noportrait jsou zlo. Máš konkrétní chybná data narození? obvykle je problém už v infoboxu, odkud to bere (nestandardní zápis). JAn Dudík (talk) 19:44, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Merge articles

Hi. Could you help sorting out one item? Article about football referee Néant Alioum exists in several languages. I added no-article to item Q2837091, which already had fr, it and nl. Later someone merged all these with hu:Neant Alioum (item Q1216031), but this item was later deleted (by mistake?). When I tried to reconnect the articles again, a new item was created (Q17113468). Should all articles be moved to the lowest number (Q1216031) and connected there with hungarian article? --Wikijens (talk) 08:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

  Done JAn Dudík (talk) 08:38, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Gadget-Merge.js /sk

    'sk': {
        close: 'Zatvoriť',
        closeDialog: 'Zatvoriť toto okno bez spojenia položiek',
        confilictMessage: 'Detekovaný konflikt v',
        confilictWithMessage: 's',
        deleteOption: 'Pokúsiť sa automaticky zmazať extra položky po spojení (len správcovia)',
        deleting: 'Mažem...',
        deletingItem: 'Mažem položku...',
        itemDeleterAccessError: 'Nie ste správca',
        itemIdInvalid: 'Nie je zadané id položky',
        loadingMergeDestination : 'Načítam výsledok spojenia...' ,
        lowestQid: 'Vždy spojiť do položky s nižším číslom',
        merge: 'Spojiť',
        mergePendingNotification: 'Skript Merge.js bol aktivovaný.<br/>Teraz môžete vo vašom prehliadači prejsť na inú položku.',
        mergeProcess: 'Vykonať teraz spojenie',
        mergeThisItem: 'Spojiť položku',
        mergeWithInput: 'Spojiť s:',
        mergeWithProgress: 'Spojiť s...',
        mergeWizard: 'Nástroj na spájanie',
        mergingClaim: 'Spájam tvrdenie...',
        movingClaim: 'Presúvam tvrdenie...',
        movingSitelink: 'Presúvam odkazy...',
        pleaseWait: 'Prosím čakajte...',
        postpone: 'Odložiť',
        postponeTitle: 'Uložiť id položky a odložiť spojenie',
        processPostponed: 'vykonať odložené spojenie',
        requestDeletion: 'Požiadať o zmazanie extra položiek na RfD',
        requestingDeletion: 'Žiadam o zmazanie...',
        requestingStreamDeletion: 'Žiadam o zmazanie (StreamDelete)...',
        sendingToRfd: 'Posielam na RfD...',
        streamDelete: 'Požiadať o $1StreamDelete$2 (experimentálne)',
        unwatchOption: 'Odstrániť spájané položky zo sledovaných stránok (ak sú sledované)',
        unwatching: 'Odstraňujem zo sledovaných stránok...',
    },
Vďaka. Bubamara (talk) 21:25, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Bot know-how

Díky za nabídku. V nejbližší době si zprovozním vlastního pywikibota a mrknu na skripty k harvestingu info z infoboxů, abych se vás už mohl ptát konkrétně a neotravoval se základama, kt. jsou na stránkách pywikibota dobře zdokumentovány. Bude mi to ale chvíli trvat, právě mi začalo zkouškové :-)
Mohl byste mi prosím ještě odpovědět zde? Díky za ochotu.--Hypothalamus (talk) 06:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

bot creates duplicates

Hello, have you seen your bot creates many duplicate statements "is a = disambiguation" and/or "is a = family name"? see eg. [10] at Charfreitag (Q11723060). i don't know what is wrong but double statements are not good and need removal. Holger1959 (talk) 22:27, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Your bot still add duplicate properties. Please fix you bot! --Fomafix (talk) 10:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
I used only functions from documentation of script claimit.py. Unfortunatelly, this script does not work as expected. Bugzilla67284. JAn Dudík (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Human groups

Hi, please see [11]. Please add additional checks to your bot to avoid such edits. Parameters of {{Constraint:Conflicts with}} from Property talk:P21 can be used for the algorithm. — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 05:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

I am not able to include such control - I am only user of claimit.py, not programmer. But this is the same situation as if in infobox is incorrect value which is imported to Wikidata - I am importing this from category. Now I removed this category from article, so it should be OK for future. JAn Dudík (talk) 05:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

herder (Q12059906)

Hi, it looks like you reorganised herder/pastoralist items a bit. Please notice that pastoralists are generally herders, but herders are not always pastoralists. Herder is the broader term. Therefore i removed the main category/article connection between them. I cannot reinsert the old herder category item because it is already deleted. Holger1959 (talk) 16:26, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

There is problem, that Wikidata are multilingual. cs:Pastevec should have main category cs:Category:Pastevectví.
Q15051373 was deleted because of an item with only a sitelink to a category page in Wikimedia Commons is not allowed
The soulution should be to split article or category item... JAn Dudík (talk) 17:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

You again added Category:Pastoralists as main category to the herder item [12]. But pastoralist as a term has a different meaning and clearly is a subclass of herder, eg. a gooseherd is a herder (one who herds geese usually on areas close to houses/farms), but is not a pastoralist (because this kind of herding has none of the typical aspects of pastoralism; not to be confused with pastoral or livestock farming). So if cs:Pastevec does not mean herder in general, but only refers to pastoralist, then why do you not split it from the herder item, but reinsert the factually inaccurate main category? Holger1959 (talk) 00:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Užití wikidat na non-WMF wiki a pomoc se sjednocováním infoboxů

Dobrý den, chtěl jsem se zeptat, jestli bych Vám mohl pomoci s nějakou prací sjednocování infoboxů a jejich uzpůsobení pro práci s wikidaty na české wikipedii? Případně s harvestingem dat? Kdybych měl nějaký konkrétní úkol (aby nějaký infobox automaticky tahal přiřazený obrázek z wikidat např.?), lépe bych se to naučil a mohl bych se vás ptát přímo na problémy, které se vyskytnou v průběhu. Pak jsem se chtěl zeptat, jestli je plánováno fetchovat data na wikidata z taxoboxu (nebo už to proběhlo?)? Myslím, že je dost rozšířený a poctivě vyplňovaný. A dále jsem se chtěl zeptat, jestli víte, zdali je možné vkládat data z wikidat do článků na wiki, které nespadají pod hlavičku WMF. Rád bych časem použil wikidata u nás na wikiskriptech. Děkuji za informaci a pomoc. --Wesalius (talk) 15:35, 17 July 2014 (UTC) (dříve pod nickem Hypothalamus)

@Wesalius: Tato stránka je vlastně spojením importu a sjednocování. Pro sjednocování je zde taky uzavřená žádost o komentář a seznam některých parametrů k převedení; jak takové sjednocování probíhá, je možné najít v těchto příspěvcích (doporučuji se také připojit k wikiprojektu). V rámci sjednocování je možné i infobox upravit tak, aby data z Wikidat rovnou přebíral (viz příspěvky). Import dat z taxoboxu je poněkud složitější, protože na Wikidatech se u taxonů používá pouze vlastnost parent taxon (P171), vlastnosti jako rod se posléze smažou (tím samozřejmě nemyslím, že jiná data se importovat/přebírat nedají). Ohledně non-WMF projektů by ses měl informovat přímo u vývojářů. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
@Matěj Suchánek: Děkuji. Mám trochu zmatek v tom, které dotazy cílit na Vás a které na JAna. Mrknu na podklady a pokusím se přispět rukou k dílu. S pozdravem --Wesalius (talk) 04:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
@Wesalius, Matěj Suchánek: Byl jsem pár dní mimo internet (a nestěžuju si :-). Většinu už zodpověděl Matěj.
Importy je třeba jednou za čas zopakovat, protože přibývají nové články. Já mám dvě metody, jak postupovat:
  1. Čistě import - vezmu odpovídající položky z infoboxu, přiřadím jim příslušné vlastnosti Wikidat a spustím import. Naimportuje se vše, co ještě není, včetně případných nesmyslů (upravené skripty od uživatele Underlying_lk (linkované ze stránky mého bota) umí kontrolovat, zda nebyla v minulosti už tato vlastnost z položky odstarněna, v tom případě znovu neimportuje).
  2. Import s kontrolou - udělám si trackovací kategorii podle učité položky infoboxu a případně i kontroluju hodnotu tohoto parametru (srovnávání s Wikidaty, porovnávání importovaných hodnot s nějakou šablonou pomocí {{Constraint}} u příslušné vlastnosti). Metoda je o dost pracnější, trvá déle (je třeba porovnávat následující den, co se dostalo mezi podezřelé a ty ručně opravit/zkontrolovat. Tuto metodu pravidelně používám pro Commons category (P373) a NL CR AUT ID (P691), jednorázově jsem ji použil např. pro import NUTS pro české obce.
Můžeme si na české stránce dělat více poznámek pro lepší koordinaci importu, případně si založit importní stránku zde. JAn Dudík (talk) 11:18, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "JAn Dudík/Archiv 1".