Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2019/12/13
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Q78231067: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This item is used solely for self-promotion Kostas20142 (talk) 23:17, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78186751: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Sans article NEHAOUA (talk) 08:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Q63808907: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 14:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Q63258446: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 14:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78153817: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable (Wikidata:Notability); spam. User blocked on mediawiki.org as spam-only account ToBeFree (talk) 15:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Q12029952: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty item, previously only included a nonsensical redirect Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 15:45, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78216544: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Test edit Kostas20142 (talk) 18:42, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78216453: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q60474634: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Delete because it is a private blog that does not need a Wikidata entry --129.240.20.101 12:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78116245: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty item. Shinnin (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78157185: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Sans valeur NEHAOUA (talk) 23:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78122814: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Sans article NEHAOUA (talk) 00:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Q55308965: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This was created for the Commons category link, which I moved to Avebury and Associated Monuments (Q64817813). Peter James (talk) 22:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deletion is fine by me, now that there's a primary item for this grouping. Jheald (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Looks like User:Pi bot did not like it. User:Mike Peel, can you please have a look whether we can move the Commons sitelink to Avebury and Associated Monuments (Q64817813) and delete Q55308965? —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- @MisterSynergy, Peter James: No objections here. Pi bot moves the commons link to the category item that's linked through a category's main topic (P301)/topic's main category (P910) pair, remove that and it won't move it again. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 05:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Looks like User:Pi bot did not like it. User:Mike Peel, can you please have a look whether we can move the Commons sitelink to Avebury and Associated Monuments (Q64817813) and delete Q55308965? —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 07:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Fool's Village (Q61446814): season of television series, part of the "Calambur" programme: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
It seems to be this series has no seasons: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seznam_d%C3%ADlů_seriálu_Děrevnja_durakov Queryzo (talk) 06:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Derevnya durakov (The Fool's Village) was a part of sketch TV show en:Calambur. Calambur had 6 seasons. I'm not sure if Derevnya durakov divided by seasons itself. Anyway, it's not our problem for now, request the deletion of the Czech article in their project first. --Wolverène (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- BTW there's reason to move cs:Děrevnja durakov into the separate item, because it doesn't describe the whole show.--Wolverène (talk) 09:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Queryzo: looking above your move seem to be controversial, could you please explain? ‐‐1997kB (talk) 04:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- you can feel free to revert my edits, I'm not familiar with this series and may did wrong with requesting a deletion. Queryzo (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Different concepts, thus 
Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:51, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875): Regional and S-Bahn station in Berlin, Germany: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Incomplete and erroneous duplicate of Q567079 --Iulle (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- It look like Bahnhof Jungfernheide (Q567079) is about all the station including Fernbahnhof and S-bahn rail. and Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) is only about s-bahn. but I don't know if it is right or not. - yona b (talk) 11:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- That's correct. That's why Q22284875 has a Property:P361 pointing to Q567079. One cannot merge these items without removing that property first. - cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 06:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- I started to clean up the three items. But it is a bit difficult Bahnhof Jungfernheide (Q567079) Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) Jungfernheide metro station (Q19951075) --GPSLeo (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- That's correct. That's why Q22284875 has a Property:P361 pointing to Q567079. One cannot merge these items without removing that property first. - cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 06:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- It look like Bahnhof Jungfernheide (Q567079) is about all the station including Fernbahnhof and S-bahn rail. and Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) is only about s-bahn. but I don't know if it is right or not. - yona b (talk) 11:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
There have been some changes in the items recently. @Srittau, MB-one, GodeNehler, GPSLeo: can you please have a look, particularly at the item histories [1][2][3]? I have no idea how we usually model railway stations. —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:52, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- The content of Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) should definitely not get removed until the deletion request is decided. But we have to decide if a station with a part for the S-Bahn (Q95723) and a part for the regular railway should have two separate items or not. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- I would propose to stay only with item Bahnhof Jungfernheide (Q567079) and to remove item Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) as the Berlin S-Bahn (Q99654) of Berlin has only combined items with S-Bahn and Train. There are only separate item for Berlin U-Bahn (Q68646), see also item Berlin Alexanderplatz station (Q698497), Berlin-Friedrichstraße railway station (Q702402) or Berlin Hauptbahnhof (Q1097). --GodeNehler (talk) 08:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- I don't know if this is the case here, but S-Bahn stations are quite often treated as separate stations from the main line stations, they share the name with, if they don't share any track infrastructure (which is the case here). So, I guess, we should keep separate items for all three stations (main line (Q3238851), S-Bahn (Q95723) and rapid transit (Q5503)). --MB-one (talk) 09:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- I would propose to stay only with item Bahnhof Jungfernheide (Q567079) and to remove item Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) as the Berlin S-Bahn (Q99654) of Berlin has only combined items with S-Bahn and Train. There are only separate item for Berlin U-Bahn (Q68646), see also item Berlin Alexanderplatz station (Q698497), Berlin-Friedrichstraße railway station (Q702402) or Berlin Hauptbahnhof (Q1097). --GodeNehler (talk) 08:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- The items seems to be confused at the moment. In reality the station has 2 S-Bahn tracks, 2 U-Bahn tracks, 2 regular train tracks and at least 2 metro bus stops(I'm not sure from memory whether it's 2 or 4 metro stops). The S-Bahn part and the train part is owned DB Netz (Q896765) but neither buses nor U-Bahn is. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:25, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- To add my (late) comment to this: There are two Jungfernheide stations that not really related physically: the subway station (Jungfernheide metro station (Q19951075)) and the S-Bahn and railway station (Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875)). They have completely separate histories, are separated physically, are run by separate entities, and different laws apply to them (the former is legally a tram station, the latter a railway station). Therefore they should stay separated. On the other hand, it makes sense to have an item like Bahnhof Jungfernheide (Q567079) that combines both items (and possibly the bus stop etc. as well) as a "stop", since from a schedule standpoint, they are treated as one stop. I will remove all duplicated items from Bahnhof Jungfernheide (Q567079) to the other items, though. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- I did now restore the proper hierarchy. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:04, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted per comment by User:Srittau (thanks!) —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Pascale Canova (Q57904781): French author: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Demande de la personne objet de la notice Alain Schneider (talk) 08:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- no more links Alain Schneider (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- It is highly irregular for your to remove links, and data, while the item's deletion is being discussed; doubly so as you have declared an apparent conflict of interest. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- no more links Alain Schneider (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Keep "Request of the person who is the subject of the notice" is not a valid reason for deletion; and is in any case stated without evidence. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment @Alain Schneider: pourrais-tu donner des détails ? d'où viens la demande de suppression, directement de la concernée ? est-ce publique ? sur quoi cette demande est-elle basée ? etc. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:33, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @VIGNERON: Cette personne est une collègue de travail qui ne voit pas en quoi des éléments personnels ont à être mis dans une base de données publique. Elle considère que c'est contraire au RGPD et veut s'adresser à la CNIL. J'ai d'ailleurs quasiment vidé (avant que tu ne les remettes) la notice de toute information et enlevé tous les liens Alain Schneider (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed, after carefull checking most of these data are not public so I would lean towards
Delete at the very least and in any case, the history should be purge by an admin. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed, after carefull checking most of these data are not public so I would lean towards
- Delete As I understand it the item contains sensitive information that was unfortunately put in. Either the history should be hidden or the item should be entirely deleted. I think the delete option would be best. It is better to be on the safe side concerning sensitive information. Hiding the history may also draw unfortunate Streissand effect attention to the item in question. The item can be created as a new item (with less information) or not based on whether this is appropriate. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 08:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- There is a difference between revision-deleting inappropriate claims and deleting a valid item that meets our noatability crteria. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
I can do the appropriate revdels if someone can email me what revision numbers specifically to revdel and whether the summaries and the contributor names of those revisions should also be hidden. @Fnielsen, VIGNERON, Alain Schneider, Pigsonthewing: Mahir256 (talk) 04:43, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted; the item meets the notability criteria as the subject is listed in several other (linked) databases as well. A complete deletion is not an option here.
@Alain Schneider, VIGNERON, Pigsonthewing, Fnielsen: if there are concerns about particular statements in the item, or the item history, please contact an administrator so that we can revdel the corresponding revisions. @Mahir256 has offered to do that, and I would do so as well. This can be done via email or user talk pages. —MisterSynergy (talk) 08:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Kovářová (Q63968208): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No need for this item, only included redirects; this is a feminine version of the name Kovář, no need for it in Wikidata ontology Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 20:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment actually we have surname for other gender (P5278) --- Jura 04:34, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted per Jura; there are plenty of equivalent items, and there is (potential) use for this one as well. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:21, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
IEEE official website (Q23308924): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This item is the "official website" of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (Q131566). Is there a reason that a website, this one in particular, should be its own item? Senator2029 (talk) 01:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:10, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- It’s a clearly identifiable entity. I used it in a source statement to state in which website a url that sourced something pointed to (Q23308923#P279. Meets the notabitily policy then, it does not requires any further reason. author TomT0m / talk page 07:20, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep @Senator2029: it's strange but unusual (we have more than 9318 items about website right now) and it's used as a source which is a reason enough to keep. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment – This item is for the organization's homepage which is not useful as a reference URL either on Wikidata or Wikipedia, as those should be specific unique links. Senator2029 (talk) 06:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- It’s not used as a reference url, so I don’t understand the point. It’s used to explicit the publication location, exactly as for a scientific article we also state the scientific journal in which it is published, even if their is a link to the full article content available online. author TomT0m / talk page 16:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted; as it is properly in use in a reference. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
mbsf (Q6799778): type of measurement: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
The English Wikipedia article (the only sitelink) has been redirected (final revision of article). I would replace this with a lexeme containing the equivalent information. Jc86035 (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Jc86035: Do you think this might be useful as a unit when adding measurements as statements or qualifiers? Mahir256 (talk) 04:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Mahir256: While this is vaguely possible (though extremely unlikely to be necessary), I think it would make more sense to use metre (Q11573) as the unit, with a property similar to elevation above sea level (P2044), or otherwise some sort of qualifier indicating this. Jc86035 (talk) 15:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted; might not be used anywhere yet, but it is properly sourced and thus a "clearly identifiable subject". —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Ludvík Vašica (Q66305811): Czech educator: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Bad source, real name is Ludvík Vašica Skim (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Skim: could you not just correct the name and source? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: I created this record from Historie učitelských ústavů na Moravě a jejich význam pro současnost (Q66305797), but this bachelor thesis isn't right. I found Zpráva c.k. ústavu ku vzdělání učitelů v Příboře za léta 1875–1899 (Q66305950), where is precise list of directors of school. Second director hasn't this name, but Ludvík Vašica Ludvík Vašica (Q66306493). Source is on many places in this report.
- So i can merge this two records, but this one is false, i decided that deleting is better. Skim (talk) 15:45, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, ok, thanks for the precisions. I would still merge and correct (which is the usual way), I let others give their point of view. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- If they are the same person, merge them. Quakewoody (talk) 10:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, ok, thanks for the precisions. I would still merge and correct (which is the usual way), I let others give their point of view. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted, but merged. @Skim, VIGNERON, Quakewoody: please have a look at the remaining item Q66305811; I did already try to correct some things, but I am not expert here… —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:45, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Jim McCarthy (Q57076870): 1955-: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No information except the name. There are links to this, but that raises another problem: The links are for at least 2, probably 3 different persons. --Andre Engels (talk) 09:42, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
@Magnus Manske: The item was created by your SourceMD tool. Can you explain how the tool reasoned that the three works are by the same author? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 17:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- This was intended to be Jim McCarthy (1959-), but a link was added from Q20591656, which should link to Jim McCarthy (1955-), for whom VIAF is now using this item as an identifier (and has added the other works). I created a new item Jim McCarthy (Q72674606) (McCarthy born 1959) and started adding to Q57076870 (McCarthy born 1955) before noticing this; it would repurpose the item, but for a purpose already used externally. Peter James (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted; properly defined meanwhile (thanks to everyone involved here!) —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Praesidium (Q2107396): Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Conflicts with Q2115302. Both pages relate to the same concept (Praesidium). --LitigiousOx (talk) 08:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- presidium (Q2115302) is a subclass of public institution (Q294163); Q2107396 is a disambiguation page. There is another disambiguation page Praesidium (Q50569257) but I don't know if it should be merged to Q2107396; different spellings are used in the linked pages. Peter James (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted, but moved two sitelinks. The dab-item is required for the dab interwikilinks. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:58, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Palazzolo Acreide (Q30028540): chief town of the homonym municipality: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
The true item is Palazzolo Acreide (Q489260) --Elyparker (talk) 13:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- One is a town, the other is the comune in which it is located. If these are the same they can be merged and one replaced with instance of (P31):Wikimedia duplicated page (Q17362920) (similar to many civil parishes in the UK) as the Cebuano Wikipedia has pages for both. Peter James (talk) 22:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted; still a poor situation with cebwiki, but due to the existence of two sitelinks to that project, and the fact that those two are not exactly identical, we need to keep both items. —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Raynaud Ritsma (Q66811114): Dutch singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty item Trijnstel (talk) 14:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Linked to Vangrail (Q2358576), added a source. Edoderoo (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:10, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep @Trijnstel: not empty at all and seems notable for Wikidata (per point 3 of Wd:N). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted per User:VIGNERON —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q66836070: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable. Fails WD:N. Hiàn (talk) 21:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep this author seems notable enough per WD:N (critera 2 and 3), @Hiàn: why would you think it's not notable? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- I have not yet seen enough reliable third-party sources to make the analysis that she would be notable. I fail to see how this is not simply another self-promotion attempt. Hiàn (talk) 14:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
lienzo (Q51940267): canvas painted with indigenous Mesoamerican pictorial writing: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)
Already exists as Q1866550 --MS-SPO (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- If the English Wikipedia article is correct, it's the same as poplin (Q1141566), not broadcloth (Q1866550), which is another, possibly unrelated, use of the term. Peter James (talk) 18:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- @MS-SPO: According to the different from (P1889) in both Q1866550 and Q51940267 they aren't the same and the property even lists a source for that. Also this property prevents the merging of the two. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 07:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Notifying the creator of the alleged duplicate: @PKM:. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: thanks for notifying me.
- I thought I had made it pretty clear. There two entirely different fabrics called "broadcloth" in the USA. One is a (usually) cotton shirting fabric and the other is the traditional (usually) wool fabric that dates back to the middle ages. The Fairchild's Dictionary of Textiles (Q28888841) has two definitions of "broadcloth". Textile Terms and Definitions (Q52580215) makes the same distinction; the Inter-Active Terminology for Europe (Q1520860) cites this as a definition for "broad-cloth": "Definition: 1) a light-weight fabric of poplin type, used extensively on the North American continent for shirtings. 2) a cloth made from fine woollen yarns in a twill weave,heavily milled(traditionally approximately 90 in.in the loom for 56 in.finished)and given a dress face finish.It is usually dyed in dark colours." I've added the UK name "shirting poplin" (from Fairchild) and I will add the additional source and "name"/"valid in place" statements. - PKM (talk) 18:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- I have added the IATE terms for "cotton broadcloth" and "wool broadcloth" as other language labels for these two items, and I've changed the default EN label to "cotton broadcloth" to make the distinction clear. [Edited] - PKM (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep In case that wasn't obvious. :-) - PKM (talk) 19:11, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted per User:PKM —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:02, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Catalogue of nebulae in Crux, Centaurus, Circinus and Norma. (Q68199391): scientific article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spurious entry. GZWDer (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Seems to be some other publication, rather than a journal, which explains its non-standard bibcode, but title and publisher are stated. Peter James (talk) 20:13, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted; I changed the identifier so that it resolves to here. The work seems to be existing. —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q51417962: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Double with the Q51405496 item. I made some corrections before, now it is not necessary to keep two times the same topic. --Givet (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Givet: They have different identifiers. How can they be the same? Esteban16 (talk) 00:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- Esteban16: You are right, at the beginning it is two scans on BHL of the same book (in fact two different "physical" objets - one of them with a complement to the author's name) so, OK, we refer here to these two scans but is it really important to have this double entry. There was many errors on these Wikidata pages and, of course, it is more difficult to complete perfectly two articles instead of one. But why not. Thank you very much for your comment and sorry for the inconvenience. Have a nice day :-) Givet (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted per different identifiers —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:11, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Praveen Antony (Q19660967): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Assuming the information is true and correct, he is mentioned on more than 1 WP article related to the WD items that link to him. Quakewoody (talk) 13:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted per backlinks —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q65684897: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Just spam Bahnmoeller (talk) 20:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Quakewoody (talk) 22:14, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Linus Bruhn (Q76626615): German singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Was deleted again lacking notability in german wikipedia (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:L%C3%B6schpr%C3%BCfung#Linus_Bruhn_(erl.)) Groetjes --Neozoon (talk) 00:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- But "was a contestant on The Voice of Germany in 2015 and competed also on My Name Is TV", he may fill a structural need. Quakewoody (talk) 00:24, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- He may not pass on WP, but on WD I am leaning on a Keep for this one, as he is mentioned on WP articles. And someone with this same name has authority control identifiers, but at this point in time I cannot confirm who they belong to other than "someone (a musician) with this same name". Quakewoody (talk) 13:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- He may not pass on WP, but on WD I am leaning on a
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted per participation in two musical contests; he is also properly identified against external resources —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:29, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Kvizovka (Q4823053): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Unused entry Dcirovic (talk) 21:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted; in use at Commons in the Wikidata infobox. —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Miriam Ramos Heres (Q78166766): Cuban singer, guitarist, songwriter, actress and conductor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Sans article NEHAOUA (talk) 00:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- There are two musicians named Miriam Ramos from Cuba. I have some language issues and don't feel comfortable to try sorting it out, but it looks like one is a piano player and one is a singer. Both have identifiers, although there is always the possibility that they are corrupted. Quakewoody (talk) 02:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted; seems fine now —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:25, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Abe (Q77975714): Japanese family name (阿部): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Link to German-language Wikipedia has been deleted, no other page links to it. HarryNº2 (talk) 08:33, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Could this be used for David Abe (Q29452815) or Magnus Ngei Abe (Q6732156)? Peter James (talk) 10:49, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:MisterSynergy, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q15639541: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
The article on french wikipedia was reintroduced in the omnisport club's article Q1993916. --LeFnake (talk) 09:42, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78225898: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty by xwiki troll Achim (talk) 10:16, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Burton, Sir Richard Francis (Q67183631): entry in Dictionary of Indian Biography: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Redundant: Sir Richard Francis Burton is already item Q125057 --UrielAcosta (talk) 20:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Not the same - Q67183631 is a biographical article about the person. Peter James (talk) 06:32, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted per User:Peter_James —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:32, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q57826466: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Duplicate of https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11735065 --Simonefrassanito (talk) 20:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted; not really a duplicate, as the item describes the Italian version of the concept. —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:31, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78037353: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty item David (talk) 17:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete In the meantime, I blanked the item because of a dubious weblink. Quakewoody (talk) 17:36, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78057033: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam Praxidicae (talk) 17:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78052639: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Hoax Praxidicae (talk) 17:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78051067: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Hoax Praxidicae (talk) 17:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78051183: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Hoax Praxidicae (talk) 17:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78050761: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Hoax Praxidicae (talk) 17:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78016360: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam Praxidicae (talk) 17:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q76190190: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not meet the notability policy. Self-promotion. --BSRF 💬 17:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q78078501
- correcto? Q55624527 ? Quakewoody (talk) 20:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
(delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
User space page, content of report doesn't actually present anything useful --jacksonj04 (talk) 09:20, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Pasleim (talk • contribs • logs) —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Nodoka Sakuraba (Q78311449): Japanese AV idol: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Is already used by item Q74145580. Perhaps the items should be merged and one of them deleted? --Mohammdaon (talk) 10:32, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:MisterSynergy, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Life during wartime (Q78314206): novel by Lucius Shepard: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Similar item already exists - Q6544767. Created without checking first. --Sunwin1960 (talk) 11:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Ahmad Kanik, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78322097: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
I've tried to merge it with Q9964199 but that fails. --- сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 12:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q28065731: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not sure what it adds. Complicates check for disambiguation. Use Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410) instead --- Jura 18:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Support; It is in use in ~900 items as value of instance of (P31), most of them with qualifiers of (P642) that link to the "main" item. I suggest to use Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410) as value for instance of (P31), and add a permanent duplicated item (P2959) statement that links to the main item. Also: @Pasleim: who has created this item. --MisterSynergy (talk) 11:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ping @Pasleim again to request a comment here. I would otherwise move the claims as proposed in August soon and delete Q28065731. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:31, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- For me it is okay to delete the item. --Pasleim (talk) 11:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Ping @Pasleim again to request a comment here. I would otherwise move the claims as proposed in August soon and delete Q28065731. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:31, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted; use instance of (P31): Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410) instead and mark the "duplicate" with a direct said to be the same as (P460) statement. —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:50, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q31826900: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty item, I've deleted the avwiki page (which was obviously created by mistake). WhitePhosphorus (talk) 13:53, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q65053355: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Reference URL's are listed there, so just to clarify, what is your vision of WD:N #2? For me the criterion #2 fits for this item well. --Wolverène (talk) 09:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- For starters, he is known for "founding an influencer marketing agency", which means we need to suspect that everything about him is fake or a paid advertisement, including things that look like legitimate articles and interviews. But also, the references posted are about other people with him as a passing mention. And, lastly, I found this item while looking at edits by a GB-SPV. So, again, it is suspect. If WD wants to keep it, that's fine. But I couldn't let it go unchecked. I don't find much else available via the web. Almost as if everything posted to WD is everything that exists.
- Here's a breakdown of my google search results - the top result is a wedding announcement for a different Michael Gruen (a 20 year old self made billionaire gets overshadowed by the son of a dentist getting married). Everipedia. Twitter. Instagram. More stuff about different people of the same name. And 2 results for linkedin (not his) close out the first page. The 2nd page of results has the forbes article, but that is the only one about him. Looking at his Twitter page, he joined in 2016 and has 1377 followers. I can't see this as being an identifiable entity. Quakewoody (talk) 14:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by Pasleim (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q66084982: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by Pasleim (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q12304382: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Maybe a hoax - no source Steenth (talk) 14:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- If it is a hoax, it needs deleted. Not just from here. Her name is on multiple language WP articles. I linked the item to one of the items/articles. Quakewoody (talk) 15:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Based on which information did you add that link? I cannot find any reference tbh, and tend to delete this item. —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:27, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- She is listed in the cast lists on WP articles in 5 languages for Q217303. Quakewoody (talk)
- Not in IMDB's cast list; the name was added to English Wikipedia in 2006 and probably copied to other languages from there. Peter James (talk) 15:07, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- I know that she is not on IMDb (which isn't as odd as you would think). But she is on WP's lists. That's the problem. That is the reason I added the link. What good is removing her here, if we are leaving her there. If WP has her, it should be fixed there first. Quakewoody (talk) 15:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- I think also worth mentioning is the fact that her own WP article was up for 13 years. Any idea why someone decided now to mark it as a hoax? Quakewoody (talk) 15:23, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Well, those are Wikipedias' problems. You can report it there, but quite often they are not going to fix it because nobody cares.
Provided that dawiki found that this is probably a hoax (they did not find anything about her for a year, see da:Wikipedia:Sletningsforslag/Brigitte Svörwald), and dewiki found the same already some 13.5 years ago at de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/2. April 2006#Brigitte Svörwald (Gelöscht), I am now going to delete the item as well. —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Well, those are Wikipedias' problems. You can report it there, but quite often they are not going to fix it because nobody cares.
- Not in IMDB's cast list; the name was added to English Wikipedia in 2006 and probably copied to other languages from there. Peter James (talk) 15:07, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- She is listed in the cast lists on WP articles in 5 languages for Q217303. Quakewoody (talk)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
drowned valley (Q65247514): a coastal landform formed by the submergence of a valley.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This item needs to be removed because there is a mixup between fjords and rias in the Japanese articles --Mccunicano (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:11, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Given that the article has a sitelink it's notable and won't be deleted in that state. Maybe you mean that this item should be merged with another? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 20:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted; it is occasionally the case that there is a mixup of similar concepts in Wikipedia articles. We don't have influence on that, unfortunately. We must keep the item nevertheless. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Kim Iversen (Q6408835): American radio hostess and journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)
Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 14:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- She has lots of web hits. But I don't know if that equals notability. Quakewoody (talk) 14:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted; has two sitelinks now —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q72860936: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not Notable --49.34.187.94 06:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- He's had local articles written about him (most read like press releases). But I don't know how that fits into WD notability. They are all very short articles containing mostly the same information as each other, and they were written within a few months of each other. Quakewoody (talk) 12:27, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q77700321: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
I've recognized too late that a correspondig object exists --Warrel040 (talk) 16:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- what is the other item, so that we can merge them Quakewoody (talk) 12:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't link to an article, and if https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Stolpersteine_in_Hamburg-Wohldorf-Ohlstedt is correct, this would be an empty list. Peter James (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q36152680: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not an identifier Adam Harangozó (talk) 21:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- There was a property proposal at Wikidata:Property_proposal/Český_Krumlov_Encyclopedia_ID. Apparently, somewhat small. I added from the proposal to Český Krumlov Encyclopedia (Q36149237) (which isn't listed for deletion). --- Jura 01:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q76925628: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q76918917: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q67158495: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Aimeri II de Narbonne, Vicomte de Narbonne (Q75915893): confusion; Peerage person ID=401384: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Unexistant person, mistake of http://www.thepeerage.com/ (automatic creation) BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- I've restored the information you removed from the item. Where do you see that the entry is a mistake? Quakewoody (talk)
- This entry on The Peerage confuses two people, Aimery III of Narbonne (son of Pedro Manrique de Lara and Sancha of Navarre) and his son Amalric I of Narbonne (husband of Philippa of Anduze). BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- So you are saying they are the same person and the items should be merged? Quakewoody (talk)
- No! Q547318 and Q14643182 are two different, well documented persons. The issue is Q75915893, automatically created from The Peerage, with mixed elements of Q547318 and Q14643182. Should we add The Peerage ID to both elements and merge Q75915893 with Q14643182 instead ?BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 18:47, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying. Now we are going to need more opinions on this type of situation. Quakewoody (talk)
- No! Q547318 and Q14643182 are two different, well documented persons. The issue is Q75915893, automatically created from The Peerage, with mixed elements of Q547318 and Q14643182. Should we add The Peerage ID to both elements and merge Q75915893 with Q14643182 instead ?BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 18:47, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- So you are saying they are the same person and the items should be merged? Quakewoody (talk)
- This entry on The Peerage confuses two people, Aimery III of Narbonne (son of Pedro Manrique de Lara and Sancha of Navarre) and his son Amalric I of Narbonne (husband of Philippa of Anduze). BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- I updated P31 accordingly. I think it should be kept, otherwise it gets recreated. --- Jura 11:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- I just found Help:Conflation of two persons. Thanks! BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 14:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Since the item has been updated with P31, can we close this nomination? Quakewoody (talk) 11:55, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted indeed; but I change some of the data again. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
freedom of movement (Q2072351): right of individuals to travel from place to place, that imply freedom of no movement, that is freedom to choose residence. The movement also include going across a frontier.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q2072351 has a swedish and a german article about the "Freedom of Movement" of natural persons. So they belong to Q1344824 which is somehow blocked by at least the german "Niederlassungsfreiheit" which is wrong in place as it is about movement of persons and organisations. --5glogger (talk) 08:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Pasleim, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q25485334: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not sure why this got repurposed/redirect. Item for actor is at Q61088477 --- Jura 11:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- It was originally about the actor.[4] Peter James (talk) 00:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Cases like this is why I advocate for "disambiguation" items. It acknowledges that the item exists in case other databases have already linked to it, but also acknowledges our own errors which would then serve to correct the data on here and on the places that have linked to it.
Q78190686: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty item Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 12:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78355352: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Test item. Hasley 19:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Q78355675: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Test item. Hasley 19:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)