User talk:Jklamo/Archive 2

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Request explanation for deletion of Q92363890

Hi Jklamo,

In my opinion, the data meets the criteria in the Notability section. If you do a search for 2Stallions on Google, you'll find it is an existing entity, and it has profiles on Glassdoor and has a writeup by Marketing Magazine - https://www.marketing-interactive.com/digital-marketing-firm-2stallions-names-regional-head-of-performance-marketing and is also an award winner: https://www.apac-insider.com/winners/2stallions-digital-marketing-agency/

And if this is considered advertising when it is a legitimately growing in notability entity in a country you may not be very aware of, then why are there other pages like these allowed: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q82791039 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q20098080 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2289460

I think these all fall under the same category! Correct me if I'm wrong.

Dhawalshah2s (talk)

Call for participation in the interview study with Wikidata editors

Dear Jklamo,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King’s College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research that develops a personalized recommendation system to suggest Wikidata items for the editors based on their interests and preferences. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I would love to talk with you to know about your current ways to choose the items you work on in Wikidata and understand the factors that might influence such a decision. Your cooperation will give us valuable insights into building a recommender system that can help improve your editing experience.

Participation is completely voluntary. You have the option to withdraw at any time. Your data will be processed under the terms of UK data protection law (including the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018). The information and data that you provide will remain confidential; it will only be stored on the password-protected computer of the researchers. We will use the results anonymized (?) to provide insights into the practices of the editors in item selection processes for editing and publish the results of the study to a research venue. If you decide to take part, we will ask you to sign a consent form, and you will be given a copy of this consent form to keep.

If you’re interested in participating and have 15-20 minutes to chat (I promise to keep the time!), please either contact me at kholoudsaa@gmail.com or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdmmFHaiB20nK14wrQJgfrA18PtmdagyeRib3xGtvzkdn3Lgw/viewform?usp=sf_link with your choice of the times that work for you.

I’ll follow up with you to figure out what method is the best way for us to connect.

Please contact me using the email mentioned above if you have any questions or require more information about this project.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards

Kholoud

Rollbar (Q66382918)

Hi,

I just wanted to ask why the page I created was flagged for being spammy?

What can be done to ensure that this does not happen again and how can I bring this page back online?

Kind regards, James

Rosalind Franklin's mother

Hello, I had tried to add the name of Rosalind Franklin's mother but was unable to format correctly the entry. Instead of fixing it you deleted the entry:

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q7474&type=revision&diff=865389844&oldid=865275886

Is it fair to ignore the mother filiation of a person? 10:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Per edit summary. That was not a right way, patronymic (Q110874) is not mother of Rosalind Franklin. You must create new item for mother.--Jklamo (talk) 13:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Edit revert on Liberec

Hi there, you recently reverted my edit on the Wikidata Liberec page, where I labelled it "city in Czechia", which you reverted to "Czech city" without providing an explanation. Would you care to explain why you did this? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 12:37, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Website of PCI

Hello, I'm a user of italian wikipedia. I write to you because I've noticed your last edits (14 June) on the wikidata's page of the Italian Communist Party. Since that party has disappeared since 1991, I think that it's not correct to indicate any kind of website for that party. The website that you inserted is the website of another party founded in 1998 as "Party of Italian Communists" and later renamed "Italian Communist Party" in 2016, but it is a completely different party, even if they use the same symbol. Feel free to ask me for additional informations and explanations. Bye, --Caarl 95 (talk) 13:19, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi, It was import from Czech wikipedia and error was there (fortunately article itself does not mix both subjects). Sorry for that, I removed it. Feel free to remove such blatant errors by yourself next time. And it is also good idea for constraint violation.--Jklamo (talk) 14:56, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Windmühle Dörgenhausen (Q65552918)

Hello,
,I have recreated the mill. Regards, Conny (talk) 13:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC).

Muhammed

Please see which image is in French article and don't revert to incorrect version. Thanks. --Obsuser (talk) 02:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

No need for 7 images in one item. Presence of some image in some wiki is not reason to include all of these.--Jklamo (talk) 22:14, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

OK, I left one image with face, one stylized calligraphy and one clear svg calligraphy. I think it's fair. Birth date has two refs in Russian article and is used on many Wikipedias in its full version. There is substantial material for that, I don't know how to include there citations, such as those generated by cite web template. --Obsuser (talk) 22:25, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited

Hi there. I noticed you reverted me on the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited Wikidata title. I'm not really sure why that was because the official title as stated in the Wikipedia article is Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited. Not Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. There's also already another Wikidata entry Q55873970 which uses the "limited" part in the name that I had nothing to do with. It's also what they are reffered to in official documents and articles. For instance, see here. Along with being in their official url address. http://www.icbc-ltd.com. So, I 100% think it is correct. Further, if your going to revert someone on a title, or change a title in the first place, you should also change it for the other languages for the sake of consistency and you should also add the title that disagree with as "Also known as" in those languages. Both of which I see you didn't do. Although, in this case it doesn't really matter because your revert was clearly unfounded. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:16, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi, please take a look at Help:Label. For a label we are looking for most common name, not the official one. We have official name (P1448) for official name.--Jklamo (talk) 22:19, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

[1]

About your undo of removal, I express what I'm concerning here: 1. What coordinate that you "restored" is, as I travelled last week, pointed to a farm near the expressway, NOT on the expressway itself; 2. IP users are also real-men users, so by such undoing, you should also provide a proper reason to do so, not "hey I just like undoing IP edits, so I don't tell them about my undo, hahaha" DIV. --125.38.13.27 06:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jklamo/Archive 2,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikidata and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 17:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Společenství vlastníků jednotek

šlo by sloučit Q12055643 a Q67582492? (viz odkazy z Q23856037) JAn Dudík (talk) 12:34, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Sloučil jsem, i když ten Otta je takový hodně přibližný (ale asi se hodí víc tam než do Q706636).--Jklamo (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jklamo/Archive 2,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Why are you trying to delete a serious WIKIDATA page?

Hi there,

you recently requested a deletion for my property (Your Inception). You categorized as SPAM, which clearly is not.

I wonder why did you do it? It doesn't make any sense and it is against Wikidata rules - you cannot categorize a non-spam page as spam.

Thanks, Grega  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gregagostincar (talk • contribs).

@Grega: You may request to remove his sysop right, as this user also wrongly restored a lot of coordinates. --117.136.54.67 00:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Note that deletion discussion is taking place at Wikidata:Requests for deletions, not at discussion pages of editors.--Jklamo (talk) 10:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Special:Diff/1056272204

Hi! You say that this isn't a class of juridical person. For example Q67803986 is a fund of this legal form. This fund is said to be a legal entity and apparently it's non-human enity. Juridical person is generally defined as non-human legal entity. So how comes that this isn't a class of juridical person? Do you have some other, more specific defintion of juridical person in mind? If so, then which one? 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:85E2:E14:25D:579F 13:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, it is more complicated. Note that juridical person if defined at Juridical person as "any organization that is not a single natural person but is authorized by law with duties and rights and is recognized as a legal person and as having a distinct identity." Important part of that definition is legal personality - capability of having legal rights and duties within a certain legal system, such as to enter into contracts, sue, and be sued.

Some legal forms do not have legal personality, for example účastnický fond (Q67583337). In a specific case of KB vyvážený důchodový fond KB Penzijní společnosti (Q67803986) this fund is operated by KB Penzijní společnost (Q58206572), so in practice in contracts KB Penzijní společnost (Q58206572) is acting on behalf of KB vyvážený důchodový fond KB Penzijní společnosti (Q67803986), as KB vyvážený důchodový fond KB Penzijní společnosti (Q67803986) is not able to enter in contracts on its own. --Jklamo (talk) 15:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your undo on Q4548311

I don't understand your undo for the addition of the structurae ID to Q4548311. The buidlings are clearly the same. The english wikipedia lists Pacific Gas & Electric Building as an alternate mane. Structurae gives the address of the building as 123 Mission Street. The images show the same building (window arrangement is the same). - 71.33.136.100 00:50, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, 123 Mission Street (Q4548311) and Pacific Gas & Electric Building (Q3486922) are clearly two different buildings, although they may use same or similar name.--Jklamo (talk) 23:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Okay ... but my edit of 123 Mission Street (Q4548311) that you deleted with this edit, you then re-entered with this edit. So clearly you agree that 123 Mission Street (Q4548311) matches to structurae ID 20021842. Thank you. - 71.33.136.100 03:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Q23011254

Hey, It's link-spam, see Special:Contributions/Asad4566 and contribs on other wikis. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:13, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, It is OK to remove spamlink, but the statement itself is valid, no reason to remove it. I replaced the reference.--Jklamo (talk) 20:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Film Dcera

Ahoj, jak jsi přišel na datum vydání Q67915808#P577? Já na to nepřišel, takže na cs.wiki to chybí. Díky.--Ben Skála (talk) 05:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Ahoj, doplnil jsem referenci.--Jklamo (talk) 08:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Pages marked as spam and deleted

You marked the entries that I created as spam and had them deleted. I would like to know why and why I didnt have a chance to provide more information prior to deletion. While I admit I am new at this I am attempting to build a knowledge graph for legal service providers. While true that I have heard of these firms previously its only because of their notoriety that I know of them. I decided to start with a small set of firms. These firms were to be placed on Wikidata and then Wikipedia if applicable. Once done my team and I were going to use other sources for linked data and start making a knowledge graph with hopefully at that point would be a very large dataset of notable lawyers and law firms. Having an entry on Wikidata was necessary for us to provide the credentials and create an RDF for some of the items. Every item we added we followed the guidelines and made sure that if needed the references were available. I also dont understand that if there are hundreds of other law firms and lawyers added why ours were considered SPAM. We have no association to any of the items added and are only trying to conduct a research project while contributing missing items in the web of data.

All I ask is that the items are reconsidered. We have at this point lost all the work up to this point and we were not going to be adding too many more items until the second phase of our research. If the deletions cannot be undone we ask that we are allowed to resubmit them so we may continue. We receive no compensation for any of what we are doing but our project cannot proceed without these entries. So again please reconsider and it will be greatly appreciated.

Zerocoolpasta (talk) 02:41, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

If you think that your items meet Wikidata:Notability (note the second criterion), feel free to propose undeletion at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard. Note that Wikidata:What Wikidata is not place for self-promotion or advertising/marketing. I do not think that your items meet the notability criteria. And these items were deleted by an administrator (not me), who apparently shares my view. There is a place for company items at WikiData (I have founded Wikidata:WikiProject Companies), but only for those notable ones, not for all law firms in the world.--Jklamo (talk) 16:14, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the reply and more information. We have a list of 58 firms + lawyers, most already have an entry on Wikipedia / Wikidata. We feel a couple of the firms and lawyers meet criteria #2. For example part of our dataset deals with sexual assault cases and the firm is involved in several high profile cases against a well known reform school. Is this something we should have added to the listing? URLs to third party, independent sources citing the information? Anyways again we appreciate the response and wont take up your time. We will ask for the items to be restored or if possible we can recreate them with more information to prove notoriety.

Zerocoolpasta (talk) 20:24, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Avast

Hi - I am trying to update the infoboxes on wikipedia of all FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 companies with up to date financial information. Some data from another source (rather than the audited accounts) seems to be coming through from wikidata. I have tried to update the infobox but you seem to have labelled by edits vandalism!! Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 15:31, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

NB. The figures need to be in US$ (the currency the company publishes its accounts in) and need to be up to date i.e. the figures for the year ended 31 December 2019. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 15:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, it is OK to update items with fresh financial information or to improve sources. But in some cases you are just removing sourced data, that is not acceptable. For example Avast Software (Q2247432) - you removed data about assets (sourced by annual report in trade register). BTW Avast Software (Q2247432) item is about Czech subsidiary, Avast (Q55103384) is listed holding company (with financial information).--Jklamo (talk) 15:47, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi - Please take a look at the wikipedia article for Avast. For "assets" it now includes out of date (2018) figures in Czech koruna. Please can you sort this? Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 15:54, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

This one is a bit tricky. As I already said, Czech subsidiary Avast Software (Q2247432) and holding company Avast (Q55103384) have its own item, while articles on wiki usually cover both entities (but interwikis are now attached to Avast Software (Q2247432)). Avast Software (Q2247432) is a Czech company and it has its accounts in CZK, so figures are right. You can update figures at Avast (Q55103384), but I am not sure if your infobox is able to use data from another wikidata item.--Jklamo (talk) 21:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi - Thanks for your response. We cannot have a mixture of current figures in US dollars (for 2019) and out of date figures in Czech Koruna (for 2018) in the same infobox. I have already tried to resolve this and all you did was accuse me of vandalism. Will you please try and sort this - otherwise all I can do is delete the figures in wikidata that are causing the problem. Dormskirk (talk) 22:28, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi - Please also look at Glencore. For "assets" it now includes an even more out of date figure (2015). Please can you address this? Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 16:04, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, that is easy. Just go to Glencore (Q169339) and add up-to date figures with reference. Do not forget to set old figure normal rank and set up preferred rank to fresh figures.Jklamo (talk) 21:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi - I have no idea what you mean by ranking. Again we cannot have hugely out of date figures appearing in the infobox for no apparent reason. These out of date figures just should not be visible at all. Dormskirk (talk) 22:28, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi - I note that almost all the wikidata entries for Avast have been made by you. Your edits are clearly having unintended consequences on wikipedia. I know this is "tricky" but you seem to be unwilling or more likely unable to fix the problems you are creating. I would urge you to stop adding financial data for companies to wikidata until we understand the consequences of your actions. Wikipedia and its sister projects are collaborative ventures. Other editors are here to help you and to solve problems. We will help you to problem solve but please don't template other editors user pages when they are trying to solve problems that you have created. I have been editing on wikipedia for around 13 years, have written some 3,000 articles and have received many complements for the work I have done and the significant support I have given fellow editors. But never before has a fellow editor applied a vandalism template to my user page. Next time please be a bit more careful. Dormskirk (talk) 11:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Request for deletion (Spam?)

Hi , I have noticed that you have marked as spam and request for deletion the following item Q86913627 Since the item has also a reference from an independent source I was wondering why you made such a request. Could you please explain your reason ? Many thanks --Doratig (talk) 14:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Request explanation for why my item is marked as spam

Hello - you marked my company's business entry (Q88084240) as spam. I'm curious why? I created this entry in good faith, and it is a real company. Can you please reverse your deletion request? Thank you! Casey

@Csarendt: Since I was the one who deleted the item, I'm going to explain you: Wikidata does not allow advertising/spam. Whether it's a real company or not is irrelevant. Esteban16 (talk) 02:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Československé IČO

Tohle se nepovedlo. České a slovenské IČO sice vypadá stejně, ale strkat to do jedné položky nejde. Buď to někdo musí ze všech slovenských firem smazat, nebo požádat o novou vlastnost pro slovenské IČO a všechno slovenské firmy na ni přemigrovat… Nějaký dobrovolník? ;-) --Mormegil (talk) 10:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Původně se to tam strkalo obojí, ale dlouhodobé řešení to určitě není. Nová vlastnost by byla vhodná, mám v "dlouhodobém plánu" o ní požádat. Ale kdyby s tím chtěl nějaký dobrovolník pomoci, budu jenom rád ;-) Přemigrovat hodnoty pak bude relativně jednoduché (zatím myslím lepší mít hodnoty ve "špatné" vlastnosti než vůbec).--Jklamo (talk) 11:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Československá obchodná banka

Hi! Do you stand by your claim that Československá obchodní banka (Q340135) and Československá obchodná banka (Q46078814) are different entities? I can't discern the distinction, which makes it hard for me to sort out the current mess. Bovlb (talk) 23:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, these are two different entities. I think that my last revision was clear, but confusing claims were added later. I will try to clean them up.--Jklamo (talk) 23:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

New OpenRefine reconciliation service

Hi!

Thank you for wearing the {{User loves OpenRefine}} userbox on your user page!

Because the existing Wikidata reconciliation service has had severe performance issues recently, I have created a new one which should be faster and more robust. You can add it to OpenRefine in the reconciliation dialog with the following URL: https://wikidata.reconci.link/en/api (or by replacing en by any other language code).

If you have any issues with this new service, let me know.

Happy reconciling! − Pintoch (talk) 15:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Kurtis Conner place of birth

Hey! I know it's an old claim (from 2016!), but here you put Kurtis Conner's place of birth as Whitby, Ontario. Do you remember which sources you based it on? All I could on this was a 2017 video where he calls Hamilton his hometown (IK that doesn't *necessarily* mean he was born there) but nothing about Whitby.

(Apologies if I've formatted anything incorrectly as I'm still fairly new to Wikidata.) --Bangalamania (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Edit: I see now it was imported from English Wikipedia. Sorry to bother you! --Bangalamania (talk) 02:54, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

based on heuristic

Hello, you added a lot of new country of citizenship (P27) statements. You used based on heuristic place of birth place of death. Both are not suitable heuristics which is why they result in error messages. Could you look into that and fix it? Thank you! --Emu (talk) 00:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

It's not only about error messages. While some countries grant citizenship to every person born of their territory, many other countries don't, and guessing the citizenship from place of birth is an ill-founded speculation. Place of death AFAIK has absolutly no formal connection with citizenship of any country.

Please stop adding these statements and remove the added ones, unless you have some tangible sources for them.--Shlomo (talk) 22:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

@Jklamo: I must say that I agree with @Shlomo: Have you considered deleting these properties? --Emu (talk) 14:39, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Q7930989

Hi. A little while ago I left a comment at Talk:Q7930989#Administrative entity regarding your edit. 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:7061:D674:D8F8:1A4 09:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Stockholms kommun

Is not a town (stad). Yger (talk) 07:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

1001 Paintings You Must See Before You Die

I see you discovered User:Multichill/1001 Schilderijen. Thanks for the help. I think you're using a different version of the book because The Water Sprite (Q5480957) is on page 494 of the Dutch version. Maybe you can just leave the page numbers? The main reason I add them is to able to easily check what is missing. Multichill (talk) 21:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you are right, I have a different edition (2007 Czech edition), I will leave the page numbers blank.--Jklamo (talk) 21:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

aktualizace TPCA--->Toyota

Ahoj. Koukám, že jsi na wikidatech změnil řadu položek u hesla TPCA reflektující změnu majitele na 100% Toyota. Přemýšlel jsem nad tím a myslím, že bylo vhodnější mít nové heslo pro Toyota Czech. Je to nový právní subjekt, nová firma. TPCA bylo vlastnictví 50:50. V hesla o Toyotě bude stačit zmínka o tom, že před rokem 2021 závod fungoval jako společná výrobna TPCA a odkaz na toto heslo. Co myslíš, mohlo by to tak být? --Unpocoloco (talk) 14:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Ha, tak jinak. Ona Toyota si nechala IČO stejné jako měla TPCA. Teď sám nevím, jak k tomu přistoupit. Asi celé heslo na cs.wiki přesunout na Toyota...Czech, že? --Unpocoloco (talk) 14:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Anoj, je to úplně stejný subjekt, "pouze" došlo ke změně majitele a jména. S tím si umíme na Wikidatech poradit. Na cswiki bych taky prostě jenom přejmenoval (a aktualizoval), vytvářet nový článek by bylo zbytečné a matoucí. Viz relativně extrémní případ Conservative Right Party – Order of the Nation (Q1347192). --Jklamo (talk) 16:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Country of citizenship

Ahoj, takhle změna je formálně špatná, protože v době narození člověka nelze tvrdit, že se narodil v Československu. Československo v tu dobu neexistovalo. Když na to občas narazím, tak to ruším. Bylo by fajn to opravit. Měj se. Skim (talk) 18:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Otázkou je, jak by to mělo být správně. V algoritmu, kterým jsem ty osoby vybíral, jsem krom dalšího bral v úvahu místo narození i místo úmrtí zároveň, aby byla chybovost miminální. Ale zas vytvořit si pro ten můj algoritmus samostatou položku (což by bylo formálně nejlepší) mi příjde přehnané.--Jklamo (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

expansion (Q19841649)

Zdravíčko pane,
jak moc jsi si jistý touto editací? Podle mě to tam nemá co dělat. Rekonstrukce je oprava něčeho zchátralého. Tady bych čekal něco jako přístavba, nástavba, dostavba. Ale jsou to spíš způsoby toho jak rozšíření provést, než jiné výrazy pro danou činnost. Tudíž ani ty bych tam spíš neuváděl. Jedudědek (talk) 17:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Zdravím, no je to nějaké pomotané, minimálně reconstruction (Q2478058) a reconstruction (Q1370468) jsou v různých jazycích podivně pomíchané, ale pravda zatahovat do toho ještě expansion (Q19841649) není moc dobrý nápad, nemůžu si vzpomenout, proč jsem to tam přidával (a není tomu zase tak dlouho :-) Klidně smazat a tu přístavbu, nástavbu či dostavbu bych tam klidně doplnil.--Jklamo (talk) 20:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Tak tuty dvě mi ještě přijdou celkem jednoznačné. Jedno je prostě obecná rekonstrukce, to druhé specifický způsob, kdy se stavba uvede do nějakého historického stavu. Otázka je, jak moc dobře je to popsané z hlediska běžně užívané terminologie. A pak jestli je to správně používané.

Já se chystám na tuhle trojici log cabin (Q695207), log house (Q884742) a log building (Q884694). A čert ví, kolik tu máme podobných zapeklitostí ;-)

expansion (Q19841649) jsem tedy upravil.

Jedudědek (talk) 08:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Narendra Modi

The BNF no of Narendra Modi is Property:P268:12148/cb17856964q or Bnf (data) Please add it as soon as possible. RoyalBazi (talk) 10:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Chris Evans

Greetings, Jklamo

By no means my previous changes were vandalism as you suggested, the previous version said the actor's middle name "Jamal", which was not the case, I tried to fix it but I just couldn't, so it was just easier to delete it. I'm still learning how to use this thing. Hope you have a great day. Biagio2103 (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, yes, there was older vandalism. It is always better to restore the last non-vandalized version rather than trying to fix it manually. See Wikidata:Vandalism.--Jklamo (talk) 13:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Adrian T. Bell

Ahoj, prosím bylo by možné dodat nějaký zdroj pro tu položku, zejména referenci pro tuto editaci? Díky! Gumruch (talk) 20:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Máš to tam.--Jklamo (talk) 22:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Dík. Tak proto jsem nemohl najít zdroj, měl jsi tam přehozená číslíčka ;) Gumruch (talk) 12:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, to už je skoro nějaká selektivní slepota, já tam viděl 1964, hledal 1964, referencoval 1964 a až teď koukám, že tam bylo 1946 :-) --Jklamo (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate Czech organizations

Dobrý den, importy českých firem označené Czech companies with LEI vyrobily v některých případech duplikáty existujících položek. Např. http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q102265653 a http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q22810780 nebo http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q102262806 a http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q58527740. Bylo by možné to opravit? Ty duplikáty se dají najít podle IČO a zřejme byly ihned označeny jako podezřelé. Good morning, import of Czech companies with LEI created some item duplicates. Can we fix it? Duplicates can be found by Czech Registation ID and likely were marked immediately as suspicuous. Radim.kubacki (talk) 07:47, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

"winner" import

Hey Jklamo, imports such as this one are problematic as you are adding one of the members of a sports team as a winner. We should attribute the win to the team, not to individual team members instead. Can you please fix your import from earlier this day?

This unfortunately happens quite often when winner (P1346) claims are imported from Wikipedia. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:23, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Date precision

Hi, I saw Special:Diff/1497221694 fly by on my watchlist − thanks for importing that data!

However it does not seem that the Crunchbase page indicates January 1st 2012 − only 2012? In that sense I don’t think it’s accurate to record a date at the day precision-level, what do you think?

Thanks! Jean-Fred (talk) 11:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, unfortunately, Crunchbase is sometimes using day precision, sometimes year precision. I was not able to distinguish this in OpenRefine and decided to use day precision (thus recorded year precision data inaccurately). If you are able to fix that using a bot, I can prepare a SPARQL query to find affected items. --Jklamo (talk) 22:50, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Ivar Nilsson

What is going on with Ivar Nilsson? If I understand right, you juts deleted his COA? Dan Koehl (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Yes, COA image is not sutiable for image (P18), there is coat of arms image (P94). --Jklamo (talk) 15:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

I understand your POV, but then if and when you delete COA from P18, then kindly paste them into P94, please dont just delete them. Dan Koehl (talk) 02:39, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Flowers

Photo in my book

Looks like Q17495511: painting by Henri Fantin-Latour & Flowers (Q87742762): painting by Henri Fantin-Latour, Manchester Art Gallery got mixed up. Are you sure you added described by source (P1343) to the right painting? Multichill (talk) 12:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes, i checked it again, it my book is clearly Q17495511: painting by Henri Fantin-Latour, same in 2008 UK edition.--Jklamo (talk) 23:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for checking. Funny that different paintings are used in different editions. I wonder why. Multichill (talk) 17:34, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Call for participation in a task-based online experiment

Dear Jklamo,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender system that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our system based on your previous edits. Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published to a research venue.

The study will start in late January 2022 or early February 2022, and it should take no more than 30 minutes.

If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSees9WzFXR0Vl3mHLkZCaByeFHRrBy51kBca53euq9nt3XWog/viewform?usp=sf_link I will contact you with the link to start the study.

For more information about the study, please read this post: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Kholoudsaa In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards

Kholoudsaa (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Countries at the 2022 Winter Olympics

I just noticed you adding P17 to number of items.

Just want to let you know that I used the following Bash script, which uses country for sport (P1532), to add labels for a number of languages:

wdWinterOL2022Labels () { case $1 in "da" ) sentence=" ved vinter-OL 2022";; "et" ) sentence=" 2022. aasta taliolümpiamängudel";; "fr" ) sentence=" aux Jeux olympiques d\047hiver de 2022";; "hu" ) sentence=" a 2022. évi téli olimpiai játékokon";; "nl" ) sentence=" op de Olympische Winterspelen 2022";; "pl" ) sentence=" na Zimowych Igrzyskach Olimpijskich 2022";; "ru" ) sentence=" на зимних Олимпийских играх 2022";; "sv" ) sentence=" i olympiska vinterspelen 2022";; "it" ) sentence=" ai XXIV Giochi olimpici invernali";; *) return 0 esac language="$1"; IFS= read -r -d '' wdquery << SPARQL # here document SELECT ?Vinter_OL_2022 ?Vinter_OL_2022Label ?repr_senterer__land_Label WHERE { SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "$language". } ?Vinter_OL_2022 wdt:P1344 wd:Q193074. ?Vinter_OL_2022 wdt:P31 wd:Q26213387. OPTIONAL { ?Vinter_OL_2022 wdt:P1532 ?repr_senterer__land_. } } SPARQL wb sparql -f tsv <(echo $wdquery) | sed -E '1d; s/[<>"_]//g; s|http://www.wikidata.org/entity/||;' | gawk -F'\t' -v language="$language" -v sentence="$sentence" 'BEGIN {print "qid,L" language} $2 ~ /^Q[0-9]/ {sub(/@.+/,"",$4); print $1 "," $4 sentence}' }

If you have a need for it, it should be easy to adapt to whatever language you want.--Hjart (talk) 17:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Picture of Bahá'u'lláh

One of the pictures at Baháʼu'lláh (Q101054): founder of the Bahá'í Faith is not of him. I tried removing it but it got reverted. --Steinninn (talk) 12:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

OK, unfortunately, there is no edit summary for edits like these to clarify. I noticed your rename proposal for the picture on Commons as well, thanks for that.--Jklamo (talk) 13:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

katalog Umění pro město

Ahoj, všiml jsem si importu z katalogu Umění pro město. Přesnost dat ale není dobrá. Například zde: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q104829843&type=revision&diff=1636103294&oldid=1341476516 . Toto dílo pochází ze stejné doby jako sídliště na kterém se nachází (tj. 60.–70. léta) a autorkou je Sylva Lacinová. --MIGORMCZ (talk) 16:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

A když si čtu co to má být za katalog, tak by se měl věnovat Praze. Q108803879 a Q104829843 jsou ale v Pardubicích a v Brně. --MIGORMCZ (talk) 16:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Ahoj, zrovna na to koukám. Ztotožňoval jsem to podle existujících ID, ale OpenRefine mi tam koukám zamotal i pár položek mimo (bohužel jsem si hned neudělal zpětné ověření). Vypadá to na cca 20 chybných přiřazení ze 750, což myslím zas tak tragická bilance není. Každopádně díky za odchycení těch dvou, opravím i ty ostatní.--Jklamo (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Tak pročištěno, z těch 20 byly nakonec jen 4 chybná.--Jklamo (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Pozvánka na česko-slovenský Wikimedia Hackathon 2022

Srdečně Vás zveme na český a slovenský Wikimedia Hackathon 2022, který se bude konat 21.5. od 9:00 do 16:00 hybridně - paralelně online (na tomto odkazu) a paralelně offline (na adrese Slovenská 1705/21 v Praze 2 v sídle spolku Wikimedia Česká republika, který akci pořádá). Letošní hackathon bude věnovaný slovenským wikidatům a budování slovenské Wikidata komunity. Celý Hackathon bude v českém a slovenském jazyce. Více o programu Hackathonu se dozvíte na tomto odkazu nebo na FB události. Těšíme se na Vás! S pozdravem, --Vojtěch Dostál (talk) & Eva Vele (WMCZ) (talk) 18:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

We cordially invite you to the Czech and Slovak Wikimedia Hackathon 2022, which will take place on 21 May from 9:00 - 16:00 in a hybrid way - parallel online (at this link) and parallel offline: at Slovenská 1705/21 in Prague 2 at the headquarters of the Wikimedia Czech Republic, which organizes the event. This year's hackathon will be dedicated to Slovak Wikidata and building the Slovak Wikidata community. More information about the Hackathon program can be found at this link or on the FB event. The whole Hackathon will be in Czech and Slovak language only. We look forward to seeing you there! Best regards, --Vojtěch Dostál (talk) & Eva Vele (WMCZ) (talk) 18:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Telekom subsidiaries

Hi Jklamo, please avoid duplicates.--Ва-банк (talk) 15:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, it is not an duplicate, it's more granularity. Deutsche Telekom Europe (Q61452147) is Netherlandese holding company (subidiary of Deutsche Telekom (Q9396)), which in fact owns shares in Hrvatski Telekom (Q470696).--Jklamo (talk) 18:46, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes indeed, but why haven't you removed "Deutsche Telekom"?--Ва-банк (talk) 20:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

jiri friml

hello @Jklamo just wondered what was bad about the merge (didn't notice your edit comment until it was too late so not trying to start an edit war, just interested to know what you thought was bad about the merge? Duncan.Hull (talk) 12:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Jiří Friml (Q29954492) (boatinst, born in 1973) and Jiří Friml (Q95177024) (archivist, born in 1942) are two different people. I think it's obvious. Jklamo (talk) 13:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Wind and Wind Tre

Wind and Wind Tre are two separate companies. In fact, the latter was born from the merger of Wind with 3 Italia, and is a separate company with a different VAT number and different corporate events. 151.57.69.234 11:18, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Spencer Roane

Hello, Jklamo, since you added the file some time ago, just wanted to inform you this is on commons, You might wish to replace the existing file by that one. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 08:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, the picture you linked is clearly better, next time feel free to make a such change in similar cases yourself. Jklamo (talk) 09:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Q109986825 and Q109986826

Could you have a look at the life dates of Q109986825 and Q109986826? They are unsourced and seem to be copied from Q56473852 and Q56473854. Thank you! --Emu (talk) 14:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

I took the dates from Hebrew Wikipedia (https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A0%D7%98%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%A7_%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%94_%D7%91%D7%90%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A8), I'm sorry I didn't make a reference. But the Hebrew Wikipedia may be wrong, the only online reference in the articledoes not mention the dates (other references are not online). Feel free to delete these dates. Jklamo (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Wikidata Barnstar
		Thank you for your tireless and valuable contributions in many areas! Kozuch (talk) 12:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Help

hi please help me for re create item. dear Please help me. Mohamadreza sadeghi item deleted. Please help me and re create this.

This item Q117749810 and Q117744150.

Please fix this. It's person famous and have more reference2A01:4F8:C010:72A7:0:0:0:1 10:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

See Wikidata:Notability. --Jklamo (talk) 20:20, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Příjmení x rozcestník

Ahoj.

První chci poděkovat za ten revert vandalismu :-)

Ohledně této editace: problém je, že na en.wp mají rozcestníky s odkazy na lidi stejného příjmení zvlášť od jiných rozcestníků, a na Wikidatech je propojují s položkami příjmení. Pokud tedy založím rozcestník odkazující na lidi stejného příjmení i na jiném wikiprojektu, zvlášťě když je také anglickojazyčný, tak by logicky měl být přes Wikidata propojen se stejným rozcestníkem na en.wp, a tudíž je potřeba ho na Wikidatech napojit na příjmení. Proto je s:Author:Burns, obsahující odkazy na autory s příjmením Burns, propojen s w:Burns (surname) a nikoliv s w:Burns, kterážto stránka obsahuje všechno možné jenom ne lidi daného příjmení. -- Jan Kameníček (talk) 20:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Karina Rotenberg (Q119789556)

Ahoj, please always use the correct translit for German, e.g. with this tool.--U. M. Owen (talk) 16:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Položky částí obcí

Zdravím. Položky, které jsou založeny pro instance of (P31) = municipal part in Czechia (Q61089180), jsou založeny primárně pro části obce. Část obce je z datového hlediska identifikována primárně svým názvem a příslušností k určité obci, podle toho jsou v projektech Wikimedia tvořeny i standardní rozlišovače částí obce - je tedy dost absurdní, aby právě tento údaj v popisu položky na Wikidatech úplně chyběl. Vzhledem k tomu, že názvy obcí jsou koncipovány jakožto jedinečné v rámci okresu, obec standardně určuje název obce spolu s názvem okresu. Naopak je zbytečné název okresu ještě duplikovat názvem kraje, protože názvy okresů jedinečné jsou (v těchto případech je v anglických popisech v názvech kraje navíc ještě plošně namnožená neopravená pravopisná chyba - malé "r" ve slově "region", ačkoliv v názvech okresů již obdobná chyba byla roboticky opravena).

Pokoušet se navíc odhadovat či určovat urbanistický charakter části obce, tj. zda daná část obce je vesnicí, skupinou vesnic, částí vesnice, rozptýleným osídlením, čtvrtí nebo sídlem smíšeného či přechodného charakteru, je už do značné míry "vlastní výzkum", pro který nemáme spolehlivý zdroj a jednotnou metodiku. Vycházejme tedy primárně z toho, jak je položka definována - jako část obce. Nyní je v tom značný chaos a nejednotnost, u různých obcí jsou popisy dělané podle jiného mustru, mnohdy i položky více částí stejné obce mají bezdůvodně odlišné popisy, popis v jednom jazyce neodpovídá popisu v jiném jazyce, mnohdy jsou popisy v některých jazycích vyloženě chybné, např. k položce části obce někdo přidá v některém jazyce popis, že jde o "obec", atd. Popis "village" sám o sobě také mnohdy dostatečně nespecifikuje, zda "vesnicí" v daném případě je míněna celá obec, nebo jen část obce. V případech, kdy je urbanistický charakter části obce jednoznačný, by nevadilo, jej do popisu položky druhotně přidat, ale primárně položka části obce určena pro část obce jakožto část obce, nikoliv pro vesnici. ŠJů (talk) 01:15, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Není konsenzus na dělání takovýchto hromadných změn, je vhodné ho před masovými editacemi najít (třeba na Wikidata:Mezi bajty). Jklamo (talk) 18:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

K opravám zjevných chyb není konsensus? A k jejich vracení konsensus máš? Ale je pravda, že takto hromadné chyby by bylo vhodné opravovat také hromadně - dělat to jen nahodile ručně u příležitosti jiných oprav či zpřesnění není příliš efektivní. Můžeš si to vzít na starost, pokud se v tom chceš angažovat. Jinak jak vidím, na věcné argumenty nereaguješ a sám také žádné nemáš. --ŠJů (talk) 19:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Co se týče konsensu, dělal jsem nyní v těch tebou rozporovaných anglických popiscích prakticky přesně tutéž úpravu, kterou u českých popisků dělal v květnu 2016 (např. zde) Vojtěch Dostál, a protože šlo o logickou a správnou úpravu, za těch 7 let proti ní snad nikdo rozumný neprotestoval. Vycházel jsem tedy ze 7 let starého konsensu, který nyní nabouráváš ty svými reverty.

O tom, že popisky v různých jazycích by si měly pokud možno navzájem odpovídat a všechny by měly odpovídat obsahu položky, snad diskusi otevírat nedává smysl, protože kdo to neakceptuje, nejspíš by nebyl ani schopný se smysluplně účastnit věcné diskuse. (Jsou typy lidí, kteří např. dvakrát hromadně revertují, ale do věcné diskuse se zapojit odmítají, možná se jí účastnit ani neumějí. Proti takovým by asi měli zakročit spíš správci.) Stále je v těch různojazyčných popisech ohromný bordel a spousta chyb a nesmyslů, jednou se to stejně bude muset řešit.

Spíše bych se tedy ptal po tom, z jakého konsensu vycházeli ti, kdo do popisů položek částí obcí vkládali klíčová slova jako "village" nebo "neighborhood", podle jakých kritérií určovali, které z nich pro kterou část obce použijí, a jestli je takovéto rozlišování obhajitelné a udržitelné, nebo jde spíš o chaotickou nahodilost. "Village" nebo "neighborhood" může být klidně i základní sídelní jednotka nebo nějaký neoficiální, neformální urbanistický celek, tedy jde o kategorii nejen obtížně určitelnou a obtížně doložitelnou, ale také méně specifickou. Zatímco status "města" nebo "městyse" je oficiální a v tomto smyslu zcela jednoznačný, titul "vesnice" či "čtvrť" se obcím, částem obce ani základním sídelním jednotkám oficiálně neuděluje ani nezapisuje - a těžko hledat objektivní ostré kritérium, kdy připojená část obce už přestává být "vesnicí" a začíná být "čtvrtí". Do Wikidat dle mého názoru takovéto věštění z lógru ani nepatří.

A pak se samozřejmě můžeme ptát, koho napadlo a o jaký konsensus se opíralo, že u těch částí obce, které byly popsány jako "village", v anglických popiscích úplně chybí údaj o tom, které obce jsou částí, a pak taky třeba proč v českých popisech u většiny částí obce údaj o okresu standardně máme, zatímco u stejnojmenných jádrových částí obce nikoliv, čímž nám zbytečně vznikla řada nejednoznačných popisů, atd. Pokud by všechny tyto hromadné importy a hromadné editace byly předem prodiskutovány někde Mezi bajty, určitě by se spousta takových chyb a nesmyslných nahodilostí dala předem vychytat, než se namnoží, ale nutným předpokladem je také to, aby ten, kdo takovou akci chystá, dokázal podstatu připomínek a možných problémů pochopit, což také není úplná samozřejmost. Než o každé prkotině otevírat vleklé diskuse, někdy možná stačí se včas a důkladně zamyslet a akci včas domyslet do detailů - a diskusi otevírat jen tehdy, pokud se vyskytne nějaký obtížně řešitelný problém nebo dilema. Diskutovat o samozřejmých věcech vcelku nemá smysl a komu nedojdou, s tím se většinou ani v diskusi nedá domluvit. --ŠJů (talk) 21:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Two architects with same life dates?

Could you have a look at Ludvík Lábler (Q12034246) and Ferdinand Hauptmann (Q108706486)? It’s of course entirely possible that those two Czech architects have the exact same life dates but it’s a coincidence worthy of closer scrutiny, I believe. --Emu (talk) 19:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Strange case. These dates are stated in source [2] [3], but it looks extremely suspicious indeed. Multiple sources can be found for Ludvík Lábler (Q12034246) with these dates, so they are probably the correct for him. I can't find any other sources with dates for Ferdinand Hauptmann (Q108706486), so they are probably wrong for him. Anyway thanks for pointing that out! Jklamo (talk) 23:56, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Mel Brooks

I notice you reverted my edits to Mel Brooks. How is it vandalism? -- 72.212.64.192 09:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

What about removing references or adding and removing same aliases again and again? Jklamo (talk) 09:35, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

I am adding references to English Wikipedia and updating his page. -- 72.212.64.192 10:13, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for catching my mistake

Hi tried to link the de version of my new article sv:Tibber and I somehow accidentally linked the disambiguation instead. I don't know how that happened, but I'm glad you caught it and saw your notification about reverting it. Thanks for sorting it out. It was an honest mistake.--Orubblig (talk) 19:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

I guess this was caused by this bug again. Mormegil (talk) 21:46, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Political candidates are not politicians

I see you changed my statements on New Zealand general election candidates from "occupation political candidate" to "occupation politician", or added statements when no occupation was listed. I'm just letting you know I will change them, as political candidate and politician are not the same thing. Most political candidates never actually get elected. Running in an election is not sufficient, in my view, to count as becoming a politician, and the distinction is a useful one to make. DrThneed (talk) 00:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello

Hello. Removed this parent company as it is no longer the parent company. Source - https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6014881?ysclid=lk12k2ohrz946206470 Bankovskyi Serg (talk) 06:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, for that case use end time (P582) qualifier to the value, do not remove old data. Adding a reference is also convenient. Jklamo (talk) 16:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

ARES.js

Ahoj, nechci ti do toho hrabat, ale neopravil bys User:Jklamo/ARES.js, aby neodkazoval na dnes již nefunkční "wwwinfo" webovky? Díky moc, Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Ahoj, no jelikož Martin nastavil na Czech Registration ID (IČO) (P4156) jako formatter URL právě ARES, tak je aktuálně k ničemu. Spíš bych si tam místo toho mohl hodit obchodní rejstřík. Jklamo (talk) 01:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)