Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts/Archive/2016/04

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q3342363/Brazzaville (Q3844)

Items involved: Q3342363Talk, Q3844Talk	Status:    resolved
Nkuna is a pre-colonial name for the city of Brazzaville. However, we can't add the French Wikipedia link for Nkuna to the entry for Brazzaville since it already has its own page in the Wikipedia. --Dancxjo (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC) These are separate entities because of the time-delta; the only other way to resolve this is to merge the French pages. --Izno (talk) 14:26, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

particle (Q1621273)/particle (Q16669042)

Items involved: Q1621273Talk, Q16669042Talk	Status:    resolved
--Headbomb (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC) Resolved by merging. --Izno (talk) 14:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Suits (Q12904431)/Suits (Q370185)

Items involved: Q12904431Talk, Q370185Talk	Status:    resolved
--Stiegenaufgang (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC) I have requested merge of the articles in mkwiki. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 09:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC) Resolved by merging. Badly, but merged. Article still has a "cleanup" tag, so they should still know it needs to be cleaned. --Izno (talk) 14:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

subarctic climate (Q5967371)/monsoon-influenced subarctic climate (Q1651358)

Items involved: Q5967371Talk, Q1651358Talk	Status:    resolved
From the maps, it appears that both are about the same climate zone, the boreal taiga zone, and should be merged (note that only the Japanese and Korean Wikipedias have different articles), although I am not a climatologist and not 100% sure. If there is a difference, it should be made explicit; but it is hard to discern any reason why de:Kaltgemäßigtes Klima and ro:Climă rece temperată are not linked with en:Subarctic climate etc. (Note that de:Subpolare Zone, confusingly, refers to the tundra zone, which is classified as belonging to the polar zone in Köppen–Geiger, although there is also a stub de:Tundrenklima.) --Florian Blaschke (talk) 01:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC) @Florian Blaschke: On monsoon-influenced subarctic climate (Q1651358), the de and ro links appear to be specifically about the Dwc Köppen climate category; the German establishes that and the ro uses the same image. The ko and ja links might be good to merge to subarctic climate (Q5967371) based on their images and keys for those images using Köppen (listing all of the items in subarctic in English), but someone has to perform that merge. I can't make heads or tails of the sr link, but I think that may also be able to be merged. --Izno (talk) 12:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC) @Florian Blaschke: Moved the ja and ko links around because ja and ko were describing "continental climate" as indicated by the navboxes. I'll leave the sr link where it is and consider this resolved. --Izno (talk) 15:51, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Sørensen similarity index (Q8170251)/Sørensen similarity index (Q2613728)

Items involved: Q8170251Talk, Q2613728Talk	Status:    resolved
Q8170251

Category:Construction machines (Q9692157)/Category:Construction equipment (Q6806404)

Items involved: Q9692157Talk, Q6806404Talk	Status:    resolved
Both items deal with categories of construction machines, but there is an interwiki conflict as commons has different categories on "construction equipment" and "construction machines". Lymantria (talk) 09:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)  Oppose @Lymantria: I disagree, these are distinct concepts, "equipment" is a more general term, which can include tools that aren't machines. See commons:Category:Construction equipment, there are multiple subcategories that don't fit under "construction machines". Intgr (talk) 08:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC) Having a second look, I agree. No action needed. Lymantria (talk) 10:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Coats of arms of Crimea (Q10087013)/Category:Coats of arms of Crimea (Q10084678)

Items involved: Q10087013Talk, Q10084678Talk	Status:    resolved
--Leonid76 (talk) 23:05, 11 March 2016 (UTC)  Done @Leonid76: Performed a simple merge. Intgr (talk) 16:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Valencia (Q20126334)/Valencia (Q743339)

Items involved: Q20126334Talk, Q743339Talk	Status:    resolved
The same elements. --Ksc~ruwiki (talk) 09:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)  Done @Ksc~ruwiki: I had to merge the two disambig pages on shwiki [1] and then it could be merged. Intgr (talk) 08:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Dersu (Q23009761)/Dersu (Q23009761)

Items involved: Q15241594Talk, Q23009761Talk	Status:    resolved
Same --АлександрВв (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)  Done @АлександрВв: Confirmed, merged. Intgr (talk) 08:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

neo-Aristotelianism (Q6991694)/neo-Aristotelianism (Q19978295)

Items involved: Q6991694Talk, Q19978295Talk	Status:    resolved
These two items are the same and should me merged to allow for interlanguage links between them --212.25.147.118 15:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)  Done Performed a simple merge. Intgr (talk) 16:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Graz (Q13298)

Items involved: Q13298Talk	Status:    resolved
Sur la page Wikipédia en Français de Graz, le lien vers la page en allemand est faux. Je ne sais pas comment le corriger car il semble juste sur Wikidata. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pronguen (talk • contribs).  Done There was a problem in w:fr:Modèle:Diagramme électoral/Parti/AT. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Godfrey Okoye (Q13605333)/Godfrey Okoye (Q23933915)

Items involved: Q13605333Talk, Q23933915Talk	Status:    resolved
The two items appear to be just the same, just slight change in description, shouldn't one be merged into the other? Stanleytux (talk) 06:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)  Merged Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

electromagnetism (Q11406)/electromagnetic interaction (Q849919)

Items involved: Q11406Talk, Q849919Talk	Status:    resolved
The same items, I suppose. --Ksc~ruwiki (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)  Oppose @Ksc~ruwiki: I disagree, "electromagnetism" is the branch of physics and "electromagnetic force" is the force being studied. They are separate concepts and some Wikipedias have two separate articles on them. It's fine that there isn't a perfect 1:1 mapping between the articles IMO, it would be worse having to conflate distinct concepts. Intgr (talk) 07:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC) ok! I wasn't sure at any rate. --Ksc~ruwiki (talk) 19:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)