Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts/Unresolved/2020

January 2020

convertible husbandry (Q17051426)/fallow (Q1161157)

Items involved: Q17051426^Talk, Q1161157^Talk	Status: not resolved
--إيان (talk) 01:03, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Q8733401/Category:People from Erechim (Q9224617)

Items involved: Q8733401^Talk, Q9224617^Talk

Status:

in doubt

Same thing. --179.233.3.144 18:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cruccone, Lucas, Doostdar: opinions? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Different: there was a mix between the category about people only born there and the category about all people who had to do with that city in their lives. --Gambo7 (talk) 17:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yield strength (Q3807177)/yield (Q899301)

Items involved: Q3807177^Talk, Q899301^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--Hannes Ulbricht (talk) 09:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3807177 should be deleted, and the pages in the languages linked to the term https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q899301#sitelinks-wikipedia "yield (Q899301)"

thank you! user:Hannes

Should ask Spanish users' help: @JackPier, Eduardosalg, Kegelschnitt, Saldanag98: --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

orthogonal projection (Q980329)/projection (Q519967)

Items involved: Q980329^Talk, Q519967^Talk

Status:

in doubt

In some languages there exist different pages on projections and orthogonal projections which is fine. The English wikipedia, however, redirects from "Orthogonal projection" to "Projection (Linear Algebra)" which makes sense if one just wants to have one page that covers both. But it should then be this page that becomes the English link both for Q980329 and for Q519967. --Scherben (talk) 09:57, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can't have one sitelink in two items. It's the problem of en.wiki that it has only one article. Wostr (talk) 13:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

list of Seljuq rulers (Q3707998)/list of sultans of the Seljuq Empire (Q6641756)

Items involved: Q3707998^Talk, Q6641756^Talk	Status: not resolved
--88.230.163.50 01:16, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Military Demarcation Line (Q588599)/North Korea–South Korea border (Q3088884)

Items involved: Q588599^Talk, Q3088884^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Any relations between both? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:20, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A good news is that French Wikipedia is discussing for a merge on this issue. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So @Douglasboavista: shouldn't Portuguese also consider for merging both? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone who speak Portuguese tell me that if merging pt:Linha de Demarcação Militar and pt:Fronteira Coreia do Norte-Coreia do Sul is possible or not? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

tripe soup (Q1089051)/tripe chorba (Q57609453)

Items involved: Q1089051^Talk, Q57609453^Talk

Status:

in doubt

There are several articles dealing with the same contense. But they are listed in 2 language blogs

1) the EN item is Tripe soup the same item is also available in these language : Català, Englisch, Español, Français, Hebräisch, Italiano, 日本語, Mazedonisch, Türkçe

2) the DE item is Kuttelsuppe the same item is also availabl in these languages : Žemaitėška, Čeština, English, فارسی, Português, Slovenčina, 中文

However, are about the same meal ! it is senceless to have these 2 blockse. you cannot switch from english to german description. should be merged. i tried but couldnt do it --Gonzosft (talk) 15:47, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Food --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per the English articles, they are not the same thing. tripe soup (Q1089051) is the generic items for all tripe soups, and tripe chorba (Q57609453) is about a subclass of it (and there are others, like tripes à la mode de Caen (Q356690). -Ash Crow (talk) 18:20, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad (Q17436400)/Conrado (Q18156205)

Items involved: Q17436400^Talk, Q18156205^Talk

Status:

in doubt

This two pages had different ID but they talk about the same content (one being linked to three different Wikipedia language pages, and another to only the Spanish version). I have tried to fix it, but due to conflicts with the translations the merge tool has not let me do it. I don't know how to solve the problem, and that's why I report it from here. Greetings and thank you very much, hopefully this little matter can be resolved quickly. --Thebestsilver (talk) 19:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Names --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, those 2 items are 2 different names, that should *not* be merged, and there is therefore no Interwiki conflict

please read Wikidata:WikiProject_Names#Basic_principles each string should have a distinct item: the most important property is therefore nom dans la langue originelle (P1705). Wassyl is not Василь is not Васіль is not Vasyl; - i.e. "Conrad" is not "Conrado" - they are the same name in different languages, so, we use said to be the same as (P460) to link them, but we do not merge them Hsarrazin (talk) 08:16, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

integral calculus (Q150008)/integral (Q80091)

Items involved: Q150008^Talk, Q80091^Talk

Status:

in doubt

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integralrechnung Cannot be accessed from https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integraci%C3%B3n although they is tthe exactly same topic. --201.141.8.35 15:30, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Mathematics --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an interwiki conflict. Just move a sitelink between items if it's necessary. Wostr (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These topics are different. To which en-article es:Integracion should be linked: to en:Integral (Q80091) or en:Integral calculus (Q150008)? I suppose all is correct now about es placement. --Infovarius (talk) 15:08, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The home articles in en.Wikipedia are distinct, although related. The English names (both here, and in en.Wikipedia) may not be the best, but they are not the same concept. I would not be surprised if the same article in some language Wikipedias would be combined. Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:13, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

molecular model (Q2196961)/molecular model set (Q1943408)

Items involved: Q2196961^Talk, Q1943408^Talk

Status:

partially resolved

Molecular model and Molekülbaukasten are similar and should be linked, but they have different wikidata. The English version is general to all models, with specific focus on physical models, whereas the German article appears to only focus on the physical modelling kits. --Jevandezande (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Chemistry --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an interwiki conflict, but a mistake in adding de.wikipedia link to the wrong item:

molecular model (Q2196961) is about molecular models (not only models built using plastic balls and sticks)
molecular model set (Q1943408) is an item created exclusively for the commons:Category:Chemical structures built with molecular model sets, there won't be any useful statements in this item ever
de:Molekülbaukasten = commons:Category:Molecular model sets.

We are not linking 'similar' in WD, there should be a third item for de.wiki article. Such interwiki link can be placed locally in de.wiki. Wostr (talk) 12:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Q83974527/Micropterus salmoides (Q755105)

Items involved: Q83974527^Talk, Q755105^Talk Status: in doubt

I am with a museum that is trying to host our specimen data on wikidata. We are having Interwiki conflicts in that the general page for the name of the specimen i.e. Micropterus salmoides already utilize wikipedia or wikispecies pages that would be appropriate to link for our specimens. We do not want to consolidate these pages as our page refers to a specific specimen of that species, not the general species itself --Maj0355 (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.

Notified participants of WikiProject Food --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:34, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Say that there are five specimens of a given species: for each it "would be appropriate to link for our specimens" to the relevant "wikipedia or wikispecies pages". This is a modelling issue, not an interwiki conflict. - Brya (talk) 06:06, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to host the data of a specimen it should be hosted under its catalogue number not its species name. The spacies name is reserved for information about a species not individual specimens of that species, within the record for the specimen you can record the species it is a representative of. However, personally I do not think that hosting data on individual museum speciemens is an appropriate use of these databases. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) ^talk 15:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Maj0355, and welcome to Wikidata. I’m not a regular here, so take anything I say with a grain of salt ;). I don’t have a strong opinion on whether museum specimens should have data items hosted here or elsewhere, but if here then I imagine the general pattern would be specimens ▻ species ◅ wikipedia articles (using triangles to signify one-to-many relationships). Is this related to https://www.shsu.edu/ (Sam Houston State University (Q1422594))? Are you using this as a test case for how to map data from your records? You will want an instance of (P31) statement: I couldn’t find “museum specimen”, but there is zoological specimen (Q2114846) (“zoological specimen”, but might be intended for taxidermy specifically?). Looking at Madonna of the Roses (Q3842700), it has properties like Collection, Catalog code, and Inventory number that might be relevant. C.f. Cameleon cristatus at Lausanne natural history museum no 225 (Q29951025), Dogor (Q76854211), RUMF-ZC-01670 (Q66098689). Might be best to ask for some more experienced advice at Wikidata:Project chat. — Pelagic (talk) 10:54, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code (Q1140221)/ISO 3166-1 (Q25275)

Items involved: Q1140221^Talk, Q25275^Talk

Status:

in doubt

I wanted to find this table in German, but it is not linked from the English article and I can not add the link because the German article is less granular and is linked to a less granular article in English. How can I resolve this? Should I resolve this or do we leave such problems to the intelligence of the user? Grahamj42 (talk) 14:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Grahamj42:, like this? Wikisaurus (talk) 18:18, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Limerzel (Q70983)/Q49463735/Limerzel (Q35717169)

Items involved: Q70983^Talk, Q49463735^Talk, Q35717169^Talk

Status:

in doubt

pretty sure it's duplicate, but I don't how to do --H mlet (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure these are the same thing, but they look similar to me and conflict on Geonames and Who's on First IDs --H mlet (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should use same section to discuss. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:35, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject France --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:35, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are indeed 2 different entities:

The municipality (or commune, or 4th order administrative division), which may contain several populated places
- GeoNames: 6437291 (fourth-order administrative division)
- Who's on First: 404404633 (localadmin)
The populated place (or human settlement), which is located inside a municipality
- GeoNames: 2998298 (populated place)
- Who's on First: 101763525 (locality)

As Cebuano Wikipedia uses bots to generate articles from GeoNames and Who's on First, they usually have two different articles, for the municipality and for the populated place, respectively. The problem is that the rest of Wikipedias normally have one single article, and the corresponding Wikidata item usually mixes GeoNames and Who's on First IDs! I have found this error many times. I propose that if there is only 1 single article, this should be associated with the municipality item, and not with the populated place item. Why? For example, statements about population (P1082) and office held by head of government (P1313) refer to the municipality, not to the populated place.

Therefore:

In Limerzel (Q70983), there should appear the municipality IDs: fix GeoNames to 6437291 and Who's on First to 404404633
Q49463735 should be merged with Limerzel (Q70983)
Limerzel (Q35717169) should be left as it is

--Albert Villanova del Moral (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with @Albertvillanovadelmoral:, the first two should be merged (on ceb.wp first, then on Wikidata). The commune and the town should also be linked with capital (P36)/capital of (P1376). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:02, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I also think that 1st=2nd, but both are ≠ 3rd, merge request posted by VIGNERON. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Kurort (Q28067896)/spa town (Q4946461)

Items involved: Q28067896^Talk, Q4946461^Talk

Status:

in doubt

The German Wikipedia article "Kurort" is currently linked to the English Wikipedia article "spa town" and the Japanese Wikipedia article "温泉街". In Germany "Kurort" is legally defined as a place where people can take a cure for medical purposes. Such a cure can be prescribed by a medical doctor and health insurances usually pay for such a cure. The English article "spa town" and the Japanese article "温泉街" describe holiday destinations, whose main attractions are hot springs, but are not recognized as medical cures. The Japanese article "クアオルト" on the other hand, describes the concept of "Kurort" in Germany, with its medical and legal implications. I therefore propose to disconnect "温泉街" from object Q4946461 ("Kurort"), and replace it with "クアオルト" from object Q28067896. --Doktork (talk) 05:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wotheina, Iso10970, Loup and Law, Tekeonin, JapaneseA: Opinions? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:48, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I suggest you move German "Kurort" to Q28067896("クアオルト"). Reason:The creator of Q4946461("spa town : specialized resort town situated around a mineral spa")[1] appears not limiting it to healings nor German-government-regulated version, and I bet all Wikipedias (including de.wikipedia) will eventually need an article about all those non-German (typically American) "spa town/resort" concept. Now, most, if not all, articles linked from Q28067896 seems more general, not restricted to German-government-regulated version even if their titles use the word "Kurort". So, keep all of them in Q4946461, and move only the few articles of narrower sense to Q28067896. By the way, I wonder what to do with the "Weltbad" section, and could de:Kurpark be filled into Q4946461? ~~(Well, the appropriateness of putting the Japanese "温泉街"(or which else among the chaotic pile of articles) in Q4946461 is another huge question, but that's a different issue.)~~ Wotheina (talk) 06:08, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wotheina: But then, both English and Chinese articles mentioned both, is your comments meaning that both en and zh should also be another separated item? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:58, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: The articles you mentioned: English and Chinese both does not contain even a single occurence of word "Kurort" or mention any German law. Perhaps you meant to quote different articles? Anyway, articles that mention both the broader ("any kind of spa-like things") and/or narrower meanings can stay in Q4946461 as it is now. Just move articles that are dedicated to the narrower German-government-licenced-only meaning into Q28067896. No need to artificially split any existing articles. Most of the 36 articles(languages) that are currently bound to Q4946461 (including non-german articles titled "Kurort") seems generic, and aren't restricted to German licence. So we only need to move one article, de:Kurort. The remaining 35 articles can stay in Q4946461. --Wotheina (talk) 07:16, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wotheina: Well, here is what I've looked from zh:温泉镇: "温泉镇是一类以温泉及水疗法为卖点的旅游型城镇，中西方均存在许多直接以“温泉”或“温泉镇”命名的城镇，较著名者包括斯帕及巴斯，而日本则有类似的温泉街。" (lit. Kurort is a kind of travel town that seels spa and hydrotherapy, China and Western countries are having towns that named "spa" or "kurort" directly, for example Spa and Bath, while Japan has a likely type called Onsen street). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:07, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: Ah, if you are responding to my remarks "(Well,..." on 06:08, 5 February 2020 (UTC)), then I'm really sorry, those remarks about "温泉街" were off-topic, so I shouldn't have said that here. May I strike them out to avoid confusion? Next, I suggest you not translate "温泉镇" to "kurort" here. Doktork's definition of "Kurort" is very strict — only German-law-certificated facilities can be called "Kurort", and others shouldn't. I guess Chinese word "温泉镇" is not limited to German-law-certificated facilities, so you'd better translate it to a more generic English term such as "hot-spring town", not "kurort". Now, I repeat my opinion: Move only de:Kurort article to Q28067896. Keep en:Spa town, zh:温泉镇 to Q4946461, regardless of what they say or not about Japan. --Wotheina (talk) 04:43, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

predicate logic (Q35148)/first-order logic (Q4055684)

Items involved: Q35148^Talk, Q4055684^Talk

Status:

in doubt

Predicate logic and first-order logic are the same things. Predicate logic also doesn't link to an English WP page. Note that in some languages, like German, there's pages on both. But mostly there's two clusters of pages in different languages, but they actually refer to the same thing. Here's a link to a related discussion. By the way, I'm not very active on wikidate so please use my wikipedia talk page. PizzaMan (talk) 12:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PizzaMan:, I believe there are two meanings of the phrase "predicate logic": either first-order logic (like here) or any logic of order >= 1 (like here); thus predicate logic (Q35148) includes both first-order logic (Q4055684) and higher-order logic (Q1644136); in the first case it is sometimes called "pure predicate logic". I believe it is no ok, as fr:Calcul des prédicats, for example, is about first-order logic and is connected to first-order logic (Q4055684). Wikisaurus (talk) 17:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GNU Recutils (Q3093295)/recfiles (Q84711691)

Items involved: Q3093295^Talk, Q84711691^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Only after creating Q84711691 I found Q3093295. Not sure if they should be merged as Q84711691 focuses more on the recfiles file format whereas Q3093295 on the Recutils toolset. Both share the same homepage https://www.gnu.org/software/recutils/ --Brevity (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually e.g. Q723030 is quite similar in also having Q56876355. Thus, keep both?! Still, it'd be nice to language-link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recfiles and https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Recutils --Brevity (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Saint John (Bailiwick of Brandenburg) (Q4498889)/Johanniter International (Q15229641)

Items involved: Q4498889^Talk, Q4498889^Talk	Status: not resolved
Q4498889 is not the translation of Q15229641. It discusses another topic different from the content described in the ENG page--Johanniter international (talk) 09:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Meall nan Eun (Q11772726)/Meall nan Eun (Q20598615)

Items involved: Q11772726^Talk, Q20598615^Talk

Status:

not resolved

two pages about the same concept on cywiki --SilentSpike (talk) 20:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pages are identical. Merge on Welsh requested. - FakirNL (talk) 15:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sgùrr Mòr (Q20596970)/Sgùrr Mòr (Q13131340)

Items involved: Q20596970^Talk, Q13131340^Talk

Status:

not resolved

duplicate page about same entity on cywiki --SilentSpike (talk) 09:26, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Breckenheimer, Llywelyn2000: I won't request any merges on Welsh unless if both say okay. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pages are identical. Merge on Welsh requested. - FakirNL (talk) 14:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Wd (Q27854178)/Module:Wd (Q24733825)/Module:WD (Q64549978)

Items involved: Q27854178^Talk, Q24733825^Talk, Q64549978^Talk	Status: partially resolved
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC) The modules in Module:WD (Q64549978) are duplicates/aliases for Module:Wd (Q24733825) and probably can't be resolved (or need local communities to resolve this).[reply]

Eucalyptus clelandii (Q5405561)/Eucalyptus clelandiorum (Q65066343)

Items involved: Q5405561^Talk, Q65066343^Talk

Status:

partially resolved

The accepted name is that of Eucalyptus clelandiorum (Q65066343). English wikipedia has two articles (one for each) So there seems to be some merging needed in enwiki. Hoever, most of the identifiers for Eucalyptus clelandiorum have been (incorrectly) attached to Eucalyptus clelandii. And the rest of the world for some reason has used the name Eucalyptus clelandii together with its wrongly attached ids. Suggestions requested. @Wikidata:WikiProject Taxonomy/Participants: MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the correctway of using ping project:

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:46, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First published as Eucalyptus goniantha var. clelandi and later combined to Eucalyptus clelandi, but named after Mr. A. F. Cleland and his nephew Dr. J. Burton Cleland. So the correct form is Eucalyptus clelandiorum. The enWp acticles should be merged. --Succu (talk) 08:55, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Succu:That will resolve the issue with respect to enwiki but not with respect to wikidata and the fact that all the non-English wikipedia articles for E. clelandii (and wikidata) are using all the E. clelandiorum ids). I guess we just attach the ids to the correct wikidata item and hope that no-one reinstates them? MargaretRDonald (talk) 12:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MargaretRDonald, Succu: I guess so, yes. Perhaps it would help if we point out the taxon name in the WD item Eucalyptus clelandii (Q5405561) as a synonym of Eucalyptus clelandiorum? Is there a WD property suitable for that? –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 13:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Perhaps it is worth considering to create a qualifier "orthographic variants" and/or "misspelling" to taxon name (P225)? Lymantria (talk) 15:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some changes. Please have a look. --Succu (talk) 19:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lymantria: Not a bad idea, but we need to remember that the term "synonym" has a very precise and scientifically valid status within the fields of taxonomy and biological nomenclature, while misspellings are just... wrong. Hence, most often misspellings are not considered synonyms, and as a result they are very rarely mentioned at all (since contrary to synonyms they are of no value in the research). Analogous to this, synonyms are not misspellings and should always be mentioned.

Lastly, we need of course also remember that "taxon" and "taxon name" are two different things. One is the actual species, and the other the name of that species. As an example the taxon name Eucalyptus clelandi and the taxon name Eucalyptus clelandiorum are both names of the same taxon. But both taxon names are unique and have their own merit, therefore their WD items shouldn't be merged. Sort of in the same way we don't merge human (Q5) with Homo sapiens (Q15978631). I fully believe that you, Lymantria, know this, but I also know that many other Wikidata users struggle with it.

@Succu: It looks a lot better than before, but the "taxon name" statements in Eucalyptus clelandii (Q5405561) renders an "allowed qualifiers constraint" error. Also, the nomenclatural status (P1135) property doesn't accept orthographical variant (Q2491016) as a value (which I guess is good, since orhography has nothing to do with officially accepted nomenclatural statuses). A good start though, so thanks! –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 03:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]

The comment "As an example the taxon name Eucalyptus clelandi and the taxon name Eucalyptus clelandiorum are both names of the same taxon" is false. What would be possible is Eucalyptus clelandiorum is the name of a taxon". As Eucalyptus clelandii is only an orthographical variant/misspelling, it cannot be the name of a taxon, or be a synonym. In nomenclatural terms: Eucalyptus clelandii has no nomenclatural status. It could be phrased as "Eucalyptus clelandii and Eucalyptus clelandiorum are the same name for a taxon" or more conventionally "Eucalyptus clelandii is a misspelling of Eucalyptus clelandiorum".

There are many users at Wikidata who like to use "taxon name" for anything that catches their attention (in this approach, basically three men that meet in a bar and write a name on a beermat can coin a new "taxon name"); at best they are willing to add a qualifier that this taxon name can not be the name of a taxon. Given that there are long-standing international agreements on what can be, and what can not be, the name of a taxon, this is Original Research at its worst. - Brya (talk) 07:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. I’m more used to animal names where the original form sticks even if it is ungrammatical or downright misspelled. Is there a technical term for this (invalid or replaced because of grammar) that could be used as a qualifier (if not a property)? “Orthographical variant” is close, but something more particular would be nice. Pelagic (talk) 11:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Big Tech (Q3122864)/Q30748112

Items involved: Q3122864^Talk, Q30748112^Talk

Status:

not resolved

The "Big Four" ("GAFA") and "Big Five" ("GAFAM") articles about big technology companies (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, and Microsoft) were merged on enwiki earlier this year into w:en:Big Tech. This was discussed at length on w:en:Talk:Big Tech over the past few months. It seems that other languages still vary in terms of membership (e.g. is Microsoft a "Big Tech" company?) and acronym. This is still very muddled on Wikidata. I recently made a modest proposal on Talk:Q3122864 (to change the label of that item from "Big Four" to "Big Tech"), but that may be too modest. -- RobLa (talk) 00:07, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest to ask enwiki WikiProject Internet members: @Mackiovello, H2g2bob, Mrzaius, CQ, Webkingashu:@Jehochman, WikiLeon, MadmanNova, Gary King, Some Gadget Geek: ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coronavirus (Q57751738)/Coronavirus (Q290805)

Items involved: Q57751738^Talk, Q290805^Talk

Status:

in doubt

The current subfamily name and the outdated genus name. Factually the same item, but different taxon. Both signed by different from (P1889) one to other, but labels are mixed and all Wikipedia articles are linked to Coronavirus (Q57751738), although their titles correspond to Coronavirus (Q290805). --ŠJů (talk) 23:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject COVID-19

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. fyi (@Medograd: please do not do any merges without agreetion from both wikiprojects, they both have rights to veto merges). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Brya: Do you familiar with differents within both? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like @Succu: reverted a merge trial. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The merge was done by User:Gambo7 (even before I created this IC report). Succu reverted it in one hour, but didn't sort interwiki links appropriately. --ŠJů (talk) 19:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Still waiting for responds from WikiProjects Taxonomy and COVID-19. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:37, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: Since the merger attempt was reverted, I tried to sort and separate wikilinks by article/category title. Unfortunately, I am not able to distinguish links which are not in Latin, Cyrillic or Greek scripts. There is (was) a big chaos in wikilinks: some "Coronavirus(es)" articles and categories were matched to Orthocoronavirinae, some to Coronaviridae. In addition, several languages use titles like Orthocoronavirus (which should be perceived as equivalents of Coronavirus, as well as equivalents of Orthocoronavirinae). --ŠJů (talk) 08:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

article items affected: Coronavirus (Q290805)/Coronavirus (Q57751738)/Coronaviridae (Q1134583)

corresponding category items affected: Category:Coronaviruses (Q9535147)/Category:Orthocoronavirinae (Q91302879)/Category:Coronaviridae (Q6212688)

@Liuxinyu970226: To make things even more complicated, Succu created a new item Coronavirus (Q91470112) with identical name (label) as Coronavirus (Q290805) recently. Thus, now we have two items for coronaviruses (on of them for the abolished genus, the second one for the persisting meaning of the word), and we can hardly tell which of the existing articles and categories belongs to which of the "two meanings". Besides, some of the articles and categories on coronaviruses (especially in non-Latin writings) remain probably linked to Coronavirus (Q57751738) or Coronaviridae (Q1134583). Many of the articles were originally created for the genus. The genus was abolished and removed from the official taxonomy (divided to several new genuses), but names and item of the articles in many languages remain identical. The meaning of the word remains relevant and identical, but the word ceased to be a systematic name of the genus. What are the persisting articles about? Coronavirus (Q91470112), or Coronavirus (Q290805)? --ŠJů (talk) 19:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Coronavirus" is not a family, not even a genus. It is a colloquial common name for all the "Orthocoronavirinae" viruses.

It is not related to the Coronaviridae family, because it includes both the Orthocoronavirinae and the Letovirinae subfamilies, and the latter are not "coronaviruses".

So again, the term strictly refers to Orthocoronavirinae only. --Gambo7 (talk) 21:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think taht somebody should contact some people in those wikis (most if not all of them are cirillic languages) and tell them they are just doing wrong calling "Coronavirus" the all the Coronaviridae family. --Gambo7 (talk) 16:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gambo7: Another way is to try creating redirects for Wikidata-linking, as I can confirm that doing so isn't possible for zhwiki zh:冠状病毒. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vauxhall tube station (Q664375)/Vauxhall station (Q86666660)

Items involved: Q664375^Talk, Q86666660^Talk

Status:

in doubt

Vauxhall vs. Vauxhall, no idea what to do. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@G195, Edward, KlaudiuMihaila, CanadianCodhead, Zvr:@Tohaomg, Dafyddt, Owain:

Notified participants of WikiProject Railways ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure. I would keep both items, since the tube station and the railway station can obviously be considered separate entities, but maybe a new approach would be appropriate. London Waterloo station (Q795691) (mainline) and Waterloo tube station (Q13141057) (tube, part of the other item) exist, which gives us a baseline for how to deal with this but I think it might make more sense to either have one item which "has part" both the mainline station and the tube station (three items total), or to remove the part of (P361) relationships (ignoring article content which is structured otherwise) and indicate interchange through interchange station (P833) (two items total). For both I would move the sitelinks that are about the tube station to the new item, but I'm not sure about the others. In OpenStreetMap you would have a separate relation to indicate that both stations are part of the same station group. Jc86035 (talk) 09:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Umm @Jc86035: I would instead plan to remove has part(s) (P527) on those National Rail stations which point to Underground stations (as interchange station (P833) already enough), but not part of (P361)London station group (Q1311711) because that's another umbrella transport-related topic. I'm not familiar with OSM data in the United Kingdom, since they use more complex tags than Asian and American countries. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:41, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

breve (Q911277)/breve below (Q911246)

Items involved: Q911277^Talk, Q911246^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Except for dewiki which distinguished the Upper Breve and Lower Breve carefully, many other wikis, even the Commons, are mixed two Breves by themselves, no idea what should I do. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mic.Ric.14978: ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vantaa (Q24339994)/Vantaa (Q127623)

Items involved: Q24339994^Talk, Q127623^Talk

Status:

not resolved

See my comment on Talk:Q24339994. --TommiWalle (talk) 14:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Finland ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

planet beyond Neptune (Q2803875)/Planet X (Q15008074)

Items involved: Q2803875^Talk, Q15008074^Talk

Status:

in doubt

There are two same items. I found necessary to combine them into one. --Tauchman Martin (talk) 17:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Astronomy ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:37, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tauchman Martin: is it really the same thing? For me Planet X (Q15008074) and Planet Nine (Q22133699) are instances while planet beyond Neptune (Q2803875) is the corresponding class, like Mars (Q111) and Venus (Q313) are instances and inner planet of the Solar System (Q3504248) is the class. That said, planet beyond Neptune (Q2803875) has strange data and should be cleaned (change the instance of (P31), move the interwikis and so on), I could do it if people agree. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreeing with VIGNERON--PATH SLOPU 12:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Making Planet X (Q15008074) an instance of a planet beyond Neptune (Q2803875) seems like the best option. I've moved some of the interwikis, but the statements could use a look. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 02:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Q719725)/baker's yeast (Q911712)

Items involved: Q719725^Talk, Q911712^Talk

Status:

in doubt

In german Backhefe = Backhefe, one time is the science discurs, the other is the commercial baker's yeast - it's crazy for me to solve included the photographes. --thx K@rl (talk) 09:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.

Notified participants of WikiProject Food ideas? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no interwiki conflict here: for example enwiki has pages on both concepts. There need to be two items. In addition, these are clearly two distinct concepts. There are lots and lots of strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (some of them commercial secrects), and there is a vast amount of literature on these strains. Baker's yeast is a set of strains, and, in a way, viewed from a certain angle, is a subset of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. - Brya (talk) 14:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

-

The commercial strains are often classified into either “bakers' yeast” or “brewers' yeast”. Wild S. cerevisiae would be a separate (paraphyletic) subgroup. Laboratory strains can be derived from either. Does German have something like brauhefe? (Google Translate gives me Bierhefe.) But in other contexts, the terms brewers or bakers yeast may both be used as synonymous common names for the species in general. (To complicate things: it may also be possible to brew with other species, so “brewing yeast” could have a wider meaning?). I found beer yeast (Q23817632), which only has a couple of labels, a sitelink to w:fr, and no other statements. Both Q911712 and Q23817632 are subclasses of nutritional yeast (Q1786540), but the description of the latter is “deactivated yeast” and the former two are used for their active qualities. Deactivated nutritional yeast should be distinct from dried yeast, plus brewers' bakers' and "nutritional" yeasts may all be purchased dry or moist. For 'pedia articles, it should be possible to determine the scope, but for photos that you haven’t taken yourself, it could be difficult. Pelagic (talk) 21:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Argh, according to #Alcoholic beverages, bottom-fermenting yeast is a different species. Seems like the brewers yeast vs. S. cerevisiae question is the easier aspect, compared to brewers yeasts, S. carlsbergensis / S. pastorianus, nutritional yeast, and some kind of practical category of commercial/culinary yeast products (yeast extract is in there somewhere also). Pelagic (talk) 12:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

narration (Q33005760)/narration (Q3328821)

Items involved: Q33005760^Talk, Q3328821^Talk

Status:

not resolved

I think these two are both referring to the same concept; certainly in the process of looking at the Spanish Wikipedia article for possiblity of translation to English Wikipedia, I determined that the English Wikipedia article w:en:Narration is fundamentally the same as w:es:Narración. However, I'd like someone better versed in the way Wikidata works to check that if possible! --Naypta (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Books has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I saw the mutual interwiki, I'm in favor to merge the items.--DnaX (talk) 08:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Jadro (Q21073877)/Kernel (Q202400)

Items involved: Q21073877^Talk, Q202400^Talk Status: in doubt

--Qdinar (talk) 12:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Disambiguation pages --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder why {{Ping project}} can't work for this WikiProject, so per its history @Ghouston, Shinnin, Matěj Suchánek, ValterVB, Epìdosis: ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages aren't supposed to be merged by topic, according to Wikidata:WikiProject Disambiguation pages/guidelines, and "Kernel" and "Jadro" are completely different words. So they are fine as they are. Ghouston (talk) 00:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

their meanings are mostly same. can you somehow put interwiki links between them? i see Q202400 already has a link to Q21073877 under header "said to be the same as". are there plans put such links into wikipedia automatically? --Qdinar (talk) 13:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

btw Q202400 is linked to arabic word with other etymology. so that is against that rule. --Qdinar (talk) 13:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinkwashing

Items involved: Q25339223^Talk, Q20200811^Talk

Status:

in doubt

Sitelinks needs to be sorted. en:Pinkwashing (LGBT) is the faucet of LGBT, while e.g. sv: Pinkwashing is both about breast cancer and LGBT. --(t) Josve05a (c) 12:53, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject LGBT has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly this is more than a Wikidata problem. Pinkwashing originated as a breast cancer-related term, but then became used for a different LGBT reasons. As the two terms have different histories and information, there should really be two articles for the two separate concepts in each language. (I personally am saddened to see that only English Wikipedia has an article for the original breast cancer term, but so it goes.) As it stands, I just went through each language article, and they are primarily translations of each other, and mention the term was originally coined by breast cancer activists but only talk about the LGBT-related information. So only the sv: Pinkwashing article is a challenge here. If the Swedish article cannot be split in two, perhaps it should be switched to a disambiguation page instead. Sweet kate (talk) 16:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Holy God, We Praise Thy Name (Q1548688)/Großer Gott, wir loben dich (Q66385375)

Items involved: Q1548688^Talk, Q66385375^Talk

Status:

in doubt

Both of these refer to what is de facto the same hymn (same melody, similar text, ...); the English being a translation of the original German (i.e. they are not different items)... --RandomCanadian (talk) 15:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC) WikiProject Music has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:31, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All of the items should be kept. They are different works with different authors, and this kind of item structure is normal for translated creative works. I don't know if the interwiki links are appropriate; I think it could make sense to assign all of the links to the original. Jc86035 (talk) 05:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki links are definitively appropriate: hymns are commonly translated. See for example w:A mighty fortress is our God and w:de:Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott - effectively the same piece of music, but in English it is better known to an English translation. I find it confusing that such works would be classified as a different item; this seems counter-intuitive and does not help with inter-language links, which is avowedly the principal use of this kind of information on Wikipedia. In any case, as with Ein feste Burg, the article on this hymn in English, and justly so, also has content about the original German version... Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk) 02:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm with RandomCanadian here. The bible is the bible, in every translation. If no one opposes, I'll merge them. -- H005 (talk) 19:28, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Juniperus barbadensis (Q1729344)/Juniperus lucayana (Q5832626)

Items involved: Q1729344^Talk, Q5832626^Talk

Status:

in doubt

Looks like same, but not sure. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of what I understand most databases consider Juniperus lucayana is now a valid species after having been considered a variety of Juniperus barbadensis, but also ITIS considers it is a synonym of Juniperus virginiana var. silicicola, and IRMNG a synonym of Juniperus virginiana. Anyway for now, Juniperus lucayana is not a synonym of Juniperus barbadensis. Culex (talk) 03:51, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Izumo (Q1054297)/Sunrise Izumo (Q16939063)/Seto (Q16939062)/Sunrise Seto (Q16939065)

Items involved: Q1054297^Talk, Q16939063^Talk, Q16939062^Talk, Q16939065^Talk	Status: not resolved
While statements are set separately, there are several problems for some bot script importer funs, that they will import wrong values to those statements which result some confusions. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

applause for health workers during Covid-19 outbreak (Q90909248)/Clap for our Carers (Q88860637)

Items involved: Q90909248^Talk, Q88860637^Talk

Status:

in doubt

both articles are about the same topic--Pacostein (talk) 12:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One is very UK specific (with data about website, etc.), while the other is about various countries. note sure they should be merged. 2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 22:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arpad (Q85869032)

Items involved: Q85869032^Talk	Status: not resolved
Eu não concordo que o sitelink Arpade seja direcionado para um artigo da Wikidata sem nome. Os sitelinks deviam estar nos artigos certos.

health in Kazakhstan (Q4287731)/healthcare in Kazakhstan (Q64061561)

Items involved: Q4287731^Talk, Q64061561^Talk	Status: not resolved
same thing--Kaiyr (talk) 19:10, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Q1119811/critical period (Q626890)

Items involved: Q1119811^Talk, Q626890^Talk	Status: not resolved
Q1119811 is the German interwiki to critical period (Q626890) --Kersti Nebelsiek (talk) 14:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Fox and the Grapes (Q1193645)/The Fox and the Grapes (Q73932013)

Items involved: Q1193645^Talk, Q73932013^Talk	Status: not resolved
One article refers to Aesops fable, the other one to the same topic, but treating solely the interpretation by Lafontaine. I suggest to merge the latter with the former, then add the original latin text on top of the french page and put a subtitle like "Interpretation by Lafontaine" --Knigi 747 (talk) 16:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

escape room (Q17015069)/escape room video game (Q1201679)

Items involved: Q17015069^Talk, Q1201679^Talk	Status: not resolved
de:Escape Game is about both data items. escape room (Q17015069) should link to de:Live Escape Games but I cannot make the edit because that article is a redirect to de:Escape Game --Dexxor (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Juan López de Padilla (Q1339628)/Juan de Padilla (Q6301304)

Items involved: Q1339628^Talk, Q6301304^Talk

Status:

in doubt

should be merged. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Spain --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: I think both are different items, one for a rebel and another one for a missionary, both named "Juan de Padilla". Regards, Ivanhercaz (Talk) 15:45, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pictogram weg Europa E-weg (Q6706965)/Q14338615

Items involved: Q6706965^Talk, Q14338615^Talk	Status: not resolved
Are they different? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fiery Creek (Q21910960)/Fiery Creek (Q21960908)

Items involved: Q21910960^Talk, Q21960908^Talk

Status:

in doubt

There is one watercourse named Fiery Creek in Victoria. I have recently created en:Fiery Creek (Victoria) and OSM relation 11156149 (a relation with two parts that flow from one to the other). However, there are two articles in CEB and SV Wikipedia, and they use different Geonames and GNS identifiers. I have linked the English article to the item closest to the mouth of the creek. I am not sure how to safely merge these items, or how to distinguish them if not merged. --ScottDavis (talk) 12:48, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Australia --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottDavis: Hard one, but I fear quite common. Path of least resistance: treat them as two items, then make a third item about the dyad (link with "has part"), which your article would be linked to. Harder option: delete one item in Geonames (or can you merge?), then try to ask for the same in GNS, then request deletion in ceb,sv (I've done this many times - don't bother with "request merge", just skip straight to deletion), then finally you can merge WD items. --99of9 (talk) 23:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have come across hundreds of these in my Aus/NZ geo-rummaging. As far as I can tell, Geonames splits a river or similar that sits over multiple local government areas/territorial districts, which is quite common in Australia and New Zealand (but there could be other reasons it happens), then Lsjbot generated articles on ceb and sv wikis for each Geonames entry. Sometimes I have unlinked the ceb/sv duplicate and merged the items, but that's not ideal as GDWFlood bot or whatever will probably just recreate another item for the (now unlinked) CEB/SV article, so you are probably best trying to get it fixed properly. It's a pain in the arse if you're trying to resolve hundreds or thousands of these, but if it's just the one stream you are concerned about it might be worth getting GN/GNS/cebwiki/svwiki AND Wikidata all fixed by following 99of9's method. --Canley (talk) 06:11, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not trying to solve the general case at the moment. I got here from family history research that a relative was born at Fiery Creek in 1855 and I had no idea where it was. It looks like I'll have to learn Cebuano and Swedish. --ScottDavis (talk) 07:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottDavis: the good news is that the templates {{delete}} and {{merge}} still work in those languages. --99of9 (talk) 03:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottDavis: What's in SV/CEB Wikipedias is pretty much crap automatically generated (without evidence of a human in the loop) from a non-authoritative source for Australian place naming which means Wikidata is full of similar crap. This is why I am hesitant to trust content in Wikidata until some kind of standards are implemented in terms of reliable sources. Just look at the Victorian official place names and be guided by it. It is of course entirely possible there are two Fiery Creeks in Victoria, certainly in Queensland we never worry about having dozens of creeks with the same name ..., but, wearing my genealogy hat, if you are discussing a birth, I'd be inclined to think you are looking for a settlement/property name rather than a watercourse name. Kerry Raymond (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kerry Raymond: I agree about those two Wikipedia languages. I traced the creek in OpenStreetMap and confirmed that there is only one before I created the English Wikipedia article. I am not familiar with GNS or GeoNames to know how to merge or delete the duplicate entry there, assuming that one Wikidata item can't have two identifiers from those indexes. The Fiery Creek post office was an early name for the one at Streatham, but my genealogy issue appears to refer to the Fiery Creek goldfields north of Beaufort (the family appears to have visited several goldfields). Thanks @99of9: I will try the merge tags on the foreign wikipedias and see what happens. --ScottDavis (talk) 07:08, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21-gun salute (Q49095233)/health (Q12147)/gun salute (Q2143986)

Items involved: Q49095233^Talk, Q12147^Talk, Q2143986^Talk

Status:

not resolved

In Swedish wikpedia there are two separate articles for salute "Salut" and for a specific royal salute "Kungliga salut" which is more thorough article for how salute is done in Sweden. However in Finnish there is only one term for both, both are salute "kunnialaukaus" and ther is no term for specific type of salute. The term "kunnialaukaus woul be the accurate translationa nad correct article to refer to from both Swedish wikipedia articles. This is why there should be a link to FInnish wikipedia aerticle "kunnianlaukaus" from both.

--Spespatriae (talk) 11:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject COVID-19 ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SNK (Q1073880)/Playmore (Q1044563)

Items involved: Q1073880^Talk, Q1044563^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--Notsopink (talk) 11:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Japan --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SNK (Q1073880) was established in 1978, and Playmore (Q1044563) was established in 2001. Playmore (Q1044563)(former name Playmore) is the company that acquired SNK's intellectual property rights.--Afaz (talk) 15:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reynoutria japonica (Q18421053)/Fallopia japonica (Q899672)

Items involved: Q18421053^Talk, Q899672^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--Fynmar (talk) 18:14, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fyi

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ferula assa-foetida (Q111185)/asafoetida (Q16530385)

Items involved: Q111185^Talk, Q16530385^Talk

Status:

not resolved

The German and 43 other languages are connected to an English translation. But the English version itself is connected 7 other languages. So there are 2 sets of language links. I wonder how this could have happened? What is the best way to connect/merge all languages together?

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aq Köprük (Q2859104)/Aq Kupruk (Q3288584)

Items involved: Q2859104^Talk, Q3288584^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Zunkir (talk) 14:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

palace of culture (Q1181413)/house of culture (Q5061188)

Items involved: Q1181413^Talk, Q5061188^Talk

Status:

in doubt

These items need to be merged as they represent two different names for the same type of clubhouse. This currently prevents creating appropriate interlanguage links, eg. between English and Russian wikipedia articles.

Notified participants of WikiProject Museums --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:39, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: is it really the same thing? I see that one in indicated as the subclass of the others and I also see that there is two articles on cs.wp and de.wp (and seems to refers to again differents type of "clubhouse"). More informations is really needed here. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:05, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic numeral system (Q176471)/Arabic numeral (Q29961325)

Items involved: Q176471^Talk, Q29961325^Talk

Status:

in doubt

Q176471 has to be merged into Q29961325, it is the same but it does not appear as such.יוסף יצחק-talk, כ"א Sivan ה'תש"ף. 06:42, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Mathematics So? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not the same. One is about the characters use in the numeration system, the symbols, the other one is about how we use the symbols to represent numbers (and compute). Not to merge. author TomT0m / talk page 10:24, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the difference between Arabic numeral system (Q176471) and Hindu-Arabic numeral system (Q3059346)? Wikisaurus (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikisaurus: The second item, by its label name, is first item plus a "Hindu–" prefix, maybe

WikiProject India has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. can answer better. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding was that “Hindu-Arabic numerals” referred to the derived European forms 0123456789, and “Arabic numerals” to those used with Perso-Arabic scripts ٩٨٧٦٥٤٣٢١٠. But English Wikipedia uses “Arabic” for the former and “Eastern Arabic” for the latter (Eastern Arabic numerals (Q61744)). The argument is that the European forms derive proximally from Western Arabic. It uses “Hindu-Arabic numeral system” to cover the whole group [European + Arabic + Indic]. But the treatment in other language Wikipedias may be quite different, and hard to untangle.

It’s also notable that w:en lumps Western Arabic and modern European into a single article, but has separate ones for Bengali, Devanagari, Gujarati, Gurmukhi, Sinhala, and Tamil, rather than a single article for Indic numerals. And so we end up with Bengali–Assamese numeral (Q15939920), Devanagari numeral (Q2721451) (what, “Indian numerals”?), Gujarati numeral (Q28757937), Gurmukhi numerals (Q24943341), Sinhala numerals (Q19738800), Tamil numerals (Q7681423). Yes, w:en:Devanagari numerals is linked from Devanagari numeral (Q2721451) [2] not Devanagari numeral (Q68202932) [3]. What’s more important, interwiki links or semantic correctness?

Many of these scripts have alternate numeration systems that predate the decimal place system and introduction of zero, for example Sinhala Illakkan, similar to how Western Europe used “Roman numerals” before “Hindu-Arabic numerals”. So it’s not 100% correct to state “Sinhala numerals instance of Hindu-Arabic numerals”. Separate items for “Sinhala digits”, etc. would be more accurate, but is there any benefit in creating them?

Sorry for the long rant, but it’s a case of the more one looks, the more problems one finds. Pelagic (talk) 21:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UIC-X coaches (Q476376)/DB UIC-X coaches (Q65704440)

Items involved: Q476376^Talk, Q65704440^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Both handle the DB UIC-X passenger cars. I wanted to link the german translation https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/UIC-X-Wagen_(DB) to https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/UIC-X-rijtuigen_van_de_DB but that failed because there are two wikidata entries. --Mdeen (talk) 12:23, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Railways --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yard (Q1623285)/courtyard (Q309250)

Items involved: Q1623285^Talk, Q309250^Talk

Status:

in doubt

from Q1623285#sitelinks-wikipedia I try to add a French translation (Cour_(architecture)) which fails with message : The save has failed. Site link frwiki:Cour (architecture) is already used by item Q309250.

@Warofdreams, Isomorphic, CoolGin, Secretlondon, Pinkville:@Dogears, Justinc, Thane, Erebus555, Garcilaso: --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been tagged here, I'm not sure how I can help? If you're asking whether these two are the same thing, they're not, a courtyard is a specific type of yard, the difference is explained in the English language articles. Warofdreams (talk) 13:37, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy McGuire (Q56849233)/The McGuire Sisters (Q303238)

Items involved: Q56849233^Talk, Q303238^Talk	Status: not resolved
In the german Wiki, Q56849233 links to Q303238 but the first is the single person and the other is the whole groupe. So the german article about Dorothy McGuire which redirects to the article about the group, can not be set in wikidata as a interwiki link. What to do in such a case? --Tidoni (talk) 13:12, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ground granulated blast-furnace slag (Q353009)/Granulated slag (Q34989121)

Items involved: Q353009^Talk, Q34989121^Talk

Status:

not resolved

These items look like they describe the same-ish material, only the uk-wiki has articles for both items. Perhaps an Ukrainian could have a look and decide if these are really redundant.--AlanyaSeeburg (talk) 07:10, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Mineralogy --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mulino Bianco (Q3327607)/Barilla Group (Q762787)

Items involved: Q3327607^Talk, Q762787^Talk

Status:

in doubt

need to un-merge this 2 page, one company is owned by the second one, but are not the same, only in En are merged

Notified participants of WikiProject Food --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are not merged, and judging by the history page, it doesn't seem that they ever were... What is to solve here? -Ash Crow (talk) 11:01, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sierra de Cubitas (Q643052)/Sierra de Cubitas (Q39080657)/Sierra de Cubitas (Q12897304)

Items involved: Q643052^Talk, Q39080657^Talk, Q12897304^Talk

Status:

not resolved

There is a municipality and within a mountain range called Sierra de Cubitas. Q39080657 stated, based on the spanish article, a national park but the mountain range is (partially) protected area of managed resources (No national park)--Christian Pirkl (talk) 20:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing todays changes in the spanish article I propose to delete item Q39080657 --Christian Pirkl (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is one more from ht--Christian Pirkl (talk) 20:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dryandra nervosa/Banksia alliacea

Items involved: Q4856546^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Should be split to an item about Dryandra nervosa as well. --(t) Josve05a (c) 19:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:43, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eurema messalina (Q13626064)/Pyrisitia messalina (Q2633829)

Items involved: Q13626064^Talk, Q2633829^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--Christian Pirkl (talk) 17:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

berry (Q16128920)/berry (Q13184)

Items involved: Q16128920^Talk, Q13184^Talk

Status:

not resolved

When I was attempting to add w:sv:Bär to the 'Languages' link on w:Berry by editing its Wikidata by editing https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16128920#sitelinks-wikipedia, I was prevented by a warning that said

"The link svwiki:Bär is already used by Item Q13184. You may remove it from Q13184 if it does not belong there or merge the Items if they are about the exact same topic."

It seems that I was unable to add the link to w:sv:Bär because it was already in use by Q13184. Q13184 is apparently about the botanical definition. Therefore I did not merge them however there is no way to proceed with adding a link to w:sv:Bär on its corresponding English article. Lochglasgowstrathyre (talk) 13:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hospital de los Reyes Católicos (Q155443)/Q12397113

Items involved: Q155443^Talk, Q12397113^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Found this after looking up a deleted Commons category linked from Spanish Wikipedia. I recreated the deleted Commons category and redirected it to another category dealing with the same building, and tried to link it from the Wikidata page to find it already used by another Wikidata item (as a note, there are also two separate Spanish wiki articles on the same building es:Parador de Santiago de Compostela and es:Hospital_de_los_Reyes_Católicos --Simon Burchell (talk) 09:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Simon Burchell: We don't merge a category item with its topic item, instead both are linked by category's main topic (P301)-topic's main category (P910) combinations. Are you asking Hospital de los Reyes Católicos (Q155443) and Q12397113? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: Sorry, yes I was, my mistake. Simon Burchell (talk) 09:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HaShem (Q581664)

Items involved: Q581664^Talk

Status:

not resolved

So searching w/ Google gets me to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/HaSchem , and I try to confirm my suspicions by looking for the interwiki link for "en", for "HaShem", and it's not there. So I click on "Links bearbeiten" and go to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntityPage/Q581664#sitelinks-wikipedia in order to enter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_God_in_Judaism#HaShem , and then get a conflict!S!!! From the Kryptick messages I can't tell if it is saying that "es" has claimed "Hashem" so give up, or what?! If "HaShem" mortally conflicts with "HaShem"... durr?? So how do I create the en link from the de page "HaSchem" to en page "HaShem" that section? This is so unfriendly. "DBAs of the world self join!" --Shenme (talk) 06:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:FAQ#Editing, 10. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 08:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

world (Q16502)

Items involved: Q16502^Talk

Status:

not resolved

The german article is about everything while english and russian is about earth. the french version seems to be about a word(?) --Shisma (talk) 16:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Both German and French page are about the "world" meanings, we can put them in a different item Shisma--Pierpao (talk) 16:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

biomedicine (Q864601)/biomedical sciences (Q13439429)/academic medicine (Q939230)/medicine (Q11190)

Items involved: Q864601^Talk, Q13439429^Talk, Q939230^Talk, Q11190^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Inter-language links between English and German are misleading, "Biomedizin" (German) is the equivalent to "biomedical sciences" (English) rather than "biomedicine" (English), whereas "biomedicine" (English) is the equivalent to "Schulmedizin" (German) rather than "Biomedizin" (German), and "medicine" (English) is the equivalent to "Medizin" (German) rather than "Schulmedizin" (German).

Notified participants of WikiProject Biology --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Medicine too --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

socialization (Q1190277)/socialization (Q185467)/Sozialisierung (Q2305738)/Vergesellschaftung (Q1387517)

Items involved: Q1190277^Talk, Q185467^Talk, Q2305738^Talk, Q1387517^Talk	Status: not resolved
Hi gang! The German WP "Vergesellschaftung" is linked to English WP "Social ownership". This is wrong -- the two words could mean the same thing, but the German article describes "socialization" in the sociological sense, not in a political/economic sense. Hence this German article should be linked to English WP "Socialization". I tried to make that change, but was prevented because that English article is already linked to German WP "Sozialisierung". Which is correct, because "Sozialisierung" and "Vergesellschaftung" are synonyms in German in this particular sense. (Both also have other senses.) (It happens frequently in German that you have two words for something -- one with Germanic roots and one borrowed from Romance languages. As in English for that matter -- but in English, the Romance words are no longer considered foreign, and the Germanic words for some modern abstract concepts have not developed.) Anyway -- merging "Vergesellschaftung" and "Sozialisierung" in German WP might be a solution, but would be a non-trivial operation because of the multiple senses of both words. Thanks for listening! — Wegesrand (talk) 10:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Belgian Dutch (Q1404296)/Flemish (Q34147)

Items involved: Q1404296^Talk, Q34147^Talk

Status:

not resolved

I tried to add the German page "Belgisches Niederländisch" as a link from English "flemish". In enwiki they use the colloquial term, in dewiki they use the professional linguistic term, but it's on the same subject. I got the error message: "Site link dewiki:Belgisches Niederländisch is already used by item Belgian Dutch (Q1404296). Perhaps the items should be merged. Ask at d:Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts if you believe that they should not be merged." Which is interesting since "Belgian Dutch" is indeed a redirect to flemish. Please fix.

--EnTerbury (talk) 16:58, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Languages --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even if WP:EN uses a redirect, if you take the time to check WP:FR ( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%A9erlandais_de_Belgique & https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamand_(dialecte) ) or WP:NL ( https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgisch-Nederlands & https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlaams ), you'll see those aren’t redirects but distinct articles… I haven’t checked the other languages wikis, but those two are probably the most directly concerned by the topics, so I guess a merge wouldn’t be a great idea in this case! 2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 08:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Herbs for cats (Q3133407)/cat grass (Q1655002)/cat grass (Q96374542)

Items involved: Q3133407^Talk, Q1655002^Talk, Q96374542^Talk

Status:

not resolved

English one is not connected to the rest of the languages. French Catgras vs other countries catgras

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

political organization (Q7210356)/political organization (Q10341436)

Items involved: Q7210356^Talk, Q10341436^Talk	Status: not resolved
The link ptwiki:Organização política is already used by Item Q10341436, but it must be merged to Item Q7210356. --XICO (talk) 14:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

growth rate (Q3516239)/compound annual growth rate (Q1422850)

Items involved: Q3516239^Talk, Q1422850^Talk	Status: not resolved
CAGR is a business term for measuring growth. The German Wikipedia and some others lists it together growth rates in other contexts (mathematical, biological, …) in one article growth rate (Q3516239). The English one and many others do have their own article on that subject. (compound annual growth rate (Q1422850)) --rugk (talk) 15:50, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hugo (Q5476994)/list of Hugo video games (Q9294792)

Items involved: Q5476994^Talk, Q9294792^Talk	Status: not resolved
This is about the "Hugo" series of video games which was also a call-in TV show in various countries during the 1990s. I was puzzled to find only one translation on the original Wikipedia page. So I wanted to add to it and found some more listed on the second item above. It seems like, the English Wikipedia is more granular, as it has a seperate page for the "original series" part of the games franchise, whereas other languages just list them all on a single page.--Kebap (talk) 17:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Narentines (Q13089777)/Pagania (Q1166166)

Items involved: Q13089777^Talk, Q1166166^Talk

Status:

not resolved

both items are about Narentines territory by different languages, should be merge

To me I don't see how both can be same, the second item is wrongly named in English, I fixed for now. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fortified tower (Q81917)/defensive tower (Q20034791)

Items involved: Q81917^Talk, Q20034791^Talk	Status: not resolved
Actually I cannot really see much of a difference here. It apperas the only reason that there are two concepts is that the Polish wikipedia has two articles about it. I do not speak Polish, but grasping from the automated deepl translations I figured that these Polish articles neither have a clear distinction. The only clue I have is that the Polish entry for defensive tower says that the difference of the defensive tower (wieża obronna) to the fortified tower (baszta) is "that it is integrally connected with the defensive circuit and serves its defense." But the pictures do not really support this difference. Maybe someone from Poland can determine whether this really is a different concept, or could be merged. --H005 (talk) 15:54, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fog lights (Q18819713)/front fog lights (Q2143815)

Items involved: Q18819713^Talk, Q2143815^Talk	Status: not resolved
--87.92.204.251 08:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amadou Diallo (Q452292)/killing of Amadou Diallo (Q26707660)

Items involved: Q452292^Talk, Q26707660^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Majority of IW links go to Q1 while only two link to Q2. --Drahkrub (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One is about the person, the other "only" about the shooting, not exactly the same topic, probably no reason to merge. 2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 21:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

composting (Q13222335)/compost (Q212254)

Items involved: Q13222335^Talk, Q212254^Talk	Status: not resolved
One entry refers to a process (Q1/17 links), the other to the matter (Q2/55 links) created from the process. While the distinction (and the choice for either) is valid and justifiable, as a result readers from wikis using Q2 won't find the interwikilinks referring to Q1. This examplifies the dilemma that emerges when wiki projects describe some matter which is the result of a process: The choice for either will be arbitrary. --Drahkrub (talk) 10:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

confectioner (Q2992505)/pastry maker (Q6105867)

Items involved: Q2992505^Talk, Q6105867^Talk	Status: not resolved
In german there are the both names, but there are not an german Wikipedia article, because only the shop ist described. So I am not sure, if it's the same. thx K@rl (talk) 21:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aum Shinrikyo (Q217408)/Aleph (Q12605913)

Items involved: Q217408^Talk, Q12605913^Talk	Status: not resolved
Apparently Aum Shrinrikyo either changed its name or created split offs called Aleph, Hikari no Wa (i.e. The Circle of Rainbow Light) and an unnamed organisation referred to as the Group led by Yamada, according to English wikipedia, Chinese wikipedia and South China Morning Post (https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/people/article/3093734/japans-subway-sarin-attack-doomsday-cult-aum-shinrikyo-still?utm_content=article&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1595048929). Aleph in English wikipedia is linked to Aum Shrinrikyo is Chinese and Japanese wikipedia, while Aleph in Chinese and Japanese wikipedia are linked with only an article in Korean wikipedia. Not sure what should be done, as I am not familiar with wikidata, and not sure if the past practice of simply linking articles with en:Aleph is still acceptable. Many thanks. -- Andykoo1990 (talk) 19:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Calas (Q360000)/Jean Calas affair (Q28650272)

Items involved: Q360000^Talk, Q28650272^Talk

Status:

not resolved

english article : Q28650272 french article : Q28650272 unknown article : Q360000 There's a problem to make a link between the french article with the english one. When I tried, it answered me that : The link enwiki:Jean Calas is already used by Item Q360000. You may remove it from Q360000 if it does not belong there or merge the Items if they are about the exact same topic. I believe that the problem comes from the page Jean Calas in french that have every languages already bond with, I don't know if I should remove it or not (I'm new) since I'm not able to access to the Jean Calas wiki page in french.

One item is about the person, the other is about the lawsuit linked to that person, IMHO no need to merge them! 2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 21:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St. Emmeram (Q2318119)/St. Emmeram (Q28978420)

Items involved: Q2318119^Talk, Q28978420^Talk	Status: not resolved
These two items seemingly correspond to the same german Wikipedia article: "https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Emmeram_(Spalt)" that deals with both the monastery and the church. Q2318119 (St. Emmeran, church in Germany) is linked to the Wikipedia article. Q28978420 (Kollegiatstift St. Emmeram, Spalt, Kloster in Deutschland [in english: monastery in Germany]) also matches the content of the corresponding Wikipedia article. Can these items be merged? --JKrg 08:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

St. Chrysanthus und Daria (Q2317774)

Items involved: Q2317774^Talk	Status: not resolved
The Wikipedia articles linked at this item refer sometimes only to the church (german article), sometimes to church and monastery (french article). Shouldn't there be one entry for the church and one for the monastery?

reader-response criticism (Q1479773)/reception aesthetics (Q3067311)

Items involved: Q1479773^Talk, Q3067311^Talk	Status: not resolved
I've moved de:Rezeptionsästhetik from reader-response criticism (Q1479773) to reception aesthetics (Q3067311), per this entry in the Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. I'd appreciate if someone could look over the Wikipedia articles associated with the first item so see if any others need to be similarly moved. Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:00, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

nature park (Q728904)/natural park (Q16149276)

Items involved: Q728904^Talk, Q16149276^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Please, merge them. They refered to the same thing. --Lojwe (talk) 01:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Spain as the second item is specific to Spain. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

tourniquet (Q1132870)/Junctional tourniquet (Q20825984)

Items involved: Q1132870^Talk, Q20825984^Talk

Status:

not resolved

The English Wikipedia article for "tourniquet" (the tool used in (combat) emergency medicine links to the German and Polish articles for the medical tool used to make your veins accessible for an IV which is also called a tourniquet. However there are articles for the emergency medicine tourniquet in the German and Polish Wikipedia which the English article should rather link to. Unfortunately I lack the skills to fix this --Cyberhopser (talk) 13:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Medicine --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ݨ (Q65334976)/ݨ (Q18385934)/ݨ (Q87500971)

Items involved: Q65334976^Talk, Q18385934^Talk, Q87500971^Talk

Status:

not resolved

ݨ is a letter and ݨوݨ is the spelling of the letter. They should be merged into one.

The Alphabet WikiProject does not exist. Please correct the name. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

king cake (Q177166)/king cake (Q20820391)

Items involved: Q177166^Talk, Q20820391^Talk

Status:

not resolved

I found these two pages that I tried to merge, but I got the following list of conflicts that prevented me from doing it: Error while "Please wait...": A conflict detected on commonswiki: Q20820391 with commonswiki:Category:Galette des Rois, Q177166 with commonswiki:King cake A conflict detected on dewiki: Q20820391 with dewiki:Galette des Rois, Q177166 with dewiki:Dreikönigskuchen A conflict detected on itwiki: Q20820391 with itwiki:Galette des rois, Q177166 with itwiki:Torta dei Re
The talk section of Q20820391 says "Duplicate of Q177166" and nothing more.
This is my first visit to wikidata, no idea what to do! TVI1690075 (talk) 07:28, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Food --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dyad (Q5318389)/interval (Q189962)

Items involved: Q5318389^Talk, Q189962^Talk

Status:

not resolved

In English, a dyad is a set of two notes or pitches that, in particular contexts, may imply a chord (except you say chord starting at three simultaneous pitches, not just two). In French, you say intervalle for that. I wanted to link both, because both articles exist, but the french article intervalle is already linked to the english article interval, which describes the difference in pitch between two sounds, so kind of the same but not really, since a dyad are simultaneous pitches, and an interval (English) is two pitches (wether simultaneous or not). So a dyad is specific interval in English, but you say intervalle for both in French. Except that the french article describes more a dyad than an interval, in my opinion.

WikiProject Music has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Akelei (Q147641)/Aconitum plicatum (Q2363208)

Items involved: Q147641^Talk, Q2363208^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--FarnoodEsbati (talk) 19:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

سلام. صفحه‌ی ویکی پدیای «گرگ‌کش» به اشتباه هدایت میشه به تاج الملوک.نام لاتین گرگ کش Aconitum plicatum است و تاج‌الملوک(سرده) Aquilegia.

There is a mis-connection between two pages and one gets wrongly redirected to the other one. So I cant make the second page as for Wikipedia, It already coexists with the first page.

Assume that you are discussing Akelei (Q147641) and Aconitum plicatum (Q2363208). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Silicate minerals (Q6442973)/Category:Silicon minerals (Q6277723)

Items involved: Q6442973^Talk, Q6277723^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Duplicate items and several wrong interwiki links. Siliciummineral is not the same like silicate mineral. -- Ra'ike (talk) 05:12, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Mineralogy --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

detective film (Q25533274)/mystery film (Q1200678)

Items involved: Q25533274^Talk, Q1200678^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Hello! It seems that "Mystery film" (EN Wiki) is the same as "Детективный фильм" (RU Wiki). However, it is not possible to edit the Russian page and add a language-link to the English one because the "Mystery film" page is already used by the item Q1200678 (mystery film) --Alvast (talk) 15:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Movies --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Mushabbiha (Q12243080)/Mujassimah (Q4305754)

Items involved: Q12243080^Talk, Q4305754^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Please combine Indonesian into Arabic and others --Padliansyah553 (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1. The second item was instead merged into Mujassimah (Q4305754) so I fixed the title; 2. Now Mushabbiha (Q12243080)has part(s) (P527)Mujassimah (Q4305754) and then Mujassimah (Q4305754)instance of (P31)Mushabbiha (Q12243080), and since both are having Arabic and Russian conflict, we need agreements from @يافا, طالب.علم, إسلام, Chady.neji, بلال الدويك:@Dr-Taher, Khawaja Muhammad Abdun Nafay, Elmoro, TheFlyingHorse, أبو حمزة:@Maqivi, Fixmaster, Камарад Че, АРГО-67, Tempus:@Ctac, Vade Parvis:. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: The two terms are very close in their meaning. Mujassimah believes that Allah has body, but his mighty body is different than others. While, Mushabbiha believes the Allah has body can be compared to others. Difference between Mujassimah & Mushabbiha. So, it was merged together in one article in Arabic Wikipedia. أبو حمزة (talk) 13:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

artificial insemination (Q207122)/artificial insemination of animals (Q66385447)

Items involved: Q207122^Talk, Q66385447^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Dutch Wikipedia has separate articles for artificial insemination of humans and animals:

nl:Kunstmatige inseminatie bij de mens (humans, linked to Q207122)
nl:Kunstmatige inseminatie bij dieren (animals, linked to Q66385447, the only object in that item after I moved other links to Q207122)

Also it has a disambiguation page for artificial insemination in general:

nl:Kunstmatige inseminatie (linked to Q66384838, the only object there)

--Brinerat (talk) 14:40, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Anatomy --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia–Serbia border dispute (Q17098118)/Croatia–Serbia border (Q641617)

Items involved: Q17098118^Talk, Q641617^Talk	Status: not resolved
all of these articles are mostly about the border dispute --Norschweden (talk) 16:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

solid mechanics (Q1080293)/continuum mechanics (Q193463)

Items involved: Q1080293^Talk, Q193463^Talk

Status:

not resolved

French "Mécanique du solide" is a fake friend of english "Solid mechanics". In french "mécanique du solide" refers to rigid boby mechanics while english solid mechanics refers to deformable structures (it is part of continuum mechanics) as explicited in spanish for example. In order to provide correct French item, I created the page "Mécanique du solide déformable" wihich is a redirection toward continuum mechanics "Mécanique des milieux continus". I removed from Q1080293 the link toward "Mécanique du solide" but I cannot insert link toward "Mécanique du solide déformable" (which is part but not equivalent to Q193463). --A1AA1A (talk) 08:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Physics ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@A1AA1A: Make "Mécanique du solide déformable" temporarily NOT a redirect, add the link in wikidata, then make it a redirect again. Unfortunately this is a longstanding issue with Wikidata links to redirects. ArthurPSmith (talk) 21:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thak you for your answer. I recently changed this redirection in a new article. --A1AA1A (talk) 21:32, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

nychthemeron (Q11034997)/day (Q573)

Items involved: Q11034997^Talk, Q573^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--Litdayss (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC) Due to imprecise translation between language and redirects that are not 100% correct, there is now a bit of an issue with the 'Languages' linking between several pages, and linking to pages that really need not exist.[reply]

The Norwegian 'døgn' normally translates to Dutch as 'etmaal' (and German as 'Etmal'). To English it would translate as nychthemeron.

Apparently the term nychthemeron is also used in medical professions, and therefore the English nychthemeron page links to pages on Dutch and German wikipedia as nychthemeron.

At the same time 'etmaal' redirects to the Dutch page for 'day' ('dag'), where it is explained that an 'etmaal' is a 24-hour period, which could be the same as a day, but need not be a day. Because of this redirect, the Norwegian 'døgn' page cannot language-link to the Dutch 'etmaal'. At the same time it could not link to the German Etmal, because Etmal was linked from 'a day's run' (if I remember correctly - which is really an odd link to begin with).

I started trying to fix these things, I unlinked the German page to link it to døgn (NO bokmal) and nychthemeron (EN), but I cannot link the Dutch because etmaal redirects to 'dag', and 'dag' is obviously already linked where it should be ('day').

My ideas for potential solutions: The Dutch 'nychthemeron' is a stub. Either we also redirect that to 'dag' as well, or (more precise and preferred) we make a page for 'etmaal' (the common word used for a 24-hour period), and redirect nychthemeron there to add the medical translation.

Pages involved:

Denham Film Studios (Q3022458)/Denham Film Studios (Q26455838)

Items involved: Q3022458^Talk, Q26455838^Talk

Status:

in doubt

--Cnbrb (talk) 18:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't be merged: one is building, the other studio (independent entities). The only issue may be the link to Commons but I'm not sure about it. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 11:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

canvas (Q4259259)/canvas (Q12321255)

Items involved: Q4259259^Talk, Q12321255^Talk

Status:

in doubt

There are two terms in Wikidata for canvas, as listed above. Here is some additional info - 1. Q12321255 is defined as a sub-class of Q4259259, while Q12321255 also has a statement for "said to be the same as (P460)" assigned to that term (Q4259259).

2. The photo shown in the English Wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canvas) associated with Q4259259 does not match the "image (P18)" statement for this Wikidata term. However, the photo in the said Wikipedia article matches the image for the other term (Q12321255). Note that Q12321255 does not have an English Wikipedia article associated.

I can see a reason to separate between the material and its use as a painting surface, although it isn't currently defined properly via these terms: a) they shouldn't be sub-class of each other, b) they shouldn't be considered to be the same (P460), c) the Wikipedia articles should be verified to be correctly associated with one of these terms, etc.

Please advise if these terms should be merged and the best way to proceed. Also, if these terms shouldn't be merged, which of them should be used when specifying the material used for a painting?

Thank you! --Sartle az (talk) 02:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They can't be merged, because dewiki, and possibly others, have pages linking to both. And those pages clearly discuss two related but different concepts: a material, and a product commonly made using that material. I realise this isn't quite as obvious in English, but when a painter tells you to "grab me a canvas from the store", you'd probably understand him, even though the request wouldn't make sense for a material that doesn't have a natural unit that could be referred to with "a".

The relation is identical to to glass (Q11469) and drinking glass (Q56369598), both of which are commonly referred to as just "glass".

There is probably a fair amount of confusion in the sitelinks and some statement, as well as the images you mention. The relation also shouldn't be one of subclass/parent class, but rather material used, or similar. Those would need to be cleaned up individually. --Matthias Winkelmann (talk) 23:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Rihs/CCC Pro Team

Items involved: Q527199^Talk, Q787401^Talk

Status:

in doubt

Andy Rihs was the owner of the CCC Pro Team until his death in 2018. This was only one of several acitivities of Andy Rihs. The link to the page is therefore misleading and incomplete.--Captainstef (talk) 06:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not an interwiki conflict or not obvious what is wrong and should be fixed. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 08:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Matěj Suchánek: Linked both items. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Ghanem

Items involved: Q2827576^Talk, Q23637039^Talk, Q5068273^Talk

Status:

in doubt

there is different between Ahmed Ghanem the founder of the cultural program and another person is a player --41.238.173.164 12:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which items do you mean? --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 08:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Matěj Suchánek: Looks like one of Ahmed Ghanem (Q2827576) Ahmed Ghanem (Q23637039) and Ahmed Ghanem Soltan (Q5068273), the second item is a disambiguation item and so can't be merged to both others. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add Ahmed Ghanem in italian ( writer) to Ahmed Ghanem ( writer ) --41.238.173.164 15:48, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, what items do you mean? --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 08:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox sports league (Q10983958)/Q26112285/Template:Infobox football league (Q8085406)

Items involved: Q10983958^Talk, Q26112285^Talk, Q8085406^Talk

Status:

partially resolved

A template lt:Šablonas:Krepšinio čempionatas (Q ??) was linking incorrectly to en:Template:Infobox sports league (Q10983958). Q1098395 should be linking to lt:Šablonas:Infobox sports league (Q26112285). The template lt:Šablonas:Krepšinio čempionatas (Q ??) is still linking incorrectly to es:Plantilla:Ficha de liga deportiva (Q8085406), this should be unlinked. Wolfmartyn (talk) 13:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolfmartyn: Like what I did? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:44, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: It looks good, only one problem - lt:Šablonas:Krepšinio čempionatas still shows a link to Spanish article, even though there is no back link. Wolfmartyn (talk) 10:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

R.R. Bowker Company (Q22060901)/R.R. Bowker Company (Q21809557)

Items involved: Q22060901^Talk, Q21809557^Talk	Status: not resolved
I believe these are the same, but have never merged items before and wanted to get another pair of eyes before doing anything. Thank you! --Emwille (talk) 23:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

James Bond (Q844)/James Bond (Q2009573)

Items involved: Q844^Talk, Q2009573^Talk

Status:

in doubt

both are full of details, couldn't merge with a standard tool – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nikolay Komarov (talk • contribs) at 12:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Shouldn't be merged. English Wikipedia well demonstrates they represent two different things. If a link is in a wrong item, it may be removed and then added elsewhere. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 15:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

field trip (Q8013033)/field trip (Q95580140)/Ensoku (Q17239345)

Items involved: Q8013033^Talk, Q95580140^Talk, Q17239345^Talk	Status: not resolved
Same topic? —―Rex Aurōrum^{｢Disputātiō｣} 07:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pimenta dioica (Q158468)/allspice (Q1963621)

Items involved: Q158468^Talk, Q1963621^Talk	Status: not resolved
--2003:D1:DF12:4A00:9D6A:3614:69D6:2F29 14:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

European early modern humans (Q24300417)/Cro-Magnon Man (Q179234)

Items involved: Q24300417^Talk, Q179234^Talk	Status: not resolved
The term "Cro-Magnon Man" can either be in reference to all Stone Age people in Europe, or just the 4 skeletons from the Cro-Magnon rock shelter. Because this is confusing, the English Wikipedia called the former topic "European early modern humans". The correct links for this topic are under Q179234 (which is attached to 0 English Wikipedia articles), and only 3 of the links are listed on Q24300417 which is currently attached to "European early modern humans" Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 16:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Kouachi brothers

Items involved: Q18744555^Talk, Q18745613^Talk

Status:

not resolved

When visiting https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ch%C3%A9rif_Kouachi it is impossible to link it to its French version, and it looks as if there was no information about this person in other languages than Arabic and Farsi. The same is true for https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saïd_Kouachi. How can this be fixed? --Erdpferd (talk) 22:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is another instance of the Bonnie and Clyde problem. There is probably nothing to do, you can add missing interwiki links manually the old way to the articles. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lin Shicheng (Q97347946)/Lingshi County (Q1197064)

Items involved: Q97347946^Talk, Q1197064^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--معتصم عبد القادر (talk) 05:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC) hello the arabic page named as "محافظة لين شي" is linked to the wrong page which named as"林石城 (音乐家)“ and the correct one is" 灵石县" thanks[reply]

merged --Jingkaimori (talk) 03:06, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Milky Way (Q321)/appearance of the Milky Way from Earth (Q98841210)

Items involved: Q321^Talk, Q98841210^Talk	Status: not resolved
Decided discussion at talk:Q321 was correct and made a new item for statements to be osmoted to, and posted here. --Arlo Barnes (talk) 07:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hussite Wars

Items involved: Q478301^Talk, Q131372^Talk

Status:

not resolved

The English page for the Hussite Wars has no link to the Swedish page. The Hussite War is incorporated within the Swedish page (Husiter) for the Hussites. There is a redirection page for Husitkrigen, which is the Swedish word for the Hussite War. I attempted to link the English page for the Hussite War to the redirection page but that resulted in a conflict.--00prometheus (talk) 12:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Handling sitelinks overlapping multiple items. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Senkewitsch (Q20998162)/Sienkiewicz (Q443729)

Items involved: Q20998162^Talk, Q443729^Talk	Status: not resolved
Der russische Name Сенкевич entspricht der deutschen Transkription de:Senkewitsch. Da aber einige Einträge in beiden vorhanden sind, ist ein Zusammenführen schwierig. --Rita2008 (talk) 15:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trichophyton mentagrophytes (Q84851010)/Trichophyton interdigitale (Q7840903)

Items involved: Q84851010^Talk, Q7840903^Talk

Status:

not resolved

The two species have been synonymized for some time, but now they are separate.--Ivan Pchelin (talk) 18:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. ideas? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Estação Varginha (Q85812795)/Estação Varginha (Q18475846)

Items involved: Q85812795^Talk, Q18475846^Talk	Status: not resolved
It's about the same (under construction) railway station. 179.208.106.116 18:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A.C. Lumezzane (Q289339)/Football Club Lumezzane (Q63994855)

Items involved: Q289339^Talk, Q63994855^Talk	Status: not resolved
The first one is the orignal club founded in 1946 or 1948 and the second one is the new club that was founded in 2018. It depends on the wiki wich object is linked to their article but wich should stay?--Winschu (talk) 13:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

João Monlevade (Q985508)/João Monlevade (Q22039937)

Items involved: Q985508^Talk, Q22039937^Talk	Status: not resolved
The municipality João Monlevade has the main Wikidata Q985508, someone created another Wikidata (Q22039937) including duplicate Wikipedia articles. --Túllio F (talk) 23:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

water heating (Q27098513)/hot water dispenser (Q16630809)

Items involved: Q27098513^Talk, Q16630809^Talk	Status: not resolved
-- Just stumbled upon this inconsistency going from English article on "water heating" to Russian version. The problem, as it seems, that English article covers both water heating boilers and space heating by means of water, e.g. centralised heating, while Russian has two distinct pages(Водонагреватель for water, Водяное отопление for space heating). I don't quite understand how this wikidata thing is working, and don't quite understand how to fix that. RfxDarth (talk) 00:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hubert de Vaux (Q62128091)/Hubert de Vaux (Q98960282)/Hubert de Vaux (Q98960280)

Items involved: Q62128091^Talk, Q98960282^Talk, Q98960280^Talk	Status: not resolved
Same person Newm30 (talk) 08:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert de Vaux, Sheriff of Cumberland (Q65085018)/Robert de Vaux (Q98960281)

Items involved: Q65085018^Talk, Q98960281^Talk	Status: not resolved
Same person Newm30 (talk) 12:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (Q20712394)/Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (Q15766916)

Items involved: Q20712394^Talk, Q15766916^Talk	Status: not resolved
Same name, same creation year, both linked to Oxford University. --2A02:2788:22A:100D:1D49:29AA:E70F:4681 16:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Q27563162/Q27563171

Items involved: Q27563162^Talk, Q27563171^Talk	Status: not resolved
I’m not 100% sure about the validity of the conflict, every data are the same, except the inventory number which is 160182-G or 160184-G depending on the Q-item, so we should investigate and see if there is 2 valid entries at the "Collection of the Cabinet of Drawings and Prints" or if they made a mistake in their own database… (if so, they should fix the potential duplicate too) --2A02:2788:22A:100D:D898:7A51:906:76A 08:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

local train (Q17355583)/regional rail (Q14626453)

Items involved: Q17355583^Talk, Q14626453^Talk	Status: not resolved
I tried connecting the articles "Stoptrein" from the Dutch Wikipedia & "Train omnibus" from the French Wikipedia because I personally think they're talking about the same concept but the French article seems to be linked to a German, Norwegian and Swedish page about "local" trains, while the Dutch page is linked to a bunch of other wikis, which seem to be talking about "regional" trains. Even though the Dutch page is in the "regional train" set, the first sentence of the page literally states "lokale trein" (= local train). The question here is what we should do with these 2 Wikidata items? Should they be merged? Probably not because the German, Norwegian and Swedish wikis have 2 separate pages already. The difference (if there is one) between regional & local trains should be explained first before this matter can be resolved. --MrLeopold (talk) 18:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Q27952558/Q27952558

Items involved: Q27952558^Talk

Status:

in doubt

--Turror (talk) 12:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One and the same item. Not actionable. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 11:09, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

object file (Q14902318)/object code (Q157965)/Q11740769

Items involved: Q14902318^Talk, Q157965^Talk, Q11740769^Talk	Status: not resolved
Polish Wikipedia article pl:plik obiektowy is linked in object code (Q157965), but it would be more fitting in object file (Q14902318). In turn, pl:kod wynikowy linked in Q11740769 is very similar to object code (Q157965). There might be some subtle differences and nuances and I lack the expertise to make the judgement call. In particular I'm not sure if "kod wynikowy" is the same as "kod obiektowy" or if the former is a more general concept. Please take a look at it. Tengwar (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Monoon longifolium (Q42707873)/Polyalthia longifolia (Q957447)

Items involved: Q42707873^Talk, Q957447^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--Roy Bateman (talk) 07:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Q10 (temperature coefficient) (Q28088158)/Q10 (Q129609)

Items involved: Q28088158^Talk, Q129609^Talk	Status: not resolved
On the German Wikipedia it's called RGT rule, where RGT is some german-specific abbreviation, and in English it's known as Q10. Both describe a change of 10 degrees metric (though one calls it Kelvin, the other Celcius) causing a 2-3x increase in reaction speed and use the same formula (though slightly different formatting). It seems like parallel work but the exact same thing, and I can't link the english to the german page because they're different wikidata items. Probably the wikidata items should be merged, then? --LucGommans (talk) 21:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

list of medical disciplines (Q1862607)/medical specialty (Q930752)

Items involved: Q1862607^Talk, Q930752^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Katzmann83 (talk) 14:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Galatheidae (Q1731771)/Squat lobster (Q28747875)

Items involved: Q1731771^Talk, Q28747875^Talk

Status:

not resolved

The en link currently points to Galatheidae, which is only a subgroup of "Squat lobster", so the link should consequently point to "Squat lobster". The problem probably comes from the fact that in the de wiki, an autolink of Galatheidae was set to Jumpcrabs because de Galatheidae was empty. In the en Wiki, you can find both (Squat lobster + Galatheidae), in the de Wiki only the crayfish, but no Galatheidae. It is even more complicated because in en Squat lobster there is no link to the wiki, and if I want to link to the crayfish there, I can't, because en Galatheidae already points there. By the way, a merge would not make sense... it would be like merging "Car" and "Volkswagen". (Autotranslated by deepl)

Der en Link zeigt derzeit auf Galatheidae, was aber nur eine Untergruppe von "Squat lobster" ist, der Link müsste also folgerichtig auf "Squat lobster" zeigen. Das Problem kommt wohl daher, dass im de Wiki ein Autolink von Galatheidae auf Springkrebse gesetzt wurde, weil de Galatheidae leer war. Im en Wiki gibt es beides (Squat lobster + Galatheidae), im de Wiki eben nur die Springkrebse, aber kein Galatheidae. Noch komplizierter wird es dadurch, dass im en Squat lobster gar kein Link zum de Wiki geht, und wenn ich dort zu de Springkrebse verlinken will, geht das auch nicht, weil en Galatheidae bereits dorthin zeigt. Ein Merge wäre übrigens nicht sinnvoll... das wäre so, wie wenn man "Auto" und "Volkswagen" mergen würde --Paddy (talk) 15:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:50, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cheilocostus speciosus (Q150883)/Costus speciosus (Q15250450)

Items involved: Q150883^Talk, Q15250450^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--Roy Bateman (talk) 16:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. (PS: Is this ping project still working?) --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ordinal scale (Q1719931)/ordinal variable (Q7100785)

Items involved: Q1719931^Talk, Q7100785^Talk	Status: not resolved
--R4nd0m1 (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Narrow gauge railway Saraklis-Stavros (Q99522466)/Perivolaki – Nea Zichni railway line (Q98713572)

Items involved: Q99522466^Talk, Q98713572^Talk	Status: not resolved
--NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

quadratrix of Hippias (Q12791006)/quadratrix of Hippias (Q2121861)

Items involved: Q12791006^Talk, Q2121861^Talk	Status: not resolved
--93.136.54.227 01:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

scope statement (Q427948)/technical proposal (Q4456859)

Items involved: Q427948^Talk, Q4456859^Talk	Status: not resolved
--188.194.148.245 18:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manzana Postobón Team (Q1110403)/Q46995719

Items involved: Q1110403^Talk, Q46995719^Talk	Status: not resolved
Q46995719 is a duplicate of Q1110403, but the nl wikipedia has separate articles for both of them. Other wikis acknowledge that it was a team rename, but the nl wiki keeps them as separate items. --Desiderantes (talk) 02:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mizuko kuyō (Q2879429)/Q85878566

Items involved: Q2879429^Talk, Q85878566^Talk	Status: not resolved
I can't establish language links on ja:水子 to zh:嬰靈 even they are same one --180.176.36.201 07:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Freskin (Q76360492)/Freskin (Q3087531)/Freskin de Moray (Q75532132)

Items involved: Q76360492^Talk, Q3087531^Talk, Q75532132^Talk	Status: not resolved
Please merge items. They are the same person. Newm30 (talk) 22:12, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

flight figure (Q2094922)/aerobatic maneuver (Q32015063)

Items involved: Q2094922^Talk, Q32015063^Talk

Status:

not resolved

first offers: Polski Deutsch 日本語 Қазақша Кыргызча Svenska Українська

second: English Español – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rasz pl (talk • contribs).

bulimia nervosa (Q180913)/bulimia nervosa (Q64513386)

Items involved: Q180913^Talk, Q64513386^Talk

Status:

not resolved

i think they should be merged. not a usual wiki writer sry. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.213.252.228 (talk • contribs).

Notified participants of WikiProject Food --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They have different external identifiers, which suggest that one is indeed a subclass to the other, just as they are modeled. However, most of the interwiki links should probably be moved to bulimia nervosa (Q180913), but I am not a medical expert. Strange ping, this is not food related in my opinion. Ainali (talk) 08:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Medicine Ainali (talk) 08:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bertrand Blondeau (Q54410341)/Bertrand Blondeau (Q54410325)

Items involved: Q54410341^Talk, Q54410325^Talk	Status: not resolved
Same name, same domain of study, even if the ORCID are different, both mention "Université Paris Diderot: Paris, Île-de-France, FR 1997-10-01 to 2000-11-14 ! PhD Education". I guess they should be merged. --2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 07:32, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

taxonomy (Q8269924)/biological classification (Q11398)

Items involved: Q8269924^Talk, Q11398^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Trying to add the Hebrew wiki page for Biological Classification; since it redirects to Taxonomy (Biology) - as seems to be the case for most wikipedias - it spits out an error and suggests a merge. --Telecart (talk) 02:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. (not sure if this ping project is dormanted or not now) --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Giza pyramid complex (Q12508)/Giza Necropolis (Q13217298)

Items involved: Q12508^Talk, Q13217298^Talk

Status:

in doubt

Similarly, the Necropolis in Giza aka the Pyramid Complex all seem to be the same thing --Telecart (talk)

There are many ddiferent articles in various languages for both those Wikidata items, and for example the Sphynx isn’t part of both. I guess there is a good reason to keep them separated. 2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 05:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

electromagnetic interaction (Q849919)/electromagnetism (Q11406)

Items involved: Q849919^Talk, Q11406^Talk	Status: not resolved
And another failure to add from Hebrew wiki - Electro-Magnetic Force / Electromagnetism are the same thing --Telecart (talk)

Château de Saint-Hubert (Q2244831)

Items involved: Q2244831^Talk	Status: not resolved
WP:DE link is about a novel, WP:EN & WP:FR are about a place… IMHO, we should split WP:DE article from that Wikidata item and create a new one dedicated to the novel (but I don’t feel comfortable enough with Wikidata for doing it on my own). --2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 05:49, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Standard electrode potential (data page) (Q15830996)/galvanic series (Q371578)

Items involved: Q15830996^Talk, Q371578^Talk	Status: not resolved
--109.228.170.219 12:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC) Q371578 WP:se is an article about the Electrochemical series and should be an entry in Q15830996 not in Q371578. In the Q371578 WP:en (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactivity_series article) there is even a "Not to be confused with Electrochemical series." note in the top of the page.[reply]

Benjamin L. de Bivort (Q21392957)/Benjamin L. de Bivort (Q90246091)

Items involved: Q21392957^Talk, Q90246091^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Mgrenci (talk) 20:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

truncated mean (Q32278)/truncated mean (Q31838946)

Items involved: Q32278^Talk, Q31838946^Talk	Status: not resolved
Q32278 also links to the section dewiki:Mittelwert#Winsorisiertes_und_getrimmtes_Mittel (or should at least link there; the link to the section does not work because its title was probably changed). However, the main article is dewiki:Getrimmter_Mittelwert . In my opinion, dewiki:Getrimmter_Mittelwert should be added to Q32278 and Q31838946 should be deleted as duplicate. I already marked Q31838946 as duplicate of Q32278 via wikidata statements, as per the procedure described on Help:Merge#Mark_as_duplicate . Thank you! --FWCologne (talk) 23:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Farin Urlaub discography (Q1396703)/Q100252325

Items involved: Q1396703^Talk, Q100252325^Talk	Status: not resolved
(text unfortunately in german language -- sorry) Farin Urlaub ist Solokünstler, das Farin Urlaub Racing Team ist eine Band in der Farin Urlaub im Mittelpunkt steht. In der Musikkritik und auch in anderen Datenbanken wie z.B. Discogs werden beide Projekte separat behandelt. Allerdings führt dewiki die Diskografie beider Projekte in einem Artikel (Und nur die Diskografie! Die Projekte haben jeweils einen eigenen Artikel!). Wie löse ich das Problem? Ist es überhaupt auf Wikidata zu lösen? Sollte es besser auf dewiki gelöst werden? --Westerbrook (talk) 23:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

trading company (Q2865305)/commercial company (Q567521)

Items involved: Q2865305^Talk, Q567521^Talk	Status: not resolved
Very similar items, the distinction is unclear and maybe not universal. In some languages or countries, labels are identical or confused/confusable. --ŠJů (talk) 11:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

self-complementary graph (Q97188092)/self-complementary graph (Q3736652)

Items involved: Q3736652^Talk, Q97188092^Talk	Status: not resolved
Q97188092 and Self-complementary graph (Q3736652) should be merged --92.184.124.57 09:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meunerie romaine de Barbegal (Q22986284)/Barbegal aqueduct and mills (Q89272148)

Items involved: Q22986284^Talk, Q89272148^Talk

Status:

not resolved

I'd like to add https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mühlen_von_Barbegal to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbegal_aqueduct_and_mills but I can't, this is the error msg:

Could not save due to an error.
The save has failed.
Site link dewiki:Mühlen von Barbegal is already used by item Q22986284. Perhaps the items should be merged. Ask at d:Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts if you believe that they should not be merged.

--Tickle me (talk) 17:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British brands (Q6734011)/Category:British brands (Q33005569)

Items involved: Q6734011^Talk, Q33005569^Talk	Status: not resolved
Q33005569 should be added to Q6734011 BN language--Mashkawat.ahsan (talk) 07:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MM Gakuen Gasshoubu (Q100333000)/"previously" MM Gakuen Gasshoubu (Q7381284) maybe?

Items involved: Q100333000^Talk, Q7381284^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Japanese MM学園合唱部 --219.254.113.34 09:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

according to the poster’s history, he removed link to https://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/MM_Gakuen_Gasshoubu (MM Gakuen Gasshoubu (Q7381284) - "MM Gakuen Gasshoubu (MM学園合唱部)" on the WP:MS article, which is now Wikidata-wise "orphan" - so after checking properly (but I can’t read Japanese, nor the language used on WP:MS, so I can’t be sure) maybe should we relink the WP:MS article to Q100333000, or do the opposite, merge both back to Q7381284, it Wikidata allows doing that) 2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 02:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese description for MM Gakuen Gasshoubu (Q7381284) was "2009 single by MM Gakuen Gasshoubu" but there are no such releases found. So I rewrote the description and relinked Japanese Wikipedia to MM Gakuen Gasshoubu (Q7381284). Now MM Gakuen Gasshoubu (Q100333000) is nothing mor than a duplication. --JuthaDDA (talk) 20:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

miter saw (Q70945447)/power miter saw (Q373255)

Items involved: Q70945447^Talk, Q373255^Talk	Status: not resolved
Swedish wiki has an article on "Geringssåg" which is linked in several languages but the English article "Miter saw" is not one of them but has a few languages linked with it. I have no idea how to merge the two so I'm creating a conflict on this. --Boltabulla (talk) 13:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Police of Monaco (Q16678687)/law enforcement in Monaco (Q6503266)

Items involved: Q16678687^Talk, Q6503266^Talk

Status:

not resolved

en:Police of Monaco is a redirect to en:Law enforcement in Monaco -- Ninetyone (talk) 22:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since when law enforcement = police? IMO there is no conflict, these items should not be merged. Wostr (talk) 14:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then how do we get fr:Sûreté publique de Monaco to show up in the languages box on en:Law enforcement in Monaco? Ninetyone (talk) 18:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to have fr.wiki link in a Wikipedia article, just add this locally; if you think that sitelink should be moved from one item to another, just move it. Wostr (talk) 10:46, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mountains of Austria (Q7295160)/Q7704029

Items involved: Q7295160^Talk, Q7704029^Talk	Status: not resolved
The second should be merged into the first. "Горы Австрии" has no parallel in English or German wiki, it's a higher level category that combines "Горные вершины Австрии" (= "Mountains of Austria", "Berg in Österreich"), "Горные хребты Австрии" (= "Mountain ranges of Austria", "Gebirge in Österreich") and a few other things. --Booblique (talk) 23:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NGC 6175-1 (Q946722)/NGC 6175 (Q13088787)

Items involved: Q946722^Talk, Q13088787^Talk

Status:

not resolved

The same object is in two different items--AidepolkycnE (talk) 00:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AidepolkycnE:

Oppose The second item is a disambiguation item, hence not really same. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:27, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Manuscript format (Q25109543)/standard page (Q1999954)

Items involved: Q25109543^Talk, Q1999954^Talk	Status: not resolved
The "standard page" doesn't have an english article and it seems to be a literal translation of the term in different languages (german, czech, slovak etc.) I believe the concept is the same as the "standard manuscript format" - a standard formatting of a page for publishing and printing that has a different rules based on the country and purpose of the text. I'm unsure how to merge them properly + maybe a standard page means something in English? Thanks! --Paviinka (talk) 16:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Partenio (Q17624566)/Parthenius (Q1593519)

Items involved: Q17624566^Talk, Q1593519^Talk	Status: not resolved
I think these two should be merged. Thank you. --Fidulario (talk) 23:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Internet celebrity (Q2045208)/influencer (Q2906862)

Items involved: Q2045208^Talk, Q2906862^Talk

Status:

not resolved

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_celebrity & https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influencer needs languages linkage--193.30.140.137 09:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that some wikis (eu, ja, ko, no) have articles for both, so probably before merging the Wikidata entries, should we make sure those wikis accept merging their articles. 2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 06:37, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a bit different from both, though I don't know how and why both are different, pinging jawiki editors: @正親町三条, ドングリ, 軽快, さかおり, Sei:@Strangesnow, Taisyo, K-iczn, JapaneseA, 有足魚:@上野毅, 新幹線, 伏儀, Sendagaya428, Nattoumaibo:@渥美, 15l4311, 顔文字すみおばさん, Wakuna99, Dr jimmy:@Haetenai, たびびと５５１, Owarai Freak, こんせ, あじゃる丸:@Hiro119296:. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Charles Frémine (Q17116924)/Charles Frémine (Q2959138)

Items involved: Q17116924^Talk, Q2959138^Talk

Status:

not resolved

I cannot link Commons:Category:Charles Frémine at Charles Frémine (Q2959138)--Havang(nl) (talk) 10:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, an article and a category are two distinct concepts and aren’t ment to be merged. The statement "category's main topic" (in the Category-based item) and the statement "Commons category" (in the article-based item) make the link between them. (and if I’m wrong, then there are probably millions of items that should be merged!) 2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 21:07, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is still an inverse constraint in Commons:Category:Charles Frémine for statement category's main topic , I don't know how to resolve that. --Havang(nl) (talk) 21:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By trial and error, removing import seems to resolve the problem. --Havang(nl) (talk) 21:29, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Q21786841)/European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Q546101)

Items involved: Q21786841^Talk, Q546101^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Lotje (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Essential Video Coding (Q65063690)/Low Complexity Enhancement Video Coding (Q87647518)

Items involved: Q65063690^Talk, Q87647518^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--85.221.231.106 21:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC) I suppose it would be good to merge both in mpeg5 article Part1 = EVC and Part2 LC EVC, as in French wiki Because, I do not know how to make linking work from Both:[reply]

English/German EVC
and
English/German LC EVC

to French Mpeg5 Part1&2

Clifford Scott (Q100834242)/Clifford Scott (Q12283220)/Clifford Scott (Q17126634)/Clifford Scott (Q75527700)/Clifford Scott (Q76097561)

Items involved: Q100834242^Talk, Q12283220^Talk, Q17126634^Talk, Q75527700^Talk, Q76097561^Talk	Status: not resolved
Es lassen sich lemmatas der französischen, bulgarischen, arabischen, englischen Wikipedia nicht zusammenführen, obgleich es sich um die selbe Person handelt aber in unterschiedlichen Schreibweisen des Namens --Zusasa (talk) 19:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fateh-313 (Q21484972)/Fateh-313 (Q21191149)

Items involved: Q21484972^Talk, Q21191149^Talk	Status: not resolved
--DRIS92 (talk) 09:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

tarotology (Q16635395)/tarot card reading (Q126645)

Items involved: Q16635395^Talk, Q126645^Talk	Status: not resolved
Hello, I am a user of Wikipedia in french, and I felt like the article Tarot divinatoire (french) should be linked to the article Tarot card reading (english). Are these articles actually on the same topic? The main thing that bothers me is that Wikipedia in russian have two distinct articles (Гадание на картах Таро and Таро в эзотерической традиции) and I don't know if they should stay distinguished, or be merged. Thanks for your help! --Lorèloi (talk) 12:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

financial engineering (Q5449714)/financial engineer (Q1202190)

Items involved: Q5449714^Talk, Q1202190^Talk	Status: not resolved
Merge requested. Identical terms. Thank you ! --Abune (talk) 14:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

internment (Q1668049)/concentration camp (Q152081)

Items involved: Q1668049^Talk, Q152081^Talk

Status:

in doubt

--Imad_J (talk) 19:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And what is the problem here? internment (Q1668049) is about an act/process, concentration camp (Q152081) is about a place. Wostr (talk) 23:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BAS hybrid (Q4834674)/BAS hybrid (Q1251187)

Items involved: Q4834674^Talk, Q1251187^Talk	Status: not resolved
--R4nd0m1 (talk) 19:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

White Rust (Q7995360)/Q17494141

Items involved: Q7995360^Talk, Q17494141^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Homme en Noir (talk) 11:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Toktogul Reservoir (Q16508570)/Toktogul Dam (Q278196)

Items involved: Q16508570^Talk, Q278196^Talk

Status:

in doubt

I was doing the Catalan article of "Toktogul Dam" and I noticed that there two WD --KajenCAT (talk) 11:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dam and reservoir are different things. Links can be relocated if they fit the other item. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clifford Scott (Q76097561)/Clifford Scott (Q75527700)/Clifford Scott (Q17126634)/Clifford Scott (Q12283220)/Clifford Scott (Q100834242)

Items involved: Q76097561^Talk, Q75527700^Talk, Q17126634^Talk, Q12283220^Talk, Q100834242^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--Zusasa (talk) 12:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Guessing that you're asking all 5 items above? Well, the last item can whatsoever not be merged, in favor of redirect-linking. Others may have choices to merge, I'm not sure. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jubileu (Q88980846)/Jubilee (Q6664984)

Items involved: Q88980846^Talk, Q6664984^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Items in pt and ro are merged and all other languages merged in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q88980846#sitelinks-wikipedia and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6664984#sitelinks-wikipedia --FlorinCB (talk) 17:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Disambiguation pages --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:45, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ball (Q18545)

Items involved: Q18545^Talk

Status:

not resolved

This item is mostly about balls (as used in ball games, what we Spaniards call pelota) but it also includes billiard balls (very hard, very rigid balls, we call them bolas).

Some languages like English use the same term for both concepts, so images of billiard balls appear in ball (Q18545) and in the English Wikipedia, and objects like billiard ball (Q862747) and golf ball (Q919777) are wrongly categorized as pelotas.

I don't really know how many extra items are needed to catalogue these new divisions (do “game ball” and “rigid hard ball” merit a page?) so I'd appreciate some guidance in that matter, too. --ArenaL5 (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zakho technical institute/Duhok university

Items involved: Q97352593^Talk, Q18162019^Talk, Q3666468^Talk, Q20181523^Talk Status: not resolved

--FarhadGuli1 (talk) 08:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When reporting a conflict, please use the Wikidata ID: write Q97352593, not Zakho technical institute. This way we can be sure we're talking about the same item.

Also, please remember to change the Wikidata IDs in the section title next time.

I found one item with the name “Zakho technical institute” (Q97352593), no items with the exact name “Duhok university”, and three items about a university in Duhok (Q18162019/Q3666468/Q20181523). What is the problem? Are all of these the same university? --ArenaL5 (talk) 13:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As Iraq is an Arabic speaking country, I wonder if @علاء, باسم: can tell us that where are differents and overlaps between all four items here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I'm not sure if these two items represent the same institute, but they seem not to, just by looking at their names. There seem to be several institutes with a similar name, one is a university college, while the other is an independent organization. That's what I can tell. best--باسم (talk) 09:14, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Q19906300/Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Q1751970)

Items involved: Q19906300^Talk, Q1751970^Talk	Status: not resolved
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilcoxon_signed-rank_test should lead to https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilcoxontoets (both are two samples, the 'rangtekentoest' is for 1 sample --Rcsmit (talk) 12:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

amateur radio call sign (Q455644)/amateur radio call sign (Q3877955)

Items involved: Q455644^Talk, Q3877955^Talk	Status: not resolved
--O0TsRVi7 (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semet (Q63065558)/Semet (Q66023169)

Items involved: Q63065558^Talk, Q66023169^Talk	Status: not resolved
I see no reason to keep two distinct Wikidata items for the same family name. I guess merge should be done. --2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 14:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Batten (Q1950907)/Mount Batten (Q65122404)

Items involved: Q1950907^Talk, Q65122404^Talk	Status: not resolved
All language versions except EN use the single word spelling. EN having its own entry means it won't show up in "in other languages". --2003:C4:DF04:B220:40A6:AD2:F2E7:E5F7 09:41, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel Mendoza (Q16221909)/Miguel Mendoza (Q6014750)

Items involved: Q16221909^Talk, Q6014750^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--Валерій-СЧП (talk) 15:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(en.wiki)Miguel Mendoza (composer) isn't Miguel Mendoza (swimmer) (Q16221909)
(en.wiki)Miguel Mendoza (composer)=(es.wiki) Miguel Mendoza (Q6014750)

The English Wikipedia’s article seems to mix both data. 2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 19:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re'em Sari (Q15261676)/Re'em Sari (Q96868974)

Items involved: Q15261676^Talk, Q96868974^Talk	Status: not resolved
Probably duplicates --2A02:2788:22A:100D:4169:D178:FCCC:5DDD 19:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suomen Cup (Q11894817)/Q60518936

Items involved: Q11894817^Talk, Q60518936^Talk	Status: not resolved
Disambiguation pages about the same thing in Swedish (Finska Cupen) and in Finnish (Suomen Cup) --Bandy långe (talk) 10:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

honorary doctorate (Q11415564)/honorary degree (Q209896)

Items involved: Q11415564^Talk, Q209896^Talk	Status: not resolved
Its my first time proposing an edit like this, so I don't know the convention. Regardless, my discussion is based on the language links of the items in question. In Q11415564 the dutch "eredoctoraat" is linked as an alternative language and the german "Ehrendoktor". In Q209896 the German "Ehrendoktor" links to the English "honorary degree". The dutch "eredoctoraat" and the english "honorary degree" do not link to each other. As far as the dutch language is concerned, these two words (the Dutch and English versions) are literal translations of one another. No Dutch person ever uses "honoris causa", although it may have been the olden way of saying "eredoctoraat". Hope you don't mind me maybe not responoding again as I'll lose track of this comment. I'll try to find it again!31.21.71.229 23:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Loma San Juan (Q23789083)/San Juan Hill (Q7414587)

Items involved: Q23789083^Talk, Q7414587^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Christian Pirkl (talk) 18:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Novo Brdo (Q994263)/Novo Brdo Municipality (Q6081267)/Novo Brdo (Q31223377)/Novo Brdo (Q31223427)

Items involved: Q994263^Talk, Q6081267^Talk, Q31223377^Talk, Q31223427^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Article Novo brdo exists in Slovenian, but is not registrated in English articele. Let resolve this problem. --Stebunik (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No idea on which "Novo brdo". --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Novo Brdo Municipality (Q6081267). But there is probably nothing actionable on Wikidata (maybe except merging Q31223377 and Q31223427). --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrtophyllum fragrans (Q33958373)/Fagraea fragrans (Q4921433)

Items involved: Q33958373^Talk, Q4921433^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Modern synonym is Cyrtophyllum fragrans - as in En:WP, Wikispecies and POWO --Roy Bateman (talk) 10:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Гимны (anthem+hymn)

Items involved: Q541947^Talk, Q484692^Talk, Q63203971^Talk	Status: not resolved
Which words in which languages are religious and which are not? --Infovarius (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And their categories

Items involved: Q8871795^Talk, Q6257493^Talk, Q5615051^Talk, Q101513744^Talk	Status: not resolved
Categories seem arbitrarily correspond to main items. Recent moves ([4], [5]) by User:BohemianRhapsody seem wrong

Isaurian dynasty (Q1165543)/Byzantine Empire under the Isaurian dynasty (Q98776204)

Items involved: Q1165543^Talk, Q98776204^Talk

Status:

not resolved

one is a redirect page of the other --Maher (Beit al Hikma) (talk) 16:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Liuxinyu970226: could you look at this please. --Maher (Beit al Hikma) (talk) 16:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Museum of Fine Arts (Q347071)/Q12130569

Items involved: Q347071^Talk, Q12130569^Talk	Status: not resolved
The same term--Dgho (talk) 16:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Srisailam Project (RFC) Township (Q1382167)/Srisailam (Q2269015)

Items involved: Q1382167^Talk, Q2269015^Talk	Status: not resolved
Both items currently contain en:Srisailam --Bluemask (talk) 03:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

two-factor authentication (Q17086335)/multi-factor authentication (Q7878662)

Items involved: Q17086335^Talk, Q7878662^Talk	Status: not resolved
The german Wikipedia differes between two-factor and multi-factor authentication where the english Wikipedia does not and redirects from two-factor to multi-factor authentication. --Ziegenberg (talk) 11:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

geography of Japan (Q333690)/Japanese archipelago (Q841337)

Items involved: Q333690^Talk, Q841337^Talk

Status:

not resolved

I wanted to replace "Japanisches Archipel" (neutral adjective, wrong) by "Japanischer Archipel" (male adjective, correct) in the object Q841337, down left. When trying to save the change, I got this: Site link dewiki:Geographie Japans is already used by item Q333690. Perhaps the items should be merged. Ask at d:Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts if you believe that they should not be merged. Sorry for being confused ... --Hodsha (talk) 16:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to me, there are enough distinct Wikipedia articles for both Q items to avoid merging them… but I could be wrong… 2A02:2788:22A:100D:CC7:4965:C55E:5853 08:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Smith (Q15477554)/Brad Smith (Q50300377)

Items involved: Q15477554^Talk, Q50300377^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Russian article ru:Смит, Брэд should be linked to en.wiki Brad Smith (American lawyer). Pls advise. 95.73.79.252 13:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--95.73.79.252 13:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the Russian article has been completely changed, Could you please check both linked Q items on the Russian wikipedia to make sure the issue is now fixed, and if so adapt the status to "resolved". Thanks. 2A02:2788:22A:100D:CC7:4965:C55E:5853 07:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Quadrilaterals (Q7149603)/Category:Quads (Q8217913)

Items involved: Q7149603^Talk, Q8217913^Talk	Status: not resolved
--2A02:120B:2C71:CB80:D42D:8920:A18C:B515 14:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

positional notation (Q1747853)

Items involved: Q1747853^Talk	Status: not resolved
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positional_notation to WD https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1747853 does not show the same interwiki languages as https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posisjonssystem to WD https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25457532 seem to be due to a redirection. Is there a simple solution or should it be done manualy? --Pmt (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rubus rolfei (Q15248609)/Rubus hayata-koidzumii (Q17271964)

Items involved: Q15248609^Talk, Q17271964^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Rubus hayata-koidzumii is only a synonym of Rubus rolfei --213.142.96.151 23:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mudar

Items involved: Q0^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Mudar exist in Italian, please merge it --165.225.27.21 06:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please specify the valid Q numbers ? Thanks. 2A02:2788:22A:100D:CC7:4965:C55E:5853 07:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

grasshopper (Q18398431)/Tettigonioidea (Q19896606)

Items involved: Q18398431^Talk, Q19896606^Talk	Status: not resolved
--2A02:AB88:CB7:DA80:4414:81AC:8709:6548 12:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

list of people and organizations sanctioned in relation to human rights violations in Belarus (Q6546947)/list of people and organizations sanctioned in relation to human rights violations in Belarus (Q42582831)

Items involved: Q6546947^Talk, Q42582831^Talk	Status: not resolved
Basically the same sanction lists of the EU and USA.--178.120.70.227 17:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

publishing (Q3972943)/Publishing (Q1244565)

Items involved: Q3972943^Talk, Q1244565^Talk	Status: not resolved
would like to link https://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leidyba with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publishing

toffee (Q927904)/fudge (Q379138)

Items involved: Q927904^Talk, Q379138^Talk	Status: not resolved
In German Karamellbonbon means Toffee (Q927904) and also Fudge(Q379138), I think both sites (Fudge and Toffee) should be linked to the German wikipedia page Karamellbonbon -- 2A02:8071:31C8:2E00:C865:630E:B4FC:FA0A 17:36, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coccothraustes vespertinus (Q318913)/Evening Grosbeak (Q25167830)

Items involved: Q318913^Talk, Q25167830^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Camill (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

proper noun (Q147276)/Antonio Vivaldi (Q1340)

Items involved: Q147276^Talk, Q1340^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--2806:107E:12:2B0C:ADD1:8F:1F0F:4BE3 00:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To me they have nothing in common, maybe have you done a test or a copy-paste error? 2A02:2788:22A:100D:CC7:4965:C55E:5853 08:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Fulmine (Q63797410)/Dick Fulmine (Q3706948)

Items involved: Q63797410^Talk, Q3706948^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--82.48.109.171 11:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comic book series vs. its main character. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

panta rhei (Q254982)/Heraclitus (Q41155)

Items involved: Q254982^Talk, Q41155^Talk	Status: not resolved
Hi: There are many Wikipedia pages on this phrase quoted by Plato, but on English, it's a subsection of Heraclitus. There is a page created redirecting to that section, but when I added it, it shows "Could not save due to an error […] Site link enwiki:Heraclitus is already used by item Q41155. Perhaps the items should be merged" --Potter System (talk) 02:13, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joâo Bethencourt (Q53096968)/João Bethencourt (Q1710128)

Items involved: Q53096968^Talk, Q1710128^Talk	Status: not resolved
One wikidata entry has very few data but according to this source (with Dutch titles) it seems to have in common play(s) with the theme "The Day They Kidnapped the Pope" I’ve found on the IMBD of the other wikidata entry. I guess both are for the same person, despite the "â" vs "ã" in the first name. --2A02:2788:22A:100D:CC7:4965:C55E:5853 07:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Sésiano (Q93428974)/Jacques Sesiano (Q102164957)

Items involved: Q93428974^Talk, Q102164957^Talk	Status: not resolved
I’m not 100% sure about this, but it’s very likely it’s a duplicate (both seem to work in the mathematical field), unfortunately the second wikidata entry is almost empty, not giving me enough data to be sure about a valid merge. Further investigation may help resolving this. If you know where and are willing to seek, it would be great. --2A02:2788:22A:100D:D91:4C33:3DC:107E 23:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Branchiostoma (Q200700)

Items involved: Q200700^Talk

Status:

not resolved

TOPIC: Link from German Species to English Genus

Hello, during research i found the german Wiki of the SPECIES https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanzettfischchen to be linked to the english page for the GENUS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Branchiostoma. The English page of the species is not linked to any german page, either. There does no page exist for the genus in german but it does for the species in both english and german. Trying to fix this myself didnt work. I hope to be helpful with this. --178.203.105.130 12:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

decarbonization (Q11693783)/low-carbon economy (Q3267905)/FR-Décarbonation

Items involved: Q11693783^Talk, Q3267905^Talk	Status: not resolved
Hello, I cannot link those pages : FR-Décarbonation / EN-Decarbonization can anybody solve this, please ? thanx a lot for your help regards --Egidio47 (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Biomorphism (Q2262741)/Biomorphism (Q2811564)

Items involved: Q2262741^Talk, Q2811564^Talk	Status: not resolved
The dutch article is separated from the other languages

strigil (Q282837)/Strigil (Q60979004)

Items involved: Q282837^Talk, Q60979004^Talk

Status:

not resolved

--79.190.215.156 18:28, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

pl Strigilis https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strigilis eng Strigil https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strigil

Minority governments in Canada (Q3112702)/Federal minority governments in Canada (Q16980572)

Items involved: Q3112702^Talk, Q16980572^Talk	Status: not resolved
The English Wikipedia articles are broken down into two separate articles while the French article only has one covering the two topics. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fengshanche (Q65041400)/winnowing machine (Q664674)

Items involved: Q65041400^Talk, Q664674^Talk	Status: not resolved
These are about the same thing (winnowing machine) and so should be merged -- Firezzasd (talk) 15:50, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Guilandina bonduc (Q21874434)/Caesalpinia bonduc (Q1020695)

Items involved: Q21874434^Talk, Q1020695^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Christian Pirkl (talk) 22:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Harmaja (Q3127504)/Harmaja Lighthouse (Q33397944)

Items involved: Q3127504^Talk, Q33397944^Talk	Status: not resolved
Sorry, not sure if this is a conflict or could have been handled with a merge, but: I was trying to link the English wiki article on Harmaja (the island) with the Finnish one on Harmajan majakka (the lighthouse on that island); the two are effectively the same, and should be linked. However, when I tried to add the Finnish 'Harmajan majakka' to item -504, I got an error saying it's already linked to item -944. Any help or advice? Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eurymachus (Q3060909)/Eurymachus (Q61043403)

Items involved: Q3060909^Talk, Q61043403^Talk	Status: not resolved
Some languages have Eurymachus as a set of characters while some other only mention the one from the odyssey, having a cross reference between languages would be beneficial -- (signed, posted by 31.205.201.208 02:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC))[reply]

regulatory technology (Q28458338)/regulatory technology (Q65244393)

Items involved: Q28458338^Talk, Q65244393^Talk	Status: not resolved
merge en Regulatory technology and de Regulatorische Technologie --77.3.218.158 21:24, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

collector (Q3243461)/collecting (Q208165)

Items involved: Q3243461^Talk, Q208165^Talk	Status: not resolved
Dear all, "Kolekcionar" article must be connected with English: Collecting, Collectioner. Best Regards --193.14.247.103 20:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

theory of tides (Q857130)/Q1521170

Items involved: Q857130^Talk, Q1521170^Talk	Status: not resolved
de:Gezeitenkunde should be the right interwiki-link for en:Theory of tides. de:Partialtide should be "alone" or linked manually to en:Theory of tides#Tidal constituents.--W like wiki (talk) 22:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

nunation (Q633306)/nutation (Q190009)

Items involved: Q633306^Talk, Q190009^Talk	Status: not resolved
In language links to English (en), the item Astronomical nutation (Q633306) should be replaced by the item Nutation for Q190009. --Aren (talk) 07:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stutenkerl (Q153944)/Stutenkerl (Q16662704)

Items involved: Q153944^Talk, Q16662704^Talk

Status:

not resolved

both articles in French are about the same thing. --104.159.101.166 15:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

... which must be solved on the wiki. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:28, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

partition of an interval (Q2344169)/Q2152205

Items involved: Q2344169^Talk, Q2152205^Talk	Status: not resolved
I believe these should be merged

automaton (Q787116)/automated machine (Q16039868)

Items involved: Q787116^Talk, Q16039868^Talk	Status: not resolved
The Dutch page 'Automaton (machine)' should be interlinked to Q787116 instead of Q16039868. --82.73.226.92 10:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andrejsala (Q4360264)/Pētersala-Andrejsala (Q16866868)

Items involved: Q4360264^Talk, Q16866868^Talk

Status:

not resolved

The problem is with the links in the Latvian and English Wikipedias. The Latvian, Russian and Estonian Wikipedia articles Pētersala-Andrejsala and should be transferred from Q4360264 to Q16866868; whereas Q4360264 could be supplemented with a link to "Andrejsala" in the Latvian Wikipedia (even though it currently results in a redirect).

P.S. would a merge, which could be due, on the English Wikipedia solve this issue? --Ivario (talk) 11:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lachsack (Q1485983)/Lachsack (Q11599526)

Items involved: Q1485983^Talk, Q11599526^Talk	Status: not resolved
--218.180.212.7 15:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Q6452116/Kallir (Q56538853)

Items involved: Q6452116^Talk, Q56538853^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Archibald Tuttle (talk) 09:10, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flavius Polemius (Q23835823)/ Julius Valerius Alexander Polemius (Q1232604)

Items involved: Q23835823^Talk, Q1232604^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Matlin (talk) 09:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Network (Q20830730)/Network (Q20830730)

Items involved: Q20830730^Talk, Q20830730^Talk

Status:

not resolved

{{#Network analyst1:zh-中文|ja3-日本語|he-עברית}}
conflict between the sweiki and the inclusion of links to other languages
case = not resolved the control system will include links to other languages which is Chinese, Hebrew and Japanese

-~ Please solve these forms and adding other languages to the topic of your network analyst

wikipedia:Network analyst w:Full Wikipedia translations Thank you so much for your tireless efforts, God willing, for success.

--Ĥuyazėę Melpas Mohmmad (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Ĥuyazėę Melpas Mohmmad[reply]

You mean Network (Q20830730) and network (Q109406)? --JuthaDDA (talk) 09:30, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Point (Q1438659)/Fort Point National Historical Site (Q49490692)

Items involved: Q1438659^Talk, Q49490692^Talk

Status:

partially resolved

The two items need to be merged, but there seems to be a problem with ceb. I don't get it and can't resolve it myself. Is there anyone who can fix ist? TIA --H-stt (talk) 17:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marked as duplicate on cebwiki. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Dagger of Kamui (Q101189695)/The Dagger of Kamui (Q3205406)

Items involved: Q101189695^Talk, Q3205406^Talk	Status: not resolved
Both items pertains to Kamui no ken (original japanese name), the original book but also the anime adaptation. Pages in different languages for both items should be all merged under one item. --Legenderfox (talk) 03:44, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Lee Kwok-bun (Q104215549)/Ivan Lee Kwok-bun (Q104215549)

Items involved: Q104215549^Talk

Status:

in doubt

That's my mistake. Sorry for any inconvenience.--Hoising (talk) 04:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One and the same item. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 11:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mirza Hadi Beg (Q6874858)/Mirza Hadi Beg (Q104218424)

Items involved: Q6874858^Talk, Q104218424^Talk	Status: not resolved
--2405:204:A20B:7DE9:C024:8978:B811:FE2D 15:09, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

livestock housing (Q1207909)/stable (Q214252)

Items involved: Q1207909^Talk, Q214252^Talk	Status: not resolved
Item Q1207909 links to Wikipedia Byre, but Byre is a redirect to Stable --UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 00:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Entangled Life (Q98686638)/La red oculta de la vida (Q104245408)

Items involved: Q98686638^Talk, Q104245408^Talk

Status:

not resolved

Hi, I'm new here (Apologies! :).

There is a book, it had an item already: Q98686638 The book has a Spanish translation. I created a new item for the translation: Q104245408

What is an alternative solution to avoid creating a 2nd item for the translation? Can I just add ISBN, etc. of the translation to the original item?

Thanks for any help! --Ricocotamo (talk) 14:55, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dirichlet function (Q948386)/nowhere continuous function (Q93430594)

Items involved: Q948386^Talk, Q93430594^Talk	Status: not resolved
Some of the interwiki links of Dirichlet function (Q948386), at least EN and FR, point to articles about nowhere continuous functions in general, of which the Dirichlet function is an example. I couldn't find an item for such functions, only for a paper about them. --Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 06:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

oil tanker (Q14928)/tanker (Q14970)

Items involved: Q14928^Talk, Q14970^Talk	Status: not resolved
Dem Objekt Q14928 (Öltanker) fehlt ein deutsches Lemma, denn in der deutschen WP ist Öltanker nur ein Redirect auf Tanker (Objekt Q14970). Kann einem Redirect ein Objekt zugeordnet werden? --Alfrejg (talk) 11:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ilya (Q31440338)/Ilya (Q1096462)

Items involved: Q31440338^Talk, Q1096462^Talk	Status: not resolved
The Wikipedia page for the name "Ilya" doesn't have a link to the Russian Wikipedia article for this name, because the wikidata item for it was created much later. The original Wikidata item says its a "first name or given name", are those not the same thing? These two items should be merged and the description should be changed to "male given name". --Akeosnhaoe (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marcellus (Q20817456)/Q16109349

Items involved: Q20817456^Talk, Q16109349^Talk

Status:

in doubt

These are both about the name "Marcellus" --Akeosnhaoe (talk) 21:44, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One is about the name "Marcellus", the other is a disambiguation for "Marcel"/"Marselas". Probably nothing to be done. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At least for the Russian wikipedia, this is not the case, they are about the same name. If you click on all the people mentioned in the Russian article, then go to the English version of that article, all of them have the name Marcellus. Akeosnhaoe (talk) 02:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative (Q2205075)/Alternativa (Q226386)

Items involved: Q2205075^Talk, Q226386^Talk	Status: not resolved
--JuthaDDA (talk) 10:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

identification in Nazi camps (Q169799)/Nazi concentration camp badge (Q15631700)

Items involved: Q169799^Talk, Q15631700^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Angelant (talk) 21:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One, No one and One Hundred Thousand (Q3021244)/One, No one and One Hundred Thousand (1926) (Q18746288)

Items involved: Q3021244^Talk, Q18746288^Talk

Status:

in doubt

--Giu.gent93 (talk) 22:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Work vs. edition. Probably not to be merged per Wikidata:WikiProject Books. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anusha Khan (Q4067732)/Anush (Q63952715)

Items involved: Q4067732^Talk, Q63952715^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Fano (talk) 11:06, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Citadelcross (Q61051447)/2017 Citadelcross (Q60159898)

Items involved: Q61051447^Talk, Q60159898^Talk	Status: not resolved
Two items about the same race.--Hoebele (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

registered voter (Q62704113)/eligible voter (Q2386616)

Items involved: Q62704113^Talk, Q2386616^Talk	Status: not resolved
tried to clean the entry with Russian article, but merger still failed. Both entries refer to a voter in electoral process.--Fixmaster (talk) 10:47, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny House Hunting (Q23001047)/Tiny House Hunters (Q97273677)

Items involved: Q23001047^Talk, Q97273677^Talk	Status: not resolved
Tiny House Hunting (Q23001047) Tiny House Hunting (Q97273677)

Brazilian revolts (Q6644943)/Q2992547

Items involved: Q6644943^Talk, Q2992547^Talk

Status:

not resolved

they are about the same but are separated with no need --138.219.247.161 03:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The French articles is only about conflicts during a period of Brasil history. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Catholic Diocese of Kangding (Q870303)/Daphnusia (Q582188)

Items involved: Q870303^Talk, Q582188^Talk

Status:

partially resolved

--Mezzonev (talk) 10:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your changes to Q582188 as it seems you probably wanted to edit Q870303? --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 11:19, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

it seems there is a mistake in the reference, as Pierre-Philippe Giraudeau has been bishop of Kangding and of Q582188 at the same time. I'm going to look further… Mezzonev (talk) 13:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andrey (Q15732892)/Andrew (Q18042461)

Items involved: Q15732892^Talk, Q18042461^Talk	Status: not resolved
same given name --37.212.11.129 23:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

falconet (Q1054134)/swivel gun (Q1256431)/Breech-loading swivel gun (Q11246676)

Items involved: Q1054134^Talk, Q1256431^Talk, Q11246676^Talk	Status: not resolved
--Kintaro (talk) 23:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

carpet (Q163446)/rug (Q104602244)

Items involved: Q163446^Talk, Q104602244^Talk	Status: not resolved
I would like to link Q104602244 to the Wikipedia article Carpet, which also discusses rugs. Since Q163446 is already linked to the article, I couldn't add the link. But in this case, can both items have the same link? --UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 17:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]