Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts/Unresolved/2016
|
January 2016
editItems involved: Q213051Talk, Q27801Talk | Status: partially resolved | ||
These two elements mean the same thing, but I can't merge them, because there are two different articles in Tagalog Wikipedia. --Facenapalm (talk) 12:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
|
copy/copying
editItems involved: Q1156791Talk, Q23013246Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
--Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q677012Talk, Q2612293Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
confusion interlocking paver with simple paver Otourly (talk) 19:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q6304756Talk, Q309383Talk, Q18029395Talk, Q21809330Talk | Status: partially resolved | ||
Three items with unclear definitions and a lot of overlap. --Joostik (talk) 09:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Mainly done. Three items are kept, some more replaced by redirects. A lot of articles are checked and moved. I wanted to add Property:P1889 in order to link the items but Abc82 removed the property. More information see Talk:Q309383#Related items. -- Juetho (talk) 14:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC) |
February 2016
editItems involved: Q12106Talk, Q15645384Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
The first is about genus of plants, but the second is about staple food. All of this is in one article of most of languages. Brya (talk • contribs • logs) separated these article. He explained why he seprateted in his discussion. However, I think, these articles need to merge. --Treisijs (talk) 10:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q134185Talk, Q2309085Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
The English Wikipedia covers these both in the same article. Despite the fact that the enwiki page starts out describing the fruit ("The durian (/ˈdjʊriən/) is the fruit of several tree species belonging to the genus Durio"), at Talk:Q134185, User:Brya contends that enwiki page should be linked to the plant Durio (Q2309085). Most WP languages only have one article for the two concepts, but currently the links are arbitrarily fragmented between the two concepts. This is just a fundamental problem with Wikidata requiring a 1-to-1 relation between Wikipedia articles and concepts, while WP articles frequently cover one main topic and relevant subtopics (that sometimes aren't even notable enough for an individual article). Intgr (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC) |
March 2016
editItems involved: Q11564204Talk, Q15578898Talk | Status: in doubt | ||
--AntanO 05:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
|
April 2016
editItems involved: Q16746709Talk, Q2708719Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
genus or spcies --(t) Josve05a (c) 18:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC) WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. (t) Josve05a (c) 09:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q166955Talk, Q1483917Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Both Wikidata items refer to "sophistry"; the former refers to the Greek school of philosophy, the latter refers to the modern usage of the word to mean a specious argument. At least on the English and Simple English Wikipedias, both topics are covered by a single article; other Wikipedias appear to have similar conflicts. The Arabic Wikipedia, as best I can tell, has two separate articles broadly about the Greek philosophical school (Google Translate gives them titles of "Sophistry" and "Sophistical discussion"), and has one article linked from each Wikidata item. --Me and (talk) 14:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q557165Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
About both the event and the people. --(t) Josve05a (c) 11:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q837816Talk, Q1653223Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Some confusion about wordmark vs logotype. --Quiddity (talk) 16:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q133902Talk, Q2506682Talk, Q23834677Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
--(t) Josve05a (c) 22:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC) WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. (t) Josve05a (c) 09:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q854503Talk, Q17144529Talk | Status: in doubt | ||
I think these two items are referring to the same "6174 (number)", but I do not know russian language, so I cannot edit them and merge two items together. Could anyone help me? Thanks a lot!
|
Items involved: Q4691918Talk, Q11626629Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Unfortunately, these pages are conflicted. From Japanese, Senkyo-Ken (選挙権) means "right of vote" and Hi-Senkyo-Ken (被選挙権) means "right of candidate" ("被" being the use of the causative form Kanji; "権" meaning "right"). --126.24.175.39 18:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC) |
May 2016
editItems involved: Q309250Talk, Q737988Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
The English words "courtyard" and "patio" are translated into 中庭 in Chinese. Actually, linguistically speaking, patio is a special type of courtyard, but we would just use the general word 中庭 (courtyard) to say patio and we don't invent a special word for patio. So far so good, because both courtyard and patio articles in English wiki both have a language link pointing to the same 中庭. But when I want to add a language link to patio in *French* wiki to point to 中庭, it was rejected. I suppose it's because "cour (architecture)" in French wiki article already has a language link to 中庭. Please remove this restriction.石庭豐 (talk) 09:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q215292Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
When creating electrical plug type (P2853) with Lymantria, we noticed that the labels of AC power connector (Q215292) differ across languages. So do titles of the articles on sitelinks, but the scope of the articles may still be the same. --
|
June 2016
editIlves
editItems involved: Q537238Talk, Q1659275Talk, Q2608062Talk, Q6001351Talk, Q12646500Talk, Q21482680Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Could anyone review this? --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 19:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q16048255Talk, Q43637Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
could somebody with knowledge in Persian (Q9168) figure this out? --T.seppelt (talk) 20:20, 12 June 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q166861Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
It's a mixup between the order and its members. Label is different in English from other languages. |
Items involved: Q16287483Talk, Q4178004Talk | Status: in doubt | ||
--Hannibal (talk) 14:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
|
July 2016
editItems involved: Q501519Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
the Wikipedia articles connected to this item refer to different concepts (de: maritime rescue coordination centres, en: rescue coordination centres in general, no: one institution). --T.seppelt (talk) 13:25, 2 July 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q15089357Talk, Q1550345Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Both items refer to the same operating system, in two phases of its history (first Q-DOS then 86-DOS). The only wiki that has both items as separate articles is fr, the others treat both names as one article only. --Banjo (talk) 10:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC) |
Guadeloupe raccoon (Q1028475)/Procyon minor (Q21968197)Le raton laveur de la Guadeloupe
editItems involved: Q1028475Talk, Q21968197Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Je pense que c'est la même chose : Q1028475=The Guadeloupe raccoon / Q21968197=Le raton laveur de la Guadeloupe |
Items involved: Q207959Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Items involved: Q915263Talk, Q3945Talk, Q8990577Talk, Q4387616Talk | Status: partially resolved | ||
--GZWDer (talk) 18:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
|
Never Shout Never
editItems involved: Q456190Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Group, or just one person? --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 15:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
|
August 2016
editItems involved: Q229256Talk, Q988594Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Hi! Those articles are about the same topic. Some of them are linking to the redirect page, but they all articles should be linked to the "non-redirect page" one. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me˱M @ C S˲» 16:25, 2 August 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q21384170Talk, Q24764435Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Items involved: Q17375334Talk, Q1789484Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
--Majella1851 (talk) 20:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
@Majella1851:. Looks good to me. What do you think is the problem? |
Items involved: Q7741335Talk, Q17379598Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
The Ideal City (painting) has been created in English as an entry about a single painting (the so called "Baltimore" panel) and mentions two others variants. In other languages (french, Italian) an other variant (called the "Urbino") is taken as the main subject and mentions the others. It seems that the English case reflected a minority's view and it has been rewritten but now there is conflict.195.96.229.126 09:51, 15 August 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q20888920Talk, Q867913Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Appear to be overlapping terms, may wiki sites are one or the other but a few languages have both. --Traveler100 (talk) 06:37, 21 August 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q6491422Talk, Q24091400Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
English labels are identical, and language interwikis are mostly disjoint except for nl. -Mwtoews (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q236055Talk, Q15807620Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
DE has disambiguation pages for both Icebreaker (very specific use of the engl word, e.g. as a company) as well as Eisbrecher (as the general term, e.g. type of ship and drink). This of course is not separated on the EN side Icebreaker which is currently linked to the engl word in DE (very specific version). --Aeroid (talk) 06:25, 24 August 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q6881511Talk, Q783794Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
--Luan (talk) 19:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q2667895Talk, Q691992Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Bonjour, Je suis tombé sur une ville qui possède deux numéros Q, Grocka en Serbie. Les numéros sont Q2667895 et Q691992. En partant de la page en français dans Wikipedia (Q2667895), on peut passer de l'un à l'autre par l'anglais ou l'italien qui mènent au Q691992, mais pas dans l'autre sens. Les autres langues semblent séparées et certaines mènent à des articles différents. Comment faire pour les fusionner (ou les séparer complètement) ?
ar غروتسكا bg Гроцка (община) bs Grocka de Grocka el Γκρότσκα en Grocka hr Grocka (općina) it Grocka ka გროცკის თემი ms Grocka nl Grocka no Grocka pl Grocka ru Гроцка (община) sh Opština Grocka sr Градска општина Гроцка tr Grocka zh 格羅茨卡 et bg Гроцка fr Grocka hr Grocka ru Гроцка sh Гроцка sl Grocka sr Гроцка Merci ! J'ajoute les langues visibles de la page Wikipedia en français : Български Bosanski Deutsch English Hrvatski Italiano Nederlands Norsk bokmål Polski Русский Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Slovenščina Српски / srpski 中文
العربية Български Bosanski Deutsch Ελληνικά Hrvatski Italiano ქართული Bahasa Melayu Nederlands Norsk bokmål Polski Русский Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Türkçe 中文Fortelle65 (talk) 18:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC) |
September 2016
editItems involved: Q2027018Talk, Q26202673Talk | Status: in doubt | ||
Brömsebro (Q2027018) exists also on Svwp, and there you can see links to all the other languages. The problem is that if you go to Enwp (or other languages) you can not see the svwp-article. I tried to add the language on wikidata but got a conflict ("Länken svwiki:Brömsebro används redan av objekt Q26202673. Du kan ta bort den från Q26202673 om den inte hör hemma där eller slå samman objekten om de är om exakt samma ämne.") and can not solve it. --Adville (talk) 22:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q578810Talk, Q5974947Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
The English Wikipedia page Ypthima baldus (Q578810) should be linked oto the Japanese wikipage ヒメウラナミジャノメ(Ypthima argus (Q5974947) because they are about the same butterflyThe Nature Box (talk) 13:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q15906640Talk, Q12491Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Q15906640 is just another version of Q12491. It would even be possible to auto-merge them, if it weren't for the fact that the Luxembourgian Wikipedia has two different pages; the one in Q15906640 even says, in its first sentence, that "Napoleon is the English, Scandinavian and Slavic designation for mille-feuille." Similarly, the Norwegian article says that the only difference between a "Torte Napoleon" and a "mille-feuille" is the frosting. Finally, on Q12491, 'napoleonskake' is entered as the Norwegian word for mille-feuille. Any thoughts on what should be done here? --DarkPhoenix (talk) 19:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q846360Talk, Q627232Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Both refer to autogestion leading to a lack of xref between e.g. the Fr and En wikipedia on the topic --Gallais (talk) 08:52, 13 September 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q158951Talk, Q15523284Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Gymnadenia nigra; same name and pictures at enWp/nlWP, though clashes at other wikis -- — billinghurst sDrewth 11:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q493382Talk, Q14811107Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Both means musical piece sounded at dusk or funerals. --Ran Ayase (talk) 11:25, 24 September 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q9295456Talk, Q792542Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
same concept, can't merge because of what seem to be a duplicate on ptwiki --author TomT0m / talk page 17:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q16872010Talk, Q7444782Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Spanish article is not the interwiki of the English and Turkish articles.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q16964590Talk, Q22480244Talk, Q22480234Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Frwiki for Q16964590 talks about both Q22480244 and Q22480234.--Laurianna2 (talk) 00:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC) |
October 2016
editItems involved: Q1032796Talk, Q9184399Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
In the enwiki, there is a redirection from Canaries Quarter to article linked to Q1032796, but Canaries Quarter refers to Q9184399, and I can't put it in the right element.--Laurianna2 (talk) 23:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q18450141Talk, Q2346673Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Both seem to be about the same book, but one of the items seems to have different ISBN (for a Swedish translation) and one more author than the other. --(t) Josve05a (c) 21:16, 15 October 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q519608Talk, Q19563580Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Both articles w:en:Classification yard and w:en:Rail yard at English Wikipedia are linked to w:it:Stazione di smistamento (the forst through WikiData element, the second through "old stile" interlaguage link in wikicode). --5.170.8.21 22:35, 15 October 2016 (UTC) |
November 2016
editItems involved: Q4991662Talk, Q7884538Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Share a link to hewiki as True duplicates. I cannot decide which one is to be removed and which one to stay. --Lymantria (talk) 15:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q7168625Talk, Q17013749Talk | Status: in doubt | ||
Could not be merged.--Hubon (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q1677899Talk, Q559298Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Canada Arm 2 and the Mobile Servicing System are the same things. some wikipedias have articles related to Q1 and others to Q2 . I want to combine the two wikidata entries. is it possible? thanks
|
Items involved: Q1494444Talk, Q20660322Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Link for cane. Eg: see enwiki and simplewiki. --AntanO 10:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC) |
districts of Austria
editItems involved: Q871419Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Split. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 15:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q1844333Talk, Q2547711Talk | Status: in doubt | ||
Judging from their respective Wikipedia page contents and a few dictionary searches, Walzhaut corresponds to mill scale, but currently cannot be merged as mill scale is already using Abbrand (Metallurgie) for its German entry. --JanTH (talk) 13:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
|
December 2016
editGravity
editItems involved: Q30006Talk, Q673166Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
all mixed in Q30006 sitelinks: acceleration, field, force... --Infovarius (talk) 15:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q2660305Talk, Q2428191Talk | Status: partially resolved | ||
Hello everyone, Utzli, a he-wiki user, wrote here that Q2660305 and Q2428191 were about the same type of a helicopter. If he's right, please merge the items. thanks, Amitayzl (talk) 21:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
|
Искусствоведение (History of art OR Art history?)
editItems involved: Q50641Talk, Q50637Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Those confusing english terms... The main question: where is the right place for ru-link (if keeping en-links at places). ABBYY Lingvo dictionary says that ru:Искусствоведение=en:"Study of art, art history, art critism". And it consists of studying modern state of art, studying history of this activity and art critics. So I believe the first item (as of now) is the wrong place. And probably it refers also to uk/be/az/hy/ka/ka/lt/tg. So I propose to move these links to the second item. --Infovarius (talk) 13:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q23835349Talk, Q47577Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Il existe deux éléments Wikidata pour le même objet : la suite des nombres de Fibonacci : une dizaine de langues utilise Q23835349, et une cinquantaine Q47577; aucune des langues partage les deux. Comme il s'agit du même objet mathématique, une discussion sur la fusion s'est engagée sur fr:Projet:Mathématiques/Le Thé#Suite de fibonacci vs fibonacci numbers?, et l'unanimité n'a pas été atteinte, à un contributeur près. Je demande néanmoins la fusion. --ManiacParisien (talk) 11:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q37212Talk, Q1192405Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
English: I think en:Lemur should be linked to de:Lemuren, please. Deutsch: Meines Erachtens sollte bitte en:Lemur mit de:Lemuren verlinkt werden. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q81672Talk, Q3882219Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
The link for English wikiquote and English wikipedia are to different places, which doesn't make sense. There seems to be duplicates in itWP and frWP and I don't know sufficient to differentiate. Either way the English sites need to point to the same item. -- — billinghurst sDrewth 22:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q8551672Talk, Q15337267Talk | Status: not resolved | ||
Both categories hold the same kind of articles about internet personalities/celebrities, interwikis are separated in two groups except for a couple of wikis that hold both items at same time. --Banjo (talk) 09:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q1197718Talk, Q1197757Talk, Q27661960Talk | Status: in doubt | ||
Actually, per [5], the first and second districts are merged as third name, but on most of Wikipedias there's still separated articles... Perhaps this is the last 2016 IC report. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
|