I moved :de, :id, :it, :pt and :simple to majority (I understood enough to do so), but there are probably some articles left in the wrong item Supermajority. And Q27636 (Majority rule) is also involved, because it has the :pt article Maioria absoluta which I wanted to add to Supermajority. --A doubt (talk) 23:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I saw a translation error from the dutch "Spaanplaat" which is pointing to the english "Pressed Wood" (which is significantly more generic) and should point to "Particle Board". I tried to change it, but I got the following error:
Site link Particle board is already used by item Q2307034. Perhaps the items should be merged and one of them deleted? Request deletion of one of the items at Wikidata:Requests for deletion, or ask at Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts if you believe that they should not be merged.
I moved the link to nlwiki as well as the description. I guess you tried to move the link to enwiki, which gave you the error. Can you give an appropriate label and description in Dutch for the more generic particle board (Q898776)? Moreover, someone should check the link to dawiki, which looks like another error. --Zuphilip (talk) 18:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Why did you change the links to enwiki, dewiki and subproperty statement? enwiki and dewiki are normally my anchor, about the meaning of an object... --Zuphilip (talk) 11:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I didn't see that there was already an entry for the subject and applied one... Now there are two entries, please delete one! --Kurator71 (talk) 13:24, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
C standard library includes a set of headers, like <stdio.h> <string.h> <stdlib.h> etc. But enwiki doesn't have the entry "Stdlib.h"; it simply redirected to entry "C_standard_library". "Stdlib.h" in zhwiki was linked to "C_process_control" in enwiki improperly. Function qsort() belongs to "Stdlib.h" but not "C_standard_library". Please split the entry "Stdlib.h" & "C_standard_library". Thank you.
I have no idea what "numbers" are supposed to be quoted here. The en:Academic freedom is linked to de:Forschungsfreiheit. Later a newer entry has been written on de which is "Akademische Freiheit". This should be linked to the en:entry as it is the wider concept. On German wikipedia the differentiate between freedom of research (Forschungsfreiheit), freedom of teaching (Freiheit der Lehre) and freedom of studies (Freiheitbdes studiums) because that is the language in the text of the German constitution. But the general term is Akademische Freiheit and this should be linked here. Kipala (talk) 17:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Please remove the redirect "Flytende oksygen" (Q618153) which leads to the main article about oxygen (Q629) on Norwegian Wikipedia. I've created a separate article on liquid oxygen there and Wikidata doesn't let me add it to the interwiki list due to this conflict. These two links shouldn't be merged on Norwegian WIkipedia. Sorry if this is the wrong place for reporting this kind of problem. I'm new to Wikidata. Thanks in advance. − Sandip90 (talk) 14:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
There are two different ruwiki disambiguation pages for psi and I can't see the difference. Is there any difference? --Zuphilip (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
They prefer to keep latin and cyrillic abbreviations as separate disambigs since the spelling is usually not interchangeable. Unless the articles be merged, we can do nothing. --4th-otaku (talk) 14:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
An object in wikidata can have at most one link in a language. This explains why an error occurs, when you try to attach a second link to a page in English wikipedia. The Danish article mixes the two meanings of the word "meander", therefore I would see it as a disambugation page, which can be linked to Mæander (Q229521). I changed the dawiki link to the disambugation item, where you will also have a link to enwiki. --Zuphilip (talk) 11:36, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
These two objects seems to be very close but not the same. There are different wikipedia pages in ca, en, es, pl, pt, vi. Certainly, we cannot merge them. But maybe someone can help to improve them, such that it is possible to better see the differences. For example the German label is exactly the same and there is no description on either of the pages. --Zuphilip (talk) 14:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
One could always add more descriptions and labels, but these pages are already sufficiently distinct. I'm going to add a different from (P1889) property to both pages, just in case, and tag this tentatively as solved. --ArenaL5 (talk) 17:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
resolved
