Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2020/05/04

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q56109259

Q56109259: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This looks like a lazy attempt to avoid listing all sports of multi-sport events (such as the Olympics) with sport (P641). Per this query, there are some 100 uses to be replaced before this item can be deleted. MisterSynergy (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

If relevant, please see some consensus discussion at Project Sports. Jagulin (talk) 05:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

There seems a parallel between this item and multisports club (Q13580678), can we do something in parallel with that? - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 15:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

I disagree that there is a similarity.

• multisports club (Q13580678) is a well-defined concept, it even has sitelinks.
• Q56109259 is just an invalid value for sport (P641), because the creator was too lazy to figure out actual types of sport instead. There is no sport "Q56109259".

—MisterSynergy (talk) 12:59, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

suggest to merge both. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Merge? There is no potential duplicate for Q56109259. It is just ill-defined. --MisterSynergy (talk) 11:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

 Delete--Trade (talk) 14:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

 Delete Germartin1 (talk) 09:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Finally  Done --Fralambert (talk) 20:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q28326490 and Q28326484

I don't see the point of having items for Q28326490 and Q28326484, and they are likely to cause some confusion. --Yair rand (talk) 05:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

@D1gggg:, you created these items, can you comment on this request? - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 14:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

D1gggg is blocked indefinitely since 2017. —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Ontology has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. I tend to delete these items as it is unclear what they are good for (and indeed potentially confusing), but I want to hear some input first. So, please comment. Thanks, MisterSynergy (talk) 12:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q25420941

soil salinization (Q25420941): Soil salinization happens when the salt content in soil increases above normal, naturally occurring levels: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merged with Q935277 --Grumbler eburg (talk) 10:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

• How certain are you that these are the same thing? I had google translate some of the articles, and they seem like they are different things even though discussing similar subjects. I undid your changes until a 3rd party can confirm. Plus, your edits were unneeded because a merge would have done them. Quakewoody (talk) 11:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
  • @Quakewoody: the subject may be familiar to someone not familiar with russian language or this topic, but these are two different things. Sincerely, Nadzik (talk) 15:18, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Well, then, since you agree that they are different - maybe someone (with language abilities) should check the other data/links on the two, to make sure they are on the correct items. Quakewoody (talk) 16:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't think it's the same as salt pan (Q935277) (a type of landform), but based on Google translation to "saline soil" and categorisation as a type of soil, it may be the same as soil salinization (Q754836) in some languages - Q754836 looks like it is about at least three things: soil salinization, soil salinity and saline soil, and has always been about at least the first two, and two items - soil salinization (Q16118071) soil salinity and soil salinization (Q3977119) saline soil - were merged to it. Q25420941 should be kept, but there may be sitelinks that could be moved to it from Q754836 (such as the Italian article originally in Q3977119). Peter James (talk) 17:47, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

"Засоленная почва" = "salt(ed?) soil", it's an umbrella term for surfaces classified by concentration of salt (poorly/слабозасоленные, medium/среднезасоленные, highly/сильнозасоленные), and partly by poorness of coverage by plants because of that. The term of 'salt pan' describes only the surfaces appeared after complete evaporation of lakes or ponds. For example, solonchaks are not necessarily a result of evaporation of water areas. --Wolverène (talk) 08:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per discussion —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Items about "entrepreneurs" with P973

I suspect that many of these items are spam, primarily because the behavior of spammers lately has been to add a bunch of probably junk P973s to the items they create in order to appear legitimate. Mahir256 (talk) 06:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

@Mahir256: Donald Trump (Q22686) is in that list. Please trim it down to something more meaningful. For example filtering out the entries that have a sitelink. Multichill (talk) 23:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

• I support the deletion of all of the above that are not linked to something. We can figure out what to do with any remaining items once we get rid of those from the list. Quakewoody (talk) 17:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

  Some of these have identifiers; others such as Jean-Baptiste Prévinaire (Q53580670) are clearly not spam. Probably better to move this to a separate page, similar to User:Pasleim/Items for deletion/Page deleted. Notable items can then be removed from the list. Peter James (talk) 22:57, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

• I updated the list - removed items that were already deleted Quakewoody (talk) 11:31, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done; keep the remaining ones for now, but mention that some of them are clearly edge cases which might deserve a second look in individual nominations. —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q73910738

Toxic Crusaders (Q73910738): Wikipedia article covering multiple topics: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same as Q73910400 - ʂɤɲ ✉ 10:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Or the same as Q3535976, or not the same and Q3535976 and Q73910738 are part of the series Q73910400. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 11:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q73910738 intended to be for game series, but you changed it to game. Which one of games named "Toxic Crusaders"? There 3 different games - for NES, for Sega Genesis and Game Boy. I created different entries for all of them, now it's just totally mess. --Winterheart (talk) 13:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

applsdev Arlo Barnes BugWarp Coloradohusky CptViraj Cupkake4Yoshi Cwf97 Cynde Moya Danrok Datumizer Dexxor Diggr Dispenser Dollarsign8 DoublePendulumAttractor EdoAug Edolusill Eniehack Facenapalm Floyd-out FullyAwesome Harshrathod50 Jean-Frédéric Keplersj Kirilloparma Lewis Hulbert LotsofTheories Macocobovi Macrike Master Of Ninja Matthias M. Metafire18 Nicereddy Odjob16 Oduci Poslovitch Rampagingcarrot RampantSpirit Santer Sight Contamination thgiex Tomodachi94 VGPaleontologist Wd-Ryan WikiSyn YotaMoteuchi

Notified participants of WikiProject Video games I think all 3 mentioned vgs are not same, ideas? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Liuxinyu970226

Thanks for reviving the topic, it's useful

Yes, there are three different games indeed, for NES, Sega Genesis and Game Boy.

Q3535976 is for the NES game, links to WP are correct for this one.

I just realize I made a mistake by making a request for deletion for Q73910738 (I didn't get Winterheart's answer, I must admit he was right). So we should keep it. The problem is that the French WP doesn't make difference between the three games but doesn't talk of series either. The English WP is correct, so I 've just relinked it to Q73910738, as well as the french WP for now (the article should be changed on WP, it would be better).

Sorry for that, it's all my fault.

Thanks and have a nice day

--- ʂɤɲ ✉ 08:14, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per discussion —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q27561770

Q27561770: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The item does not meet notability requirements. It's generated by a bot from a database entry in a catalunian museum's database without indicating to which print by Franz Marc it actually refers. The item therefore does not refer to "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity". There is not title, no image, nothing by which the artwork might be identified. A print by Franz Marc dating from 1904 cannot be found on the museum's website. Further, I couldn't find prints by Franz Marc from 1904 nowhere in the internet or in art books. Maybe it is an error in the year and should read 1907 or 1914? Then it might as well be a print for which a wikidata item already exists. In any case, as it is, the item is more confusing than giving the user any information especially no reliable or verifiable information. --Bjs (talk) 09:12, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

@KRLS: as the bot operator, can you please have a look what's on here? There is an inventory number in the item, but I do not manage to locate this item on the museum's website catalog. Thanks for your input. —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

I was just bot operator, maybe @ESM:, as project manager, has got more information about this item.--KRLS (talk) 09:57, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

At least you may possibly know which database the bot searched and whether the item is still to be found there (possibly with further information)--Bjs (talk) 20:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

It has a description, "Ex Libris Daniel Pest". The only mention I can find is on artnet.com and refers to an auction; is it possible that the museum sold it? Peter James (talk) 12:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

@Bjs, KRLS, ESM, Peter James: as the information of the item is apparently impossible to verify, I have deleted the item. If any of you or anyone else can actually spot the item, I'd undelete of course. For reference: the item claimed to be listed with inventory number (P217): 162359-G in collection (P195): Collection of the Cabinet of Drawings and Prints (Q23681667). —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Items by User:Zerocoolpasta

Spam, no sources for notability. Items were already deleted, User:Zerocoolpasta requested undeletion and promised to improve these items with references (see Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2020/02#Request_to_Restore_Deleted_Items), but failed to do so. Jklamo (talk) 13:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

 Keep Most of these seems notable to me. --Trade (talk) 13:48, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

@Trade: Could you please elaborate on which ones seem notable and why? Thanks. Bovlb (talk) 23:40, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

@Jklamo Not sure what the status is on these exactly. Again as stated before we are by no means experts at adding or editing Wikidata entries. Honestly we dont even want to be involved in this but our hands are tied so we are trying to make due. I think if you look we have added several references to the entries. The references are all as far as we can tell, voluntarily written by a third party not associated with us or the entity. They seem to provide factual information that helps substantiate the claims being made in one form or another. If they were not entered correctly or in the right spot just let me know. Again I reiterate that these entries, for us they are an integral part of our project and not just for nothing like some entries seem to be. Again I know this isnt the spot to request an undeletion but will re-open that in the proper spot at the proper time. Zerocoolpasta (talk) 14:01, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Delete I remember that discussion but I did not re-look at it or at the items. So, from memory...

The items were previously deleted. And were reinstated by request (as opposed to "oops, they shouldn't have been deleted in the first place") as a test for this guy's "who who of lawyers". If this test group passes, the list is going to be expanded. So, I believe, if this test group wasn't drastically improved, then we should delete them to prevent the list from being expanded. Quakewoody (talk) 14:50, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I was the undeleting admin (four weeks ago), and I did so on the basis of giving Zerocoolpasta "some rope here to improve these items with references and evidence of notability". Looking at the 12 items, I see that three have been given additional references since the undeletion, but none of these references appear to establish notability. @Zerocoolpasta: Can you please explain your plans to establish notability for these entities? Thanks, Bovlb (talk) 18:09, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

@Bovlb We have collected quite a few links and "reference material" on each firm / attorney as its needed on our end as well to populate the dataset / data tables. I honestly think some of the problem is just our understanding of notability when it comes to such entries. We understand (at least I think we do) the requirements for notoriety to Wikidata and while initially we felt the updates would be accepted its clear now they are not good enough. So first part of this is to ask what doesnt make them acceptable (this is a legit question and not to be taken as snarky). It seems that notoriety could be subjective as it pertains to a particular industry. We can add more references if that would help. Again just know that as mentioned before these entries we feel are not SPAM at all and know that as of right now we dont plan on adding any more entries. The other firms in our dataset are already in Wikidata and are all modeled the same way. Zerocoolpasta (talk) 20:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

@Zerocoolpasta: The guiding policy here for notability is Wikidata:Notability, which has three separate criteria. An item is notable if it passes any one of these tests. Unless I've missed something, none of these items have a sitelink, so they don't meet criterion 1 (at least one valid sitelink). While they have links to each other, taken as a group, they don't really satisfy criterion 3 (structural need). Criterion 2 has two sub-criteria, both of which must be passed: these items arguably meet 2a (clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity), so we're stuck on 2b (can be described using serious and publicly available references). The references you are providing seem to mostly be where a subject is being interviewed by a local paper about a client's case, but it is the client and the case that is the focus of the article (and hence potentially notable), not the lawyer being interviewed. Also, these local papers are not the most serious of sources. To give an example in contrast, if you were able to show two articles from a national paper (e.g. New York Times) that were substantially about the subject of one of these items, then notability would be a slam dunk. I hope this helps you.  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bovlb (talk • contribs) at 20:59, 23 March 2020‎ (UTC).

@Bovlb I think the way you put it helps us out a bit in determining which references to use. All we ask is let us review what we have and will update this week and see if the new references are better suited. Again we appreciate the patience and allowing us to update these without them being deleted (yet). Zerocoolpasta (talk) 20:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

@Zerocoolpasta: I recommend that you move fast. While I am not personally inclined to delete these, I do not have any veto over deletion, and it would be hard to justify undeleting them a second time. Bovlb (talk) 23:40, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

A month passed and nothing happened. Not sure what are we waiting for.--Jklamo (talk) 13:14, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted; no changes have been made since the items had been undeleted previously; as there is indeed no indication of notability, I have deleted them again —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q88220883

Q88220883: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, no sources MovieFex (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

• May this be equal with Art film (Q1135802)? --Wolverène (talk) 11:20, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

  experimental film (Q790192) has the title of Q88220883 as an alias, but Q88220883 is an instance of Q790192 and Q11424. Probably intended to be subclass, not instance; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_film#Definition has a possible definition of this, but the item isn't in use - Q790192 was used instead (was this because it was decided not to use the new item, or because when entering its title into a statement it was not yet in the search index and only Q790192 appeared?) If it is a specific film, as the statements suggest, then not notable. Peter James (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q31566968

Q31566968: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redundant since ID of castle Kunitzburg (Q1792219) and ID of mountain where castle located Großer Gleisberg (Q30679796) --Arjoopy (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

@Arjoopy:, this should be fixed on the cebwiki before something can be done here. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 07:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

@Cycn: just fixed the interwiki links, what else? --Arjoopy (talk) 07:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

ceb:Kunitzburg still exists, that needs to be sorted out, as the Kunitzburg is a fort, not a hill. Also ceb:Gleis-Berg (bukid) should probably be renamed to Großer Gleisberg, like the article de:Großer Gleisberg. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 07:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q89101306

La route devant (Q89101306): 2011 film directed by Stefan Ivanov: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. MovieFex (talk) 21:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

== Active users == ValterVB LydiaPintscher Ermanon Mushroom Queryzo Danrok Rogi Mbch331 Jobu0101 putnik AmaryllisGardener Andreasmperu U+1F350 Bodhisattwa Shisma Wolverène Tris T7 Antoine2711 CptViraj ʂɤɲ Trivialist 2le2im-bdc Sotiale Wallacegromit1, mostly focus on media historiography and works from the Global South M2k~dewiki Rockpeterson Mathieu Kappler Sidohayder Spinster Gnoeee Ranjithsiji Ontogon Supaplex Carlinmack Haseeb Demadrend Jakeob9000 RealityBites Sriveenkat Keplersj dseomn Fuzheado BeLucky DaxServer PaperHuman

Notified participants of WikiProject Movies maybe others --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; now in good shape —MisterSynergy (talk) 00:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q89100040

Vojta Lavička: Ups and Downs (Q89100040): documentary film directed by Helena Třeštíková (2013): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. MovieFex (talk) 21:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; now in good shape —MisterSynergy (talk) 00:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q89099217

Utlänningar: Del II - Le Rom (Q89099217): Swedish documentary directed by Peter Nestler: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. MovieFex (talk) 21:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; now in good shape —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q89041894

Q89041894: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nearly empty item, no links. MovieFex (talk) 21:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q63148112

Knight of the Bath (Q63148112): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Almost empty, similar page at Order of the Bath Iamthecheese44 (talk) 09:16, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

The Order of the Bath was founded in 1725; Knights of the Bath existed before then. en:Order of the Bath#Knights of the Bath explains, and there are also separate categories. Peter James (talk) 09:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; apparently not identical; sitelink situation —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q89645213

Q89645213: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this company notable? EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

• Yes, Avis Australia is one of the largest car rental companies in Australia, with more than 200 rental locations

Here are some References

https://blueswandaily.com/avis-australia-awards-its-renowned-travel-agent-scholarship-to-travel-managers-employee-for-third-year-running/ https://avisbudgetgroup.com/avis-australia-earns-cartrawler-service-award/ https://www.travelweekly.com.au/article/avis-awarded-for-service/

unsigned comment made by Nick-omg123

• But we have Avis. Do we need each country or location? Quakewoody (talk) 14:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

 Keep Big company--Trade (talk) 18:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q55297300

Unboxd Media (Q55297300): digital studio and marketing agency: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not sure if notable Trade (talk) 22:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Keep Quakewoody (talk) 13:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; edge case for sure —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q18250669

Fth1 (Q18250669): protein-coding gene in the species Mus musculus: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No link ( same Q17930834 ) --Eyatu Ben (talk) 19:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

• I am certainly no scientist. But they look like different items based on the information filled in to each. Quakewoody (talk) 20:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; apparently different concept —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q19455644

Damia (Q19455644): place in Balqa Governorate, Jordan: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Q2916379, but please change the name to Jisr ed Damiye (more correct) --Huldra (talk) 22:05, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

 Oppose - Q2916379 is about a bridge, Q19455644 about a village according to some descriptions. Also, the enwiki has entries in both items, so this cannot be merged. If the itmes have to be merged, it should be fixed on the enwiki first. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 22:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

• The enWP article(s) may or may not be merged. So that shouldn't be used to decide (at least not until they have a proper discussion as to whether or not the merge). But here on WD, if they are speaking of two separate subjects (the bridge and the village), then we would keep them both. Quakewoody (talk) 02:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; different concepts, sitelink situation —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q55955586

Salim (Q55955586): badminton player from Bangladesh: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No links --Eyatu Ben (talk) 01:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per backlink —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q27721813

Medical bookman and historian (Q27721813): journal: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No links --Eyatu Ben (talk) 01:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per identifiers and backlinks —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q71224932

Q71224932: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable internet marketing person, no sitelinks, no structural need. Aziz979 (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Keep NYT have written about him --Trade (talk) 12:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q86507324

Q86507324: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable internet marketing person, no sitelinks, social media spam, no structural need Aziz979 (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

 Keep Q86505092 is a drama film send on television. Structural need. --Trade (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per backlink —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q64615841

Zach King's Day Off (Q64615841): short film: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable internet marketing person, no sitelinks, social media spam, no structural need Aziz979 (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

 Keep Zach King is a fairly famous internet personality. Structural need. --Trade (talk) 17:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; it's about a film, not a person, and properly identified and backlinked —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q6912045

Q6912045: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Mixup, split into Q91014441 and Q91014439 --- Jura 16:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Now no links; I updated Morgenthaler (Q16854056) to link to Morgenthaler (Q91014439). Peter James (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q62585540

1. Q62585540 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q60043760 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q62625448 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q62584709 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Non notable Trade (talk) 23:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

• If think the two linked items are safe to delete as well. Quakewoody (talk) 23:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

  Q60043760 and Q62625448; no indication of notability in either of these. Also Q62584709, which redirects to Q60043760. Peter James (talk) 22:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Property talk:P8154

(delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created with wrong datatype --Manu1400 (talk) 23:20, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done by another admin —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q36960469

Q36960469: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Database artifact --- Jura 06:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q16862903

Q16862903: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item for Wiktionary redirect replaced by article; sitelinks moved to bimonthly (Q6307419) Peter James (talk) 13:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92597521 and Q92597403

Kreissparkasse und katholische Kirche (Q92597521): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

(I'll provide an English translation on request, but I don't know whether the creator understands English and I trust a German-speaking admin will be available ;) Ein Kombinationsobjekt von zwei Objekten, die geografisch nebeneinander stehen, aber ansonsten nichts miteinander zu tun haben. Offensichtlich mittels Wikishootme erzeugt. Das Foto kann natürlich auf Commons bleiben, aber beliebige Wikidata-Kombinationsobjekte, nur weil ein Foto davon existiert, erstellen wir nicht, oder liege ich da falsch? Gruß --Dealerofsalvation (talk) 13:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Are they one building or two? From the photograph and https://stjohannes-nuertingen.drs.de/unsere-kirchen/wolfschlugen-st-joseph.html it isn't clear. Peter James (talk) 13:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

They're two buildings - a bank and a church - that have nothing in common but they stand side-by-side, and a photo on Commons exists that depicts them both. Is that a reason to keep a Wikidata object? --Dealerofsalvation (talk) 13:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

I looked up on the cadastre ([1]), they are built wall-to-wall, but stand on two distinct plots of land. --Dealerofsalvation (talk) 13:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Kreissparkasse und katholische Kirche (Q92597403) is an obvious duplicate of this item - if this item is deleted, that one should be deleted too. Furthermore, yes, these two buildings were built in the same year, maybe by the same architect, they have a similar style, but is this a reason to create an item for this combination of buildings? --Dealerofsalvation (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

This depends on the circumstances. I merged the two items, and added instance of (P31): architectural ensemble (Q1497375) to it. If both building were indeed planned and raised together, we could keep the item as it is. Otherwise I would delete them. Does anyone have more information about it? (input in German would be fine here) —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:MisterSynergy, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q84322240

Q84322240: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Blank --Mringgaard (talk) 13:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Could be Ganoderma (Q1799774), could be Ganoderma lucidum (Q271098), or more likely a test page. Peter James (talk) 14:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q65038219

Q65038219: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam, reads like a commercial for the product --Mringgaard (talk) 13:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92931849

Q92931849: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong spelling --HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 13:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92933793

Q92933793: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable Trade (talk) 14:22, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Nikosguard (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92979138

Q92979138: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

CSS pages are not notable Pppery (talk) 13:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92303795

Q92303795: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable Trade (talk) 15:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92450063

Q92450063: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable Trade (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92555325

Q92555325: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable Trade (talk) 15:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92086381

Q92086381: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 15:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92052581

Q92052581: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 15:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92007271

Q92007271: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 15:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92000062

Q92000062: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 15:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92755944

Q92755944: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam, narcissist RaymondSutanto (talk) 16:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

@RaymondSutanto: It shoud be deleted on mswiki first. --Fralambert (talk) 18:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

@Fralambert: Ok, I've requested to delete it on mswiki. RaymondSutanto (talk) 18:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q33025584

Q33025584: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

An orphan. deleted to BashWiki Рөстәм Нурыев (talk) 17:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q93121685

Q93121685: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N. Unnotable surfer. Hiàn (talk) 17:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q92615145

Q92615145: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional spam created by cross-wiki LTA. Hiàn (talk) 17:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

@Hiàn: What about Q93129404 The two are linked and it seem not more notable. --Fralambert (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

@Fralambert: I did not see that initially. That page is, indeed, also promotional spam of the same type. Hiàn (talk) 18:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

@Hiàn: The two are now deleted. --Fralambert (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q93126507

Q93126507: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional spam created by cross-wiki LTA. Hiàn (talk) 17:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Ymblanter (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q93127185

Q93127185: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional spam created by cross-wiki LTA. Hiàn (talk) 17:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q93126681

Q93126681: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional spam created by cross-wiki LTA. Hiàn (talk) 17:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q93130756

Q93130756: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Ymblanter (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q93130059

Q93130059: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 18:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Ymblanter (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q93116035

Q93116035: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test item that was turned into a redirection to the sandbox item --Maxlath (talk) 18:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Ymblanter (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q31841199

Super NES Classic Edition (Q31841199): dedicated home video game console developed by Nintendo and released in 2017: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Super NES Classic Edition (Q30827691) and almost empty --Dexxor (talk) 18:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:Fralambert, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q33025586

Category:State Duma (Q33025586): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Сирота, есть дубль Рөстәм Нурыев (talk) 20:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:Fralambert, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q93136863

Q93136863: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No content at all Ldorfman (talk) 20:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q33025585

Q33025585: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Дуль категория, сирота Рөстәм Нурыев (talk) 20:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q65420775

Q65420775: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted everywhere Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q65421015

Q65421015: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted everyhwere Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q2819141

Q2819141: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty & no notable topic (article infr:wp has been deleted Chaoborus (talk) 22:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Q65403734

Q65403734: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, no relevant content ಅನೂಪ್ (talk) 02:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q65402038

Q65402038: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item page locally deleted ಅನೂಪ್ (talk) 02:32, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q36930430

Q36930430: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Repurposed item --- Jura 10:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

@Jura1: at which edit would you say it was repurposed? —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

• when its content was deleted ([2]). --- Jura 06:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

  It was never repurposed; it was created with incorrect capitalisation (probably using a script as the source uses all capitals) and a bot addded an incorrect statement based on that. Peter James (talk) 13:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Please make a new item for "Machowicz" and fix the (few) backlinks; since we apparently do not have any need for MacHowicz, I'd delete Q36930430 (MacHowicz) thereafter as "not notable". —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks. I just did that. --- Jura 07:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request - humans not found at source

1. Q55089279 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q55097851 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q55102711 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q64691171 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q64727468 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

not found at source and nowhere else MrProperLawAndOrder (talk) 07:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

I added identifiers to the first, but couldn't find the others in VIAF. Not much information in these items but Q55102711 and Q64727468 look similar to Wolmar Anton von Schlippenbach (Q553553) and Jacob Johann Köhler (Q1677531). Peter James (talk) 08:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done; the first one is being kept ---MisterSynergy (talk) 12:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q93175362

Q93175362: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No link to other projects, non-notable, self-promo (see the creator's username). Ahmad^talk 08:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Kostas20142 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q87742076

Museo Tazio Nuvolari (Q87742076): museum in Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item --Gce (talk) 10:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

• I merged them with the assumption that your changes were correct. Quakewoody (talk) 13:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:Quakewoody, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q88952261

Q88952261: museum in Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. --Gce (talk) 10:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

• I merged them with the assumption that your changes were correct. Quakewoody (talk) 13:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:Quakewoody, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q89400211

Q89400211: museum in Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. --Gce (talk) 10:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

• I merged them with the assumption that your changes were correct. Quakewoody (talk) 13:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:Quakewoody, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q89416356

Civico museo archeologico Platina (Q89416356): museum in Piadena Drizzona, Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. --Gce (talk) 10:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

• I merged them with the assumption that your changes were correct. Quakewoody (talk) 13:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:Quakewoody, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q3162419

Pavia Botanic Garden (Q3162419): botanical garden in Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merged into Q1765144 --Cpaolo79 (talk) 10:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

• I merged them with the assumption that your changes were correct. Quakewoody (talk) 13:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:Quakewoody, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q12277476

Q12277476: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty; the only bgwiki page was deleted Termininja (talk) 12:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deleted by Lakokat (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Q1806567

laser capture microdissection (Q1806567): dissection on a microscopic scale with the help of a laser: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty MatthiasDD (talk) 16:13, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:Wolverène, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)