Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2019/05

sex/gender being assigned to anything with a given name in the label

Hi there! There is a script being run the last couple of days that assigns sex or gender and given name to seemingly any items containing a (male) given name in the label. This includes music albums with a name in the title, singles, discograhies, other (double) names, double (patronymic) surnames, etc. I have tried to contact the editor but so far they haven't responded and the script continues (see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:%26beer%26love ). The editor's name is red, so I'm not sure they actually get the messages. Is there a way to stop this, or at least make the script runner aware, so they can fix the script? @Tagishsimon: Moebeus (talk) 15:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Yup. It's @&beer&love:, who uses Petscan. &beer&love does an enormous amount of wikidata work, and issues arising, though annoying, are IMO on the margins. (Although equally that view may be because I only look in places where the issues are not.) From a previous interaction, &beer&love is not the best at communicating, but their heart is in the right place and I hope they'll join us soon, here or on their talk page. Right now &beer&love is running a Petscan over people with ORCID IDs, from their local machine, I think. My hope is that a) &beer&love will start talking - they may well be away from their machine right now; they certainly get messages despite having no user page; and b) that we can work with &beer&love to work out how to b1) minimise issues arising and b1) put in place e.g. petscans which can be used to recognise and remediate issues that are arising. So by way of example, checks in &beer&love's petscans to determine that an item is not linked to an article which is in Category:Albums would perhaps assist in ending mistaken codings of items based on the article also being in a subcategory of one of the list of humans categories. --Tagishsimon (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

I certainly don't think it's done in bad faith, but it still creates some problems unfortunately. Small update: It seems the the script is looking for items beginning with a male given name (from a list on male given names, I assume), followed by another word. Some examples https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q62481380&action=history https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q58852775&action=history https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q63094051&action=history Moebeus (talk) 15:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Yup. Their selection algorithm in the example Miguel Ríos discography (Q62481380) sucks, given that it had a P31 clearly specifying that it was a discography. --Tagishsimon (talk) 15:49, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

The editor in question is now aware of the problem, so this is probalbly going to sort itself out. Moebeus (talk) 23:50, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Moebeus (talk) 23:51, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, could a sysop have a look to this item, about a this famous Islamic creationist guy from Turkey, that an other user want to describe as a "ciminal" guilty of "blackmail, rape, espionage" although these charges are only pending (see the English WP article). Totodu74 (talk) 08:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Probably need semi-protection --Ghuron (talk) 18:23, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done, fully protected for one day. Edit war, so protected in the version that was live atm. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

ClauszTHETOMATO

ClauszTHETOMATO vandalism-only account--DiMon2711 23:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

user was global blocked--DiMon2711 00:45, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

semi-protect this item please--DiMon2711 00:48, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done, for a month. --Okkn (talk) 01:06, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Username policy

Can any one start discussion about user name policy

(Tropp100 (talk) 06:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC))

We do not have one, and I am not sure whether we need one. Is there a current case which we should have a look at?
In general, the procedure would be to draft a policy page and put it to Wikidata:Requests for comment to make it official. Anyone can do that. —MisterSynergy (talk) 06:56, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Can we start discussion here about user name policy based on "Wikimedia Foundation" wiki policies?
(Tropp100 (talk) 07:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC))
Okay, do not ask whether we can discuss something here, just start a discussion. If this is the wrong venue for that discussion, we are going to figure out where it belongs to. —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Adding c:Commons:Username policy as another example. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Be aware that this is a "global" project. My IRL last name is offensive in Russian, my IRL first name is confusing in American and my username here contains both the words "sex" and "sju". I do not have to explain the potential problems with "sex" but if I pronounce the word "sju" aloud to a Russian, he starts to laugh. I do not know why, but it happens every time. I can assure you that in my native language, Swedish, none of this is neither offensive or confusing. "sex" is simply the Swedish word for 6 and "sju" simply means 7. My username simply tells "62.20.170.74". If you hear two Swedes talk about "Q31928", they are probably discussing the labor union (Q178790), not necessarily something offensive. Once I saw a program about a place in South America. Many people there had the name "Kuk". Kuk in Swedish describes the male genitalia and is used as F*** is in American. If you block somebody here only because you do not understand their username, it could affect their ability to move pages in Wikipedia et al. Sextvå.tvånoll.ettsjunoll.sjufyra (talk) 07:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Considering the mixed response to Wikidata:Requests for comment/Adopt a username policy, and the practical issues of enforcing a local username policy at Wikidata, I think it would be more productive to propose a global username policy. w:en:Template:UsernamePolicy (the summary itself, not the full text) could be a good start, although it would have to reflect the reality that some usernames may only be considered acceptable at particular wikis and may be locally blocked at others (e.g. if your username represents your non-profit organization, Wikidata would allow it but many large Wikipedias wouldn't). Jc86035 (talk) 08:10, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

@Tropp100: I've collapsed your previous comment because it's really long and I'm not sure what your point is. I don't know why you would want it, given that you're a new user with six edits across the Wikimedia projects, but you're not going to get a username policy through discussion on this page (this page is mainly to notify administrators of disruption or other issues that can only be resolved by administrators), and there is already an open request for comment on creating a username policy. (The main Wikidata forum is Wikidata:Project chat – most Wikidata users are not administrators.) Jc86035 (talk) 10:00, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done here See Jc86035 comment Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 07:49, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Area Rule

Hello!

I have added a new article which describes Richard Whitcombs' Area Rule (in Aerodynamics). The article exists in few languages, including English. I have added the Hebrew version (link below). I am an Aeronautical engineer, and one of my professors read and authorized it, so I'm guessing that counts as 'proofread'? Am I correct?

Cheers!

he:חוק השטחים של וויתקומב

 – The preceding unsigned comment was added by David Astro (talk • contribs) at 09:06, 2 May 2019‎ (UTC).

Refers to Area rule (Q1187390). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Not correct, in fact. The proofread (Q20748092) badge is for Wikisource sitelinks only, and it refers to a certain page status over there. Wikipedia sitelinks must not carry such a badge. —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:01, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Ксения Клычкова

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Please take a look – translate the arabic description in Game of Thrones with google-translate or similar – at the "work" of this account, the IP which changed that description later is not a bit better. --Wurgl (talk)

  DoneMisterSynergy (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Lady Gaga Q19848

Please half-protect, excessive vandalism by some IP. --Wurgl (talk) 16:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

  DoneMisterSynergy (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Please semi-protect this item again--DiMon2711 18:29, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

  Semi-protected for two weeks. Esteban16 (talk) 19:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Krishna Aryal Anpchaur

Krishna Aryal Anpchaur vandalism-only account--DiMon2711 18:35, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

132.219.144.253

132.219.144.253 Seem to be just there to vandalise article. --Fralambert (talk) 00:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done, blocked for a month--Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

IP-hopping user with severe conduct issues

There is a user with severe conduct issues who has been jumping between many different IP addresses, including 117.13.95.116, 117.14.243.223, 117.15.55.57, 125.38.13.34, 2409:8902:9300:2967:8520:E396:FDC6:D58D, 2409:8902:9021:E391:E6E6:3F77:A39A:C1B3, 60.26.9.220. (I'm assuming they are the same person since they appear to be continuing on discussions as though working on the assumption that others will consider them to have been the same person.) Conduct issues include blatant antisemitism (1 (calling another user "a Judaic" as part of an attack of some sort), 2 (proclaiming "we should anti-Judaism here")), personal attacks, general antagonism and an extreme lack of civility. I recommend blocking all of these IP addresses. --Yair rand (talk) 04:00, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

This looks like something that are about antisemitism (Q22649) (which those who controlled IP address clearly have) vs. Islamophobia (Q486296) (which C933103 probably has), which I don't know if any kinds of account block can resolve, warn posted on their talk pages. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:18, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
@Liuxinyu970226: What, those IP accused me "Islamophobia" because my edits on the Golan Height page was allegedly benefiting Israel, and then my edit on Spratly Island included removal of a "claim" for Indonesia that was not real (which is just like fake claims of other countries that I removed at the same time, like Japan and Australia and United States and such). I can understand why they would subjectively antagonize me as "Islamophobic" under charged emotion but I will not accept such accusation under objective evaluation. C933103 (talk) 10:46, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism-Editwar in Q17516 (Straßenkunst / Street Art). Please, half-protect. --Wurgl (talk) 10:54, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done (IP blocked for three months) —MisterSynergy (talk) 11:04, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

213.0.87.167

213.0.87.167 - multiple counts of vandalism over several days. Some of them have been cleaned up, but possibly not all. Perhaps this IP should be blocked for a time. --EncycloPetey (talk) 00:20, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

You didn't take the first prerequisite step, which is to warn them (since it's not that severe), so please do so first @EncycloPetey:. Block declined for now.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:38, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
OK, we'll just let them continue to vandalize then. --EncycloPetey (talk) 00:40, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
@Jasper Deng: Just to clarify for you, here is a quote from Wikidata:Blocking policy: "While editors are encouraged to warn and educate disruptive users, warnings are by no means necessary for an administrator to perform a block." So your reply about a "first prerequisite step" is in error. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:25, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Nope. I'm exercising my discretion as an admin to not block until there has been a warning since this case does not seem urgent to me.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
If you're using your discretion, then say "I'm using my discretion". You can do that. But don't say "You didn't take the first prerequisite step" when there is no prerequisite first step. That is justifying your response with a falsehood. Do not tell someone that they are obligated to perform a certain action, when the policy clearly states that such an action is not required. --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Again, you're incorrect. Blocks are a last resort, not a first one, except in extreme cases, so warnings should always be tried first. Instead of arguing with me over this, you could have just left a warning. It really doesn't take much of your time and doesn't hurt.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:46, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

2 edits, 2 times vandalism, one that smells like 70+ years ago :-( I do not see a good future. --Wurgl (talk)

As I expected, now 12 edits in 10 places, all reverted. --Wurgl (talk) 08:15, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Block request: Hannameal

Hi.

Account created to harass French Wikipedia sysops: Hannameal

Kind regards, Jules78120 (talk) 23:16, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

+ 86.223.229.178. Regards, Jules78120 (talk) 00:11, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
  Done --Rschen7754 05:39, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Please block vandal

TawaSutraBisaAjaa, endless merges of unrelated Indonesian items, edits the same items than recurrent vandal Guntur Subayigo, likely another sockpuppet. He/she resumed after I reverted a bunch and attempted to initiate a discussion. LaddΩ chat ;) 02:13, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

  blocked by Mahir256. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Undelete Q25203591

Q25203591 was previously used for the article Conglomerate (set theory) on the English Wikipedia, which had been deleted and then later restored. Please undelete Q25203591. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:15, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

  DoneMisterSynergy (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Please semi-protect Danny Phantom (Q1037387)

It's tiring constantly having to remove vandalism from a dozen or so different IP adresses. Trade (talk) 21:30, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done by Mahir256 Pamputt (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

protection of a wikidata element

Hi, the following wikidata element Lomita (Q984162) is the target of reccurent vandalism due to it's proximity with the pseudo of a french admin, vandalism which appears on the wikipedia page despite the protection measures in place there. I don't know the wikidata project well enough to propose a solution, and let the problem in your carefull keybords. cheers, --Doubleclavier (talk) 08:08, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

@Doubleclavier: je ne vois pas de vandalisme particulier sur cet élément, hormis la modification récente par une IP. A mon avis, cela ne nécessite pas de protection particulière pour le moment. Je vais suivre cet élément et je le semi-protègerai si nécessaire. Pamputt (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:16, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Please block VOA of a sock of Nipponese Dog Calvero

Special:Contributions/2401:2500:203:20:153:127:78:219,personal attack me ([1],[2]) in here after en:User:Egbert Trump and en:User:William McNeill have been blocked indefinitely (en:User:Egbert Trump,[3],en:User:William McNeill,[4]) in en.wiki.--MCC214 (talk) 11:15, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

  Globally blocked till 12 August 2019 by Alaa. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:05, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:05, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Please semi-protect this item forever--DiMon2711 20:20, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

David Carson (2)

Hi,

As the user is still spamming WMF projets trying to have his name somewhere (see three months ago), can you:

Thanks Hab'rtix / Habertix (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done by Ymblanter. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:50, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:50, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Merge request

Please merge Pierre Costier (Q57082889) with Pierre Costier (Q55768670) (duplicate). 92.184.102.154 20:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Same as for Joseph Bonnefoi (Q55768320) and Joseph Bonnefoi (Q58454904). Thanks! 92.184.102.154 20:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  Done LaddΩ chat ;) 00:02, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protection for Q16864

Please semi-protect Horacio Quiroga (Q16864) - popular theme, persistent IP vandalism from various IP addresses.--Jklamo (talk) 22:16, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done Again semi-protected for 1 year. Pamputt (talk) 05:27, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

49.214.244.219 Vandalism

Special:Contributions/49.214.244.219. Blocked on zhwiki. --Xiplus (talk) 02:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done --Rschen7754 03:04, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Please semi-protect this item--DiMon2711 12:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

vandalism Q104372

Special:Contributions/Lolajhhskksw Account who's only three edits are vandalism, I've reverted them. Niko.georgiev (talk) 13:13, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done Esteban16 (talk) 23:49, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Merge request (2)

Please merge Valérie Lafage (Q62526148) with Valérie Lafage (Q55628879). This is a duplicate. 92.184.100.189 16:32, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done Csigabi (talk) 17:30, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Historiadormundo

The user mentioned in the thread title has been repeatedly adding unsourced and untrue statements. They are blocked in other wikis for being impolite and general trolling. --Cuatro Remos (talk) 20:56, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

@Mahir256: Could you please take action against this user? They've been doing pointless reverts which I consider vandalism. TIA --Cuatro Remos (talk) 23:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
@Cuatro Remos:   Done for three days, similarly to related blocks on Commons and eswiki. Mahir256 (talk) 23:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Tropp100

Tropp100 is a sock of Nsmutte, a troll whose harassment of the user Bonadea is becoming cross-wiki. Please block the account, delete Wikidata:Requests for comment/Username policy which they created (note the reference to "Bonodea"), and consider what to do with Q63697508. Thanks, BethNaught (talk) 20:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

@BethNaught:   Done and deleted; thanks for reporting! Mahir256 (talk) 23:04, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Вандализм

@Ymblanter: Mazafucka Kalendar (talk) 08:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 10:22, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: -- Kalendar (talk) 05:49, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Block

Please block User:Secokimio 2222 asap per vandalism account. He's reverting edits with quick statements.--Sakretsu (talk) 08:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

I blocked the user. ChristianKl08:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
@ChristianKl: you're a lifesaver, thank you! :-) Meanwhile, I think I undid all his reverts--Sakretsu (talk) 09:51, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Вандализм

@Ymblanter: Айзек Стрейд. Kalendar (talk) 18:07, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done, 3 days--Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: -- Kalendar (talk) 18:17, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Block request

Please block User:Ceiiolii22288, probably a sock of Secokimio 2222.--Sakretsu (talk) 13:54, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done globally by Jyothis. Mahir256 (talk) 17:18, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:08, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

IP vandalism

Would an administrator mind blocking 194.83.243.81 and 131.165.106.6 for several years? Both are currently blocked on the English Wikipedia for 2 years due to persistent vandalism and have recently (but separately) vandalized Wikidata. Thanks, Jc86035 (talk) 14:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done each for a year. Mahir256 (talk) 17:19, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:08, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Block request for 1234hellodarkness

Please block user 1234hellodarkness because he is a vandal. -- Catherine Laurence 14:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:08, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Q519334

Please protected Q519334, a lots vandalism--NewDataB (talk) 14:47, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done for a week. Mahir256 (talk) 17:19, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:08, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Continued vandalism, probably with script, needs indef. -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 🖉 17:13, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done indef'd. Mahir256 (talk) 17:18, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Pattern suggest it's a LTA, likely MRY or the copycat. — regards, Revi 17:22, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:08, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

GualdimG.

@Nono314, Joalpe, Scs: as participants in the discussion. Multichill (talk) 16:12, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

I don't understand why Multichill opened another conversation, since in the last one the issue now with divergence was already stated, and I tried to obtain an explanation and din't obtain one. If I am not mistaken, the question now is: Can we, or we can not, insert an Administrative location (P131) and a related Country statement in a painting item?

Almost in all mine previous contributions creating painting items, at the Location (P276) statement I inserted un administrative one, probably induced by the synthetic definition in portuguese, "local onde se situa um objeto físico ou onde ocorre um evento", which still not refers to the P130, and because thinking that having the name of the city/town/village in the item was enriching the information. And as I normally use the portuguese platform, when at left the statements boxes open, what I used to see was the synthetic definition of Location (P276), and I persisted in the wrong practice (still don´t understand the dificulty arisig to querys from having a administrative location at the P276, but I accept and now respect).

But since the previous conversation, after being advised to insert the administrative location at the specific statement (P131), and after beginning to do so, Multichill started reverting this contributions, namely at the ones cited at the beginning of this conversation. And, as I had said in the previous conversation, I don't understand why. And would very much appreciate an explanation for the Multichill actions of deleting the P131 statements in painting items. GualdimG (talk) 19:16, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

I opened a topic here because you're engaging in an edit war against established consensus on how to model works of art. I'm asking another administrator to intervene here.
As explained before. How to model works of art is described at Wikidata:Project_chat#Edition_War_Q63256315. For movable objects like paintings we only use location (P276) to indicate location, we don't use located in the administrative territorial entity (P131). Adding that is redundant information that lowers the data quality. The located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) can be derived from location (P276). Multichill (talk) 10:02, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
It would be great if we would have a page that describes the established consensus on how to model works of arts the way we have for some other contexts. ChristianKl12:53, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
@ChristianKl: you mean like Wikidata:WikiProject_Visual_arts/Item_structure#Describing_individual_objects? Multichill (talk) 15:56, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Yes, I wasn't aware that that page already exists. I think it should likely be linked in discussion like the one in the project chat to make it more discoverable. ChristianKl16:14, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

@ChristianKl: @Multichill: says that "For movable objects like paintings we only use location (P276) to indicate location, we don't use located in the administrative territorial entity (P131)". Is this clear in the definition of both statements? Can a common editor understand that? And beside the declaration of Multichill about "we don't use located in the administrative territorial entity (P131)", is this notion expressed like a rule somewhere? Shouldn´t the statements P276 and P131 be writen according to this rule? GualdimG (talk) 06:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:17, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Daurellio

Daurellio vandalism-only account--DiMon2711 13:24, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:17, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Edit war on Q22663

There is currently an edit war underway on this page, apparently IPs are inserting inaccurate URLs. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:30, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Also Q16617922Q28134166 Objective3000 (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
  Done by three different administrators--Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Okay! Bencemac (talk) 16:46, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:17, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Block Mariaunpajoteusted

Hello,
Could you block Mariaunpajoteusted, who is vandalizing items after warnings on his talk page? Moreover, I am not sure, but I suspect that this is an insult against me: [8].
Regards --NicoScribe (talk) 17:40, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

  Blocked by Ymblanter. I have revdeleted the diff you provided. Esteban16 (talk) 01:34, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:17, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Sock-puppet IP's and Vandals

Please see the following IP's that are vandalizing Q63245258 50.227.116.13, 73.93.154.213, and 67.215.244.186. They are making claims that are proven by their own articles to be inaccurate, making libelous statements about an individual with no basis for their comments including referring to him as a "sexual predator." Request semi-protect and ban of IP's 2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 02:40, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Please see the updated harassment on my talk page in which the user is still using this language after being asked to stop. 2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 02:53, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

The user is now claiming the individual is a member of the "alt-right" "far-right" and "men's movement" without citing any sources and continues to vandalize. 2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 02:57, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Both this IP and the "opponent" 50.227.116.13 have been blocked 3 days each for edit warring. I've also fully protected the item and removed claims that violate Wikidata:Living people.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm curious to hear why you didn't removed the troll Twitter account. I can't imagine this being relavent on any item. --Trade (talk) 00:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Someone needs to remove the "parody" Twitter account; the uncited far-right (Q204481) ideology; and the falsely-cited charge (P1595) values, from this item, ASAP. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:12, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Talk to Andy - I completely agree. I left the following message on Jasper Deng 's talk page:

"Hello, I am looking to understand some of the changes implimented by you on Q63245258 in accordance with Wikidata:Living people. According to the policy, "Labels, descriptions and aliases need to be neutral and well-sourced (ideally based on referenced statements on the item) and particular care should be taken in editing these for items about living persons. Derogatory names, even when used in reliable public sources, should not be added as aliases. Descriptions should focus on facts, not opinions." When you locked the item you reinstated and allowed the charges of identity theft, plagiarism, and harassment. To start with the first two it says that labels, descriptions must be neutral and well sourced. The two sources linked on these charges are from a domain called box5227.temp.domains which is clearly not a source. It also is from an organization that if you go to their site now is suspended. I am curious your thought process because from my prospective these are not well sourced and you can't find these charges anywhere else. The third charge of harassment is cited in two places. The first place is Heavy and the second is some organization called Washington Press. Heavy is a secondary source to Right Wing Watch who published the story first. The blog Right Wing Watch is a biased source that attacks political figures based on their view point. It is run by People for the American Way a 501(c)4 political organization. I am curious as to how this is also neutral and well sourced.The final aspect is you restored the political ideology of alt-right, far-right, and men's rights movement. The only one that has a reference is alt-right and if you click on the link it is a twitter post of someones opinion that does not claim he is alt-right. The other two are not sourced. Again, these are labels and in according to the policy they have to be neutral and well sourced. I do not see that here. I just want to understand your reasoning please. I think this could be a libel issue given the bias and unsupported statements being made by someone looking to attack the individual. Please help me to understand."

I also do not understand why the admin allowed the labels, charges, and parody accounts to be listed. According to the policy they must be well cited and neutral which I do not believe that they are. If an organization has a temp domain it is clearly not a reliable source. Also the website has been suspended for who knows what. This was clearly an attack against the individual in question. The info left on the page seems to be a Violation of the Wikidata:Living people policy which clearly states "Labels, descriptions and aliases need to be neutral and well-sourced (ideally based on referenced statements on the item) and particular care should be taken in editing these for items about living persons. Derogatory names, even when used in reliable public sources, should not be added as aliases. Descriptions should focus on facts, not opinions" and "Almost any piece of data about a living person might be controversial; anything that's individually challenged or might be challenged should be supported by a reliable public source or may be subject to removal. In particular properties that are instance of (P31) property likely to be challenged (Q44597997) should be supported by suitable references when applied to living persons. In the case of a dispute, the burden of evidence rests with the editor who adds or restores material." I am convinced this is just an attack and the unsourced and badly sourced items should be removed. 23.96.34.23 22:46, 12 May 2019 (UTC)


Some of the comments made by others on User talk:2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B also need to be removed, revdel'd and - if too much time has not already passed - the accounts bocked. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Talk to Andy - I agree. Everyone got a 3 day block as far as I can tell. What I don't understand is why the suspension was the same. One individual engaged in edit wars yes but they made an attempt to stop it even going so far as to post notices and let them know they were being refered to admins, but the other as you have stated above was clearly harassing on the talk page, engaged in edit wars, adding un-cited items to the individual, accusing of COI, being rude, and even libel by calling the individual a "predator" on the talk page of the person trying to stop the vandalism, etc. 23.96.34.23 23:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Hey Andy, could you give us a short resume of what's going on with this item? The giant wall of text that 23.96.34.23 made is quite hard to read. Trade (talk) 23:10, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Trade - I am sorry I am still learning formatting. 23.96.34.23 23:14, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
No. An admin needs to look at the item, ASAP, and act on the patently unacceptable issues that I outline above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:27, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Trade / Jasper Deng - I want to clarify something... the charges section on this property is simply false and libel. According to the charges tag, it is "offence with which someone is charged, at a trial" see Property:P1595. This individual has never been criminally charged not once. Read the articles cited and you will learn that there are no pending criminal charges and none have ever been filed as far as I can tell. This is something Andy Mabbett pointed out. Datamaster1 (talk) 06:08, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Seeing as this was brought to the attention of project chat, I went ahead and did what Andy had asked at 22:12, 12 May 2019 (UTC). Mahir256 (talk) 09:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

I only removed the violations of LP that looked obvious to me, namely the sockpuppet ones. Maybe I shouldn't have fully protected it, but since some information like the Facebook ID wasn't in violation of LP (he has a blue check there), there was edit warring and therefore both editors received blocks. I hadn't checked the other claims for veracity and I forgot to take a deeper look (I undertook these actions shortly before falling asleep for the day). Many thanks to my colleagues for helping to tidy it up.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:08, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Jasper Deng - It is not edit warring for the first user who was reverting vandalism. At this point, everything he reverted has been removed by admins... and according to policy rverting vandalism is not edit warring. Can you explain? Datamaster1 (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

It was not vandalism. These edits were clear violations of LP, but not unambiguously vandalism. My standard for "vandalism" is: if it takes any significant explanation to argue it's vandalism, it's not vandalism, but simple disruptive editing.--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
With all due respect, Jasper Deng, Do you have a Wikidata policy that defines that. "My standard for "vandalism" is: if it takes any significant explanation to argue it's vandalism, it's not vandalism, but simple disruptive editing." If this is not a written rule it makes it difficult for editors to know. If someone sees an edit that is against policy then they put a notice on that user's page more than once for vandalism. Clearly, to them it was vandalism. I just want to see the policy you use for your justification.47.24.22.207 02:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
@Jasper Deng: We do have policy that defines edit-warring and it says: "Reverting clear-cut violations of Wikidata:Living people is not edit warring." If you agree that there were clear LP violations you shouldn't have blocked. ChristianKl08:12, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
The policy point also does not exclude reverts which only partly remove LP violations. Since I deemed a lot of the claims other than the ones to be not LP violations at first (I concede I was wrong in that point), I deemed both users to be in violation of the edit warring policy.
Vandalism has to be clear-cut. Inserting wrong or LP-violating information on its own is not a priori vandalism.--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:23, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Seriously, @Jasper Deng: now you are going to allow the same defamation comments that made on Q63245258 to be made on a user's talk page. I had to fight to get them removed. Then you blocked me for 3 days for something that you were now told is against policy... and now you want the comments that are libelous and were removed to stay on my talk page. Other admins see User talk:Jasper Deng#User talk:2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B. 2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 03:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
@Jasper Deng: / @Trade: / @Pigsonthewing: / @Pigsonthewing: / @ChristianKl: - Request immediate block of IP 93.177.73.226 they are back on Q63245258 vandalizing again. They are clearly vandalizing at this point. 2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 18:50, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
My edits are not vandalism.93.177.73.226 19:33, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Removed photo and left file name as it was down too far. @93.177.73.226: Your edits are in violation of LP when you had many unsubstancated facts such as consparacy theriorist, engage in edit warring, add things that are not supported by links, etc. Also, you seem to be a sock of RyanForTrump which has already been banned by one Wiki community. 2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 19:52, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
@MisterSynergy: - I ask you to look at how agressive the user above is being when I simply fixed the formatting. Look at the page and how it is formatted incorrectly. Look at the agressive behavior. Clearly, not here to be productive. Also note, the photo is question has been nominated for deletion in commons. 2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 20:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:25, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

GELimousin

GELimousin vandalism--DiMon2711 12:26, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

I started a discussion on the user talk page. Pamputt (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
The user ignored the message I let on his talk page and continue to remove information on Lucile Schmid (Q3265812) without any explication. I blocked this account indefinitely. Pamputt (talk) 22:09, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Sergioluen

Sergioluen vandalism-only account. --Ovruni (talk) 06:20, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done Gracias por el aviso, Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 15:49, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Please protect object d:Q12696236 and see this message. --M2k~dewiki (talk) 08:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done by MisterSynergy--Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Вандализм

@Ymblanter: 212.178.20.163. Kalendar (talk) 18:15, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Поздно, едва ли вернётся--Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: -- Kalendar (talk) 06:40, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Вандализм

@Ymblanter: 217.66.158.189 Kalendar (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 06:44, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata

i want to add a articale from hindi wikipedia with the articale shankardev shishu vidya niketan,bhuragaon.the hindi articale name is शंकरदेव शिशू विद्या निकेतन,भुरागाँव

  Done Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:21, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protection for Q23781155

Please semi-protect Avengers: Endgame (Q23781155) - temporarily very popular theme, persistent IP vandalism from various IP addresses. --Jklamo (talk) 07:50, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Manual for female detectivesanglais (Q63959595)

This item is related to nothing and should be deleted. Pierre cb (talk) 13:08, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Regarding item deletion, please request on WD:RfD. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protection for Q16285

Please semi-protect Mario Benedetti (Q16285) - popular theme, persistent IP vandalism from various IP addresses. --Jklamo (talk) 07:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

  DoneMisterSynergy (talk) 08:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

I think User:만드는사람 and IP Special:Contributions/59.16.208.153 are the same person. Both remove interwiki links from wikidata items for no apparent reason. Diff 1, Diff 2--Christian140 (talk) 05:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

  Moved here. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

WMF privacy policy and Nonpublic info policy prohibits checks between IPs and accounts. Behavioral checks must be done here. Will do tonight. — regards, Revi 10:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: please block this ip. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:35, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  Done, blocked for a year--Ymblanter (talk) 11:38, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:51, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Block Jessedruid

Hello,
Could you block Jessedruid, who is here to insult another user?
Regards --NicoScribe (talk) 14:07, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done -- Ajraddatz (talk) 16:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:30, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Block Jorgetawey and Jorge Garcia Aeropuerto

Hello,
If you look at the history of Q19029 since 15 May 2019‎, you can see vandalisms by Mariaunpajoteusted (who has been blocked for vandalism and insult, because I have made a request here).
In the history, you can also see two vandalism-only accounts, Jorgetawey and Jorge Garcia Aeropuerto, whose vandalisms are similar to the ones of Mariaunpajoteusted. Could you block these two accounts ?
Regards --NicoScribe (talk) 15:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:30, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Вандализм

@Ymblanter: G13r4n. Kalendar (talk) 17:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: -- Kalendar (talk) 05:20, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

ShirleyMoffitt seems to be here only to promote a Wikipedia page writing business (see the user's talk page). I am thinking that Q63985609, which this user created, should be deleted as a test - not sure how to go about nominating an entity for deletion, though. –FlyingAce✈hello 18:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done by Ymblanter. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:30, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:30, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

62.117.12.108 needs some blocking

62.117.12.108

During the last two month just vandalism. This IP is getting nasty. --Wurgl (talk) 08:41, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 11:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:56, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Вандализм

@Ymblanter: Leonid Ràbcenko Kalendar (talk) 09:17, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done by Ymblanter. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:30, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:30, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

May i request page protection on Cathay Pacific (Q32141)

Someone with dynamic ip spamming his personal website as the data entry of official website (P856) of Cathay Pacific (Q32141). Matthew hk (talk) 13:04, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Also, both IP are from Amazon (52.221.241.45, 54.255.199.57) , which AWS is well known to be abuse as open proxy. Matthew hk (talk) 13:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
After reading en-wiki ANI, it is related to #Edit war on Q22663 of this noticeboard . Matthew hk (talk) 19:05, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
  Already done, see here Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:55, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
I don't that "done" mean. The ip were stale, the page mentioned in #Edit war on Q22663 were protected, but Cathay Pacific (Q32141), one of the major airline of the world, was still unprotected. Does it mean the ip were stale so it did not need protection or other reason that considered done? Matthew hk (talk) 12:37, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Both IP`s was edit only onetime and after you reverted their edit don`t have any action from IP. @Ymblanter: please close this request, also semi-protect if necessary. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
The disruption already stopped, and I do not see why the page currently needs protection. Btw I am not sure why I should be pinged for any request which has not been closed. I do not think it is my role to close all the requests at this noticeboard.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Page protection request Luis Suárez (Q26517)

Famous footballer, vulnerable to vandal edits by angry football fans and troll . Matthew hk (talk) 10:44, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: please semi-protect if necessary. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk)
I only see two vandal edits by the same IP in the recent history. I do not think protection is necessary.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:06, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Reporting User:Jrwru357 as a sock of User:John574. This is an LTA, w:en:WP:LTA/DENVER. Please ensure that TPA is revoked per w:WP:DENY. Also could someone speedily delete and create protect my user talkpage. --IanDBeacon (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

And also User:IanDBeacon is a douche. --IanDBeacon (talk) 14:47, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
And User:IanDBeacon is a scumbag too. --IanDBeacon (talk) 14:51, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
And User:IanDBeacon is a scumbag too. I have a report filled at m:SRG as well. --IanDBeacon (talk) 14:55, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Property talk:P488

I fully protected chairperson (P488) from editing for one month, due to edit war. Since I was accused to be involved in the discussion, I hereby excuse myself and ask fellow admins to intervene and check if my protection was right. Thank you. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 14:26, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done, and now watching. —MisterSynergy (talk) 15:10, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

2605:E000:9383:E100:3577:9D3:F2B1:4BB is vandalizing pages Robert Van't Hof (Q1115302) and Erik Van't Hof (Q24263697). --Pablo Busatto (talk) 00:39, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Also 2605:e000:9383:e100:3191:f3f7:c49b:312f
@Multichill : please block both and semi-protect for same issue. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:28, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
  Done Looks like one person. I blocked 2605:e000:9383::/48. A /48 is the typical allocation size for one (business or consumer) customer. Multichill (talk) 12:14, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Heavy vandalism on Qcells (Q265176). Can someone fix all the sitelinkes that has been removed? - Premeditated (talk) 10:49, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

@Premeditated: you don't need an admin for that, you can just restore an old version. Can you redo the valid edits? It's a bit of a mess now. I think user:Stephan T. is just new to Wikidata and could use a bit of help. Multichill (talk) 12:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Blocking needed

89.139.176.185 had vandalized by changing birth dates of all those people. Thanks, אלעדב. (talk) 13:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done. Multichill (talk) 14:09, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quickstatements Batch

Hello I am in need of reverting a batch i did in Quickstatements but when i am in the tool, it says I don't have any recent batches. Would it be possible to see my recent batches? If not, is there another way i could revert them? Many thanks. Etradio1 (talk) 14:02, 24 May 2019 (UTC)97.118.57.251 14:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

@Etradio1: you were probably not logged in? Anyway, https://tools.wmflabs.org/editgroups/b/QSv2T/1558546944288/ and https://tools.wmflabs.org/editgroups/b/QSv2T/1558546074109/ seem to be yours. Just replace the number with the number you see in the edit summary or you can look at https://tools.wmflabs.org/editgroups/?user=Etradio1 . Multichill (talk) 14:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
@Multichill: thanks! Etradio1 (talk) 14:48, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Disruptive editing at User talk:Yamla

A dynamic IP user has been posting message to Yamla's talk page demanding an unblock (and threatening to call Jimbo Wales if not... go figure). I have reverted the messages from yesterday and today, but it didn't take long for a new IP to revert my changes (see history). Perhaps a rangeblock is needed? –FlyingAce✈hello 16:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done, I blocked the last IP and protected the page for a week.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Bitte Halbsperre Homöopathie Q81058

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q81058&action=history

Editwar wegen "Irrlehre". Mag ja so sein, aber soll die Wikipedia werten? Es gab schon eine Halbsperre, doch die ist ausgelaufen und jetzt fängt das wieder an. --Wurgl (talk) 09:38, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done by MisterSynergy--Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Please semi-protect

At Q13938, it seems that the same continues since @Lymantria:'s previous protection expired the day before. --- Jura 10:36, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done by Mahir256--Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Renaming a page

Good day! I ask the Administrator to rename the page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olexiy_Poroshenko - Oleksiy Poroshenko

According to the rules of spelling and the official page in Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/oleksiy.poroshenko - Oleksiy Poroshenko

The list of the Ukrainian delegation also indicated - https://singapore.mfa.gov.ua/en/ukraine-sg/diplomacy?fbclid=IwAR3ZAlydCD24dyFGsG0D1WfpnegKzKw2S8qx0jAVTWw00DLFxefYFw0FsnQ - Oleksiy Poroshenko

Thank you very much for the help!

rename article

{{subst: Olexiy Poroshenko | new = Oleksiy Poroshenko | current = Olexiy Poroshenko | reason = According to the rules of spelling and the official page in Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/oleksiy.poroshenko - Oleksiy Poroshenko. The list of the Ukrainian delegation also indicated - https://singapore.mfa.gov.ua/en/ukraine-sg/diplomacy?fbclid=IwAR3ZAlydCD24dyFGsG0D1WfpnegKzKw2S8qx0jAVTWw00DLFxefYFw0FsnQ - Oleksiy Poroshenko.}}

You presumably mean the English Wikipedia and should discuss it there.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Request semi protection of Blackpink member pages

Hello, I would like to request semi-protection of "Lalisa Manoban" Q26707663, "Jisoo" Q27655361 and Rosé Q27655344 which see frequent vandalism to the labels and description. Since Blackpink has become more populair in the last year their member pages have seen increased vandalism. Jennie Kim Q26262599 is already semi-protected because of this. Thanks,--Redalert2fan (talk) 17:01, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Please semi protect property

Property:P180 keeps getting messed up by ips or new contributors. Maybe this is due to Commons using it now. In general, I'd try to avoid that, but please semi-protect it permanently. --- Jura 05:39, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done Semi protected indef. Lymantria (talk) 06:42, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Need to be blocked. His contributing is only harassment. Geagea (talk) 01:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

@יונה בנדלאק : pls look into this. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:33, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Geagea is right. I blocked him. - yona b (talk) 06:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Please semi protect article and/or ip

The object of this nice "little" cat gets modified over and over again by the same ip. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q23907&action=history --Wurgl (talk) 12:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

  IP blocked Esteban16 (talk) 14:31, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Abusive IP talk page

186.11.121.44 – Talk page needs to be rev-deleted. –FlyingAce✈hello 18:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Actually, the whole range's contributions warrant a look (186.11.0.0/17). The range has been blocked in en-wiki. –FlyingAce✈hello 18:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
  Done. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

This user keeps periodically vandalizing descriptions in Swedish. I've been keeping an eye on them for almost 6 months, thinking they would get a grip and stop this nonsense if I just gave them some time. Unfortunately, it seems like they are not stopping any time soon. I believe a 6+ months block would be appropriate as a warning.

This started back in November 2018 and they seem to take a break for a couple of weeks before finding some new descriptions to vandalize. I have reverted the older ones, but will take care of the newer ones now.

Here are the majority of them:

Item Date Description (translated from Swedish)
Q767892 May 27, 2019 "gays are gay according to the bible"
Q9106 April 29, 2019 "kill me"
Q39607 April 29, 2019 "f*ck me pleez"
Q9106 April 29, 2019 "russian drunk"
Q237169 April 24, 2019 "call me <non-existing phone number> bby (im 16)"
Q2974333 April 24, 2019 "For Microd*cks"
Q237169 April 24, 2019 "i like p*rn"
Q19609 April 8, 2019 "chemistry is boring"
Q483889 April 8, 2019 "im the best"
Q6206 February 4, 2019 "astrid is a capitalist"
Q5113 January 8, 2019 "birds are not real"
Q1135338 December 20, 2018 "Hugo has it"
Q102769 December 3, 2018 (LyRiCs mOsTlY WrItTeN LiKe tHiS)
Q188543
Q107184
Q421123
Q179731
Q208451
Q2075959 November 9, 2018 "a place where many gays live and one of them is Fadel"
Q726151 November 6, 2018 "eddie is gay"
Q10498117 November 6, 2018 "the gay convention of forsheda"
Q12199 November 6, 2018 "eddie's disease"
Q43987 November 6, 2018 "alva is boring"
Q42005 November 6, 2018 "leo is the best"

// WikiPhoenix [Talk] 18:26, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

How bizarre. Blocked for six months. Feel free to report earlier; preventative blocks can be used in these cases. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 18:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
I will. Thank you! // WikiPhoenix [Talk] 18:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

The item needs temporary protection. --Succu (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done Again semiprotected for a year. Lymantria (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Вандализм

@Ymblanter: 185.247.211.18 Kalendar (talk) 11:03, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 11:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: -- Kalendar (talk) 19:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

89.225.133.10

89.225.133.10 vandalism--DiMon2711 08:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 11:09, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 10:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

please semi-protect this item--DiMon2711 09:49, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 11:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 10:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Duplicate

Please merge Serge Colombaud (Q60749648) with Serge Colombaud (Q59314517). This is a duplicate. 92.184.102.46 15:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Merged. William Graham (talk) 16:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 10:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

The Finnish page for this article has reached good article status. A good article badge needs to be added.--SilverBullitt (talk) 09:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done Pamputt (talk) 10:11, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 10:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

please semi-protect this item again--DiMon2711 12:38, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

  Not done. There hasn't been enough vandalism to protect it once again. Esteban16 (talk) 02:55, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:25, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism

Cuckboii — blocked in enwp; 2806:104e:17:23ba:60f0:8540:6616:af56. —Vercelas (quæstiones?) 23:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done Esteban16 (talk) 02:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:25, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

197.47.83.210 needs some blocking

197.47.83.210

197.47.137.228

197.47.76.210

197.47.122.31

197.47.210.69

197.47.96.173

During the last two month just vandalism. This IP likes to remove arwiki link from pages. I think they are the same person because they have similar vandalism in ar.wikipedia --Mohanad Kh (talk) 12:42, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

@Mohanad Kh: looks like these ip's are part of a larger range from an ISP in Egypt. The range 197.40.0.0/13 is registered to them and all these ip's seem to be covered by Special:Contributions/197.47.64.0/19, but is it all vandalism? Not everything is reverted, also see ar:Special:Contributions/197.47.0.0/16.
Blocking these individual ip's now is pointless because of the dynamic nature. Blocking the /19 might be overkill. Opinions please. Multichill (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
@Multichill: most of the accepted Contribs. are blank infobox parameters that filled automatically by wikidata, and other are pending, I suggest temp.block for 197.47.0.0/16 , maybe three days or less, just to inform him that's an unacceptable behavior -Mohanad Kh (talk) 15:06, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Suggest blocking /24, that way, non-IPBE users in Egypt can simply disconnect-and-re-connect their Ethernet cabels to get another fair-and-good behavior DNS. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Spam

P129.f542.n5030.z2 - mass publication of spam links to unofficial communities (especially VKontakte, Instagram, etc.). Regards, Skazi (talk) 09:51, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Some of the edits look good. Perhaps he should be warned first? -- Ajraddatz (talk) 18:26, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Hmm... Well, maybe. Regards, Skazi (talk). 18:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

I just want to tell you that he continues to spam. Regards, Skazi (talk). 17:32, 29 May 2019 (UTC)