Archives
2012-2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

Welcome on my talk page!

Wikidata weekly summary #396Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #397Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #398Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #399Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #400Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #401Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #402Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #403Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #404Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #405Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #406Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #407Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #408Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #409Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #410Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #411Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #412Edit

Deletion Wrong PageEdit

Hello Please restore this page - https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q87408331

Meet Luthra is public figure person

Search on google about him

Thanks Celetokers (talk) 16:56, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Celetokers, Thank you for reaching out! I am willing to review your request but I need more. The page was nominated for deletion by Aziz979 with the reason "Non-notable internet marketing person, no sitelinks, social media spam, no structural need". When an item is requested to be deleted, the Wikidata:Deletion policy is followed, and it must be determined if a topic is notable: Wikidata:Notability. 1. In this case, the item did not had any sitelinks (if it is a public figure person, it should have a Wikipedia article!). 2. There were zero sources used in the item, so also no serious sources. (Having a single or a few serious sources does not make a topic notable, much more is needed. Having a huge presence on social media does not make someone notable.) 3. The item did not full fill any structural need. Further the page also did not had any identifiers to independent external databases. Therefore the item got deleted.
There are now I think two options for you:
  1. You need to convince me that the topic is notable, then I will restore the item.
  2. You can ask to undelete the item at Wikidata:Requests for deletions, but then you get the same questions.
If an admin has restored the item, the item needs to be upgraded otherwise it likely will get deleted again soon after. This means it must be made sure that it meets Wikidata's notability standards. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 04:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Please Romaine,check this page if this page is eligible please restore it you can check person have too much press articles on news sources

Thanks Celetokers (talk) 04:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

& also check this page "Anunay Sood" Q87811652 This person is notable travel Photographer, his Instagram & Facebook all verified, & also too many press articles present

Please also check this & restore

Thanks Celetokers (talk) 04:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Celetokers, In my previous message I wrote clearly what I need as I have to follow the rules we have on Wikidata. I am sorry to say, but you did not supply information why this subject is notable. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 04:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #413Edit

SalutEdit

Tu as fait une suppression sur Rocco Steele(Q24955373). Comment faire pour rajouter une source qui ne soit pas pornographique? Bouzinac (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour Bouzinac, La source peut être pornographique. L'information est très sensible (Règlement général sur la protection des données(Q1172506)), une source fiable est requise. Et il doit être rendu public par le sujet lui-même. Romaine (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #414Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #415Edit

Kategorie:Wikipedia:Wikidata P7854 verschieden (eu-football.info-Team-ID)Edit

Hei, you have changed the Category:Pages using Wikidata property P7854 - and i have at the DE-WP the following fault: Kategorie:Wikipedia:Wikidata P7854 verschieden (eu-football.info-Team-ID) - there a two football-clubs listet. Have you an idea, what is happend? Greetings --Mef.ellingen (talk) 19:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mef.ellingen, On the French Wikipedia (and some others, but here it is fr-wiki only) a category was created to add in it pages that are using the property P7854. As all categories are added as item on Wikidata, this one also. As I do with all categories that are used for categorisation of usage of properties, I add a Dutch and English label, together with the statements that is a category (P31), that the category is used for (P971) and to which property it is related. As I said, this is what I do for every category with this function. This item has no German translation at this moment. So I see no reason how Wikidata itself directly is related to this category on de-wiki.
The cause is likely in de-wiki itself inside a template. On the page the template de:Vorlage:EUFootball is used and on the template page the category is mentioned and in that template de:Vorlage:Metavorlage Fußballdatenbank is used who adds this category to the articles.
Basically I would say there are two choices: or the template is modified so it does not add the category, or otherwise the category can be created. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 00:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Q25112320Edit

Any idea why someone was using the talk page to link to my checkuser request? --Trade (talk) 17:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Trade, I think it was created by an account involved. Looking at it, it did not make it directly clear to me but the page would have been deleted anyhow. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 13:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #416Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #417Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #418Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #419Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #420Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #421Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #422Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #423Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #424Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #425Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #426Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #427Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #428Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #429Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #430Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #431Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #432Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #433Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #434Edit

We sent you an e-mailEdit

Hello Romaine,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #435Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #436Edit

Is region of Belgium a legislative house?Edit

Hi,

I see this edit Special:Diff/658246620 (idem for Special:Diff/658246509) saying that a region of Belgium *is* a legislative house. That souds strange, a region of Belgium *has* a legislative house but is not itself. I would suggesting moving this claim from subclass of (P279) to an other property (but which one, maybe something like has quality (P1552)?). Could you take a look and tell me what you think?

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi VIGNERON, Not sure why I added it this way two years ago. I removed them. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 18:05, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 19:14, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #437Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #438Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #439Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #440Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #441Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #442Edit

ikidata weekly summary #443Edit